Latest posts of: theymos

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 428 »

Other / Meta / Re: DT update log

on: August 01, 2025, 10:49:28 PM

This month 120 users were eligible. Old: Code: OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 Pmalek Mitchell vizique albon Timelord2067 jeremypwr EFS hybridsole hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 pooya87 mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane JeromeTash 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin Maus0728 TheBeardedBaby tvplus006 coinlocket$ bitmover DdmrDdmr Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone madnessteat lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder New: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek vizique albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco Buchi-88 willi9974 achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner sandy-is-fine mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist LeGaulois SFR10 condoras holydarkness Lafu polymerbit tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB Igebotz roycilik hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress sheenshane JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin Maus0728 tvplus006 coinlocket$ mole0815 bitmover anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone madnessteat The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger Stalker22 Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

Other / Meta / Re: CAPTCHA service not working

on: July 18, 2025, 05:08:55 PM

I've never been able to figure out what causes that. It's not very common, though: it seems to happen to somebody 1-4 times per month. (Whenever that error happens, it's logged.) Z_MBFM and _act_ may be right that it's some sort of IP blacklist, connectivity issue, or browser issue.

Other / Meta / Re: Squishing the squashed-column bug (SMF patch)

on: July 12, 2025, 08:49:03 PM

I didn't test it that much, but it seems to work without any side-effects AFAICT, so I added it. I used your fix C, applying to posts only after about now. I had originally thought that it should use the last-edited time/ID instead of the message ID, so that editing a post would upgrade it, but after thinking about it more, I decided that this would probably be more likely to confuse people than help them. If anybody really wants this fixed on an existing post, specific older message IDs could be whitelisted in the code. Thanks!

Other / Politics & Society / Re: Musk calls for the creation of a truly American party

on: July 08, 2025, 07:14:29 PM

I like Elon's proposed party platform of a pro-tech, pro-free-speech, and anti-regulation centrist party. It sounds more libertarian than either of the two major parties, at least. But I don't think that most Americans care enough about these policies for it to really catch on unless he can find several ultra-skilled politicians to spread his message. Elon himself is a terrible politician, as well as a nutcase who I definitely wouldn't trust to stick to any particular platform. I think that the best way to try to create a third party would be to focus on having an unusual and attractive style, more than on any particular policy, and I'd particularly focus on the rare style of being reasonable and nice. Today, there's no point in ever listening to 99% of politicians: when you see a politician from either side, you know that they're going to make big speeches with zero substance, be intellectually dishonest, and trash/dehumanize everyone with any connection to the other side. A party full of politicians who don't do all that would really stand out and succeed, I think. So if I was designing a new party with the main goal of actually being competitive, I'd create the "Compassion Party": - All member politicians have to go out of their way to always be nice, respectful, and intellectually honest, even in the face of massive liars/assholes like Elizabeth Warren or Steve Bannon. - It'd be especially effective if many of the leading politicians were moderate religious leaders (such as pastors from mainline Christian churches), since they'd have experience and credibility on compassion, and I think that religious messaging is underused except among the minority of religious Americans who are evangelicals. - Focus on a few exciting headline policies, such as UBI or major infrastructure projects (eg. building some popular high-speed rail lines). You want to make people pay attention, viewing you as different and likely to actually shift the status quo. - On controversial issues, take positions which come off as reasonable, practical, and not ideological. You want to appear "above it all". - Once you're actually in power, to ensure that the economy performs well, make hundreds of small technocratic tweaks which are all pro-growth, but are each too small to annoy any special interests too much. That's not my ideal party, to be clear: just what I think would be most effective. I'd rather the Libertarian Party win overwhelmingly and then rapidly shrink the state. Though I do think that the hypothetical party I described would probably be an improvement over the two major parties.

