Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:25:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
141  Other / Meta / Let the "Merit broke my life" thread flood begin on: September 17, 2018, 10:53:05 AM
I assume everyone knows by now that there was a new change to the ranking-up system and in order to rank-up to Jr. Member you need 1 merit. Also, all of the Jr. Members that did not have any merit were demoted to Newbie.
You can read more about it here: Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements

This is a good approach to stopping the shit posting/spam in the forums and this might help us regain the Bitcoin & Altcoin discussion forums which were lost to spam a long time ago.

Another thing that needs to be fixed since there are a lot of people here that have higher ranks and still post garbage, is a better control over the shit campaign managers that basically pay people to spam. This way we could kill the cause completely and not the effect.

So, to all you guys that were demoted to Newbie please stop wasting your time by bitching about it and start contributing to the forum in order to receive merit and rank-up.

If you wonder where is the best place to start, then take a look at the rules here: Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ


142  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: Consult with which newly listed coins are worth investing in on: September 17, 2018, 09:47:58 AM
If you're new and would like to invest some money into crypto currency I would suggest doing your own analysis on them.

Things like:
1. Reading about the coin you want to invest in online (check their website, idea, possible chances of success, check their ANN here on BCT etc.)
2. Check their ATH & ATL on coinmarketcap.com
3. Check to see if they are putting a good part of their money into marketing and PR services since this is very important to get the word out.

I have a few coins that I like and have invested in them like: IOTA, IOST, XVG, ETH, ETC you can check them out if you like.
143  Other / Meta / Re: A solution to the Merit and sMerit situation? on: September 17, 2018, 09:35:10 AM
[...]
I think this move will put in check a lot of unnecessary spamming going on in this forum by users who own multiple accounts, are less concerned about adding value and who's sole aim is to gather bounty rewards.
[...]
Unfortunately, this will not stop you from spamming as you usually do... 

I randomly picked 2 posts from your post history:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4508910.msg45654874#msg45654874 (page 34)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2252159.msg45653463#msg45653463 (page 76)

Do you think anyone will read your replies? Do they bring something new to the topic? Will anyone see the signature you're displaying? The answer is NO to all of course...

As I said it in the announcement thread, I would have gone with a more drastic approach of up to 5 merits required to rank-up to Jr. member.
But this cannot be the only solution to this, shitty campaign managers need to be banned to stop the spam & carelessness that is financed by them.
144  Other / Meta / Re: Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements on: September 17, 2018, 09:22:10 AM
It's good to see hilariousandco suggestion of adding a merit requirement for Junior Members has finally been put in place. Thanks theymos! Smiley
Although, I might have gone with a more drastic measure of up to 5 merits required to rank-up.

I'm curious to see what will the spammers & incompetent bounty campaign managers do from now on. I think we should see a sharp reduction in the number of spam posts created and maybe regain control over Bitcoin & Altcoin Discussion.

@theymos, I hope you do realize that you just fixed just part of the problem here. Another bigger issues is campaign managers that are financing the spam & clogging up BCT.

Take a look at this poor guy: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1556229 he has 3 merits and he's spamming the forums as usual. There are a lot of people here with higher ranks that are spamming the forum on a day to day basis.

I replied to one of this meta threads here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030427.msg45819616#msg45819616
145  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: September 17, 2018, 07:51:35 AM
Glad to see this merit requirement for Jr. Members has finally been put in place. Good job, theymos! Smiley

I'm curious to see if this will kill the spam in the infested Bitcoin & Altcoin Discussion forum sections since Newbies cannot display any signatures thus rendering their posts useless to bounty campaigns.
146  Other / Meta / Re: vlad230's Merit source application - Romanian Local board on: September 17, 2018, 07:23:10 AM
Happy to see that you took the initiative to become a merit source.
I remember you found the phishing links in one of my post and I was very grateful for that. We have been interacting with you before and from what I've seen, you are a the type of the user this forum needs badly.

Wishing you good luck and know that you have my support.
Thanks a lot for the support, iasenko! Smiley

Hopefully we can get things moving in the Romanian local board too and also spark people's interest in creating quality posts.
I know there were a lot of people talking about the fact there is no merit source there so, maybe we I can fix that if no other members want to do it.
147  Local / Română (Romanian) / Re: Activitate si Merit pe forumul Romanesc. Solutii? on: September 16, 2018, 06:43:33 PM
Am decis sa candidez si eu pt a fi sursa de merit pt forum nostru aici: vlad230's Merit source application - Romanian Local board.

Daca credeti ca ar fi o idee buna sa devin sursa de merit aici, as aprecia un feedback pe thread-ul acela sa-l facem cat mai vizibil pt theymos.
148  Other / Meta / vlad230's Merit source application - Romanian Local board on: September 16, 2018, 06:34:38 PM
Dear theymos,

Please consider my application here to be a merit source for the Romanian local board.

