|
801
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested
|
on: January 17, 2015, 12:43:17 AM
|
I use Bitcoinmonitor.net for WeeklyPonzi and 24HourPonzi. Their IPN service is currently down. I have contacted them to fix it. I don't have an ETA. Neither WeeklyPonzi nor 24HourPonzi will work until that is sorted.
STOP DEPOSITING WHILE THE IPN IS DOWN.
Transfers those 24hours to weekly  or refund and restart round after few hours for 24hours 24HourPonzi will launch at the same time tomorrow. All those deposits made will be added to the start of 24HourPonzi tomorrow. BitcoinMonitor.net has caused this problem. Those people shouldn't be first in line because site was down and im pretty sure most of those deposits were scripted by people you should just restart it completely tomorrow agreed, that would be best. A full refund and a full re- start .. Actually that does make sense. Just refunding each transaction would be the fairest thing to do. They were below the minimum, the tx fee is more than the fuzz sent. |
|
|
|
|
802
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested
|
on: January 16, 2015, 11:32:56 PM
|
Yeah I have been noticing a number of transactions being paid without deposits coming in.
I just received a payout from a deposit that was about 20+ BTC down the line. There are now about 10 other paid orders above me.
Got to hand it to the dev. Im sure that not many of the Multipayed people returned there coins, at least some of this has to be coming from his own pocket.
Only one person did and that was pushed out earlier, this came from the OPs wallet.. |
|
|
|
|
804
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested
|
on: January 16, 2015, 09:26:20 PM
|
can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi I will pay .01 500 word easy money.
I have been unbiased about it but a few think I am licking his ass because he has been honest in regards to how this has been run. He has had issues with his script though that caused some massive problems. He is trying to get people to return their funds that were over paid. It is unknown if he will cover the remaining amount to true it up. I doubt he will which will be a strike against him in my book. However he only started asking for money back from those users a few hours ago so it is too early to say. The user above has been harassing him on twitter and bashing him on here but has not given him time to actually get things fixed. Granted some of the OP’s twitter sure shows he will not be paying anything out of his Fee income to balance the game where it should be. He might be waiting to give people that have extra funds time to send them back so he has to eat less of the costs. I do not know but I do know the OP had the chance to run with 100 BTC when things went downhill last night and he did not. How many ponzi operators would do that? His game last week went the way it was planned. It had a few issues with his API/Script but he fixed those. This OP has taken the time to fix numerous things when most operators would cut and run when things get tough. You spent your time trying to justify and say that OP was legit and that he didn't take the money, etc. But I'm sorry, the fact is that OP has lost about 62 btc which is roughly 13000$. I'm reacting like that because I talk to him on Twitter and he said a lot of BS about blokchain API and then he said: I'm not prepared to throw away all my profit I've made. He is absolutely not ready to fix things and that's why I think he doesn't deserve our trust. What happened is his fault and I don't understand people trying to defend him. The only reason is to lure people to invest more in the ponzi to get money back. Again, as I said multiple times, I have 4 transactions unpaid and I would like too that other people invest to get my money back. But I'm not going to lure them intentionally by minimizing the loss of 62 btc. For the part where I say that OP could have done some investments himself and paid them double, I don't have any evidence. I'm just saying that we don't know what happened and OP doesn't want to fix it, so it could be a possibility. Some people said they were paid double but it doesn't add up to 62 btc. I agree he lost a lot of money. I was defending him from the people saying he took the money. With that said I have not followed everything you guys have been talking about on twitter. And you are correct we do not know if he was some of the double pay. I do thing if he wants to regain trust he needs to cover lost amount. However we know he is sleeping know based on his post history from last week. He had just started asking people for money back that were over paid right before he went to bed so I am hoping he will fix this issue when he wakes up and there has been time for people to repay. I didn’t see the tweet about him not willing to repay with his profit. I can see why you are upset then. And if he doesn’t I will be standing next to you. I just want him to have time to fix this. And for the people saying all of the 60 btc double pay was on purpose and it was just to him was wrong because people have confirmed it was not. Just nobody really cares to pay back the ill-gotten gains. I really do not want to be protecting the OP here. However he in the past has fixed issues so I am giving him the benefit of the doubt he will fix them again. Yeah I understand what you mean. I don't really think he has done any of the double paid transactions, but since he is not willing to use even a little bit of his fee to relaunch the ponzi, I thought about it. I spoke to him by private messages on Twitter, that's why you didn't saw it. Well I hope he changes his mind when he wakes up and sees how things have slowed down. How can he expect users that were overpaid to send money back if he is not willing to pay for his mistake. Of course it goes both ways. How can users that were over paid expect him to take the lose when all they are doing is scaming other users. But if he wants this long term he has to run it like a business and do what is best for his image. The games will die off if he doesnt fix it. I think they will explode if he does fix it with his money. What image? He's some random dude from eastern Europe that played your dumbass for easy Bitcoin. He can disappear with all the coin then start up another ponzi. All the people hoping this guy will come back are delusional If he held the coin then yes, but it's been paid out so outside of his fees, which he keeps anyway, he doesn't have any coin to run with.. Of course if conspiracy theorists want to weave tails there is no stopping that.. |
|
|
|
|
805
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested
|
on: January 16, 2015, 09:20:13 PM
|
Has any gone and checked alll the address they all are attached too? maybe 10,000 sitting in many different wallets. starts with the 1fee address. every one have a look if there was a mistake from OP he has enough to cover everyones btc in order to continue his service
I'm assuming 58.85 BTC sitting in 8 wallets. Just did a quick look over the BTCs sent over the blockchain so could be wrong. From what I see the bitcoins went from the main wallet where everyone sends to 1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4 and then to 1DonatjhWqYZNQYsxR5h1CyrQKxDXWKsUa and then to 16cEeGfsKFEjLLYkoaLpX96JBCPMbA3Ut9 after that it goes to a few different wallets that are holding the money. He doesn't change addresses so you should see the fees from two weeks of the game plus some BTC that was previously there.. The fees are hovering about 50BTC based on the deposits.... Not sure what the OP is up to or what his plans are to address the shortfall, but he could if he choose to, only one player returned the overage thus far and I would guess in the end that may be it since there are not too many stand up people that play these... |
|
|
|
|
806
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: PonziCrypto.com | 130% Return | 100% Automated | Secure
|
on: January 16, 2015, 01:22:02 PM
|
Round 1 was ended because nobody wants make new deposit to it. There wasn't any deposit in last 20-hours. There was no reason for waiting 11-days. Last investors were unlucky.