Other / Meta / Re: DT update log

on: July 01, 2025, 10:02:58 PM

This month 120 users were eligible. Old: Code: theymos OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 gbianchi EFS dbshck stompix arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club ekiller Jet Cash condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato buwaytress Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin coinlocket$ DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis mendace DireWolfM14 1miau Little Mouse jokers10 Awaklara zasad@ Rikafip Lachrymose NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder New: Code: OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 Pmalek Mitchell vizique albon Timelord2067 jeremypwr EFS hybridsole hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 pooya87 mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane JeromeTash 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin Maus0728 TheBeardedBaby tvplus006 coinlocket$ bitmover DdmrDdmr Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone madnessteat lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

Other / Meta / Re: Access denied

on: June 21, 2025, 08:29:09 PM

Quote from: LoyceMobile on June 21, 2025, 06:43:09 PM That huge number of requests made me think it includes Bitcointalk's image proxy. That was in fact the problem. ip.bitcointalk.org was supposed to be ignored for this sort of ban, but after looking into it more, I realized that it wasn't. (For Cloudflare rate-limiting rules, it turns out that the activation expression and the counting expression are totally independent, so I had to exclude ip.bitcointalk.org in two different places.) Thanks!

Other / Meta / Re: Access denied

on: June 21, 2025, 06:24:43 PM

That happens only if your IP is traffic-flooding at an especially high rate. In your case, I see that your IP attempted to make 1340 requests in a 120-second period starting at 08:25 UTC. This is far above the general limit of 1 request per second. Maybe someone else is using your IP to flood, or maybe you have some background process running which is making requests way too quickly.

Other / Meta / Re: DT update log

on: June 01, 2025, 09:57:46 PM

This month 120 users were eligible. Old: Code: gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus d5000 Pmalek Mitchell wwzsocki Timelord2067 gbianchi EFS Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 nutildah minerjones BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club ekiller Jet Cash condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane JeromeTash 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena MinoRaiola Agrawas GazetaBitcoin coinlocket$ bitmover shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka madnessteat The Cryptovator DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger Lachrymose seek3r FatFork NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder New: Code: theymos OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 gbianchi EFS dbshck stompix arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club ekiller Jet Cash condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato buwaytress Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin coinlocket$ DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis mendace DireWolfM14 1miau Little Mouse jokers10 Awaklara zasad@ Rikafip Lachrymose NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

Other / Meta / Re: Negative Sendable Merits. A bug?

on: May 31, 2025, 05:43:02 PM

Quote from: fillippone on May 31, 2025, 02:10:55 PM At this point, as the hours pass and my curiosity grows, I am waiting for Theymos to explain in layman terms what happened. The changes which precipitated this were pretty boring: I'm making tweaks to the backend infrastructure which will make things a bit faster and more reliable. (But don't expect huge improvements.) As part of this, in order to ensure fast and reliable database replication, over the past ~week I've been modifying all of the database tables to have primary keys. In the case of the merit_ledger table, I did this by adding a new "ledger ID" column. Adding this column is what broke the sMerit calculation. That's a big hint, so if you still want to try finding the bug, go back and give it a try now, because I'm going to give the answer in the next paragraph. The bug was in this query: `select time, amount from merit_ledger where ID_MEMBER_FROM=$user and time>={$sourceAmtLog[0][0]}` The code after goes through each send from oldest to newest, and "replays" it to see whether it was using the sender's source-merit or sMerit. But critically, the query doesn't actually specify an ORDER BY, so the order in which rows are returned is undefined. Previously, it was just by chance that rows were being returned in the intended order. But adding any key, and especially a primary key, is likely to change the order in which rows are returned when there is no ORDER BY. As a result, code which was working 100% correctly all of a sudden started working 100% incorrectly: the section of code after the query was just producing complete nonsense. I thought that it was an interesting bug, since one change far away broke something which seemed largely unrelated, and even though the code is self-evidently wrong, it's still fairly difficult to find the bug if you don't have some hints.