1. Be a somewhat established member.
I have been hesitating for some time now to try to apply for a merit source position, to help out my local board, but since we do not have a designated merit source and while talking to my fellow co-nationals, some said they would support my application so, I have decided to try my luck. On top of that, recently there was a discussion where a poll was created and the majority said more merit sources would be required.
I am willing to invest my time into this and try to give something back to the forum.

I know I am nowhere near as established as some of the users here, I also think a user may be at least a senior member here to stand a chance at this, although, I am only missing the merit to rank-up, having just gained the activity in the past month.

On the other hand, I don't know how many of the members here remember my FREE post review service that span across 10 pages: vlad230's post review service - Jr. Member and up. I think I have gained a lot of experience with this and could be a good fit for this position.

2. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months by other people that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread. The point of this is to demonstrate your ability to give out merit usefully.

As I have encouraged other merit source applicants, I have included a few short posts that deserve merit, based on my opinion, not only the long threads everybody is usually quoting that are easy to spot.
I'm not sure how the merit distribution works, if it's limited to the local board I'm applying for or it can be used more broadly (like on other English forums), or if I should only quote posts from the local board. I'm going to quote posts in both English & Romanian to make sure I cover everything. Please advise if I need to change anything and I'll do it.

I am especially eager to have merit sources in sub-communities such as the local sections.
I'm glad to see you also consider having merit sources important in local boards.
I remember when I joined, although I have some decent English skills, I first posted in the Romanian local forum to see how are my co-nationals buying BTC & selling it using our local currency or Euros. So, I do believe that the local forums are very important too.

I have also started a discussion in the Serious Discussions forum about solutions on how to spark interest in the local forums that I think if put into practice could bring back people to the local forums and also get more members interested into cryptocurrency and not creating spam.

Here they are (will remove some of the quoted text as this posts is exceeding the maximum allowed length of 64000 characters):

1. Could not quote this one as the thread is locked: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3094459.msg31946161#msg31946161

2.
I would say that many factors are involved in revitalizing a local board; a Merit Source is just one of them, albeit an important one.

Factors such as regulation, hype, crypto awareness, crypto friendliness, share of wallet one can place on crypto, Bitcointalk SEM/SEO, etc. are all factors to be pondered into the equation.

On a specific local board, a Merit Source would certainly help to keep a certain traction going for those who consider rank important to them, but it is not so much a driver as the above. For example, my local board (Spanish) does indeed have a merit source, although he acts both on my local board and globally. In fact, my first two sMerits came from him and got me started.
I would’t say though that my local board is thriving with posts, nor thrilling in terms of content. Rather more, there is a small set of people that post with a good command of expression and knowledge that try to push things forward, but even so the debates are of late not as intense as before.

I figure nevertheless that Merit Sources on local boards are assigned, amongst other criteria, based on the number of posts on the local board.
My local board for example had an average of 229 posts/day at the end of June 2018, with an average of 0,033 merits/post. Even with a Merit Source, only 22 people have ranked-up at least one level since the Merit System was introduced, and out of those, only 5 have got all their sMerit on the Spanish Local board (the rest have emigrated partially so as to say).  

The Romanian local board had an average of around 40 posts/day at the end of May 2018 (June was 28), with an average of 0,004 merits/post. Only 3 people have ranked-up at least one level since the Merit System was introduced, all of them receiving their sMerit on local and English boards simultaneously.

The French local board had an average of around 170 posts/day at the end of May 2018 (June was 132), with an average of 0,039 merits/post. Similarl, to the Spanish local board, 21 people have ranked-up at least one level since the Merit System was introduced, and out of those only 7 have got all their sMerit on the Spanish Local board (the rest have emigrated partially so as to say).  

To sum it up, a Merit Source is important, but there are many more factors that play their roll in driving traffic to the local board. A “largish” number of posts per day is probably essential to get thing moving.

Sources for the above data:
- Analysis - Ranked-up Users – Section/Subsection profile (& Local Boards)
- Bitcointalk – Posts per Day - evolution during past six months  


3.
Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?

Satoshi Nakamoto is a talented cipher and coder.
Wrote the whitepaper on bitcoin "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" and published it on the cypherpunks mailing list in October 2008
Developed the code for bitcoin and founded https://bitcointalk.org
He used an e-mail address and a web site that is untraceable.
In 2009 and 2010, he wrote hundreds of posts in flawless English.
He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them,
He never revealed any personal details.
Stefan Thomas, a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts and found:
He made almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time.
In April, 2011, he sent a note to a developer saying that he had “moved on to other things.” He has not been heard from since.

His birthday is said to be on April 5, 1975 according to this post.
(But it is likely that he didn't select his real birth-date)
[...]

4.
The SpamBuster's Club


SPAM is everywhere, lets try to clean the forum together. I see many people reporting quietly alone, let's joint forces and help each other. Many have turned the forum in a money-making machine, this is not bad in the first place but abusing the possibilities this forum is giving to you is a bad thing.


