|
10% yearly share dilution is on the table!
otherwise things sound reasonable. anyone from china can do some background due diligence on these people?
|
|
|
|
|
i don't know if this has been addressed yet.
it appears that labcoin is focused mostly on sales and talks about the possibility of mining.
can this be elaborated on.
|
|
|
|
Oh my gosh... this is... not... good.
or....true.... |
|
|
|
|
200 btc is a lot for a board seat (not unreasonable though) AM's board seats were at like $6k
|
|
|
|
|
implosion the value goes to -100
|
|
|
|
noooooooooooo... not again
a repost of the same topic AND another newspaper who can't factcheck.
sad.
Are you saying it isn't true? Can you provide a link? (And sorry if it's a repost, I checked here and press section, didn't see anything) have you read the "source". |
|
|
|
|
noooooooooooo... not again
a repost of the same topic AND another newspaper who can't factcheck.
sad.
|
|
|
|
|
where did sam go? he was the front and now he's disappeared?
|
|
|
|
|
why split up 3 different coins for 3 different market segments. one coin COULD be used for all. heh perhaps i'm not getting it
|
|
|
|
My prediction
NEVER
Why do you think that? Would be interested to know your reasoning. Continued deflation of the current bubble down to $30 - $50 range over the next 6 months based solely on the drying up of the hype that generated the bubble. Then a second bubble would not be expected for at least another year minimum, meanwhile the crypto-coin market will be fragmenting into more coins with newer and better features (such as alternative hashes) and this will draw off funds that would in the past have flowed into BTC by default when it was alone in the marketplace. In addition centralization of hashing power in ASICs will weaken demand for BTC as its security becomes weaker due to the easily target-able nature of the ASIC operators (FINCEN will be knocking on their doors asking if they are registered money transmitters), and for the obvious collusion potential that such a small group has. only for pools. non-solo asic operators don't generate bitcoins. it gets sent to them by the pool ops. legally speaking FINCEN guidelines aren't actually correct (and US centric). the protocol pays pool operators who then redistribute to "miners". anyways |
|
|
|
if blitz and others actually made a bet- they would have lost. no wonder noone wanted to put their bitcoins behind their predictions  |
|
|
|
|
where the bears at? they like to moan and groan.
|
|
|
|
|
averaging 2% fluctuation is - no news - back to being boring! nothing is going to happen. we are past the "crashing" phase. now we all just sit and wait for news to be the leading cause of movement
|
|
|
|
It is a very wise saying, and the more direct way of saying it is "Don't take out loans you won't be able to pay if the investment doesn't work out."
I guess if you don't care about your credit rating or about being able to take out loans in the future, then sure, it doesn't really apply to you. If the investment doesn't work out, then just declare bankruptcy and be done with it. But for the vast majority of people, this is a poor fallback plan.
Go all in, just don't go all in with money you don't have (what you can't afford to lose).
bankruptcy yo. |
|
|
|
reserved  |
|
|
|
|
Before this continues..... Does everyone have their tinfoil hat on?
|
|
|
|
|
my bad.... i guess i didn't realize that these were bond like instruments as opposed to actual "shares" of Lab Rat.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