Other / Meta / Re: Negative Sendable Merits. A bug?

on: May 30, 2025, 05:21:57 PM

Quote from: TryNinja on May 30, 2025, 04:52:15 PM Could you tell us what did you change? That'd probably make it too obvious to be fun. There is definitely a self-evident bug in the code I posted. Quote from: Mia Chloe on May 30, 2025, 05:00:46 PM So I thought the easiest fix is to cap `$sendableUserMerit` at 0 after subtracting `$excessSent` in the source branch. I may be wrong though and I don't mind an hint. That would prevent it from giving negative numbers, but it still wouldn't give correct numbers.

Other / Meta / Re: Negative Sendable Merits. A bug?

on: May 30, 2025, 04:21:21 PM

It should be fixed now, sorry about that! I've been making a number of little tweaks over the past few days which could cause hard-to-predict bugs, so let me know if you see any other buggy behavior. Can anyone find the bug? This function worked for years, but then I did something very far away (i.e. I didn't change this function at all) which broke it. function calculate_smerit($user){ $sendableUserMerit = db_query("select sum(amount) from merit_ledger where ID_MEMBER_TO=$user", __FILE__, __LINE__); if(mysql_num_rows($sendableUserMerit)) $sendableUserMerit = (int)(mysql_fetch_array($sendableUserMerit)[0]/2); else $sendableUserMerit = 0; // merit_sources is a log of when users' source merit was changed: "source merit becomes 'amount' at timestamp 'time'" $q = db_query("select time, amount from merit_sources where ID_MEMBER=$user order by time asc", __FILE__, __LINE__); if(!mysql_num_rows($q)) { $sent = db_query("select sum(amount) from merit_ledger where ID_MEMBER_FROM=$user", __FILE__, __LINE__); if(mysql_num_rows($sent)) $sent = (int)mysql_fetch_array($sent)[0]; else $sent = 0; return array($sendableUserMerit - $sent, 0); } // this user is/was a source, so the calculation is more complex $sourceAmtLog = array(); while($row=mysql_fetch_array($q)) $sourceAmtLog[] = $row; mysql_free_result($q); $timeWindow = 606024*30; list($excessSent) = mysql_fetch_array(db_query(" select sum(amount) from merit_ledger where ID_MEMBER_FROM=$user and time<{$sourceAmtLog[0][0]}", __FILE__, __LINE__)); if(empty($excessSent)) $excessSent = 0; $sourceMeritSendsRange = array(); $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum = 0; $sourcePos = 0; $q = db_query("select time, amount from merit_ledger where ID_MEMBER_FROM=$user and time>={$sourceAmtLog[0][0]}", __FILE__, __LINE__); $sends = array(); while($row = mysql_fetch_array($q)) $sends[] = $row; mysql_free_result($q); foreach($sends as $send) { if($sourcePos < count($sourceAmtLog)-1 && $send[0] >= $sourceAmtLog[$sourcePos+1][0]) { $sourcePos++; $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum=0; $sourceMeritSendsRange = array(); } while(count($sourceMeritSendsRange)>0 && ($send[0] - $sourceMeritSendsRange[0][0] > $timeWindow)) { $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum -= array_shift($sourceMeritSendsRange)[1]; } $remainingSource = max($sourceAmtLog[$sourcePos][1]-$sourceMeritSendsRangeSum, 0); $excessSent += max($send[1]-$remainingSource, 0); $sourceMeritSendAmount = min($remainingSource, $send[1]); if($sourceMeritSendAmount>0) { $sourceMeritSendsRange[] = array($send[0], $sourceMeritSendAmount); $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum += $sourceMeritSendAmount; } } $sendableUserMerit -= $excessSent; if($sourcePos != count($sourceAmtLog)-1) { $sourcePos = count($sourceAmtLog)-1; $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum=0; $sourceMeritSendsRange = array(); } while(count($sourceMeritSendsRange) > 0 && (time() - $sourceMeritSendsRange[0][0] > $timeWindow)) { $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum -= array_shift($sourceMeritSendsRange)[1]; } $sendableSourceMerit = max($sourceAmtLog[$sourcePos][1] - $sourceMeritSendsRangeSum, 0); return array($sendableUserMerit, $sendableSourceMerit); }

Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: How can we add a Portuguese version?

on: May 13, 2025, 07:04:05 PM

Due to inactivity, all of the non-English versions were deprecated, and are now in read-only mode. There'd have to be a very significant amount of interest to reactivate any of them or add new ones. Inactive wikis are a potential hazard, since nobody's around to remove spam links or update dangerously-outdated info.

