Was gibt es Neues? Hab lange mich lange nicht zu NXT informiert?
|
|
|
Buy your own accounts to counteract any FUD BAM! Problem solved...
|
|
|
Is NUD really unique and a 100% new codebase?
Or is it based on a existing known codebase?
|
|
|
Just a reminder:
The thread is about FUD from "bought accounts", not from "fresh regged accounts" (who no1 is taking seriously).
|
|
|
Wirkliches "to da moon" findet erst statt, wenn (realistisch absehbar ist dass) die großen Merchants nicht mehr sofort auscashen, sondern einen Großteil ihrer Lieferanten und des Personals in Coins bezahlen.
Bleibt dir überlassen zu prognostizieren, wie lange dies noch dauern kann.
|
|
|
If these accounts get deleted in time, these attacks would stop.
Simple as that. It's just needs a stuff member to click on the "Delete Account" button. Dont act like this would be impossible, it's possible on any other forum in this universe.
|
|
|
How to stop FUD campaigns with bought accounts? All Monero-threads are full of bought and previous months unused, forum accounts spreading FUD against Monero. It's an big campaign, going over weeks now. It's a big problem, really destroying most serious discussion and all the other bad things coming with it. It's absolutely enough now. How can this be stoped?
To whom I report these accounts? What "evidence" is needed with the report? Who is going to delete them?
|
|
|
I read that the devs of XMR use botnet to make fake demand for this coin. Is it true?
PS If it's true, I'll be very disappointed in XMR team
GTFO, FUD-master. I have absolutely enough of this bullshit. Please support my thread against the bought Anti-XMR-accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=690377
|
|
|
Why there’s so much PR about Monero? If a thing is really worthy, it does not need so much noise around it. Looks kinda suspicious - like there are things behind all this that Monero devs would like to hide.
How many accounts did you bought for your FUD campaign? Do you really think this works? Why are you fighting against XMR? What is your problem?
|
|
|
AnonyMint: Just give some clear suggestions for improvements for Monero. So the devs and community can discuss. We all read your vague, repeating, standard NSA & Co remarks already 2 till >5 times in this and other threads.
|
|
|
"Hash Rate: 573.16 KH/sec" that's 100 till 120 computers. That's a kid, with his Windows Skiddy-RAT or an computer pool admin at university or whatever.
What I wanted to point out is, there is no major botnet (> 20.000 bots) mining. Because people talk like the really big and well known botnets - managed by professional east-european groups - are mining now. Not true.
|
|
|
2. Whether the I2P+ring is secure against the global police state.
Even if you are correct that limited transactions would allow #1 to scale, it doesn't diminish the fact that #2 is not secure against the global police state.
Who really needs to be secure against "global police state", must have full-anon internet connection anyway. Monero alone doesnt have to be 100000% secure against any theoretical risk. Who needs this security level, most combine different techniques and systems (anyway). Dont act like a privacy coin must include its own anonymity network as new network layer.
|
|
|
This botnet talk is really big exaggerated. There is not a single Malware-Report by AV/IT-Sec guys, about an XMR mining botnet. Every new variation of malware is tracked and documented very closely, e.g. a report from yesterday is here http://blog.malcovery.com/blog/breaking-gameover-zeus-returns?utm_campaign=Gameover+Zeus+Return or just see http://malware.dontneedcoffee.com/ (+ blog roll) every new development in botting is documented and known There is no announcement or advertisement for about an new mining/mining-modules/mining-plugin for Monero/CryptoNote (for the major botnet frameworks/software systems) on any major (russian) botnet/cybercrime forum. Not even an discussion thread or postings. --> there is no big botnet mining ---> Hello FUDder!!!?s
|
|
|
http://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/zahlungsdiensterichtlinie-zag-2-bafin-aenderungZAHLUNGSDIENSTERICHTLINIE Warum bald wohl noch mehr Startups eine BaFin-Lizenz brauchen
Kati Meister, 1. Juli 2014 FACHBEITRAG – Wer Zahlungen für andere abwickelt, braucht dafür eine Erlaubnis. Tritt der aktuelle EU-Gesetzesvorschlag in Kraft, wird die BaFin-Lizenzpflicht ausgeweitet. Ein Beitrag von Kati Meister, Rechtsanwältin im Berliner Büro von CMS Hasche Sigle.
|
|
|
Die Coins sind mit (so gut wie) absoluter Sicherheit nicht in der Hand von Cyberkriminellen. Denn dies wäre erfahrungsgemäß schon längst bekannt.
Bleiben ja noch genug viel realistischere Täter (Mark, anderer Insider, RL Einbrecher, Geheimdienste, ...) oder Ursachen für das Verschwinden (alle möglichen technischen Versagensgründe, ...) über.
|
|
|
|