you guys are awesome, thanks for enabling euro transfers with your service. Any chance you raise those limits for businesses ? And here goes another, the euro wires are sent internationally or from within SEPA zone ? Thanks
We have two stable sources for Euro transfers, so even if one becomes disrupted we can still operate for our merchants. They are not available to all EURO/SEPA countries just yet though, just the 5 countries I mentioned, plus the UK. Right now we don't have any businesses hitting the limits, but we do have options in place incase we need to go higher. it's a paperwork hassle, so there's no need to burden every account with it. nice to know, hope i get to do the paperwork of the online marketplace soon and get to use your service in Madrid, Spain i will surely contact you guys if i get in troubles with the transfer limits on bit-pay
|
|
|
you guys are awesome, thanks for enabling euro transfers with your service. Any chance you raise those limits for businesses ? And here goes another, the euro wires are sent internationally or from within SEPA zone ? Thanks
|
|
|
Heh, thanks D&T i read the mintchip thread and this is starting to look more like a joke to me. I'm really out of comparing points between mintchip and bitcoin, the later is the obvious winner.
|
|
|
Hey all
I'm trying to export some keys as a safe backup, i'm using an external drive as my datadir and that usually works fine but now i'm running into some trouble.
i'm running:
./bitcoind -datadir=/media/BTC listreceivedbyaddress
it then returns: error: couldn't connect to server
Am i doing something wrong or how should i go about this?
i assume you enter that command by console so you can try first... ./bitcoind -datadir=/media/BTC& wait a few moments for hte bitcoin daemon to start-up and do... or when this commands return you some nice info try... ./bitcoind listreceivedbyaddress <address>
|
|
|
Hola!! saludos desde Mexico!! a mi me gustaria comprar y vender btc sin comiciones mexico no tiene servicios para eso saludos y somos pocos de habla hispana , exito con la mineria ya con mis 200 mhash no avanzo mucho no te quejes, yo tengo los mismos 200 mhashes y me vienen de perlas para pagar el internet cada mes
|
|
|
Lol, why not. Peeps apparently are paying the other 3 analyst/precognition providers for their "services"
rofl, i really laughed at this, so maybe they need a little competition...
|
|
|
Si si, aqui estamos... en la mina. Alguna novedad tipo: Ya tenemos nueva Casa de compra/venta BTC en Euros a 0% de comision??? jaja que cachondo, pos ya somos dos que tams escuchando el eco... oeee no tengo pelas pero si cojones para abrir una casa de cambio en Madrid con un cartel grande que ponga "Compramos BITCOINS", ya vendra, todo a su tiempo...
|
|
|
Espero que no este solo aqui, como un loco, en el foro espaņol. A veces se escucha el eco de mi voz entre estos hilos
|
|
|
Maybe this is a wrong thread, but I would like to have access to a bitcoin-based SMTP server. I am one of those dinosaurs that don't want to use web-based email. I'd pay something like 0.01BTC per email sent, provided there is no minimum amount to deposit. 1 BTC will last me through a year.
that was exactly what i see it will happen, but your e-mail will be the same private key that carries the 0.01 btc postage Bitcoins will get swept by the smtp server and shared with the destination server. Backwards compatible and signed with strong crypto.
|
|
|
I found this humorous: If you find this useful or interesting, please consider a donation: 1NYhM2pzT6PDfZyXbyFm3dVcoob4phrGc5 Ideally, wouldn't you preferred providing a unique vanity address, one hashed by the app? ~Bruno~ Look at his username. You guys wanted so much to make fun of him that you ended up ridiculing yourselves... That still doesn't explain why he pees zebra trees. heh welcome to the forum Nyhm and thanks for making that useful website for for us
|
|
|
1 NYhM2pzT6PDfZyXbyFm3dVcoob4phrGc5 stands for: New York helps Me to pee zebra Trees Ugh, it was sooooooo obvious lool i do the same thing to remember some of them
|
|
|
I love my new address (Check sig) sent you some coins so you can use the firstbits @BurtWagner not necessarily, firstbits claims they add it to their database after a payment is made and it reaches 7 confirms
|
|
|
It is a joke. And old, old, old joke. You were supposed to laugh.
Oh, I get it. I get jokes Sometimes yeah, your mind is Like a Cray computer Meni The problem with spam, as pointed out by others before me, is that spammers are already not paying the cost of sending mail. What makes you think they will start paying for it when you make it more expensive? Why wouldn't they just keep using stolen resources like they do now?
Depending on how this is implemented, it may not be the case that being able to compromise an email account will also mean having access to the bitcoins used to pay for messages. So this may make it much harder for spammers to steal the resources required to send messages. So then if someday we decide to use digital "stamps" it will actually work, great * Who should get the money from emails anyways? The recipient? The mail hoster (gmail, hotmail, your own mailserver...)? * How do you attach 1 Bitcent to an email if you don't know a payout address beforehand? * How do you know a mail was properly paid for if you only get a transaction of 1 Bitcent from a Bitcoin address and 2 mails at the same time from different senders, both claiming to be from this payment? Do you then require to have a signed message in the header of the mail or so from the sending address?
* The recipient. * There will be some sort of DNS system that resolves email addresses to Bitcoin addresses. This will be handled automatically by the mail client. * The transaction will embed a hash of the message. *Why the recipient ? He gets the information contained in the e-mail already. This has to be addressed. *The "DNS system" is already in place, is the blockchain. The MUA software would hash the message and output you a bitcoin address. You pay the fee and e-mail gets sent automatically when bitcoin tx is broadcasted. If the e-mail is relayed with 1 confirm or not depends on server you connect to. The market would self regulate. If TLS is used to communicate with the service provider you know the "stamp" is protected. "Stamp" would be swept by the service provider, MTA, that gets to send the message. The receiving service provider doesn't have to trust the other end, there are only two interested MTA's in the whole process, because they would relay a fix amount of e-mails and wait for the payment or ask a payment in advance for a chunk of them. No coins, no e-mail relay to local user boxes. The remote MTA would even have the ability to check total postage paid with the blockchain. *The message would be hashed until you get something like this 1CfauqxxHNDVkZTmcsDik1LB9Ka5gmWqRT. You can try buying some "stamps" if you want. Thanks
|
|
|
Oh god I laughed so hard. Great work Phin.
+1
|
|
|
Would be nice to have a "Generate stamp" in the bitcoin software and get it funded with btc cents before you paste it in your e-mail. It would get relayed between servers that trust each other to share the fees, just like a WoT. The users could chose to let e-mail without stamps pass through or not. Post Office 2.0, yay
|
|
|
Just found out about this Earlier this week the American Civil Liberties Union revealed a trove of documents it had obtained through Freedom of Information Requests to more than 200 police departments around the country. They show a pattern of police tracking cell phone locations and gathering other data like call logs without warrants, using devices that impersonate cell towers to intercept cellular signals, and encouraging officers to refrain from speaking about cell-tracking technology... http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/04/03/these-are-the-prices-att-verizon-and-sprint-charge-for-cellphone-wiretaps/Will be interesting to know how much European telecos charge for this too
|
|
|
i see what you did there
|
|
|
heh, i will be out making tutorials on how to use tor...
|
|
|
|