... I would be all over linux if it was supported by video games. I know that sounds silly but it would be hard for me to give up one of my favorite pass times. I suppose that's why having 2 PC's is useful, one with windows and one with linux for cryptos Having more than one PC is definitely an option. The thing to keep in mind here is that a computer or device cannot serve two masters. If it supports DRM at the operating system level then one should assume that any information that is entered into that device or computer will be shared with every government spy agency on the planet, any criminal that seeks this information, any corporation wishing to profile etc. It should not be used for anything even remotely sensitive from a privacy perspective such as browsing the web or sending an innocuous email, let alone Monero. On the other hand a computer or device that makes its owner the master will not be trusted by any licensor of DRM infected content be it the MPAA, a game vendor, streaming service etc. It will protect the privacy and security of its owner very well. The only way to ensure that the owner is the master is to use a FLOSS operating system which for most people means GNU/Linux. Edit1: When it comes to virtualization it is the host and not the guest that is in control so running a GNU/Linux guest on a Windows host is not a solution, since the DRM supporting host namely Windows is in control. One the other hand running a Windows guest on a GNU/Linux host can be an option in certain situations since the GNU/Linux host is in control. Edit2: When it comes to Monero one must realize that security is only as strong as the weakest link. Ring signatures, I2P, Stealth Addresses, etc are not going to be of much help if the adversary knows one's private key and can track every transaction one makes via the DRM in the operating system.
|
|
|
community activity low, volume very low, price not so low but also not so high. reversal is not far away, all it needs is a potent buyer to step in. is everybody busy watching btc? are the big fish all doing holidays?
They will come when its too late: http://www.coindesk.com/be-vigilant-on-compliance-coinbase-warns-bitcoin-startups/Bitcoin in the US is gone! Why? Push for regulation and taxation is at ATH and Bitcoin blockchain is open to everybody and your doge do tracking and surveillance, do the math, Coinbase already track your transactions and if you do something weird they ban you, you can't buy from them without KYC, it won't end nice. Thanks for all the fish Satoshi but the future of cryptocurrency requires something better, it requires Monero The future of crypto-currency requires Monero on GNU/Linux not just Monero. If one is using Windows 8.1 RT the only choice will be to use a service such as Coinbase regardless of whether one is using Bitcoin, Monero or some other crypto-currency. The reality is that Microsoft has been gradually moving Windows towards the fully locked down Orwellian Telescreen Windows RT model for at least the last 15 years, much like slowly rising a temperature on a pot of cold water with a frog in it. My expectation is that the frog will be dead certainly within the next decade and very likely within the next 5 years. Edit: Those that are still in the Microsoft pot would be wise to jump out while they are still able.
|
|
|
Let's say bitcoin starts a strong bull run this week. Any thoughts on how this will affect XMR in the short term?
Short term we could see .0017-18s before XMR would bounce back up. We could see 0.0017 - 0.0018 before a bounce back up but I would not count on it. Also those hoping for lower XMR prices would be wise to watch DASH especially on a daily chart.
|
|
|
I have no problem figuring out capital gains on XBT or XMR and paying the appropriate tax to the Canadian government. I do have a big problem with DRM and bootloader locked devices. The real evil is corporations such as Microsoft and Apple that push DRM to meet the greed of organizations such as the MPAA.
But you are completely free to use alternatives to their devices. The state is the only thing that could, at-least in theory, even conceivably be able to enforce the monopoly that would be necessary in order to cause drm bootloader locked devices to negatively impact your life in any serious way. Dont get me wrong im not saying that apple and microsoft aren't evil. But what harm is an evil dog without teeth? The state is the teeth in the mouth of evil corporations. Have you tried to purchase a mobile device that is not bootloader locked? Ever heard of the PRISM program? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%29 In the PRISM program the state uses corporate teeth to bite not the other way around. Edit: Corporations are the teeth in the mouths of evil states.
|
|
|
...snip I have no problem figuring out capital gains on XBT or XMR and paying the appropriate tax to the Canadian government. I do have a big problem with DRM and bootloader locked devices. The real evil is corporations such as Microsoft and Apple that push DRM to meet the greed of organizations such as the MPAA. If they had their way I would not be able to use XBT or XMR, would not have any of the capital gains and would not have to pay said taxes. ...snip
How? Let's say you start using crypto on a daily basis- lets say 3-5 times a day. Coffee on the way to work, fill gas, buy an online newspaper, a game on playstation, and chinese food in the evening. 1000-1500 transactions in a tax year - most of them small. How? Exactly. And, FIFO, right? Have fun with that, buying Bitcoins, then buying Moneroj, and doing your taxes on each of *those* conversions, as well as on each purchase. Actually FIFO is easier that the Canadian adjusted cost base system. I use a spreadsheet on LibreOffice calc to calculate this. Yes one does have to keep track of all expenses, but that has the added advantage of promoting fiscal prudence among citizens. In most "developed" countries the rise in poverty and the fall of the middle class is driven by debt fuelled consumption as opposed to falling incomes. This is why we see citizens and governments with ever increasing debt and corporations with ever increasing cash reserves. If the tax system makes consumption inconvenient by forcing people to track expenses that is actually a good thing. I do agree with don't buy, it is actually the easiest path to wealth for many people. A good place to start is propriety operating system licenses and bootloader locked devices. By the way don't buy also applies to governments who could save billions of dollars by saying no to the likes of Microsoft and using FLOSS instead.
