Yup, this setting sometimes works and doesn't. The template wont apply consistently across all miners. Sometimes toggling the add worker in the template settings fixes it, other time you have to toggle that on the miner itself on and off and then the template works like normal.

Yes it's enabled, but when I click on "map to system monitoring" it just displays the first two GPU's out 6.  That's all it shows.  The previous version listed them all.

Here's another attempt at adding a screenshot (for whatever reason, I can't embed photos):

The latest update messed some GPU monitoring with my Sapphire RX580's. The GPU Name / Clock / Fan / Performance in particular.  Also, the Progress for each individual card isn't working, but maybe that's just the nature of Phoenix Miner?  The hash rates are correct.

A suggestion. When choosing the preferred exchange in the currency, only the exchanges of which there is a price could appear in the list.

For example, if you have only 4 exchanges of a currency, when displaying the list that only the exchanges appear in bold where that currency has a price, and so it would be easier to change from one to another or know if it is only in one or several.

The function is very useful, but right now to know which exchange to use, I have to go to the ANN and investigate what the exchange is in the currency.

You take the data directly from CTM, I think it would not be difficult when you display the list, mark in bold or otherwise the exchanges where that currency is, it would make things much easier.

As always it is a suggestion to make the program more complete and easier to use.

Small bug fix, it seems as though the 'add to worker name' tick box is not inherited sometimes from templates. You have to manually go to the miner and change it. It'll even show up as ticked or unticked regardless of what it's actually doing.

Hello Patrike, I usually suggest new features, today I have a complaint.

The benchmark section has been losing its functions over the months. There are very few Al-Gos that I can benchmark directly. This forces me to create a test pool and select the auto-exchanges and do the manual miner mining test.

Suggestion. If I have all the Autoexchanges activated, but I have them as they do not automatically enter autoprofit unless I choose it. Because the benchmark is not able to use those algos from the auto exchanges? I mean nicehash, zpool, ahaspool, etc ... On Saturday I teach a 3 day course of Awesome miner and it will be tedious to explain to people that the benchmark system is almost useless and that they have to create a pool of test, activate the Auto exchanges and select only one Al-GO and try different miners.

I think the benchmark if it detects that I have activated the auto exchanges, should use those algos. I'm not going to lose money, but I think it would be the logical thing to do, because now the benchmark is almost completely useless, and it's giving me a lot of work to measure the new AL-GOS and find the best miner by hand. This needs to be improved soon, it's my personal opinion.

Thanks in advance.

Sorry I wasn't clear, the miners stop working until I manually start them, the other day I went to sleep and it failed after 1-2 hours, I received the offline email but it didn't wake me up(that's ok). Another day the same thing happened, I didn't see/check my email until noon, miners were idle for around 11 hours until I started them.
I just wanted to know if there was a way to troubleshoot this because it started happening with more than 1 algo/pool/software. It doesn't happen that often but I'd rather it kept mining by itself.

I usually can't remote to the computers very fast so when I remote to them they are just not doing anything, I can confirm the "Interface offline" only for Equihash 150.5+NiceHash+Gminer CUDA Equihash Miner (it happens more often, I'm not 100% sure about the others).

Edit: If I go to right click->view details (even after a few hours) I have several timestamps (as if the mining didn't stop) and when I click the timestamp after the error (i.e. 12 minutes after the error), it shows the message that some pool is being ignored and the button to reset. If I click a more recent timestamp there isn't any ignored pool message.

Hi Patrike.

Ever since I installed the last update AM notifies me that all of my A9 Zmaster's are running at 9999 degrees but the factory GUI is correct. Can I roll back the update somehow?

https://cointomine.today/calculator/coin/FNO/

On its website it already shows the purchase and sale price, and also in several times, current, 1 hour, 3 hours etc ... I do not know if it will still be in the api, so I indicated that contact KArl or see your api directly.

It would be nice to be able to choose the current or 3 hours and sale or purchase price as we do in CC.

My managed profit miners are going "offline" now and then, this seem to happen when pools fail (seen it on nicehash and zpool so far, with bminer, gminer and z-enemy). Even that the miner is flagged as offline, it is still connected to awesome miner manager and I can just start it again. Is there a way to force the miner to not stop/go to the next pool/algo, or any ideas on how should I troubleshoot this?

On options->Profit switching I have this:
Ignore pools with no accepted shares in minutes: checked 6
Ignore minutes: 50
Ignore pools after too many failed miner restart attemps: checked

Thanks

PAtrike I have been talking to KARL from CTM in his discord, I am very active speaking with the developers.

I have convinced you that shortly in your API, include the purchase and sale price, as CC. I hope you can integrate it in AM. Many times CTM gives the value of the last sale, something that is not desirable, and as this has already been done for CC, it will be easy to implement it in CTM. Please talk to CTM's KArl for these new data in the CTM api. IF it's not done yet, you have a few days left.


Really CC updates prices very little, even with large volume coins, does not do the price work well. CC is good in the data of the currencies, but not in the prices. And yet CTM is very good at giving updated prices, but now when we can choose the purchase price as I like it.

It gives the impression that CC is more and more abanadonado. I suggest everyone to put cointomine as the first provider. I can not be seeing the same price of a coin, in the case of GRIN, kept the same price for 4 days in CC, something unaffordable.

it is possible to benchmark 2 of 8 card?
I have 4x1070ti and 4x1060 and i want to benchamrk it.

working fine 2.1.11 final build as well, i added it in awesome miner

Hello
Any plans to add Zilminer for dual mining?

One other thing - I see a lot of other posts about coin values - I don't know if its been brought up but with coincalculators, recently its exchange prices aren't being updated that often - or at least for lower volume coins - but its "average last price" is.  This can cause the current profit estimates to be way off. It would be great if there would be a way to use that value instead of the exchange ones for more accurate mining.

Hal

Hello Patrike. there something that I wanted to comment to see if somehow you could do

Surely you know, I know you know the AM CU of shootaa. He has left it abandoned. It only has small fixes to do, the problem that as the Explorer have been updated, when reading the HTML to extract the data, I mean to parse, it does not get the nethash, but the difficulty.

I do not know to what extent you could rescue, that you talk to Shootaa to see if he gives it up, fix it and offer it as a complement of Awesome miner. The truth is that I miss it and it's a pity to lose that job already done.

Can you please add a Rules- Trigger for Miner power-watts.

Then I can take Action like "Apply GPU clocking profile" to reduce power limit.

Thanks.