Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2024, 01:11:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
821  Local / Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) / Bagaimana Perasaan Anda Tentang Merit? Sebuah Voting on: February 04, 2018, 01:43:52 PM
Halo agan-agan semua pencinta forum bitcointalk terutama local board Indonesia.

Dengan adanya implementasi sistem baru yang diberi nama "merit", banyak terjadi pro dan kontra terhadap sistem baru tersebut teruta di bagian Meta.

Diskusinya bisa agan temukan di :
Quote
Tapi bagi yang kurang paham dengan bahasa inggris mengenai seluk beluk merit gan, kita bisa diskusi di sini sambil meilhat data infographic yang saya buat dari thread saya mengenai voting tentang perasaan member terhadap merit (dalam bahasa inggris) di bagian Meta. Kurang lebih thread ini saya buat hampir sama maksudnya dengan thread pertama saya, yaitu untuk mengetahui perasaan agan-agan sekalian mengenai merit. Perlu digaris bawahi, ini hanyalah voting untuk mengetahui perasaan agan-agan semua, bukan untuk dijadikan sebagai alat menjatuhkan sistem merit tersebut.

Btw, ini data infographic yang saya dapatkan dari 100 voters dan beberapa data yang ada di thread orisinil saya.



Saya pribadi suka dan setuju dengan sistem merit ini karena ke depannya akan mengubah pola postingan kita semua, yang awalnya hanya bersifat spam, nantinya akan lebih berkualitas dan berbobot. Bagaimana dengan perasaan dan tanggapan agan-agan sekalian?

Nantinya data yang terkumpul di thread ini bisa saya buatkan infographicnya untuk versi user bitcointalk di lokal board Indonesia ini.\

Salam, athanz88.
822  Other / Meta / Re: Merit system= Rubbish posts on: February 04, 2018, 09:05:42 AM
Merit system is introduced to nullified low quality posts in the forum. but something is going exactly opposite to this.
I am seeing more rubbish posts, as everyone is trying to make more and more posts which shows the insecurity among them.

Yes merit purposes is too get rid of low quality posts in the forum, and it will happen in the future. And you can not judge the system now because it is just only 2 weeks from the update till now, we need time to make it fully functioning.

I am seeing more rubbish posts, as everyone is trying to make more and more posts which shows the insecurity among them.
As they all wants to show on the top of the discussion where they have a little opportunity of getting merit points.
Do merit system really make a difference in this forum?

What you are seeing now is because merit system is forcing people to make posts. It is natural that people join popular thread to get merits. But later on if they only do low quality post, they will realize that it is hard to rank up and eventually they will leave the forum or they will step up their game, and we will only see normal to high quality posts later on the future, but not now. And to make it works, the system need all of the forum member (especially who can give merits) to give merits to people which is worthy of it, it is kinda like encouraging people to do good things, it is a simple things but means a lot to people.

And FYI, there are some low rank members that is happy, agree, and confidence with the merit system even on your thread, and of course in my thread too, i even make infographic for it, feel free to check it at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.0
823  Other / Meta / Re: How Do You Feel About This New System?? on: February 04, 2018, 01:55:11 AM
Feel free to comment about it guys !

Most people seem to be ignoring the main and positive purpose of the merit system:  It gives appreciation and encouragement to good posters.

The whiners are exactly the ones who should go away.

Signed,

A user who ranked up from Jr. Member to Member on 30 January, and thus started with zero merit.

Yeah, and most of them people is at the "low member ranks" category according to the statistic i gathered. But Some of it (57%, 16 people i count on this thread) are happy with the system because they agree with the system which can make a better forum and encourage good posters.
There is a better option for the whiners rather than leaving, which is to realize that this is the good system and should be embraced by him/her and start learning and doing something good for the better oh him/her.

By the way, congratz man, 187 merits wow, thats a good achievement.
824  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [ICO] VLB - Vehicle Lifecycle Blockchain on: February 03, 2018, 06:17:17 PM
After the refund session, i wish this project will come back to make another ICO, and here it is now, with the adjusted 4m usd softcap and 12m usd hardcap and not to mention one of well-known bitcointalk member is one of their advisor now.

