you guys are really unbelievable...

I was redeeming a week ago already and didn't get any message. will you contact me?

I honestly don't think so. There are so many innovations out there, that even BTC will have a hard time to keep its first position.
I do believe, that crypto will overtake fiat to multi trillion dollar market caps, but I don't think that LTC can go along for a long time...
So we probably will see 10 maybe even close to 100 but 600 i find somehow unlikely for LTC...

Depends on the price of btc. If its dropping again, ltc will follow. If it found its support and rise, we can also see 5 or 10$ for LTC this year...

For me this seems like someone knows something, that we don't know yet...

Ridiculous. IF there was a name violation, then it would have been by moneero...
A registered trademark can be rejected easily, if someone else had already a webpage before.

seems like it worked for stellar...
you can still give better alternatives. Maybe going for existing shares like clams?

so you missed the main point, well done ;-)

Features can be programmed into any coin. The biggest problem is, that we don't reach the WORLD. We have to find a way to address everyone.

Heres my idea. I call it POSID (Proof of Stake Identity Distribution). I have it already for a while...
Please pm me at least on your release date, if you implemented this. That's fair ;-)

What is the good thing on bitcoin distribution?
Everyone can still get it "for free", if he mines it. Even now. But its getting less and less.
Early adapters have advantage. Thats good.
Of course they have a little too much advantage in this case, but in general its not bad, because they want to advertise the coin.

What is the bad thing?
Its power consuming.
Now only the people that have money can mine it. The early adapters had a little too much advantage.

How is the POS distribution?
Previous ICO attempts and giving for free attempts fail for only one reason:
They always make the ICO while the coin is still unknown. Later you have to pay more and more, to get it. Early adapters have way too much advantage.

How can we get the best out of all?
Ok. The perfect POS distribution would be, that every person on earth gets exactly 1 stake. But in my eyes thats a little unfair for the early adapters.
Why? Because they took the risk to jump in right away while others waited until its safe.
And: The coin can't get popular, because noone holds enough to say, "Oh, I want this rising! I have to advertise it!".
And people don't jump in because they think: "I can do that later anyway...". We still have to grab everyone on its greed.

So how can we get this more into the bitcoin advantage but not too much?
Simple every person can claim one and only one share for free. The shares stay free and (officially) untradeable.
All available coins (e.g. 36 000 000) are divided by several months (e.g. 36 (too much makes it too less advantage)).
These coins are then sent monthly to all claimed shareholders divided by there number. It can be programmed even in a smart contract.

So in the first month are only less shares claimed (e.g. 100). Then everone early adapter gets more coins (e.g. 10000) plus the later months.
In a later month are alredy more shares claimed (e.g. 10000). Then everone gets less coins (e.g. 100) plus the later months.
And at the end there are many shares claimed (e.g. 1000000). Then everone gets very less but still something (e.g. 1).

This provides a steady and fair growth. To push the price grow you could also put some progression in there, so that the monthly "dividend" is not always the same but getting lower similar to the bitcoin block reward getting less and less.

That sounds nice, but whats the problem?
Yeah, as you guessed, there is indeed a problem with this. It's the oldest problem of crypto.
The UNIQUE person is simply not existing in a decentralized and anonymous environment.
How can we handle this? Honestly I don't know. In my opinion we have to find some consensus, so that the share has to be granted not anonymous, like stellar was starting to do this already.

The following options I have. Tell me, if you have better:
- Facebook.
Fake accounts possible. But Facebook is trying to delete them already. If you say for example, the account has to be not older that 2014, facebook has deleted already most socks and you have potential of some billion users. Of course there are still socks, but a few could be ok. The biggest downside I see. If someone does not yet have a facebook account he can't join.

- Telephone numbers. Sending SMS for a share. Mobile phone numbers are unique. But everyone could have more (or many) phone cards. Still we will have socks. But they may be ok, as everyone can have a few mobile phones but too many are too expensive... So everyone has a reasonable amount of socks...
A problem is maybe the fakeable number, so that you have to provide a service, that sends a secret to a given number and then use this secret to grant a share.