|
|
|
The real threat is not governments. It is corporations such as Microsoft and Apple who use DRM to control their customers for their own profit.
Hey, corporations aren't the ones putting a gun to your head and forcing you to pay. Don't like, don't buy. I expect XMR price to continue decline for a while. The pen is mightier that the sword and corporations are using DRM to control the pen. That is why DRM is so evil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_pen_is_mightier_than_the_swordEdit: The sword does have some uses. Here is an excellent example of using the sword to liberate the pen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuQZTAJ2KLk
|
|
|
Government's public purpose is to provide public services. But its real purpose is to be a power monopoly. They are in a difficult position, because if they care too much of the services for the people, they end up being attacked by other governments. If they care only for their staying in power, they end up becoming tyrannies and also succumb to bloody revolutions.
People should try to stay away from these power games. The more I have read and heard about history, governments are always the same. Follow your conscience.
The real threat is not governments. It is corporations such as Microsoft and Apple who use DRM to control their customers for their own profit. A perfect example of this fast growing problem is the following support request: Hey I'm using windows 8.1 RT and I cant download anything from outside except the store and the Store Doesn't have any Bitcoin related Applications! Now how do I setup a cold wallet? You can't. Windows 8.1 RT can best be described as a Portable Orwellian Telescreen. Only those applications authorized by Big Brother (Microsoft and the MPAA) are permitted and Bitcoin is not one of them. I would recommend a computer running GNU/Linux for anything related to Bitcoin. I have no problem figuring out capital gains on XBT or XMR and paying the appropriate tax to the Canadian government. I do have a big problem with DRM and bootloader locked devices. The real evil is corporations such as Microsoft and Apple that push DRM to meet the greed of organizations such as the MPAA. If they had their way I would not be able to use XBT or XMR, would not have any of the capital gains and would not have to pay said taxes. Every time one pays for or supports any DRM infected content one is supporting an evil that is many times worse than the vast majority of governments on the planet.
|
|
|
So besides the fact that over 30% of all Dash in existence currently were instamined in 2 days Are you a dash shill because you keep downplaying their instamine. It's closer to 40% than 30%: Instamine: 2 million Current supply (via coinmarket cap): 5,333,827 DASH Instamine percentage: 37.496529227513% Well it is not as bad as the Bytecoin pre-mine / ninja-mine at over 80%.
|
|
|
There is also the possibility that Satoshi could pass away and his or her estate would sell the coins in order to pay capital gains / and or inheritance taxes in some jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Hey I'm using windows 8.1 RT and I cant download anything from outside except the store and the Store Doesn't have any Bitcoin related Applications! Now how do I setup a cold wallet? You can't. Windows 8.1 RT can best be described as a Portable Orwellian Telescreen. Only those applications authorized by Big Brother (Microsoft and the MPAA) are permitted and Bitcoin is not one of them. I would recommend a computer running GNU/Linux for anything related to Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Cryptonote
AFAIK, Cryptonote cleans the old transactions, which is not good to keep evidence. Probably good for anonymity though... Cleaning old transactions is not a requirement of Cryptonote. https://cryptonote.org/ The key advantages of Cryptonote in my opinion over Bitcoin are ring signatures to provide fungibility and privacy and adaptive limits. The latter deals with the 1 MB blocksize issue right from the start.
|
|
|
volume seems pretty dead to me. get ready for sub 0.001 coins Very low volume after a very significant drop is actually bullish not bearish.
|
|
|
... Working my way down from the market cap Ripple, Stellar, Bytecoin and Paycoin. Most of these are completely pre-mined with the exception of Bytecoin which had a massive hidden pre-mine. I am not saying these are all bad projects, though in terms of fairness of the initial distribution these are all much worse then DASH. Sorry to point my finger at these other coins, you did ask for this information though. Yes I agree. Ripple, Stellar, Bytecoin and Paycoin are orders of magnitude worse than DASH when it comers to the fairness of the initial distribution.
|
|
|
I see a very significant chance that XMR will end up complementing rather than replacing XBT, especially since it is way simpler to set up a crypto-currency to crypto-currency exchange than a crypto-currency to fiat exchange.