Rules:

First       Do not expect any reward (including merit) by joining our club, it's on a voluntary basis.
Second    If you are willing to help and have 300+ good reports and access to your report history you can join*.
Third       All you need to do is to dedicate some of your free time to the the cause and REPORT THE FUCKERS!!!

(*)- to avoid eventual abuse, I will review the applications and decide who will be included.

Side note: If you have no experience in reporting, that's OK. Read this marvelous piece of work - [Guide] Reporting effectively written by our fellow Moderator Welsh
In addition to it you can throw one eye on my work here : [Guide]How to detect rule-breakers.Techniques and tips.
When you reach 300 good reports, just apply here, will find work for you Wink

What is the idea and how is working?
Our fellow member LoyceV will can drop some accounts for manual review here, and we can divide the job in between our members and check them. We are looking mostly for spammers/bots.
You have to decide by yourself if the user is a spammer-bot and deserve reporting or not.


  • You need to be accepted member in order to report the listed accounts. If you are not a member, don't waste your time, no need for duplicate reports and extra work for the mods.
  • You reserve a range of accounts and you need to go trough their post history.
  • If you spot a potential spammer use the report to moderator use the Welsh's guide as reference if you are uncertain*.
  • If you see a spammer bumping few times same threads you can further investigate the Ann threads for eventual incentivizing people to post. [/i]
  • When you are done with all the accounts, update your status to Done.


*Will clarify this later.
[...]

5.
Hi everybody

Here's a list of cheat sheets related to Technical Analysis

I think this might be useful not only for newbies but also for experienced traders. Just print it and hang up on the wall in front of your eyes)

If you also have nice cheat sheets, please post them below and I'll add them here.


Market Cycles


full size


full size



Reversal Chart Patterns


full size



Continuation Chart Patterns


full size



Chart Patterns


full size



Harmonic Pattern


full size



Candlesticks


full size




full size



Volume


full size



Divergence


full size


full size

6.
It's probably best known Bitcointalk phishing website.

I found two more clones of the forum:
- fonstavka.com
- lawcommonentrance.com

7.
Everyday we see threads about hacked/locked accounts, which are not only beginners' accounts but also for Legendary members'.  In addition to the brute force hacking risk, there are peculiar risks in the current system and by data breach on May 22, 2015.  The security of the forum account has been one of the biggest issue.  The improvement of security, e.g. requiring email verification for changing password/email, introduction of 2FA, automated account recovery system, and the new forum software with stronger security would be ideal.  

Meanwhile, until these features are implemented, what we can do now is to learn how the current bitcointalk system works, how to improve the security of your bitcointalk account, and also what you should do in case your account is hacked/locked.  In this thread, I tried to provide a thorough guide about these topics.  I hope it helps to reduce the number of hacked/lost accounts.  


Table of contents




Basics

1. Bookmark https://bitcointalk.org/ and always login from the bookmark.  Avoid bitcointalk.to, thebitcointalk.net or any other phishing site.

2. Use new email address that you don't use for any other purposes.

3. Use new password that you don't use for any other websites, with sufficient length using a combination of letter/capital characters, numbers, and special characters.  

4. You could set a secret question and its answer for password reset but most likely it increases the risk of your account to be hacked/locked.  For more details, see Tips below and Change password and email / Forgot password.

5. Do not download untrusted softwares and keep your device clean from malware.  

6. Keep all your devices and softwares updated to the latest version.

7. Stake your Bitcoin address.  See Stake Bitcoin address below for more detail.  

[.......]

8.
This has been quite a long and challenging project given the amount of information to show, i have started to look into it since i saw the network graph threads of DdmrDdmr and sncc. My goal was to have an explorable version of the full network with interactions included, as well as my take on trying to find new merit sources.

Each node represent a user and the edges with arrows merit transactions, received or given.
I made 2 versions, the main difference is in the shape. Then for each of these versions i made two variants,one where the coloring is based on the Rank and the other is based on the Trust.








The node size is based on the Node Merit Size variable (on the User Information Panel) and reaches the maximum with a total of 500 merits given away, i did this to try to avoid the current merit sources shading emerging one. This should help visualize at sight the main givers just by looking at the size of the nodes.

Node Merit Size is calculated in the following way:
Code:
 If Merit Given > 500 
Node Merit Size = 500
  otherwise
Node Merit Size = Merit Given


The node and edge color simply tells the rank/trust of the node.

I removed from the network all the nodes and edges where:

Code:
Merit Received + Merit Given = 1

So anybody who sent a single merit or received a single one won’t be in it.

There are exactly 15954 Nodes and 54108 Edges in there. If there are more merit transactions from user A to user B they will be grouped together and be represented with 1 line(Edge) that goes from A to B

What is the purpose?

You can use these visualizations to help identify users which could be a merit source, since at first glance you have a very intuitive way of knowing the amount of Merit given (size of the node) and Rank/Trust (color of the node). Plus the personal network tells the merit story of the user.

How i made this?

I prepared all the data i needed and made several iteration with Gephi for the layout of the network graph. The drawing is made using the library Sigma Js which supports WebGL.

