Whats happening, you railroaded the coin that was do perfectly OK, several members had actual real plans, you made out like you did yet did nothing but send it backwards.

You have zero programming skills, added to that zero marketing skills, or support from what you claim as your team.

So why did you even force-ably takeover if you weren't going to do anything to actually revive it? and merely getting some clown to make a new equally crappy client is not reviving a coin.

And being/not being on bittrex should neither make nor break a coin, hell I wanted to take over myself but it was always to be under the the provision that it was delisted from bittrex.

I want to invest to alt coin, what alt coin i should buy?, I never buy or collect alt coin before.

This Poll is for the burning question that MUST be asked.. Should Spoetnik Coin exist ?

Yet again today i had a guy tell me he would invest in Spoetnik coin if it existed on Poloniex's chat box.
I have also had other people bring up this idea a LOT before too.

So i bring you all this poll question..

And if so ? what kind of coin should it be feature wise and HOW should it be initially distributed ?
Also if yes what dev(s) are going to be involved and what famous person should help advertise ?
I think Daniel Tosh from Tosh.0 fame would be perfect.. he can be my Max Keiser LOL
Trade symbol ? NIK ?

We'll have coffee.. we'll talk.. so talk amongst yourselves
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_Talk

Note: No moderation and Poll runs forever and you can change your vote.. thank your all for your time (and your vote)

(even icons)

http://youtu.be/fC9qVrlKXRs

We need more info On ZenCoin.

im going to go on a mission to post in as many threads as possible to try and notify any remaining unclaimers of their stake. i mean literally copy/paste the same notice 100's of times all over btt to get peoples attention.


anyone care to join the effort to hunt down these lost souls? we could take a section each and molest it with notices across all threads its worth a shot i think.

or would this get me banned for spam?
 

Dear community,

I would like to point out the following situation:

Some members who have applied to join the New Economic Movement have lost access to their BTT account.

In a few cases, these same people have made contact with the development team with a second (new) account in order to claim their token.

I have come up with a simple system in which these tokens can be reclaimed by the rightful owner without risking the original owner getting scammed.


System:  


The developers assign two types of priorities to the following accounts:


Priority 1 (highest priority): The original (lost) BTT account.

Priority 2 (lowest priority): The new BTT account.



Then, whenever someone claims to have lost access to an account, the developers would have to carefully inspect the case and hand over a so called "temporary token".

If the original owner claims the token from the original account at a later point in time, the developers would have to remove the "temporary token" from the list and blacklist the person who had claimed a "temporary token".

If the original owner is in fact the same person as the one who claimed the "temporary token", the stake has found it's way back to it's owner.

With this simple system, you can help those who are in a bad situation while preventing any scam.



Feedback is welcome!

Nem Stake distribution is bad ass imo.

for this i have assumed all stakes are redeemed. i have also assumed that the 25% for dev stuff has been split equally 25 ways just for arguments sake adding 25 account to number of accounts and adding 1000 stakes to the 10 - 50 stake range. iv no idea whats happening with those stakes so just stuck em in.

2822 possible nxt account holders excluding dev stakes so we have only lost 188 stake holders out of 3000 initial.. that is amasing..




some stats:

Stakes range      no. of accounts                % of                 Total Stakes     % of Stakes
                                                          all accounts            
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 - 0.4                 193                          6.78%               39.2                1%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 - 0.9                   89                          3.13 %              54.7                1%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0 - 4.9                2519                     88.48%               2668.1             67%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.0 - 9.9                12                          0.42%                 84.7                 2%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.0 - 50.0            34                          1.19%               1153.3               29%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

no compare this with nxt(cant find a pic i can copy): https://nxtblocks.info/#section/blockexplorer_distribution

amount of nxt           no. of accounts   % of accounts     total nxt              % of all nxt

0-10                                  44922       78.89%       59596.00773985              0.01%
10-100                          4010          7.04%       159677.21025917              0.02%
100-1,000                          3286          5.77%       1262328.65081496      0.13%
1,000-10,000                  2510          4.41%       8736397.06823062      0.87%
10,000-100,000                  1530          2.69%       47858828.92765824      4.79%
100,000-1,000,000           549          0.96%       166355838.50015077      16.64%
1,000,000-1,000,000,000   139          0.24%       775547357.6386226      77.55%


tbh.. i think even if there are a good few unclaimed we are still very clear into the safe zone when it comes to distribution.. :)7

this is what distribution looks like with out dev stakes..

Unless the owner of bitcointalk decides to steal all unclaimed coins an year later, and no one will know, as the coins will  be unclaimed.

Yes, time shouldn´t be relevant, concerning owning rights  ! !

Very Sci-fi feel to it.

Charity need not be "just sold" and then NEM is forgotten. Can we not think beyond how charity can be used as a means to an end? For example, we help a charitable organisation to distribute funds to the most remote parts of Africa using the NEM platform and make a case study of it for the world to see how NEM is used. Isn't this a good idea to gain world wide audience? Contribute a few NS and then get 100K readership. Is that a lot of money? A few hundred K people knowing here and there is enough to get the world's attention and use. Writing it off totally gives nothing in return and we haven't move an inch.

Destroying? Why does it make sense? We are only reducing the amount in circulation, thereby pushing the price up, but that will not make NEM great in the long run.

We need to make NEM great so that its price is pushed up on its merit, i.e., the demand for it to be used. Reducing circulation although will increase demand, is artificially created. We need to increase use and not take measures to increase value by destroying.


If we take note of what have been commented so far, everything seems to be yes/no, but I don't see a proper solution and in depth study on what can be done.


In short, every suggestion may have its merit. Don't close the door. Think deeper. If it is not right, make it right by thinking more about it. We need to exhaust every idea and turn them from a no-go to a go by making it work right.

I think I have said enough about thinking out of the box.

I have no clear idea yet on what todo with the unclaimed stake but here are the things I'm utterly against doing.

Charity
If we're gonna do that everyone can donate form their own stake. It makes no sense what so ever to use unclaimed stakes to donate to charity. It wouldn't be very charitable actually since those stakes don't actually belong to us.

More for stakeholders
We want to spread NEM wide and far and not give more to the people that already have NEM.

PoW Giveaway
I didn't even no about this idea prior to reading TaunSews post but yeah...totally fucked up imho. Here we are saying how much greener we are and how were not wasting energery and then we go ahead and do this ?

Giving it to celebs
Srsly ?

Destroying them
Basically same deal as with "more for stakeholders".

Using most of it for development
Are we underfunded ? Hell yes ! I still think this would be a bad idea as it would also not spread NEM further unless we figure out a guaranteed way to sell them to many people.

The goal imho has to be to get more people into NEM not get more NEM to the people that are already here many of whom are only in it for the profit anyway.

How do we register 2 stakes? I entered my token on the website but when I close out of it and open it up, it says I successfully registered my token. I need to register my wife's token now. Any ideas on how to go about doing this? Thanks!