Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 06:08:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 361 »
181  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 28, 2014, 07:29:42 AM
the reasons for the Bible are basically, in simplistic form:

1. Salvation of souls for the afterlife;
2. Directions and instructions for living a better life here.

Regarding #2 above: The Bible gives instructions for living a good life here. It is filled with many examples of how God favors people who follow the instructions. It gives many examples of how God is against those people who don't follow the instructions, even though He patiently puts up with them, often for a long time. In addition, it shows how difficult it is to live a life that follows the instructions entirely.

Can you give us some examples of those directions and instructions for living a better life in the bible?

Yes, I can. Well, I think I can. Not knowing the future, maybe if I truly tried, I would find that I couldn't.

Smiley

So... What are they?

There's the Ten Commandments for starters. They are first written in the book of Exodus, in the O.T. Following them are other rules that make a lot of sense where they apply to us in life.

Smiley

Of the ten, only five, half, are actually good for late bing a better let me: don't murder, don't commit adultery, don't steal, don't bear false witness against your neighbor, and don't covet. The one about honoring your mother and father are dubious, since people should be honored for what they do, not what they are (what if your father is a violent alcoholic, and your parents generally neglect you?)

What about things like don't rape, don't force people into slavery, don't commit fraud or lie, don't hit people, don't destroy other's property, or even just help others who need it if you're able? Seems like a lot of waste using up the first 4 of those commandments for just vain stuff.
182  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who's brave enough to invest their life savings into Bitcoin? on: December 28, 2014, 07:13:56 AM
The risk was very high and it looked likely that Bitcoin will fail soon.

Those who were really lucky were those paid in bitcoins or mined bitcoins very early on then forgot about their bitcoins

Or those who understood the technology behind it, believed that there are no other serious options to replace it, and thought there was very little chance that it will fail, and a bug chance that it will take off and replace much of the financial system. There are quite a few of us who thought the concept of "cashing out" of bitcoin made as much sense as "cashing out" of dollars.

By the way, how many people have 100% of their savings invested in dollars, or euros?
183  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: December 28, 2014, 06:54:08 AM
I like this comment here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjGSXKSLpfY from Vanilla Face

" These so called "academics" are simply pathetic. Even if they had overunity device before their eyes, running for 1 year non-stop without a battery, they would take it apart, find nothing inside and then say "I don't see any proof of overunity. My physics textbook says it's impossible". What a bunch of ridiculous, useless people. "

ha ha ha !!

And yet, there has not been a single case of an over unity device running for a year. Or even a few months. Hmmm...
184  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 06:40:35 AM
]http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/Obama_Putin_Differences.jpg

haha, this is hilarious!

I admit, that was pretty funny. But, you know what's cool? We get Obama, or anyone else, for 4 to 8 years tops. How long have you guys been stuck with Putin, and for how much longer?
185  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 06:24:05 AM

Well THAT'S obviously outdated. The new uniforms are plain green, with balaklavas, and no labels.
186  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 06:15:43 AM
Well, it´s a good thing that Russia has a solid anti-nazi record.

They need to make that record a little bit more solid

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism#Russia

Quote
In a country that lost more people defeating the Nazis than any other country, there are now an estimated 50,000 to 70,000 neo-Nazis, half of the world's total.

Sounds like Russia is using the same old tactic of trying to distract by pointing at someone else's problems. Besides, what do Ukrainian Nazis have to do with anything? This is a thread about Russia!
187  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 06:05:07 AM

Yes, it is. Formally, it is another state, but it is the same nation. No difference.

Oh. Well in that case this thread should be renamed Pictures from Mongolia.
188  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 06:04:16 AM
LOL is right. They are the world's biggest bully. The corporate military industrial complex is all that keeps the US economy afloat, albeit smoke and mirrors.

How much of that US military industrial complex is in Russia right now? Or how about in Ukraine? None? Well, how much of Russia's military industrial complex is in Ukraine?

This is so typical of Russian bullshit and propaganda. They do things, then accuse someone else of doing that same things, both to distract others from what they are doing, and to excuse their behavior. If I murder you, that doesn't make it ok just because someone else committed murder too.
189  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pictures from Russia. NSFW!!! on: December 28, 2014, 05:56:27 AM
No this 'whole thing' was started by the USA by causing an overthrow of an elected government and replacing it with a neo-nazi front, all because Ukraine refused to join the EU. That is the reality of the situation and is verifiable.