And hey, i got a notification for the private pre-sale. Time to invest !
825  Other / Meta / Re: The chaos on the forum! Judge, please on: February 03, 2018, 06:03:19 PM
I already see the post for the sMerit they give each other, im not a russian native speaker,  but for a post like that he got 15+28 merits? Wow, that is a great number. I made a statistic with chart for my thread on how does people feel about merit system in the first week of it (with the data gathered from poll and from my thread) and i only gathered 4 points up till now since i post the infographic update, life is really have a lot of unfair things. I guess if the post is really good, then it will atract more people to give merits, not just by 2 people who gives a big amount of merits.
826  Other / Meta / Re: How Do You Feel About This New System?? on: February 03, 2018, 05:34:37 PM
Merit system is good but gaining merit for higher rank is not justified. Because most of us not only learn every thing about crypto from Bitcointalk also learn what to write and how to write about crypto from Bitcointalk. Now we are thinking the new comers will come on Bitcointalk after learn everything about crypto and must write high quality post.
This is not justified for newcomers. There is already provision on Bitcointalk for deleting irrelevant and spam post and block the member after some warning.
Merit system is good but linking for higher rank is not justified.

Well from my data which i gathered from this thread, there are some low rank members ( newbie, jr. member, and member) that is happy with merit system and not afraid to compete with others. If some of them (57%) can say they are happy, then i guess they wont leave the forum, but unfortunately some other (43%) do not happy about them and there is a chance that they will leave the forum. But when the system running properly, i guess they wont even talk about it in the future how they trash this system in the early time of the implementation.
827  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: February 03, 2018, 01:32:35 PM
I think that there is one overlooked problem which needs to be addressed if we want forum quality to raise.
No.

What are the low quality farmers doing when they understand that chance of them ranking up is close to zero?
I believe that  they just could start farming more accounts in order to compensate for their inability to rank up, thus generating more sh*t post than ever.
You lack common sense and any understanding for incentives of any kind. Once they realize that they are unable to rank up, thus unable to progress, thus unable to earn, there is a near-zero incentive to continue doing what they're doing.

Otherwise there is no real way to prove or disprove my theory.
Your theory is fundamentally flawed. Empirical evidence is not needed to disprove it.

If they can rank up to Jr.Member who can still earn with signatures, they have motivation to farm more accounts thus generating more accounts.
If you can not see the logic in this, you are the one lacking common sense.

Well i guess it is still better if they only have 10 Jr. Members account rather than if they have 10 high rank accounts because they can rank up just because they posted shit. And you still missed out the trend now. For campaign, some manager already applied merit as a requirement, if they dont have it, they will get lower payment rate. So it will eventually discouraged people who is always finding an easy way to get money because things will be hard from now on. Luckily, based on my poll and data i gathered from my thread, there are some low rank members who is being positive with this merit point system.
You guys can check my infographic that i made from my thread in here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.msg29502964#msg29502964

If this about trend of Managers adding criteria about merits is true then you are right and then my theory is disapproved.
Thank you for providing solid argument.

There is already a manager who applied this rule, the campaign starts last week, just not too long after the merit system was introduced. I guess this is the future for the campaign in a near time, since merit indicates (hopefully) people who did a great posts, so it is natural that people with higher merit will get a better payment than other in the same rank who doesnt have merit.
This is the payment rate for my campaign

Quote

Rates without merit
Jr member - .00075/week
Member - .0015/week
Full Member - .003/week
Sr Member - .006/week
Hero - .008/week
Legendary - .01/week

With merit
This means merits above what you started with. You can only get this rate if you have the merits when applying
Jr Member with at least 1 merit - .00125/week
Member with at least 2 merit - .0025/week
Full Member with at least 5 merit - .005
Sr member with at least 5 merit - .009/week
Hero Member with at least 10 merit - .012/week
Legendary Member with at least 10 merit .015/week

I want to make a post and make it clear how the tiers work here. All users depending on rank were given a Merit score. Newbie 0 Jr member 0 Member 10 Full member 100 Sr member 250 Hero member 500 Legendary 1000. Anyone who is in this campaign wanting the higher tier pay needed to have scores of Jr member 1 Member 12 Full member 105 sr member 255 Hero member 510 Legendary 1010.


This is the link to the campaign if you want to look at it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827626.0
828  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: February 03, 2018, 12:48:34 PM
I think that there is one overlooked problem which needs to be addressed if we want forum quality to raise.
No.

What are the low quality farmers doing when they understand that chance of them ranking up is close to zero?
I believe that  they just could start farming more accounts in order to compensate for their inability to rank up, thus generating more sh*t post than ever.
You lack common sense and any understanding for incentives of any kind. Once they realize that they are unable to rank up, thus unable to progress, thus unable to earn, there is a near-zero incentive to continue doing what they're doing.

Otherwise there is no real way to prove or disprove my theory.
Your theory is fundamentally flawed. Empirical evidence is not needed to disprove it.