How to use it?

  • Each node you see can show the user name on mouse over and by clicking on it it will isolate the connections based on merit sent and received, both in the form of a graph and with a panel, which shows supplementary informations about the use selected as well. Moving the mouse over the names on the list will show the label on the graph as well.
  • You can drag the network by clicking on an empty space, zoom in and out with your mouse wheel or using the buttons in the bottom overlay. The magnifying lens with the square center the graph on screen.
  • On the left panel you can search for any user by name.

Links to the visualizations:

https://albertoit.github.io/Merit-Network-Visualization/
https://albertoit.github.io/Merit-Network-Visualization/?config=config_Trust.json
https://albertoit.github.io/Merit-Network-Visualization/?config=configsparse.json
https://albertoit.github.io/Merit-Network-Visualization/?config=configsparse_Trust.json

9.

If this helped you, don't forget to hit +Merit. Thanks

Lot of people asking how to mod RX bios. There are 2 ways the easy one and the proper one.
I will show you the easy way. This bios modding is easy for newbies. This bios mod tutorial is for memory intensive algos such as Ethereum, Monero, Dubaicoin, etc.
Undervolting will only work with Windows.
If you need undervolt bios for Linux you need to do the harder way. You can ask here, someone could make it for you. I know that masters Eliovp and Wolf0 can do it.

If you need help, buy me a beer I can help you. Write me on e-mail monerobiosedit@gmail.com
What I can offer:

  • Performance timings for all GPUs
  • Bios mod
  • Support



Buy Mining Bios With Performance Timings

You all know I don't like this... but since most of you want this and I don't have time to mod bios for all of you. You can now buy it prepared for mining. It's undervolted and uses performance timings! Prices are as low as $5. You can pay only with crypto. Paypal possible for PBE buy only, contact me for purchase with that.
I will add more bios hopefully soon! I recommend to pay with LTC because BTC fee cost more than those bios Cheesy
If any problem contact me via e-mail monerobiosedit@gmail.com, the payment system is tested so hopefully there will be no problems, if the payment will stuck contact me I will aprove it manually.

https://mining-bios.eu/ - The one and only Mining Bios shop running by Mattthev

There are more and more fake shops that they try to look like https://mining-bios.eu/ and probably try to scam you. Always check for the right address https://mining-bios.eu with SSL lock. Also look for McAfee badge and Shopper Identity Protection.

NEW affiliate system with 10% commission rates for bios and PBE purchase. https://mining-bios.eu/2018/08/10/affiliate-program-for-mining-bios/

Mining-bios.eu accepted crypto


Discount coupon
indeedminers10 - 10% discount on bios orders of total 15 USD and more.

CoolAirMining10
Here you can grab 10% discount on order total.
Always check the link, SSL lock and McAfee secure sign, there are few fake shops that might try to scam you. They have almost same design and pretty much same bios and PBE offers...


NOBS Crypto by John McAfee and Chris Koerner


CAT OFFER - 5% DISCOUNT
Contact me or directly Sampey with my nickname (Mattthev) and you will get 5% discount on your copy.



C.A.T. is an "automatic-trader" written in Java Code (Desktop Application) using Exchanges API
You only need to choose markets, set the first orders and parameters (not mandatory) and then let C.A.T. algorithm trade for you.
C.A.T. works on Linux/Windows/Mac with Java 8

More info:
🌟【BOT】C.A.T. Cryptocurrency Automatic Trader 5.2 🌟



Drivers

For best ETH performance you need to use drivers with compute workload for Windows 7/10 and for Linux blockchain drivers

Blockchain Drivers for Linux
Radeon Software Crimson Edition ReLive Graphics Driver 17.12 - Adrenaline - these drivers need to be switched to compute workload
If you don't have compute workload in settings with Adrenaline drivers use 17.11.4 instead and switch cards to compute workload.
Blockchain Drivers August Windows 7/10 1703


VEGA 56/64

Guide How to Flash VEGA 56 -> 64 + Bios Download + Mods
VEGA Guru3D thread + Bios download - VEGA 56 -> VEGA 64
Bitcointalk VEGA thread
Reddit mining thread VEGA 64 43.5MH/s 130W

Vega Mining - A Consolidated Guide
VEGA 64 Oldcomer's youtube guide
VEGA 56 Hellae guide Bitcointalk
Monero and Vega - the definitive guide by Hellae
VEGA 56 Hellae guide Reddit thread

Reddit Wattman settings
Album how to mod VEGA 64
VEGA 56/64 Video BIOS Collection

Softpowerplay voltage mod guide by Hellm


Basic Performance Timings for Elpida/Hynix/Micron/Samsung for RX


Free performance timings for Hynix H5GC4H24AJ for testers! You need to know how to use PBE or SRB I also need feedback on that. Send me an e-mail monerobiosedit@gmail.com