Please. Verify it. Show me where those billions that America supposedly spent on protesters went, since America has barely even agreed to give just $53 million for "non-lethal" support.  Show me all the Nazis that are in charge of the government, or how Poroshenko is controlled by them. Point to me where people of Crimea were demanding support from Russia, instead of wondering who the hell are all these green men that blocked their airports and borders, and prevented them from leaving.
190  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 28, 2014, 02:56:17 AM
the reasons for the Bible are basically, in simplistic form:

1. Salvation of souls for the afterlife;
2. Directions and instructions for living a better life here.

Regarding #2 above: The Bible gives instructions for living a good life here. It is filled with many examples of how God favors people who follow the instructions. It gives many examples of how God is against those people who don't follow the instructions, even though He patiently puts up with them, often for a long time. In addition, it shows how difficult it is to live a life that follows the instructions entirely.

Can you give us some examples of those directions and instructions for living a better life in the bible?

Yes, I can. Well, I think I can. Not knowing the future, maybe if I truly tried, I would find that I couldn't.

Smiley

So... What are they?
191  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 28, 2014, 02:54:15 AM
You guys will all figure this out for yourselves Smiley

Pretty sure you're being overconfident with some of these guys.
192  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: The Great Bitfie Giveaway: 1 lucky winner WILL win entire wallet. Seeded w/$100. on: December 28, 2014, 02:47:43 AM
OK, looking back through the thread, I believe I know how to claim my prize now!! Please can the prize be sent to
1G6XYjh4gdDPKVtmfHYVg7jNJkQzzM9GHP
my old blockchain wallet where I sent the bitcoins from is no longer in use, and can't access it as it seems to be locked to my old IP address!

Boom! Transaction sent! https://blockchain.info/tx/ac9237722106bd17632b4105b043c9b1efd546f1154a8658fd2f627518279542

Now everybody be impressed with me that I held a WHOLE $60 for a year and didn't run off to Mexico with it  Grin

Think of all the things you could've done with it!

Hmm. $60, gas is $2.50 a gallon, my Prius gets 55mpg on average, 60 ÷ 2.5 * 55 = 1,320 miles. I can drive half way from Washington DC to Mexico.
193  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why Do People Believe Bitcoin Will Replace Fiat? on: December 28, 2014, 02:36:23 AM
Cause it's better, simpler and you control your funds! No one can touch your money!

This is pretty much in a nutshell one of the primary reasons governments won't allow Bitcoin to replace fiat...even if adoption reaches a grand scale.

Isn't governments us?


Regarding bitcoin replacing fiat, this should be required reading for new bitcoiners http://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/speculative-attack/
194  Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: Mycelium Bitcoin Wallet on: December 28, 2014, 02:34:49 AM
What was the main reason for going away from "one address" to the system where you get a new receiving addy for each transaction?

Privacy is a big one. Reusing an address exposes that address, and any others you spend together with it later. It also helps others, since as a receiver of a payment your address is identifiable if change goes to the sender's address, but is private of both your addresses are new.

Security, with no public keys exposed, as already mentioned.

Much easier for users to secure and back up funds. Note that ALL your addresses and HD accounts are backed up using a single 12 words backup. You no longer have to back up every key individually, and make new backups for every new address you make.
195  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 25, 2014, 11:01:23 PM
the reasons for the Bible are basically, in simplistic form:

1. Salvation of souls for the afterlife;
2. Directions and instructions for living a better life here.

Regarding #2 above: The Bible gives instructions for living a good life here. It is filled with many examples of how God favors people who follow the instructions. It gives many examples of how God is against those people who don't follow the instructions, even though He patiently puts up with them, often for a long time. In addition, it shows how difficult it is to live a life that follows the instructions entirely.

Can you give us some examples of those directions and instructions for living a better life in the bible?
196  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: December 24, 2014, 07:49:20 AM
Making a prototype would take much time and money. 1000$ would be if you already know what to do.

But all these guts are already claiming they know what to do. They have prototypes that they claim create free energy. So why did you bring up?

And the guy from Utah already has funding. He is building a prototype in Canada for an Oil company. He received millions, but needs billions to create a market applicable machine.

It costs $5,000 at most to patent it, at which point you can explain it publicly and not sorry about it being stolen. It probably costs much less than millions to create a small scale working model that you can use to prove it works, and let others test with. Why is money always an excuse with these guys, even if they have millions?

Physics is not simple you know. It's delicate.

I know. I have an engineering background as well, in electromechanical engineering, dealing in linear motors and magnetic levitation. I also own patents and have been through the process of getting them, and have had to design and build my own models. I'm calling bullshit on all these things because I know how this stuff works.

Also dangerous he works with pressures of up to 100G. That's why you can't do it in your home. You need a lab and team of scientists to do that successfully.