If they can rank up to Jr.Member who can still earn with signatures, they have motivation to farm more accounts thus generating more accounts.
If you can not see the logic in this, you are the one lacking common sense.

Well i guess it is still better if they only have 10 Jr. Members account rather than if they have 10 high rank accounts because they can rank up just because they posted shit. And you still missed out the trend now. For campaign, some manager already applied merit as a requirement, if they dont have it, they will get lower payment rate. So it will eventually discouraged people who is always finding an easy way to get money because things will be hard from now on. Luckily, based on my poll and data i gathered from my thread, there are some low rank members who is being positive with this merit point system.
You guys can check my infographic that i made from my thread in here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.msg29502964#msg29502964
829  Other / Meta / Re: Don't you think that merit system is like avoiding new comer in Bitcointalk? on: February 03, 2018, 12:38:35 PM
I am very worry about new merit system. This is like killer rules for newbies like us. As i know that if somebody gives merit rating only then our rank will grow. Without getting merit from someone we can't rank up from jr member. So, who will give us those merit rating? Is this rules for avoiding new comers in bitcointalk? I am truly feeling too bad.  Cry Cry

Do not worry about merit point system, if you are a worthy person, you will surely get the points of merit point system.

And to answer your question, this is some statistic that i gather on my thread, there is an interesting fact about low rank member upon this merit system



As you can see from the yellow box at the right, low rank member is the most rank that is affected by this system, but some of them are happy and agree of this point and some dont but the number is bigger on the agreement of this system. This mean that some low rank members are a positive person and wont leave forum just because of this.
If you want to check my thread you can come to here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.0


(i use a lower resolution for the graphic, the original one is on my thread)
830  Other / Meta / Re: How Do You Feel About This New System?? on: February 03, 2018, 09:55:17 AM
OP guess I owe you an apology, turns out that your work is decent even if your way of gathering the data needs some work..

So I am sorry for jumping the gun and assuming the worst, but it seems you are the exception to the rule.

Thanks TMAN, it is okay, i didnt take anything from what you ve said before, if i did, maybe i wont gather this data. I just want to look about this merit point from the perspective of the user's feeling. Just want to see how they feel about it in the early and how they feel about it later after a few months. So later i can make some conclusion again for the future.

And maybe you can invite your friends to look at the statistic and give comment or suggestion.
831  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: February 03, 2018, 06:56:11 AM
After i run my thread about "How Do You Feel About Merit System?" for 2 weeks up till now, i got my data to make some infographic and statistic, thanks to all the voters.
And i made some abbreviation for MERIT, LOL.



I make this statistic because i just want to know about the feelings of member, not for taking down the merit system, in fact, i love the system.
In the yellow box, i highlight things that is crucial after merit system applied, which are :
1. Feelings' of the members of this forum
2. Will this system make someone who is new give up on the forum (can be read as does people still want to join bct forum after there is a merit system)

Feel free to discuss here if you guys want , and if you want to vote again, i will unlock my vote so you guys can vote again, you can find my thread here (or if you want to discuss it there) :

Quote


Best regards,
athanz88
832  Other / Meta / Re: Merit System hits me hard. on: February 01, 2018, 04:58:07 PM
well i know that feel, since one of my friend had the situations almost same like you ( he only need to wait another weeks more to become Sr. Member)
To me it looks like the ones that already has a high rank likes merit because they got a great number of free merit and also don't need to rank up.
While us new members don't have any merit and hardly gets any even if we post great quality posts.

To conclude:
- High ranked members like merit
- Low ranked members do not
i really do agree with this , man when i saw my friend reactions after the merit systems come , it's really priceless lol.


After all we all know this merit systems just like a "like" on facebook, an "upvote/karma" on reddit.
The different is merit has limit , AND THIS IS THE PROBLEMS here why it's hard to get merit

Well it is hard to earn it because we are at the early stage of the merit point system. What you said is true that merit point is limited, but the circulatory amount of it will be increased in a fast rate. How come so? Let me break it for you.
If 'merit sources' can make maximum 200 smerit point out of nothing (I don't know the exact number of how many points a 'source' can make per month), then that 200 point can be used up to 397-398 point (200+100+25+12+6+3+1=397 points) and if we have  40 'merit sources' then it will be up to 16000 points of smerit to distribute to other members. It is only from 'merit sources', all member with high rank has smerit that can be given too even thought it wont be replenished per month basis like 'merit sources' do, and if the maximum number of smerit from 'sources' is increased, we can see even higher number to be distributed among all the worthy posters.
833  Other / Meta / Re: Merit system - simple improvement on: February 01, 2018, 04:40:53 PM
it seems that i wasn't lucky enough in merit system , this week i got 126 activities but still a member !
i think it was just luck , many got ranked before it happens and now they are not suprised like me!
i need merit and i dont know how to get it!
u don't think it's a bit unfair and modarator was enough?