Guide: How to Mine Monero / Sumokoin and Other Cryptonote Coins + Miners Download Links ⛏
Guide: How to Mine AEON Cryptonote-light + Miners Downloads ⛏
Guide: How to Mine ⚡ Electroneum + Miners Downloads ⛏


How To Mod Polaris Bios AMD RX 470/570/480/580

Tools
Polaris Bios Editor 3 PRO - This build includes my timings (better than the original and those free in this thread) it's more intuitive you can choose optimized timings for XMR or ETH, it auto applies customized timings for 4GB or 8GB cards and include several options such as power saving. More info on the link.
Polaris Bios Editor 1.4.1
Polaris Bios Editor 1.6.7
Polaris Bios Editor 1.7.0
SRBPolaris Bios Editor V3.4
AMD/ATI ATIFlash 2.84
GPU-Z 2.7.0
ATI Pixel Clock Patcher 1.4.6
DDU
HWinfo64+32
[.......]

10. Romanian post:
TOP-25 termeni răspinditiți în lumea cripto-valutelor, decodarea argoului (SLANG-uri)

Adeseori când vizitezi un forum de schimb de cripte sau un grup, există unele cuvinte care nu sunt pe intelesul tuturor. Sensul lor nu poate fi găsit imediat, deoarece este vorba despre un slang. Pentru a înțelege alți investitori și comercianți, interpretarea anumitor fraze pe care trebuie să le cunoaștem este pur și simplu necesară. Deci, mai jos este o listă a celor mai frecvent utilizate cuvinte pe care le folosesc membrii comunității cripto-valutare.

1.  Hodl / Hold / Holder - este tradus în același mod ca și cuvântul din care se presupune că a avut loc, adică din "hold" - pentru a stoca, a păstra. Expresia "Hold On for Dear Life" înseamnă - ''a păstra ca și când viața depinde de ea". Un cripto-trader, care cumpără jetoane, dar nu le va vinde în viitorul apropiat, se numește "holder de monede".

2.  FOMO - este o abreviere a expresiei din engleză  "fear of mising out", ceea ce înseamnă teama de a pierde ceva. Un astfel de sentiment este experimentat de comercianții care văd pe ecran o lumanare imensă, dar în acel moment au deschis vânzări. Mulți dintre ei opresc imediat tranzacția de la sentimentul de frică și încep imediat să cumpere, pentru a nu pierde trend-ul.

3.  FUD  - o scurtă expresie "fear uncertainty and doubt" - "frica, incertitudine și îndoială". Se folosește de obicei sub forma "XXX distribuie din nou FUD". Un exemplu: "James Daimon de la JPMorgan distribuie FUD, spunând că Bitcoin este un" balon "care va exploda în cele din urmă.

4.  ATH  - o scurtă formă a expresiei "All time hight" - "cel mai mare preț" (vorbim despre prețul monedei crypto). Aceasta înseamnă că prețul unei anumite monede a stabilit un nou record și a atins cel mai înalt nivel.

5.  Whale - este o balenă, adică un jucator mare cu capital considerabil. Balenele sunt adesea forța motrice a pieței pentru dimensiunea imensă a tranzacțiilor cu care intră in joc.

6.  Pump and Dump - "pompare și resetare". Orice salt brusc al prețurilor este însoțit de un declin enorm. Astfel de mișcări sunt adesea explicate prin volum redus, ca urmare, prin apariția "Pump". După un astfel de fenomen, mulți comercianți încep să-și vândă monedele, respectiv se observă "Dump".

7.  Shill  - aprobarea publică exagerată a oricărei monede. Comercianții care au cumpărat jetoane noi sunt interesați de shilling. Cu alte cuvinte, crează în mod obsesiv iluzia popularității, exagerând reputația companiei sau alte informații, prin urmare promovând artificial proiectul.

8.  Bag Holder  - așa-numitul investitor care a cumpărat token-uri la un cost ridicat și a ratat ocazia de a scăpa de ele în timp. După aceea, monedele au devenit mai ieftine sau aproape inutile.

9.  Margin Trading  - tranzacționare prin utilizarea fondurilor furnizate unui comerciant pe un împrumut împotriva unui gaj al valorii convenite - marjă. Acest comerț cu active cripto-active crește semnificativ depozitul comerciantului, veniturile acestuia, minimizează riscurile de a pierde totul foarte repede.

10.  Long  - o poziție care se deschide dacă comerciantul presupune că piața va merge în sus. De obicei, pozițiile lungi sunt deschise de un comerciant dacă acesta crede într-un proiect sau într-o monedă cripto și crede că va crește semnificativ în valoare după o lungă perioadă de timp.

11.  Short  - o poziție care se deschide dacă comerciantul presupune că piața va cădea. Comanda scurtă presupune că comerciantul ia jetoane de la bursă, le vinde și când graficul atinge un punct scăzut - cumpără această monedă și o returnează la bursă. Diferența dintre prețul de vânzare, care este mai mare, și prețul de cumpărare, care este mai mic, comerciantul lasă pentru el, acesta este însuși profitul său.

