Thank you very much, very kind of you.
Could I trouble you with another?
This time it is 4 1/4 minim per fluid ounce to grams per liter.

Primary Competitive Advantages:

    Country of Origin
    Distributorships Offered
    Experienced Staff
    Form A
    Guarantee/Warranty
    International Approvals
    Military Specifications
    Packaging
    Price
    Prompt Delivery
    Quality Approvals
    Reputation
    Service
    Small Orders Accepted

So, having a country of origin is a primary competitive advantage.
It also claims to be mil spec, allow me to doubt

For crying out loud, it's already been established that it's a mute button. Don't you read earlier posts?

We all knew that the British upper class are more or less gay, and that they like to play strangulation sex with boys of various ages, oranges are often mentioned in that context as well.
That's kicking in open doors.

Hehe.

Interestingly, it turns out that the USA adopted the metric system already back in 1866, they just never implemented it fully in the states and territories.
Quote from wikipedia below.

"Although the constitution gave the authority to dictate standards of measure to Congress, it was not until 1832 that the customary system of units was formalized.[4] In the early 19th century, the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey (the government's surveying and map-making agency) used meter and kilogram standards brought from France. In 1866, Congress authorized the use of the metric system[5] and supplied each state with a set of standard metric weights and measures. In 1875, the United States solidified its commitment to the development of the internationally recognized metric system by becoming one of the original seventeen signatory nations to the Metre Convention or the Treaty of the Metre. The signing of this international agreement concluded five years of meetings in which the metric system was reformulated, refining the accuracy of its standards. The Metre Convention established the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (Bureau international des poids et mesures, BIPM) in Sèvres, France, to provide standards of measurement for worldwide use.

Under the Mendenhall Order in 1893, metric standards, developed through international cooperation under the auspices of BIPM, were adopted as the fundamental standards for length and mass in the United States. The U.S. customary units such as the foot and pound have been defined in relation to metric units ever since.

The 1895 Constitution of Utah, in Article X, Section 11, originally mandated that: "The Metric System shall be taught in the public schools of the State." This section was, however, later repealed.[6]"

As to links about government agencies, here you go:
http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/metric/metric-policy.cfm
http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/metric/metric-program.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States

As I understand it the federal government of the USA have already adopted the metric system, doesn't all government agencies use it? I know for sure that the military does.

Besides, if all the other countries on earth could change you would think that the USA would be able to as well. The network effect now works in favor of the metric system.

You are clearly not a student of economics, the price has slowly gone up up since the USD 300 bottom on october 6. this means that there are slightly more buyers than sellers (you know, supply and demand sets the price, something you would have known had you studied basic economics). Who sells and who buys is irrelevant. If it actually is some of the big holders that are selling to more ordinary users/investors then I personally see that as a good thing.

Besides, the world is not increasingly hostile, it's in fact the very opposite. We have never lived in a more peaceful time, ever.

http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_on_the_myth_of_violence

http://www.npr.org/2011/12/07/143285836/war-and-violence-on-the-decline-in-modern-times

And that's why the counts in the old days had their own small armies.
But you have to remember that bitcoin is the capital. It may become more valuable in the near future, but at some point that increase in value will stagnate, and if you use your bitcoins for buying goods that doesn't generate income you will eventually run out of bitcoins. Land generates income, so does rent on money lent.

I own a little piece of land, and it is nice, I don't have to pay someone else to live, the small cottage and the patch of land that comes with it is mine, and that makes my cost of living a lot smaller.
Next to me is a castle, in it resides the local (rich) count, and he owns a heluvalot more land than I ever will. And so has his house for generations and generations. And they most likely will for generations to come. So, yes, land still matters. There are other ways to become and stay rich, but land is always a sure thing.
And banking, the Jews were, historically, usually banned from owning land in European and other countries, that made them go in to money lending, and that too turned out to be a sure thing. As the Yiddish proverb says "Interest on debt grows without rain".

Yes there actually is a castle with a real live count in it. Skabersjö castle has been owned by the house of Thott since 1600.

http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skabersj%C3%B6_slott

The house of Thott http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tott

Nakamotostein?

"What is causing the slump is people are dollar cost averaging out, everyone is saying the transactions are up, that's because everyone is selling. Those are transactions."



For every seller there is a buyer, you might as well say that everyone is buying.

Absolutely, There was a core of seriousness in my statement about the Jews, they do know their way around money.

And also, the jews say it's inevitable, And when is a Jew ever wrong about money?

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-inevitable-say-israeli-politicians-central-bankers/

An example of how more and more people are using bitcoin.

As long as the number of new wallets on blockchain keeps going up in a steady pace I'm not worried.
The number of transactions seem to be in a steady but slow rise as well.
It's when curves like these start going down that we should be worried for real.

https://blockchain.info/en/charts/my-wallet-n-users

https://blockchain.info/en/charts/n-transactions-excluding-popular

I don't think the demand is dwindling, it's the supply that out paces the rising demand for the moment. But that will change.

A gentleman never runs.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArD8rjI3DD1WdFIzNDFMeEhVSzhwcEVXZDVzdVpGU2c#gid=1

I wouldn't exactly call it a stagnation.