Well, There are many cases like what you have been experienced recently. They are complaining on the official merit thread created by theymos but up until now there is no moves from admin to 'fix' your problem, because it is not a kind of unfairness. But theymos already stated on the official thread if someone really deserves to get the promotion to next rank (if they have been posting high quality posts up till now) then people should help that person.
Just keep doing the great work, learn English, leanr about cryptocurrency, make high quality posts, and I'm sure you can get your merits.

P.S : here is a link that maybe useful for you. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2832127.0 , it is a thread that has a list of all thread that can give you merit points if you do the job right.
834  Other / Meta / Re: 'Merit' System is a SLAP to the term 'Decentralisation' on: February 01, 2018, 02:11:13 PM

A Like system will be more appropriate rather then this crappy 'merit' system where new users will need to look for the mercy of the high ranked users


A 'like' system like social media would be more appropriate than this crappy merit point system? Are you sure?  Then how about people who have 10-20 alt accounts? They will likely to get 'like' spammed across all of  their account without doing much thing. Post anything shit and spammy, then they will have likes from their alts. It can not be used to against spam and shitposting, it will just encourage them to do more. And nowadays 1 person can have multiple devices that can access internet like pc, notebook, smartphone, imagine how much 'like' will be spammed across their alt accounts.
835  Other / Meta / Re: I've still got 80 sMerit to give away. on: February 01, 2018, 12:36:12 PM

While I agree with the merit system and praise the admin/s for their decision to help prevent the stream of low quality posts on the system, it could be seen as a flaw with the activity system. Im not sure if the post/time requirements Ive read before are in place (as in you can only get x amount of activity a week and you need to post x amount of times). Ive seen people ranking up pretty quickly, you can especially see this in ICO organisers accounts who post regularly on their threads. If a person actively participates in the forum for a long period of time then do they not deserve to rank up? If people are only giving out merit for 'outstanding' posts instead of 'beneficial' posts then some people may miss out entirely. There is a lot of politics that enter the frey with a merit system and I hope that the admin/s keep an eye on how it progressing to ensure it is working as they hoped it would.


Okay, first of all, we are facing merit system now, so it cant be applied to the people who get the rank before the system applied. They got that because they are in this forum for long and play by the rules back then and they got the ranks. Maybe they are not a good quality poster, but nothing can be done right now.

Secondly, lets think about this merit points as a score for you when you are in a college or work.

Quote from: college
When you re at the college, you can be at the college for a long time, but do you deserve to graduate (rank up to real life worker person) when you don't pass the exams? Do you deserve to graduate just because you are already long enough studying on the college? nope I guess, you need to pass the exam with the minimal score to graduate (rank up) and the score for this forum is this merit points.

Quote from: work
When you re at the work, you can be working for a company for a long time, but do you deserve to get the promotion to upper position when you don't have something to offer? Do you deserve to get the promotion just because you do the usual work (your usual work is beneficial for the company tho) long enough? nope I guess, if its to be applied then all workers will be at top level position then, you need something to get the promotion like extra work, great work, etc, not just the usual work. In fact, there are many people that is younger and has not working for a long time who got the promotion to upper position. And the extra work here is stated by merit points in this forum.

I am not going to discuss about politics, but it is just a real life law that is applied to this forum, and people thinks that they are free from the real world when they are on the internet.
836  Other / Meta / Re: Merit - Why every member should have started with a clean slate on: February 01, 2018, 12:13:39 PM
If you started everybody at zero, then you would need to go through every post made by every member to determine if they were merit worthy. That would probably be the fairest system, but it is  monumental task, and who would be prepared to devote their life to it. The current system is probably a reasonable compromise, but it needs a bit of tuning. One thing would be to reduce the post award cap to one or two merit points. Giving 50 merits to a low grade spam post is a slap in the face for members who try to improve the forum with decent posts. Making sig programme mangers merit faucets is also a bad idea in my opinion - it can lead them into temptation.