12.  Limit Order  - o comandă limită plasată la un preț viitor. Poate fi instalat atât pentru cumpărare cât și pentru vânzare. Comerciantul stabilește o comandă limită, cu prețul specificat în prealabil, care va fi activ până la încheierea tranzacției.

13.  Fill or Kill  - executați sau anulați. În cadrul criptologiei, aceasta este instrucțiunea unui investitor de a efectua o operațiune de cumpărare sau de vânzare a unui anumit activ la un moment dat.

14.  BUY / SELL Wall  - un perete creat, printr-o asociație a ordinelor limită cu același preț țintă. Pereții de tranzacționare din cauza volumului mare nu permit ca prețul să crească sau să scadă, menținându-și astfel nivelul.

15.  Altcoin  - altcoin (monede alternative). Așa se cheamă toate mărcile și monedele, cu excepția celor de tip bitcoin, care este considerată a fi principala monedă criptografică.

16.  Circulating Supply  - numărul de monede aflate în liberă circulație pe piață. Prețul monedei nu contează de la sine. Cu toate acestea, prețul monedei, înmulțit cu numărul de monede aflate în circulație, dă capitalizarea de piață a monedei.

17.  Market Cap - capitalizarea pieței. Pe piața cripto-valutară, acest indicator este ilustrat de dominanța monedelor. Capitalizarea pieței se determină prin înmulțirea numărului total de monede emise la valoarea de piață a unei monede.

18.  DDoS  - un scurt formular din "Denial Distributed of Service", care înseamnă "refuzul la distribuirea de servicii" (atac hacker). Un  atac DDoS asupra bursei de valori poate duce la consecințe imprevizibile, deoarece hackerii încearcă să fure monedele de Utilizatorilor sau a Bursei de Valori atacată.

19.  ICO  - oferta inițială de monede. Token-urile proiectelor potențiale dobândite în timpul ICO sunt de obicei vândute cu un profit. Acest lucru se datorează activităților promoționale care sporesc cererea de monede. După intrarea în bursă (piața secundară), valoarea jetoanelor proiectelor de calitate crește in alte cazuri (rar) poate scădea.

20.  Arbitrage  - procesul de cumpărare mai ieftin a unei monede cripto de pe o bursă și vânzarea ulterioară a acesteia către o altă bursă cu scop de a obține profit. Rețineți că comisioanele și prețurile pentru monede se pot schimba în orice moment în momentul transferării monedelor de la platformă la platformă, în special în timpul volatilității ridicate. Un alt factor de descurajare este întârzierea asociată depozitării și retragerii monedelor către saituri. Diferența dintre valoarea de schimb a monedelor este profitul comerciantului.

21.  BTFD  este o scurtă formă a expresiei "Buy The Dip Fucking", care încurajează cumpărarea jetoanelor după scăderea prețurilor pe partea de jos.

22.  Moon sau To the moon  - o creștere lungă sau imediatată a valorii unei monede. În mod excepțional, mișcarea de creștere a prețului activului a crescut agresiv sau in Long dar cu profit foarte mare.

23.  Veak Hands  - acestea sunt numele celor care nu pot suporta reducerea prețurilor pe piață și ca urmare înceap să vândă inainte de timp.

24.  Airdrop  - distribuirea gratuită a indicativelor între membrii comunității cripto-valutare. Uneori, astfel de evenimente se desfășoară după FORK sau chiar la începutul proiectului, pentru a face publicitate și pentru a atrage atenția utilizatorilor cît și a investitorilor.

25.  Vote for Token Listing  - votați pentru introducerea monedelor pe lista de schimb a Bursei. Crypto-bursa  Binance  și  Huobi.Pro  aplică monedele lor BnB și HT pentru a vota proiectele care candidează pentru listare.

Există și alte expresii și abrevieri în lumea cripto-valutară, însă cele de mai sus sunt considerate cele mai comune. Folosirea slangurilor vă permite adesea să transmiteți semnificația unei expresii mari sub forma unui singur cuvânt scurt. Cu toate acestea, nu uitați de importanța altor cunoștințe, care joacă un rol important la investițiile în moneda criptografică.

                                                         Aceasta este o completare a termenilor din posturile publlicate anterior in acest Tread

Looking forward to getting a resolution,
Vlad
149  Other / Off-topic / Re: Merit System Upgrade on: September 16, 2018, 10:51:43 AM
I'm not sure if this thread is still open, since it was created a long time ago, but in case it is here's a list of some of my posts but feel free to check my post history too:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4143199.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023857.msg45339579#msg45339579
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5028004.msg45621749#msg45621749
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4984068.msg44962979#msg44962979
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4809327.msg44458346#msg44458346
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4906761.msg44397528#msg44397528

Thanks a lot for your time! Smiley
150  Other / Off-topic / Re: Merits For Deserving Members Of Forum on: September 16, 2018, 09:30:37 AM
[...]
You could alternatively ask them to link to ten different posts that they think are merit worthy just to speed up the process a bit.
[...]
However asking them to link ten different posts looks good to speed up the process, i will keep it in mind if i need to change the application process in future.
I would like to encourage you guys to take a look at the post history of every applicant instead of just looking at a few posts. Better yet, you could just look at ten posts and then also browse through the post history.

