Yeah, yeah, OPSEC. Don't care.
Okay. That image is the biggest you have? I'll do my best. Yes unfortunately, unless you want the whole crest. |
|
|
|
Mr xhomerx pretty please, may I have a cool hat like all the other cool dudes? Preferably with my family crest.
I had previously searched for your Crest to no avail. I've been trying to make hats for all. Yeah, it's not on the net, only in my computer, and I think there might be a copy in my photobucket, I'll check. |
|
|
|
|
Mr xhomerx pretty please, may I have a cool hat like all the other cool dudes? Preferably with my family crest.
|
|
|
|
LOL, where can I get one?
Manhattan? Are you saying they aren't available in Europe? |
|
|
|
|
LOL, where can I get one?
|
|
|
|
|
I first came in contact with bitcoin in 2011 on a blog called "Cornucopia". He totally dismissed the whole idea, and I foolishly trusted him. The next time I heard of bitcoin was in 2013 on the same blog, and then I kind of went "wait a minute, I thought that thing died back in 2011". So now I started to actually look into it and form my own opinion, after about a week of intense studies on the Internet I came to the conclusion that this is going to be big, so I downloaded the qt wallet and did my first buy, it was followed by many more in 2013 and 2014. Since 2104 I have basically been hodling except for some minor buys. Buying and selling has been easy from the start using BTCX.se They aren't cheap but I'm willing to pay for a smooth and hassle free transaction.
And I ask again, what's the deal with the hats?
EDIT: I did sell some in February to pay of debts and retire.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everybody
Sorry for not visiting lately, hope you all have been good. I had some log in problems, but I finaly got around to fixing it.
So, what's new? What's the deal with the hats?
And as I'm not working anymore I'm bored and have time on my hands and would love to read some good classic scifi.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Preferably something in the style of Asimov, you know, foundation like.
Are there any authors out there that has made any good Foundation or robot sequels?
And also, my earlier prediction of 80 000 USD at years end is hereby revoked.
|
|
|
|
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first. We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying. Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes. But now we also have 2 million immigrants. |
|
|
|
Nonsense. The climate is always changing. The assertion that humans are the main driving force behind it, however, that is bullshit.
+1 on that Exactly. Just because 98% of the worlds scientific community agrees on it doesn’t make it true. Science is just made up numbers. They even admit to having imaginary numbers, which just proves they are making it up. It’s time to fight back. We can start with that Galileo guy. Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong? In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not. And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong. |
|
|
|
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first. We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8 |
|
|
|
Vitalik Buterin should get Noble price for founding most widely used Etherum and changing the world in many aspects
I for one agree that Vitalik should fetch a noble price As long as it isn't a Nobel price I'm ok with it. |
|
|
|
Is this a weekend dump? Where’s the bottom?
It's up some four percent on the three day chart right now, not exactly a dump. |
|
|
|
Go look at btc dominance and tell me more about a limited supply.
I don't understand the question. BTC dominance have nothing at all to do with the price. The relevance is, if someone wants to use crypto they are not forced to use bitcoin, and altcoins absorb market cap that bitcoin could have had, lowering bitcoin's price in the long run and also removing arguments about scarcity because crypto is anything but scarce now. That's like saying that the price of a Rolex will tank if there are too many other watch brands on the market. The price of a Rolex has nothing to do with the price or volume of a Timex. Rolex watches bitcoins are collectors items (not utility) and timex watches shitcoins are used for telling time nothing really. Rolex bitcoin and timex shitcoins are not in any competition or similarity at all. The total market cap of all rolex watches bitcoin is less than $1B a figure I don't know and money supply is not a limiting factor. Rolex bitcoin and timex shitcoins are not competing to be the entire money supply. This analogy makes no total sense. |
|
|
|
Go look at btc dominance and tell me more about a limited supply.
I don't understand the question. BTC dominance have nothing at all to do with the price. The relevance is, if someone wants to use crypto they are not forced to use bitcoin, and altcoins absorb market cap that bitcoin could have had, lowering bitcoin's price in the long run and also removing arguments about scarcity because crypto is anything but scarce now. That's like saying that the price of a Rolex will tank if there are too many other watch brands on the market. The price of a Rolex has nothing to do with the price or volume of a Timex. |
|
|
|
Go look at btc dominance and tell me more about a limited supply.
Show me a coin other than BTC, ETH or XMR that deserves to have a value above zero. Kittehcoin, because kitties are soo cute. |
|
|
|
Well I for one do believe that we will see USD 1M within five years.
And I still believe we will se USD 80k end of year.
Thanks for answering. C'on people don't be shy and express your feelings about it. 10 years is too soon. $1 million in 12 years - after 3 halvenings. based on s curve and wave adoptions mathematically the next wave is 2013 $100 2014 $1000 2017 $10000 2018 $100000 2021 $1000000 2022 $10000000 I imagine anywhere from now and onwards BTC could simply be replaced or saturated with other markets resulting in a cap somehwere That's pretty much what I believe as well. |
|
|
|
Go look at btc dominance and tell me more about a limited supply.
I don't understand the question. BTC dominance have nothing at all to do with the price. |
|
|
|
Well I for one do believe that we will see USD 1M within five years.
And I still believe we will se USD 80k end of year.
Thanks for answering. C'on people don't be shy and express your feelings about it. 10 years is too soon. $1 million in 12 years - after 3 halvenings. We have the the network effect which leads to s-curve adoption AND a perfect inelastic supply, which in itself gives a very rapid price rise when demand increases. These two factors together leads to a never before seen price increase. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