Round 2 was launched. You can send BTC and get %130 back when the bank can cover your payout. It is %100 automated.
Good luck.
no good luck needed here, stop scamming people ! That is ponzi. Somebody wins and somebody lose. Round 1 was ended because nobody wants make new deposit to it. There wasn't any deposit in last 20-hours. There was no reason for waiting 11-days. Last investors were unlucky. We didn't steal any money from anybody. When money was deposited, we paid it first investors. It is %100 automated and first investors win always. Unilaterally changing the rules is the thing that will erode confidence, if people were paying in or not this reinforces the point that they should not. I did not because you previously made it clear you "might" decide to break your own commitments, this shows you will in fact do that. |
|
|
|
|
808
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Bitcoin30.net - Make 30% on your deposit quick - A bitcoin ponzi game.
|
on: January 16, 2015, 05:39:46 AM
|
Just started? Then why is the timestamp yesterdays?
Included In Blocks 339103 ( 2015-01-15 20
Received Time 2015-01-15
Thats "just started" in my book. I plan on running it for a while. There currently isnt much of a line. So you advertised it for the first time that I can tell about 15 minutes ago, yet already have things built up a bit, suspect from some of your own addresses? Or can you point to earlier announcements (say yesterday)? |
|
|
|
|
810
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested
|
on: January 16, 2015, 12:24:57 AM
|
Bye-Bye! Bitcoin
Unlikely he would run away considering he takes a cut. As he can do week 3-4-5-6 etc. Basically if the OP doesn't take a cut then its a guaranteed scam, but actually playing this game out might be more profitable for OP. Well he could because he is sitting on 94 BTC. But only time will tell. Site down. "Give me 10 minutes. API stopped noting down addresses. Stop depositing until I can solve it. Thanks." Where did you see this? Refresh the website.. |
|
|
|
|
812
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: How does the CoinTerra IV PSU work and can I put in my own PSU if it fails?
|
on: January 15, 2015, 12:47:11 PM
|
I'm thinking about getting a cointerra IV but I dont know if I can put in my own ATX psu incase their one breaks (as I have been told they tend to)
The PSUs are replaceable but you need to replace them with the same type, it is not an ATX PSU.. You can find spares on ebay from time to time and I suspect if you needed one you could get one from the forum as well.. With all of that said the Cointerra is quite dated so unless you bought one for peanuts (literally I mean tens of dollars) and had very cheap power it would not be as economical as a current generation system (SP20, S5, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
815
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: PonziCrypto.com | 130% Return | 100% Automated | Secure
|
on: January 14, 2015, 05:02:51 AM
|
Website was up for a bit and went down again. I think OP is just tweaking the script. The payments are flowing really fast on blockchain!
"this transaction spends an input which is unconfirmed" warning is normal? This is what happens when spending funds not yet confirmed, in short it is generally recommended to spend only BTC that is confirmed, for example even some BTC clients keep the BTC pending until 1 confirmation.. it may result in a double spend although not very likely with the volume... The downside is block solve time drives the site and can dry things up quick.. |
|
|
|
|
818
|
Economy / Auctions / Re: Auction for three coin set 2013 Silver Casascius MS-67 grade
|
on: January 14, 2015, 04:36:11 AM
|
nubbins your like the only person in the world who cares about the chain of custody docs. The singles go for 3.5+ why would I ever consider selling all three for that amount? Add to that the giant dump BTC is in the midst of taking...as a set I wouldn't discuss selling them for under 7BTC so I have to respectfully LOL at your offer.
ig
Sounds like the market has respectfully LOL at you as well.. When BTC is trending down you won't have many people running to pay hefty premiums for coins.. |
|
|
|
|
820
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Cointerra is dead
|
on: January 14, 2015, 03:45:59 AM
|
Personally I think what cointerra did was shady as crap to the C7... The knew they weren't going to pay, and let the DC provide them power for 2 months for free and collect profits.
there's two sides to every story. I'm sure we will hear more about this. There is a high mountain to climb for Cointerra, C7's contract is fairly straightforward and they have been doing this for quite some time.. They did a great job on the buildout for Cointerra and delivered everything, apparently they even went above and beyond per the suit.. Knowing them I wouldn't doubt it as they have a great team at C7.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