Other / Meta / Re: Unable to Blcok a username from private message

on: May 10, 2025, 07:44:20 PM

Quote from: hosemary on May 10, 2025, 10:09:52 AM You have successfully blocked the user from sending you message, even if you see a different username in "ignore" feild. Some users in the forum have different username and display name. You entered the display name of the user and after you clicked on the display name, the forum added the username in ignore feild. I think you should be able to add the display name of the user, if you type it manually. Right. This is confusing, though, so I changed it to insert the display name now. Forum-wide, the display name is always supposed to be the name displayed, though the username can be used as an alias in some places.

Other / Meta / Re: Trust flags

on: May 01, 2025, 10:10:01 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on April 30, 2025, 03:19:44 PM I have a question about the Type 3 Flag: Code: This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages. What if a service makes contradicting claims on their website, and only one of those claims would mean a written contract was violated, while the other claim supports what they did? Would that still qualify as breaking a written contract? For context, see this post. Voters should read the flag allegation-statement and decide (with the same mindset as a judge in a legal case) whether it's true or false. Especially when it comes down to edge cases like that, people can validly have different opinions as to the truth. My personal opinion: I lean toward thinking that a type-2 is more appropriate because advertising which contradicts the ToS is in my eyes more of an informal/implied agreement than a contract. But I wouldn't say that a type-3 would be egregiously wrong or anything.