I ran a free review service some months back here: vlad230's post review service - Jr. Member and up and you'll be amazed how many spammers I got in it that linked 3 okish posts but the rest were garbage posted on page 40-50+ in mega threads. So, make sure you keep a look out Smiley
151  Other / Meta / Re: Do you think more merit sources need to be added? on: September 15, 2018, 08:04:00 PM
Right now it seems like decent posters are having to wait a hell of a long time to rank up, and I think it ought to go a little quicker for them and that having more merit sources would help that. [...]
I believe I'm creating decent posts but one of the issues I'm facing is trying to make my posts visible. For example, I've created this topic in Trading: [Guide] Best/Top Crypto Exchanges: Fees & more and it was buried instantly by spam... I see it has begun to pick up attention lately, so all is not lost yet  Roll Eyes

[...] some of high quality members left unmerited because the coverage of  current merit source is not that wide. I suggest it should be added based on region/local board activity, because there are gems hidden in the local boards, and some of them are not good at english. [...]
Yes, it's true, the merit sources are not seeing all the posts especially the ones in the local boards. They're only 84, they can't see everything obviously...

Another thing is that some local boards do not have merit sources at all which is very bad if you ask me. I've create a post in Serious Discussions about this here: Revitalizing the Local boards about the fact that some local boards are also dying down and maybe we could use merit to stimulate posters there as well.

[...] the best of the best aren't restricted by Merit, but I think anybody who isn't a spammer shouldn't be limited by Merit either.
[...]
Yes, you are right. The original idea with the merit system as proposed by Theymos was that merit was to be received almost as fast as activity (about 1 per day) for me, this has worked fine while we had the initial merit circling around but nowadays it has been increasingly hard to earn merit (although I believe I'm posting the same quality) and from what I've seen here it's not just me.
152  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Guide] Best/Top Crypto Exchanges: Fees & more on: September 15, 2018, 11:40:33 AM
Bitfinex is actually a big no for me, like was before I created an account there but to my astonish I can't make any deposit since I need to have at least a $10k balance, though it's accumulated it's impossible for me to have that. So I ended up not using it even I really need it.
Hmm... Interesting, I wasn't required to deposit $10k. Could this be a new policy change? Or maybe something dependent on geographic location?

Wow I just know that, 779 pairs. Considering many hated hitbtc plus the fees that literally robbing us but if the liquidity is concern then fees shouldn't be weigh.
I guess they are charging higher fees because they also need more personnel to maintain all those trading pairs and issues associated with them.

I'm glad to see this question Smiley By the way, your guide is great. Really useful, not only for newbies.
Answering your question. I'm using CEX (https://cex.io/), their security measures and an easy-going interface played a decisive role for making a choice. Though the verification procedure looks like it's gonna eat you alive but this also makes you feel safe and confident.
Yeah i too had been using cex.io for some years and it is also a good site.
Earlier it took a long time for verification but i guess things have changed now.
only 1 problem I faced when I wanted to update my details there,it really pissed me off.
can anyone tell me what is the present scenario in bitbuy.ca and shapeshift, I had been thinking to use some other exchanges for some different reasons.
Looks like I need to check out CEX.IO Smiley Will review it and add it here later on. Thanks for the suggestions!

I think it should be noted that most of the large crypto exchanges have already emitted their own ERC20-tokens (for example, BNB, HT, etc). These tokens can be bought for getting bonuses and discounts. As I can see, not all the exchanges support the "trailing stop (TS)" function. Nice guide, good work.
Yes, good point. Some of them offer big discounts on fees, like Binance with the 50% off on fees if you're using their token to pay for them.
153  Other / Meta / Re: [RUPL] Ranking-Up Pipe Line of Forum Members on: September 13, 2018, 01:06:43 PM
Just to note here, that this is a list of people who need 1-5 merit to rank up / depending on the rank of course [...]
Aaa.... ok Smiley I missed that "small" detail.

I though OP was just creating a list of people who are missing merits to ran-up, didn't check their current merit rankings.

In your case you gonna need to wait until you reach 245 merit. I hope you don't need to wait to long as I'm familiar with your posting habits.Looking forward to give you the missing merit to rank up Wink
Thanks for the encouragement but from the looks of it, it's going to take some time for me to gather the extra 80 or so, merits...
I have been trying to make my posts more visible these days, let's see how this works out.

Don't know why, but since I gained the necessary activity, I'm seeing getting the required merit as a challenge.  Smiley
154  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Network congestion & transactions on: September 13, 2018, 12:44:32 PM
You can check the current mempool status (amount of transactions with X sat/B) here: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#1,24h.

