If you guys claim eMunie is still alive, why not give a concrete release date and serious & believable (project) roadmap?
|
|
|
Interview die deutschen bzw. internationalen Informatik-Wissenschaftler aus den Unis Saarbrücken, Aachen und Münster, die Papers & Diplomarbeiten zu Bitcoin geschrieben haben. (am besten die Professoren oder Projektverantwortlichen von den Crypto Currency-Arbeitsgruppen) Oder die Veranstalter & Organisatoren von: https://ecurex.com/p2pfisy/Vielleicht noch die Leute von http://www.bitcoin-frankfurt.de/ , die scheinen aktiv und sinnvoll sein. Sonst in Deutschland doch eh nix los.
|
|
|
So what was he trying to say?
|
|
|
Wow, there is simply no willingness to hold the coin.
Are you for real? Why do you post such nonsense? Alot of people think day in and day out about how to support this coin & keep the price stable and organic growing.
|
|
|
Regarding a possible Bytecoin release: I would assume everything from them is some sort of deception or fraud until and unless proven otherwise.
Ullo just wrote: The next Bytecoin release (1.0.3) is coming out early next week.
|
|
|
Are there any posts or thoughts on fairness of the XMR distribution setup and how it plays out?
Are there any posts or thoughts on, that the (in my eyes and judged by today) too slow distribution, may hinder adoption, because its slows down natural, organic price development?
I feel very awkward and undecided. For Bitcoin, I wish the distribution would have been slower, because it very clearly shaft early adopters, over later regular adopters & users.
On the opposite, for Monero, I sometimes wish the distribution would have been faster, because I think the current reward schedule with its selling pressure, could hinder adoption & organic price development today (see above).
I ask a myself a easy question, today "80% of Monero will be mined in 4 years" & we are just one year in, would it we better for us, the whole project and vision behind and still be as fair as possible, if reward schedule would be "80% of Monero will be mined in 2 or 2,5 years".
It feels to me like we have to wait alot from now vs. competing coins, where the distribution is faster. (for whatever reasons: Premines, Flashmines, start heavy schedules, ICO, PoS&PoW-combos, ...)
I am interested on your thoughts on this. Thank you for reading.
|
|
|
arnuschky: You are doing very good work, thank you.
|
|
|
NEM is a movement which aims to create a new economy based on the principles of decentralization, financial freedom, and equality of opportunity.
Welche Prinzipien der Dezentralisierung sind denn da jetzt konkret gemeint und umgesetzt?
(Allgemein & insbesondere auch im Vergleich mit anderen Crypto Currencies.) Mit "Equality of opportunity" ist in etwa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_opportunity gemeint, richtig?
Was ist davon jetzt konkret schon umgesetzt? (Allgemein & insbesondere auch im Vergleich mit anderen Crypto Currencies.)
|
|
|
I was the same way all of 2013, but converted in early 2014 when I took a deeper, more technical look into PoS
Share the insights you learned, please.
|
|
|
Anyway, I just dont prefer day trade at most coins. The key for altcoin trading is patient and finding a good potential coin. If you really find this kind of coin and buy at cheap prices and wait enough , you can easily multiply your coins to 3-4-5 even 10x.
I think this is nonsense and random blabla. 1.) the quality 99,99% of the coins and projects are historically proven way to bad, for that strategy to work 2.) "finding a good potential coin" is kinda impossible today, every half-serious coin that launches announces itself with a roadmap & list of 1000000 top-features and sexy infographics (+ public devs, expensive marketing) --> you cant judge anymore if its 100% scam, likely scam or honest project & even for honest projects you cant use announcements and roadmaps as indicator, because you never know if the devs stay active and will ever deliver, even 10% they announced IHMO: to really, realiable judge a coin it has to be at least six or more months old, and if its that old and trust-worthy, then its already to expensive -----> you may can be right by the judgement of one coin early (and get lucky & rich), but IMHO strategic, long-term altcoin investment is impossible (because of the problems mentioned above)
|
|
|
Regarding yesterday, the consensus algorithm topic interest me very much. I am of the opinion that PoW massive wastage of energy and leads to dangerous centralization of mining. Nevertheless, I see many posters, I respect, who prefer PoW. So I made a thread about this, in the Tech Discussion section. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1011906, topic: "Why do most known experts and widly-respected poster prefer PoW over PoS & PoI?".
|
|
|
The consensus algorithm topic interest me very much. I am of the opinion that PoW is a massive wastage of energy and leads to dangerous centralization of mining. Nevertheless, I see many posters, I respect (e.g. in this thread), who prefer PoW. So I made a thread in the Tech Discussion section, about the topic. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1011906, topic: "Why do most known experts and widly-respected posters prefer PoW over PoS & PoI?". Myself am very curious about your answers, because I think the most respected posters on this boards, post in this thread. Thank you very much.
|
|
|
Dieses Konsensus-Algorithmus-Thema interesiert mich selber sehr. Ich bin sehr ebenso der Meinung, dass PoW massive Energierverschwendung und gefährlich ist. Trotzdem seh ich viele Poster, die ich respektiere, die PoW bevorzugen. Also habe ich mal einen Thread im englischen Bereich dazu gemacht. Siehe https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1011906, Thema: "Why do most known experts and widly-respected posters prefer PoW over PoS & PoI?". Bin selber sehr gespannt auf die Antworten.
|
|
|
Dieses Konsensus-Algorithmus-Thema interesiert mich selber sehr. Ich bin sehr ebenso der Meinung, dass PoW massive Energierverschwendung und gefährlich ist. Trotzdem seh ich viele Poster, die ich respektiere, die PoW bevorzugen. Also habe ich mal einen Thread im englischen Bereich dazu gemacht. Siehe https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1011906, Thema: "Why do most known experts and widly-respected posters prefer PoW over PoS & PoI?". Bin selber sehr gespannt auf die Antworten.
|
|
|
Nearly everybody agrees that a Bitcoin-style PoW is I) a huge waste of ressources & esp. energy and leads II) to dangerous centralization of mining. But, if I scan the forum, I fell like still most pundits prefer PoW. Why almost all renowned Crypto Currency and Crypto Finance experts [incl. most widly-respected BCT-posters] prefer PoW as consensus algorithm? Sub-questions: Why not use PoS or PoI? Are there othere preferable consensus algorithms? What about PoB? ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_burn) Can PoW be improved? I am happy with detailed answers, answers in bullet points or just links or references elsewhere. Thank you!
|
|
|
|