You should have known it, it was James Harden and he was still 22 during that time so both of them got an early experience to be in the Finals but that seems to be a rare scenario nowadays. Westbrook seems to be too concern for his personal stats compare to what he can give to the team.

That trio in OKC should have been unstoppable but Durant was kinda in high regard for his talent, when in fact they were already a championship-caliber during that time when they made it to the NBA Finals in 2012. He's just an opportunist I'd say, when he sees that GSW lacks anymore the chance to get a ring, he forms another team in BKLYN and one source tells that he demanded lot of trade for that. It's a slap to his face, I'd say.

It is likely a suicidal attempt, it's a liability if it wouldn't make any profit unless it will turn the table and you hit a jackpot. It's good to gamble as long as you're not going all in and still thinking for yourself, the needs for everyday living and if you have family make sure it's intact until the day you've been compensated again.

This means they prefer it to be a store of value and 66% is quite high for a holder, the future is good. It seems a little bit disadvantage for me if it will not be used for payment purposes or other means but the crypto is becoming larger and storing Bitcoin was more likely the best choice rather than spend it, alts is there for that I guess for purchasing or other means of payment.

They should make a way in the next season to improve their roster or even get a good coaching staff, this is a total disaster to be honest and not fun to watch. If by chance you got a ticket to watch the game, it's almost as if you just wasted it. Kind of harsh to say but that's the reality, it's not even worth it if this is the game they'll show everytime they play.

I personally don't hide it as long as it will not involve any sensitive information that may harm my own account. I haven't hide any bets in public since it's not that much they can get to anyway on  all of my accounts in online gambling. I think those whales probably needed it the most but for as shrimps, it won't matter I suppose.

They are dead, there are just people thinking it will still get there in its ATH once again, Binance was probably having a huge stash of these LUNA to dump on investors as well, we may never know the intention that they still support them but it's my wild guess.

Those who believes in them are those who want to minimize their losses and sell it again for a higher price. They already broken the trust  of a lot investors here and a lot has already lost confidence in them. We know that since it's ba bear market but what happened to LUNA was far more worse than a bear market and you better know the difference in it.

Maybe it's painted on cave walls from our ancestors for newer generations to see. We may not know that but I had a feeling with the advancement of anthropology in the modern era more and more evidence will be found not just in gambling but on other niches as well.

I wonder what will those user's reaction when they found out that they have changed their T&C and they don't know about this. I think it's better if they close the account if for several months there's an inactivity on the account and post a note of the closing in the account.

That's what I thought too, maybe they are still believing that Beal will be bringing good thing for the team. His experience though is good but we may never know with the addition of Porzingis if that's what they are expecting to get better this incoming season.

Wow, these players are still getting good contract even though they don't make any good thing for their teams. This isn't for Bradley Beal only but for other players that doesn't make any impact on their respective team, it's like they're just milking the organization.

The outcome was "High Risk Gambler" do I don't think what's the criteria to get one. Well, I only get 1 probably in the higher selection and I guess that wouldn't be considered solely to be at a high risk when most of my answer was at the minimum to never. Okay, it doesn't matter I guess.

Both scenarios can be possible or not depending on the individual as well if he engages in the activities or resist it to not be involve. This kind of questions is always subjective because not in all instances we can't be so sure even on ourselves or someone else's behavior.

The site's domain name was already on the title and to play the game you need to go to their dApp site, if you visit their main site you'll be able to find it. Kinda interesting on how AVAX dApps work but I guess as most of the gaming site dApps out there, they'll be just playable using personal wallet. The interesting part for me was the NFT but they're already sold out and secondary market is the only choice.

Meme tokens are lively when there's a bear market and the proof of that was the trend on NFT memes. That can be said on bull market as well, but their hype was just for a meantime then they'll decline. Meme as they called, they're not that to be trusted in any way, remember the squid game rug pull.

I wonder how far can these meme coins go but the fact that these two has large market cap probably Bitpay just look into that and not the actual definition on how they was created. Well, it's a positive one but as always, the question is how far can it go? I wish they still accept it even after a -90% decrease in value for the next bear market.

So when they bought it when it's not this price we can call that a bottom? Of course not, they're just the celebrity speculators and Bitcoin maximalist, and they don't have any crystal ball to tell it's the bottom or the top. This is the reason sometimes people weep over their investments.

You're not alone in that regard but for some reason, if you have something in mind that is more important than losing money in a gamble that may change a bit. I think it always comes in the responsibility in each of us who wants to gamble and deal with real money, as a human oftentimes we tend to risk it without having second thoughts especially if we have something in mind like, "I can earn the lose next time", "my partner or my family members can still handle the daily financial stuff", etc etc.

Not a good reason for most gamblers I suppose but if you're responsible in and out, you'll be having second thoughts even if it means seeking the thrill or the chance of winning. In the end, gambling most of the time weighs on the losing side.

Well, I trust Rollbit can do that, they even organize thousands of prizes for a single giveaway, how much more for just a couple hundred bucks? There are lot of good promotional strategy but what I think with the Twitter giveaways is that it was for hype, lot of people utilizing Twitter as part of their marketing strats.