Other / Meta / Re: [April Fools] Replacing the merit system

on: May 01, 2025, 09:47:41 PM

Thanks for playing, everyone! I was excited to be able to see an o_e_l_e_o with ESG and PowerGlove yesterday. Below are the final scores. A day or two after the end of the main event, all pMerit balances were cleared, but after that, there were no other pMerit adjustments. Since all of the bugs were also worked out by this point, these scores are probably more representative of actual skill (and/or persistence) than the scores after the main event. Code: \| ESG \| 17855 \| \| PowerGlove \| 11371 \| \| ibminer \| 5119 \| \| Cyrus \| 2366 \| \| d57heinz \| 1709 \| \| BlTCOINPostage \| 1651 \| \| Avox \| 1600 \| \| KosmoKisa \| 1504 \| \| XICO \| 1474 \| \| hopenotlate \| 1411 \| \| theymos \| 1168 \| \| infinitesimal \| 1146 \| \| mirtotanota \| 1108 \| \| Jewan420 \| 1093 \| \| Mitchell \| 1055 \| \| iv4n \| 1045 \| \| joker_josue \| 1036 \| \| pdneves \| 1022 \| \| Youngrebel \| 1016 \| \| kingbj21 \| 1015 \| \| jackielove4u \| 1012 \| \| hisslyness \| 1009 \| \| mocacinno \| 1007 \| \| garlonicon \| 1007 \| \| Thamizhan \| 1006 \| \| Findingnemo \| 1006 \| \| GIF-JOBS \| 1006 \| \| ranochigo \| 1004 \| \| JohnGalt \| 1003 \| \| vd309 \| 1003 \| \| Behat1981 \| 1003 \| \| just4kicks \| 1003 \| \| daverick_cgn \| 1003 \| \| Joca97 \| 1002 \| \| Sledge0001 \| 1002 \| \| rohang \| 1002 \| \| Tazzy4050 \| 1002 \| \| bitrsanch \| 1002 \| \| farou9 \| 1002 \| \| eminent1 \| 1002 \| \| Normalize \| 1002 \| \| MaxAlphax \| 1001 \| \| khaled0111 \| 1001 \| \| Ulven \| 1001 \| \| Tebe654 \| 1001 \| \| Koceila \| 1001 \| \| Rhema_Artz \| 1001 \| \| AlphaBoy \| 1001 \| \| Papablo1708 \| 1001 \| \| xOrpian \| 1001 \| \| July_Alaska \| 1001 \| \| Hueristic \| 1000 \| \| bubbaj \| 1000 \| \| JollyGood \| 1000 \| \| Steamtyme \| 1000 \| \| famososMuertos \| 1000 \| \| Unsoldier \| 1000 \| \| CR_Anders \| 1000 \| \| Frankolala \| 1000 \| \| smwangi \| 1000 \| \| KFC786 \| 1000 \| \| Suzume \| 1000 \| \| Faizan Zen \| 1000 \| \| Just Say \| 1000 \| \| yamin_galib \| 1000 \| \| Charltonleo2 \| 1000 \| \| Hell Boy \| 1000 \| \| hawkqs \| 1000 \| \| jackg \| 999 \| \| Strongkored \| 999 \| \| Wapfika \| 999 \| \| Seniorbrovai \| 999 \| \| Bitcoin_people \| 999 \| \| Mohamedlaoui \| 999 \| \| Leomiles \| 999 \| \| omargg 55 \| 999 \| \| Sd49budz \| 999 \| \| babo \| 998 \| \| romero121 \| 998 \| \| mistercoin \| 998 \| \| pawel7777 \| 998 \| \| Pascal Parvex \| 998 \| \| machasm \| 998 \| \| K4C \| 998 \| \| AbuBhakar \| 998 \| \| oleg1984a \| 998 \| \| DireWolfM14 \| 998 \| \| PrimeNumber7 \| 998 \| \| Danieleemilio \| 998 \| \| Stalker22 \| 998 \| \| Nothingtodo \| 998 \| \| Humble Bitcoiners \| 998 \| \| india012 \| 998 \| \| CryptSafe \| 998 \| \| Uruhara \| 998 \| \| Urfijaved \| 998 \| \| Pablo-wood \| 998 \| \| Cpt_reader \| 998 \| \| StealthsNet \| 998 \| \| criptoevangelista \| 998 \| \| N.O \| 998 \| \| Jamestown70 \| 998 \| \| Lucysathish \| 998 \| \| Olamidetechie \| 998 \| \| Dark.Look \| 998 \| \| safyan \| 998 \| \| Cypto2020 \| 998 \| \| Miramax12 \| 998 \| \| Borall12 \| 998 \| \| hoangty \| 998 \| \| ggtomeh \| 998 \| \| NodePhantom \| 998 \| \| elsoleado \| 998 \| \| Dup9601@gmail.com \| 998 \| \| Samang \| 998 \| \| user3 \| 998 \| \| Mackoshi \| 998 \| \| versaceicy \| 998 \| \| Ybs1p \| 998 \| \| Welsh \| 997 \| \| mv1986 \| 997 \| \| o48o \| 997 \| \| Aikidoka \| 997 \| \| hurr1cane \| 997 \| \| goldkingcoiner \| 997 \| \| rony01941 \| 997 \| \| Bitcoin_Arena \| 997 \| \| fillippone \| 997 \| \| Issa56 \| 997 \| \| Rikafip \| 997 \| \| NNRR \| 997 \| \| Charles-Tim \| 997 \| \| smmgoal \| 997 \| \| teleone \| 997 \| \| baeva \| 997 \| \| Ryu_Ar1 \| 997 \| \| HelliumZ \| 997 \| \| LivanoBerkbit \| 997 \| \| Leahized \| 997 \| \| Platinumys \| 997 \| \| Cryptohygenic \| 997 \| \| xmrhopium \| 997 \| \| Rappitman \| 997 \| \| Bluebird1357 \| 997 \| \| Ajam17700 \| 997 \| \| DVVRG \| 997 \| \| dimonstration \| 996 \| \| therealfalcon \| 996 \| \| ovcijisir \| 996 \| \| Liliana1304 \| 996 \| \| goldenmonke \| 996 \| \| Jostern \| 996 \| \| Hdhdhehehhe \| 996 \| \| BayAreaCoins \| 995 \| \| Mohon561 \| 995 \| \| Abdulzuruku01 \| 995 \| \| user_not_here \| 995 \| \| Yoona_As \| 994 \| \| RafiAhmed629 \| 994 \| \| blomen \| 994 \| \| Reham00 \| 992 \| \| Bhadmhi \| 991 \| \| Bluedrem \| 991 \| \| Ginz_24 \| 986 \| \| iron77 \| 983 \| \| Omikifuse \| 982 \| \| drpxxx \| 965 \| \| ChiBitCTy \| 964 \| \| Cointxz \| 942 \| \| Obari \| 938 \| \| Hatchy \| 931 \| \| Beparanf \| 930 \| \| Swaggman \| 913 \| \| vittosport \| 862 \| \| finitemaz \| 814 \| \| JayJuanGee \| 717 \| \| Ricardo11 \| 711 \| \| sargon_silda \| 643 \| \| Jessie2121 \| 630 \| \| tread93 \| 625 \| \| xhomerx10 \| 599 \| \| L4rs_ \| 347 \| \| 5tift \| 242 \| \| edy_58 \| 192 \| \| AG0RA \| 191 \| \| TheButterZone \| 150 \| \| Vaskiy \| 150 \| \| Hermes Mercury \| 150 \| \| Mbitr \| 150 \| \| mikeywith \| 150 \| \| clear cookies \| 150 \| \| Majestic-milf \| 150 \| \| Mia Chloe \| 150 \| \| Naser9220 \| 150 \| \| TalQ8 \| 150 \| \| meser# \| 149 \| \| Sexylizzy2813 \| 149 \|

