Hi boss
can you improve benchmark functionality and add a view of actual middle value for actual tested algo.
this is very helpful if user benchmark random algos like x16rv2, x21s, etc
If i want benchmark those algos, i need to run benchmark for 24 hours if i want precise value, but if i see that the counter no more grow, i can stop benchmark and write value in profile.

Regards

Nice! looks like i must download manualy again because auto update on aweso had problem again... whats going on on auto update on awesome?

Hi Patrik,

we have many z11 running - with the newest Firmware (from June 28th) the miner is reporting a 1000 times profit in AM - in the miner status display (WEB) everything seems right?!

BR Ralf

Hi Patrike,

Custom Access Toolbar:

Show miner online = green button
Show miner offline = the same green button

Can you change this? Or can i add my own icons?

Hai i have problem updating version 7.0.7 it always say failed to download update try to download from website... but i see in the awesome website is still 7.0.6 version... so where i can download manualy for updating my awesome???

It's already done, that's what I say for several post, although blake2s is unchecked, the dual is still taken into account attached a screenshot

and in this case, even if another currency becomes more interesting, I remain stuck on the ethereum

hmm, not really understand what your mean with [MinerWorker] variable. Where i can set this variable, in which dialog? Is this some code expression?

thx

if I enter 0h / s in the dual mining, yes I will not use it, but despite the 0h / s and 0watt dual, is taken into account in the calculation of profitability, so my rig no work more on the most profitable currency.

Suggestions:
1) please add a functionality to export/import profit profile data as .csv or exel data sheet.
2) many pools allow setting up a worker name only in password field, please add possibility to add worker name in password field.

Regards

I have no option with profit miner, which allows me not to take into account the dual mining, via phoenix miner, even if I disable blake 2s, if I enter 0h / s and 0w dual on ethereum, I will necessarily work on the ethereum, I had no problem with the previous version, while it is not necessarily the ether the most profitable consumption power

Hi boss
dont understand why i cant benchmark NBMiner ver. 26 with AM (v7.0.7) benchmark tool ?

if i run managed miner with pool parameters, all is ok. But if i start benchmark with benchmark dialog, miner exit with error:

[15:17:03] INFO - ----------------------------------------------
[15:17:03] INFO - |                  NBMiner                   |
[15:17:03] INFO - |              Crypto GPU Miner              |
[15:17:03] INFO - |                    26.0                    |
[15:17:03] INFO - ----------------------------------------------
[15:17:03] INFO - ALGO:       cuckaroo_swap
[15:17:03] INFO - URL:        ethproxy+tcp://europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020
[15:17:03] INFO - USER:       bekman.1080TI:x
[15:17:03] INFO - TEMP-LIMIT: 90C
[15:17:05] INFO - ============= Device Information =============
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9326 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 1: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9326 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 2: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9326 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 3: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9326 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 4: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9326 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - * ID 5: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 9327 MB
[15:17:05] INFO - ==============================================
[15:17:05] INFO - NVML initialized.
[15:17:05] ERROR - Error format URL: ethproxy+tcp://europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020
[15:17:05] ERROR - Accepted URL format in regular expression: ^(stratum|nicehash)\+(tcp|ssl)\://[^\:]+:[0-9]{1,5}$


I see, that the AM benchmark tool delegate wrong pool parameters to the miner, I wonna test SWAP on herominers.com pool, but why i see some other wrong pool in log file?

same problem with other algos if i try to benchmark NBMiner

looks like some database problem with object indexing.

Apologizes, I can see that Claymore miner has this option but Phoenix Miner does not.
Anyway, Phoenix Miner supports only "Blake2s" as dual mining.

You can untick Blake2s algorithm from Algorithms in options.
That should do the trick.

Hi Patrike,

FYI, "Options" -> "Online Services" is still showing "NicehashNew".

Regards,
...jim

Thanks, now with quotes it works 

how do I find out the template id? Is there a way to display the id´s of all templates?