What does danger have to do with proving whether it works? And what do you mean by 100G? The only way to get that kind of force is through centripetal motion, like on a spinning fly wheel. 100G is also not that dangerous if you use light materials or small scale. As for the lab, if he needs a lab and scientists to make this device to test it, then how does he even know it works? The only way would be to have some mathematical modeling engineering calculations. Should be easy to check and verify those.

That's how the MAGLEV patent I own is. Due to physics limitation, I can't build it too small scale, and the smallest scale possible would cost $170k, which is money I don't have. BUT, every piece of the invention is precisely mathematically calculated, using standard physics formulas, to every tiny detail, and can be checked and verified completely as a math model. Which it has been. You can calculate all the levitation forces, and prove that it works, without actually building it. That's how true engineers design stuff. Not this garage tinkering, hoping to accidentally guess something that will work without knowing how or why.

Stop arguing just for the sake of arguing.

I'm arguing for the sake of pointing out that these guys are liars and charlatans at worst, and complete idiots at best. Sadly, the vast majority of them are lying scumbags.

He said that it needs power to start. But a part of the produced power would go for powering the unit. That's the tricky part. How to conserve the produced power while unit is off.

My question, if you remember, is why does it need to be off? Let it use the extra energy it produces to power itself, and never turn it off. Problem of conserving produced power solved. But not a single one of these drives has ever been able to power itself indefinitely. Why don't you find that suspicious?


Of course he will not reveal his full idea on youtube. Someone would steal it. Oldest trick in human character.

Also, oldest trick for these liars. Spend $3000 to $5000 to patent it, and no one will steal it. Better yet, give it to the world for free. People will give him a lot of money and praise anyway.

Do you really think that the Universe runs on Oil and electricity, and that there is no free energy running it?

The universe runs on fusion, and there is no free energy in it. Stars enevtually fuse all the fuel they can, and die off. Planets and other orbiting things eventually slow down from friction, and fall into the star, assuming the star doesn't burn out and explode first. Everything in the universe is using up energy, not creating it.

Its obvious that the Universe does not need an engine to run for billions of years. It's just that our tiny brains are incapable of dealing with it.

Maybe yours is, but mine isn't. As I said, stop pretending that we are all nt smart enough, thus maybe things are true after al. Some of us ARE smart enough to know better. The universe engine that has been running for billions of years is loosing pass and burning up energy. There's a good change it will use all that energy up and stop after many more billion years. Or collapse back in on itself.
197  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: December 23, 2014, 07:33:50 AM
And again, I ask, why don't you make one of those yourself? Why are there dozens, if not hundreds, of these inventions, and not a single guy shares the technical details or instructions for how to build it, and no two people ever seem to build the same type of device?
And before you say "money," we have crowdfjnding and loans. Raise or borrow some money, build one at home, use it to power your neighbors' houses and charge them for electricity, then use that money to pay back investors or bank. Very easy, but no one in the entire world is doing it. Why?

Again - there is lack of funding of these people. First.

Yes there is! Random people on the internet raised $55,000 for some guy to make a potato salad on Kickstarter. I'm sure they would donate way for than that for something as awesome as a solution to the world's energy problem. Yet no one seems to ever be able to raise any money. It's as if they know that they can't prove their invention works to potential investors.

Second - read my previous posts. The romanian guy's invention would cost you 1000$ to build yourself, but he needs a finished demo, to be able to patent it.

Why doesn't he borrow $1,000, build it himself, use it to power his house, and use the money he saves on not paying for electricity to pay for the patent? Even better, hook his neighbor us, and charge him half of what the power company charges. He'll earn enough to pay off the $1,000 loan and pay for a patent in no time.

And why are all these free energy invention guys such greedy assholes? Every single one of them claims they won't share the technology, because they want to patent it first. Did Satoshi patent bitcoin? Did Linus Trovalds patent Linux? Give the give of free energy to the world, and you will be praised and taken care of for ever. Hell, you'll even win a Nobel Prize, and that's a lot of money. It's as if the patent thing is just an excuse all of these guys use for not explaining how their system works, so they don't have to be held accountable or be xaught lying.



Arguing that there is no free energy is stupid. Einstein (a very smart man) said that no energy is lost in the Universe, it only shifts from one form to another.

Yes. The full quote is "Energy can not be created or destroyed." Energy can only shift from one place to another, or be converted into and out of matter. When you run a motor, or use a conventional energy device, you are shifting energy from coal/wind/gravity/sun/nuclear fission into energy that moves your motor or heats something. When you create a "free energy" device, you are not shifting energy, you are creating energy out of nothing.