- banking accounts
This is very far away from anonymity but the amount of banking accounts is for sure more restricted than SIM cards. The bad thing is, that in some countries people don't have the possibility to have even one banking account. Some kind of unfair.

- Government IDs
Far away from anonymity this would be still the best option of course. There were attempts like this already from some country-based coins like auroracoin. The biggest problem in my eyes is, that you have to proof every share in person. As long as there is no unfakeable personal GUID, this won't work.

I personally tend to the telephone numbers. What do you think?

Maybe someone wants to help developing it?
Here we come to another problem. A coin will not be developed, if developers don't hold a large amount of it. Even if they are early adapters, that will be problematic, because its not that much. Developing is expensive...
Maybe we can safe a few percent for them.

I am just curious. How much did you pay him for twittering that?

Why

people are not patient???.

Wrong. For example I was reading this kind of thread last year in march and they mentioned DRK the most. I bought a few, but I am sorry, that it was not more...
Of course it makes sence, the most mentionend is something most people believe in.
Of course you can fake that with a lot of socks, but in general its a good indicator...

Here is the list with the (imho) greatest potential of raising:
 
1. NXT - The most accepted 2.0 coin with that low marketcap? Here was already a LOT of selloff. I expect 10x-20x on the next btc bubble
2. Ethereum - maybe on release a little selloff but then I think we can see here 10x easy
3. Bitshares - here was a selloff. I expect 5x on the nxt btc bubble
4. NEM - a very nice project and probably due for a big raise on the next major release. I would like to put it higher, but as it is very low ranked yet, there are some risks. can easily go 100x but can also die if people don't believe in it...
5. Stellar - a very wide spreaded coin that has still a low market cap. I guess it will skyrocket soon. But here is also a chance for fail...

Also good potential: Crypti, Dash, Ripple, BTCD, Clams

and a comment to monero/BCN:
here could be also a good potential. Problematic is the "I was first" (but secret and that means like premining) mentality of BCN against the open Monero community.
I personally don't like pow anyway, thats why I have not much of both. Just for the case...

Dev is probably on his new yacht for a certain time. But he will come back, if most of his money is spent.
Then he can buy back all coins very cheep and can get rich again while developing further, because you were not holding them ;-)

Sorry, but I don't get it. How do you want to "decrease" the amount? If I buy 50% I'll have it until the end of the world.
And even if so. See following example:
Lets assume there are only 100 of a coin, that are worth for example 100 $. And somehow you manage to remove 1 coin out of that pool, so that you have your 1% decrease. All coins may raise this 1% in price to 1.01$ but the marketcap will still be 100 $ and for sure not exceed the one of bitcoin.
I guess you have to rethink about your idea.

whats your point fudder? The app (android and ios) is out and its working... improvements on the way.

Would you please stop childish accusations and spreading bad karma (I mean the real one)?
The main reason for the 3 million deposit is clear. It's against botnets. And there are probably more reasons...
And can't you be patient? If the coins program will work out, we are discussing about literally nothing.

BTW: deleting work, because of not granting any more is ridiculous. Are we in the kindergarden?

that doesn't sound liberal at all...
For gods sake please don't make a new one, if there is no invention. There are already more than 500 out there. Crypto can't succeed, if we don't find a consensus, in what we use.
There will be more currencies, but more than 20 or 30 (maybe 50) is ridiculous.

Please choose one of the already existing currencies.

My choice would be one of those:
Bitcoin (oldest and most spreaded coin)
Dash (old and most spreaded anonymous coin)
NXT (oldest 2nd gen coin base)
Bitshares (old and enhanced 2nd gen coin base)
NEM  (newer but more enhanced 2nd gen coin base)

For a fully decentralized app you need to store every sensitive data in the blockchain. At the moment the shortest block-times are at 10 seconds. For every writing operation you will need to put it in the blockchain. And thats very slow...
It simply doesn't work yet, if you want to run really heavy applications... that will take its time...

I guess even ethereum will allow only a marginal use if its finally out.
We are still in the beginning. It will be like a 14.4 Modem downloading a movie, if you want to run too complex things on it.