1 sat/B is probably not enough for the TX to be confirmed within 5 blocks.
As you can see on the site above, the amount of TX (and therefore also the needed fee rate to get confirmed within X blocks) has gone up a few blocks ago.

This may clean up soon. I do think your TX will still confirm today, but maybe not within the next 5 blocks.
But since this isn't urgent, i guess you are fine.

If you somehow still need to bump the TX, you might also use CPFP to do so.
Thanks for the info! Smiley

It looks like the mempool increase in size significantly just after I have submitted my transaction. Seems like bad timing from my end Smiley

Will wait for it to be done, no need to bump it Smiley
155  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Network congestion & transactions on: September 13, 2018, 12:18:02 PM
Correct.

The estimate is based on past transactions, and will be correct most of the time. Future transactions and block time can sometimes vary.
Ok, thanks for confirming. Smiley

So, bad news is I've sent a new transaction that will be confirmed in 5 blocks for the same 1 sat/byte price... I assume this will get processed waaaayy later....

I'm using an electrum wallet and the price recommendation came from there. Basically I chose the confirmation time (i.e. 5/10 blocks) based on the price since it doesn't have to be urgent but I am expecting/hoping it to confirm today.

Might have been better off selecting the 10 blocks one for the same price, right? As I assume cheaper miners will be taking care of those.
156  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] 🔥IOU Signature Campaign | Member - Hero | 0.0007 BTC /Post 🔥 on: September 13, 2018, 10:55:37 AM
The devs have asked me to make this rule change. Instead of being able to do a maximum of 30 posts a week, the limit has been reduced to 20 posts. Any posts that exceed this limit won't be paid for.
I wasn't expecting that... Especially since the quota of posts is not filled every week and people were asking if this may be increased.

Looks like the IOU campaign isn't going as good as I originally thought...  Sad

157  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] ⚡BQT Signature Campaign | Member - Hero | 0.0007 BTC /Post ⚡ on: September 13, 2018, 10:52:25 AM
Hi Zapo,

With the new rule changes on the IOU campaign, I was wondering if I could jump to this campaign since I'm used to creating 30 posts per week.
Please let me know if I am accepted here and I'll update my signature.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1268116
Post Count: 833
Merit Count: 171
BTC Address: 1VLAD1TDqWAAow1ZUtdoKKgE7anqdjokb
Telegram Username: @vlad230
158  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Network congestion & transactions on: September 13, 2018, 10:38:22 AM
I have been using BTC for some time now (about 1y) and noticed that the completion of a transaction varies greatly in duration from time to time.

For example, I have sent a transaction (223 bytes) that was going to confirm within 10 blocks with a cost of 1 sat/byte and it finalized in about 8h last week, Sept 7th but one week before that I did the same transaction (223 bytes & 10 blocks confirmation again) and it was processed in about 1.5-2h.

Is this because the congestion increased (as well as prices) after I have sent sent the payment and my 1 sat/byte transaction ended up being less appealing to miners, thus got processed later?
Or is there something else that I'm not aware of?
159  Other / Meta / Re: Analysis - Ranked-up Users – Section/Subsection profile (& Local Boards) on: September 13, 2018, 10:11:19 AM
No, we are still not on the same page here. The forum members displayed as having ranked-up have done so requiring merit to do so. I do not show members that have not needed merit to rank-up. You can see this by looking at the detail and observing that merit is the required amount (or above) for each new gained rank, whilst initial merit is generally 0 (Initial rank of Member or above is not cero, since they had default initial merit).
Therefore, all now 2.608 forum members shown on the tab have ranked-up through merit, regardless of when the account was created.

The Date Created slider filter is useful to delimit precisely that. Say you wanted to see what new accounts created in 2018 have achieved, you would move the slider accordingly to focus on this subset.

Ok, I get what you mean now. Then would you agree that the date picker would need to start when the merit system was implemented (Jan 24th, 2018) and not from the beginning of the forum?

Otherwise it's a bit misleading or something does not really add up.
160  Local / Română (Romanian) / Re: Activitate si Merit pe forumul Romanesc. Solutii? on: September 13, 2018, 09:54:45 AM
Cred ca nu ai inteles. Am 50-55 merit trimis. Dar ceea ce este pentru tine "postari decente" si ceea ce este pentru mine "postari decente" difera.
Problema este ca cei de nivel mare au sanse mai mari sa posteze informatii decente, lasandu-i pe cei "de jos" relativ frustrati. Si da, stiu pentru ce este meritul. Si nu consider ca aruncandu-l in stanga si dreapta va ajuta sistemul.
Poate ar trebui sa fim mai ingaduitori cu oamenii noi si sa nu ii privim de sus #numazic

Sper ca chestia asta cu avansarea in rang "rank-up" sa nu se transforme in ceva similar cu ce e in USA cu imigratia - majoritatea sunt imigranti dar dupa ce au ajuns acolo, uita asta, si nu mai vor alti imigranti pt ca deeeeh.... de ce le-ar lua altii "painea de la gura"?.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!