The only problem here is that if there is that you are looking at it only from the perspective of the spender. To him yes this is a perfect solution. But to the retailer who is being paid in bitcoin, he will be terrified of the prospect of being unwittingly paid in "illegal" bitcoin. As such it makes a great deal of sense for him to want to cut out the middleman of bitcoin and be paid in xmr, which he can then convert to btc himself through shapeshift.io or similar service he trusts more than random customers. But if you think through the logic of that, if other retailers are thinking the same thing he is, than why even convert it into bitcoin? Anywhere he wants to spend it would rather just be paid in xmr. Why would the XBT or XMR be "illegal"? Furthermore there are many situations where 1) The transaction is perfectly legal, 2) Privacy is important and 3) the amount is well below any AML / KNC threshold. Here is a good example. http://www.salon.com/2014/04/28/one_womans_attempt_to_hide_her_pregnancy_from_big_data/.
|
|
|
I wasn't suggesting the concept of crypto is useless (I wouldn't be here if that were the case), only that current implementations cannot be easily used by even the most desperate of oppressed peoples.
Sure, people in refugee camps don't have smart phones or data plans. But there is a large middle ground between the utterly complacent and the most desperate. The NYT article on Argentina illustrates how BTC is making inroads by using in-person exchange to cover the proverbial last mile, thus providing a tool for the people there to use in their fight against financial oppression. The trend hasn't reached its 100th monkey, but the Argentinian equivalents of our brothers are in the near future increasingly like to use BTC for all the mundane crap fiat used to buy. When Kirchner's tax thugs begin to catch up and subscribe to Chainalysis, the people will move to Monero and stay one step ahead. One can easily defeat Chainalysis by selling XBT for XMR, even using a regulated exchange, sit on the XMR for a few days then trade a portion of the XMR for XBT using a service such as XMR.TO. In effect one can use XMR to "mix" XBT. The key is to use different XBT wallets for the original and "mixed" XBT. Edit: I see a very significant chance that XMR will end up complementing rather than replacing XBT, especially since it is way simpler to set up a crypto-currency to crypto-currency exchange than a crypto-currency to fiat exchange.
|
|
|
So my simple question to Brilliant Rocket is this, "If another coin is offering a better incentive for operating a masternode and the price starts rising exponentially, will xdarkdashians hold out of loyalty or move to where the most profit is?
And I swear I'm not trying to convince myself to buy crave or other centralizing node junk. I'm just pointing out a very likely scenario.
I do agree that services that reward people for holding are a good idea, I just don't think we should be using flawed models as inspiration.
Why does it have to be one or the other? I've looked into other coins with masternodes, but haven't found any that I've liked. If in the future someone uses masternodes to do something interesting and useful, I'd consider buying in. Yes, the masternode system does create a perverse incentive for node operators to attack each other, as Fluffypony pointed out, but I somehow doubt that this will manifest on a large scale. My take is that borrowed stake is the Achilles Heel of any proof of stake system, since once has stake and no exposure. With masternodes the problem is compounded since there is a minimum capital threshold in order make a return and this creates a perverse incentive for borrowed stake. Let us say the masternode return is 25%. A "banker" can then offer say 15% on amounts below the masternode threshold commingle the funds and invest the borrowed funds at a 25% gross return in masternodes. The larger the "bank" becomes the higher the net return for the "bank" since the left over amount that is two small for an additional masternode becomes a smaller portion of the over all portfolio. The result is one or more very large "banks" with a huge "stake" with the corresponding decision making power, and little or no exposure. This is what caused the near collapse of the US banking system in 2008. Edit: I actually consider over the long term the threat of borrowed stake on masternodes to be much more serious than the fratricidal attacks Fluffypony pointed out.
|
|
|
...
There is still a minimum amount of time needed for holding XBT, XMR etc even if it is used as a bridge. It is this minimum hold time that in the end gives value to the currency. By the way the same is true for government / central bank fiat currency (where holding for an extended period of time has significant cost), or even commodity money such as precious metals. That amount of time is infinitesimal with good software. These transactions in and out of bitcoin can be accomplished in fractions of a second. Precious metals have great holding appeal. People just dump money into them and let them sit, even while paying large sums of money to guard them. I think games are one good way to lock up a cryptocurrency and take it out of supply. Much better than merchant activity. We should think of other mechanisms that require longer-term holding instead of holding for fractions of one second. That's really my point. I'm not praising DASH. EDIT: the unbanked want to be banked. They just don't want inconvenient or corrupt negative interest banking or banking with fake exchange rates (as in Argentina). They are not cryptoanarchists who want to hold bitcoin. There is a minimum cost associated with banking that makes it simply uneconomical for both the bank and the customer when the customer is poor. The only way to get rid of cash or crypto-currency is to get rid of poverty.
|
|
|
|