Making a cap on how much merit can be given to someone's post is a good suggestion, but it is like a two sided sword for the community. While the suggestion is good for the distribution of merit points, it will discourage other people who wants to make a high quality posts with interesting way like infographic etc (we ve seen infographic now, maybe later someone can level up the game by using GIF or video) in the future. And later, people will not do extraordinary things to get merits, just posting good enough will give their merits, because merit point amount will be increased in the circulatory of this system in the future. So for me, making a cap is good, but not 1-2 merit points per post, maybe about 15-20 points per post.
837  Other / Meta / Re: Do you know this about the new Merit System? on: February 01, 2018, 11:28:44 AM
Each one of us according to the rank has got x number of sMerit (Spendable Merit) which you can only spend on others.

As they say:

"You have X sendable merit (sMerit) which you can send to other people. There is no point in hoarding sMerit; keeping it yourself does not benefit you, and we reserve the right to decay unused sMerit in the future."

So go forward, and click "+Merit" in the upper right corner of this post to see how many Spendable Merit you have.

And if you also didn't knew about this till now, send me a Merit  Wink

More of the 'Full Member rank who can not go to Sr. Member in time because of merit system' rants. In my opinion, you deserve the swearing from a Jr. Member because you are a full member but didn't even consider that making this post will make you look like a dumb person, because there is already official thread about merit from Theymos. I am even surprised of the fact that a Full Member rank making a thread that is only have a little information about merit points in it while there is a thread about all information for merit point system rather than seeing a Jr. Member swearing to higher rank then him/her.

And I can see clearly there is something mentioned about individual users get sMerit to spend on others on the thread.
Quote
For current members, your initial merit score is equal to the minimum required to your rank. Of that, a certain amount (less than the usual half) is spendable. The spendable amount was calculated based on your current rank and the number of activity points you earned in the last year. A Legendary member who hasn't posted in the last year would still be Legendary, but would not have any spendable merit.
Learn to read till the end of the post.
838  Other / Meta / Re: bitcointalk issue! on: February 01, 2018, 11:16:01 AM
why my all posts are deleted by forum.forum ban my account so i creat this account and forum doing again..deketing my post..🙄😏

I have some posts that are deleted from the forum by moderator. It is a sad thing when your post is deleted by the mods. But now I know why my posts are deleted, either  it is off topic or spamming or both. And if you do it in several times, your account can be deleted by admin or mods because you break the rules and they have the right to do it. It is for the better of this forum too, because if there are too many spam posts or bad posts, it will decrease the quality of the forum too, so it is their job to keep the forum to have a good name.
Instead of complaining, I suggest you learn English because it is the language used in this forum outside the local board ( and you can use English in real life too for your activity or work or business, so it is a win-win solution), then try to learn about cryptocurrency.
839  Other / Meta / Re: Merit - right to consensus on: February 01, 2018, 07:38:55 AM
On the contrary, the merit system is a way to introduce consensus about post quality, and the future direction of the forum.
Alright system is good. But why merit was calculated with that activitiy. Why not all of us with zero points: legendary, sr.members and others? Guy with 22k posts must have same points like new members and ofcourse with status Legendary.

For your information, this forum is owned by a person because he made the idea and made it real with some hosting job, coding job, etc. That person also pays for the fees of moderators and other things to make this forums goes well. You, me, and others are all only people who gathers here to talk about cryptocurrency, and some to try to get money from it. You don't even pay a single bit USD to the owner yet you claim this is an open forum and before something implemented in this forum they need to consider what the users want. Hello, wake up please !
As for your question no 2, why all people not given the same merit, zero. I believe it is also for the sake of new member too. Imagine if all people starts with 0, I bet all high rank member who is friend to each other will give merit to each other because with their experience, most likely only them will make a good and high quality posts and then all the lower rank will be ignored, resulting to much more time to rank up.
840  Other / Meta / Re: Merit - Why every member should have started with a clean slate on: February 01, 2018, 05:58:32 AM
Personally I agree with the OP. I've suggested before that all "grandfathered" members should have their free merit expire after a year or two. This will give them ample opportunity to earn that merit fairly. There's a lot of Hero/Legendary accounts that have terrible post quality that have effectively bypassed the merit system. I fear they'll also be worth a lot in the account buying/selling black market.

Not all legendary members are equals, in term of posting, learning, or even popularity. So it is their fault if they are legendary but still didn't achieve that skills. I guess they are only legendary just because they are signature spammer. And I guess popularity is the key on this. If they re popular enough, I guess it is because they already done something for this forum.

1 question for OP, if all legendary starts from 0, who will help to give you all merit points besides sources?
Making all member to have 0 merit will only make you rank up even slower because all legendary will only give merits to legendary members because they re the most likely to make a high quality and agree-able posts.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!