Hi Patrike, today I come to make a suggestion that I know is not going to be easy to do and you may not agree, but I present it to you.

My idea is to create an OC AUTOTUNE. Each brand of card, each motherboard, bios configuration, memory quantity and speed, slower or faster CPU etc ...

Getting the best OC for an AL-go is very difficult, and more so if I have 6 totally different and multi-brand rigs.

My idea starts as an addition to Benchmark. You choose all the cards of the Rig, you choose the currency and therefore the Al-GO, you choose the time, 15 -30 minutes for coins that vary little the hash, and 1 hour for more changing algorithms like x16r.

Here comes the change, a separate addition to AUTO OC. Where I define 6 values
Maximum minimum PL for example 70-90 Always in jumps of 5.
Minimum core maximum for example 30-140 in jumps of 5
Minimum maximum memory for example -500 +600 jumps of 50

This is just an example, they can be other jumps and other numbers to choose by user or leave it pre-defined. Here are 2 variants

Brute Force: test all possible configurations
Scanning. Several different tests are done, about 10 for example, and then just optimize between the 3 central sets, to find the best configuration

If a test fails, it is considered as a failure and the process must continue.

The OC must take into account 3 variants, HASH, SHARED, CONSUMPTION and temperature

The best oc is not the one that has the most hash, but the one that has a good hash with a shared that is not little or much. And avoid exceeding the maximum temperature.

Finally, 3 possible winners are selected, and a minimum test of 30 minutes or 1 hour is done to each one, to check stability and temperature, and then the best of the three that you would give per winner for that rig and AL is chosen -GO.

What I say can take more than 1 day of testing, I keep it in mind, but if I undermine what is more or less profitable, I don't mind mining it fixedly, than doing the AUTO OC.

Because many times you get better results with less consumption (this should only be informative), more hash with less temperature. Less Crash of miners, more stability.

For those who have 10 totally equal rigs, they only have to do it in a rig and extrapolate them to others. For those of us who have varied rigs, it is torture, and I prefer it alone. Obviously it only does it when an al-go or currency is in profit and I take advantage of the Auto OC with the mining of that currency.

I know it sounds complicated, it is. But one of the links that the program has left to be 360 ​​degrees in the GPU mining world.

Getting better hash, or adapting the miners for summer heat with an AUTO OC al-go to al-go at least makes you have one of the best configurations you can have for that rig in question. With multi-brand cards, ones with 8 or 16 gigabytes, the latency configuration in Bios, the chip set, etc. It is impossible that an OC is worth to all

Sometimes I notice that there are cards that work below what they can but others in the same rig are going full. Finding the intermediate point in that OC gives me stability and accuracy. Above all, extract the maximum performance from my equipment. And something that the competition is light years away. And in the end if you plan well it should not be so complicated. We already start from the base that an AUTO OC will take hours or more than a day, I already have it in mind, but it undermines what is in profit that I tell it.


Obviously it is just an outline and surely there are better ways to do it, but without testing it in each configuration it is difficult, maybe I am wrong

Where can i find the template id  

And something is wrong with API. I want to add a rule via api, but it says rule_id is a unknown command  

curl.exe -i -d POST http://192.168.178.10:17790/api/miners/28?action=rule&rule_id=55

or is something wrong in my line?

template_id it is the same - unknown command

I didn´t mean the worker name or so. I mean the internal MinerID from Awesomeminer. Awesomeminer give every miner a ID right? I need this ID and i only find it in the API report.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<StatusUpdate xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <MinerId>28</MinerId>
  <Privileged>false</Privileged>
  <ResponseTime>0</ResponseTime>
  <MinerStatus>

Hello Patrike,

can you add the MinerID to the summary tab or something else to find it better. I only see the MinerID if i generate a API report right?

I need the ID for zilliqa switching. I work with Swaggadan on a new zil switcher version for Awesomeminer.