Other / Meta / Re: DT update log

on: May 01, 2025, 08:10:06 PM

This month 122 users were eligible. Old: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty qwk Vod Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus ibminer d5000 Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr EFS stompix hilariousandco buckrogers willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens minerjones yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner sandy-is-fine mocacinno Real-Duke SyGambler SFR10 TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club ekiller Jet Cash condoras Lafu polymerbit tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Baofeng imhoneer hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood Igebotz roycilik El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo Coin-1 icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane JeromeTash 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena MinoRaiola Agrawas GazetaBitcoin coinlocket$ mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana madnessteat The Cryptovator DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau YOSHIE jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh Lachrymose NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket New: Code: gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus d5000 Pmalek Mitchell wwzsocki Timelord2067 gbianchi EFS Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 nutildah minerjones BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club ekiller Jet Cash condoras holydarkness Lafu tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB Igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress GreatArkansas sheenshane JeromeTash 3meek logfiles Bitcoin_Arena MinoRaiola Agrawas GazetaBitcoin coinlocket$ bitmover shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka madnessteat The Cryptovator DireWolfM14 notblox1 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger Lachrymose seek3r FatFork NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

Other / Meta / Re: Second chance for mixers?

on: April 30, 2025, 09:10:28 PM

Quote from: xLays on April 30, 2025, 08:34:50 PM My main question is: Is it allowed to run a contest or prediction here on Bitcointalk about when mixers will be allowed again? (The contest will not mention any website of mixer) A policy prediction market, I like it! That's fine. Note however that I may soften the ban over time, in two or more phases. For example, I may remove the wordfilter much sooner than any other aspects of the ban.

Other / Meta / Re: [April Fools] Replacing the merit system

on: April 30, 2025, 08:48:53 PM

Quote from: ESG on April 30, 2025, 07:39:55 PM I'm glad you enjoyed it! But I will be taking it down in roughly 12 hours.

Other / Meta / Re: Why is this report marked bad?

on: April 25, 2025, 03:35:54 PM

Probably it was marked as bad because it wasn't clear that a Stake account could be a KYC-verified account. I had to Google it to find out that "Stake level 2 verified" requires a photo ID and should therefore be considered a KYC-verified account. So you're right: it should be deleted. Thanks!

Other / Meta / Re: Dormant moderator; What do you guys think!

on: April 25, 2025, 03:23:23 PM

Good point. I went through and removed several inactive moderators from various boards. Thanks!

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 428 »