If we humans knew how to close that cycle any mean for energy generation would be 100% effective.

It doesn't matter how much knowledge we aquire, generation would never be 100% effective. There is always friction to overcome, even if it's from light glowing on the device, or magnetic fields from surroundings and the planet interfering with motion.

However, we are limited as human beings. We think we know everything, and in reality we know squat

Scientists and physicists who actually know about this stuff (and anyone else who is educated enough) know they don't know everything. That's why their actual job is figuring out things they don't know. People who don't know jack shit make claims like "We think we know everything, " and then add, "in reality we don't know anything" to make themselves seem intellectually superior.

If there was no Oil we would be living in the dark ages right now - no electricity, no hot water, no running cars. Don't you think that's pathetic?

Not sure where your going with this, but most electricity in US is generated from coal. Must of it in Europe and Japan is from nuclear. If there was no oil, chances are we'd be driving electric cars, but I doubt we'd be in the dark ages.


I watched an interview with one Kiril Chukanov. He said that he invented a ball lightning electric generator that outputs 10 times more than used electricity, and when turned into the cycle releases to the electric network 3.5 times more electricity than used - so 100kW is turned into 350kW. He also said that the bigger the ball lightning - the larger the output. He said it can be done upto 1,000,000 x and a clear output of 350,000 times more than used - if you input 100kW you would be able to support a whole country, but It will be huge and will cost as much as a Nuclear Power Plant. But it's 100% green and free of fuel payments.

I watched that interview. Note that everything is based on what he says, nothing is explained, and (this is the most important part) he has to plug it in to get it working, and then turns it off. Why not turn it on, plug it into itself, and just let it run indefinitely?

Asmi pointed put a while ago in this thread, why do all overunity machines have to be started up, and then shut down, instead of being allowed to run under their own power for ever?
198  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: December 23, 2014, 02:59:23 AM
OK, at whose expense are you sauntering down the street, and how does this sauntering apply to " possibly enrich themselves at the expense of others"?
Still not the right question. At whose expense were resources just sitting on the shelves during the great depression, there being no purchasing power nor incentive to give those goods away?

This doesn't have anything to do with what I was asking.
You said that all capitalism is, is people trying to enrich themselves at the expense of others. I gave you an example of capitalism: I trade my $40 for your video card. Since capitalism is done at the expense of others, you must point out to me at who's expense this trade was done. Sauntering down the street doesn't have anything to do with any of this. If you claim that it does, explain how, don't ask questions.

OK, then who owns the raw materials, and who owns the bitcoins I control?
"Libertarians" being advocates of private property, isn't that a question for them to answer? Can one own a sequence of bytes?

Ok, I'll answer. I own those bitcoins. Those bitcoins are my property. The raw materials I work to create are my property. Yes, I can own a sequence of bits, or more specifically the secret that lets me control those sequence of bits. I own my thoughts and my ideas, the secret securing my private keys being one of them.
199  Economy / Economics / Re: A Resource Based Economy on: December 23, 2014, 02:52:56 AM
So... For someone who wants to live the life of a monk for example.. if basic life standards are supplied then they have everything they need/want.



Supplied by whom?

Maybe we will create some kind of decentralized basic resource allocation network system, perhaps some rich people wont like it and try to shut it down/control/manipulate and they might have some success but the poor/others will defend it.  Just like how the internet is now.  


Why would rich people not like if, if they don't have to pay for it? Who will be in charge of resource allocation? And where will those resources originate from?

The internet is paid for by capitalist companies and its users. It's not a free resource, and not one provided by the government. It also costs very little, requiring a one time setup (lay cable, install router), instead of continuous hard labor to extract or produce resources.
200  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: December 23, 2014, 02:48:37 AM
There is this guy from romania. He was in the DW news in October. And he made sort of a dynamo ran engine, that used weights. Weights were welded onto metal bars and they were just "free" spinning, based on Earth's magnetic field, creating electrical energy using magnets. Nothing else. And it's an early stage of development.

Here is another invention, that might give you more perspective - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUOnYxRcDHU. A Bulgarian guy that lives in Utah.

There is such thing as free energy. It's what drives universe. And people have nothing to do with it. We just have to learn how to master it.

And again, I ask, why don't you make one of those yourself? Why are there dozens, if not hundreds, of these inventions, and not a single guy shares the technical details or instructions for how to build it, and no two people ever seem to build the same type of device?
And before you say "money," we have crowdfjnding and loans. Raise or borrow some money, build one at home, use it to power your neighbors' houses and charge them for electricity, then use that money to pay back investors or bank. Very easy, but no one in the entire world is doing it. Why?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 361 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!