Poloniex states 20 min ago on twitter that all funds are safe and they are under a ddos attack atm...but why is bcx banned(@poloniex?) and why is he tryna get them down? haha, wasnt he suppose to kill monero? This forum sure is cyber-cowbyspace...lol. Popcorncoin should pop up soon I guess ^^. Because that is what he did before:
The chain with 1.1 diff will make 12000 first.
I'm going to pull off the other chain and consolidate everything I got on the chain Cryptsy IS NOT on to make it to 12000 first.
Told those bastards not to ban me LOL
~BCX~
|
|
|
the site is still down. only chat works. I think the chat is running through websockets and I'm not sure they will be affected like the server is when ddos is going on.
Its back now
He did say it was only a test. This is straight up typical bcx. If I were Poloniex I would find out what he wants. He will launch full scale DDoS against Poloniex when he launches his highly anticipated Monero attack in less than 24 hours from now. This way there will be mass panic as he lets Poloniex get up and running in between knocking it down. He will crash the Monero price, he will make sure of that. Does this mean his other attack isn't real? I'm thinking he will DDoS Poloniex and the Monero chain at the same time, I'm still not sure he will be able to steal funds from private wallets though.
The chain with 1.1 diff will make 12000 first.
I'm going to pull off the other chain and consolidate everything I got on the chain Cryptsy IS NOT on to make it to 12000 first.
Told those bastards not to ban me LOL
~BCX~
Something like the above.
|
|
|
they can unban I believe.
what does BCX gain by ddos poloniex?
A 15 year jail sentence in a lot of countries. And in some places, a bullet in the back of the head for commiting an act of cyber terrorism. If Poloniex wanted to play hardball. They have an email address linked to his account which could be used to track him down a la Dread Pirate Roberts.
|
|
|
I feel bad for the guy who bought those FBI coins above market price...
I also remember paying 6.95 CAD per XBT in January 2012 and watching the price drop to 4.38 CAD per XBT in March 2012. It was painful.
|
|
|
maybe the trolls are testing if xmr is bcx proof, testing if the devs are very good, testing the community, and getting the price low before investing a lot of money aka MEGA PUMP Troll agenda is obvious. Unfortunately for them this community is above the curve. I need some good predictions for the floor to get back in. What do you guys think? I would decide on how much XBT to invest and then cost average over the next 24 hours or so. One can also monitor the trolls and when the trolling peaks then buy. I have observed a correlation between the intensity of the trolling and the price. I would also keep a close eye for developer announcements that could also impact the price. This is likely to be a tumultuous couple of days so it is best to keep a cool head and stick to a system rather than try to time the bottom. One thing is also possible. If the attack fails or is cancelled than there is a very significant chance that XMR/XBT will spike in a buying panic. One does not want to get caught short if this happens.
|
|
|
I would consider this a fairly conservative defensive portfolio in anticipation of of a Financial Crash. The USD providing the bulk of the defensive position while the short (S&P 500) and Crypto-currencies XBT, XMR and DIEM providing the growth part to offset the 1-2% decline in the purchasing power of USD. There is one part that leaves me baffled. The US Dollar will initially fare better against other currencies (particularly against the EUR), but then crash as well and may disappear in its current form by 2017-2018. Given that this is over 85% of the portfolio what happens if this happens sooner? Presumably the XBT, XMR and DIEM will skyrocket to compensate for the loss in value of the USD. The short (S&P 500) position will become worthless or have negative values since it is in terms of USD. I know there are very few alternatives but, still it is very hard to have a 85% USD position if one believes the USD is in such deep trouble.
|
|
|
If he gets offered 100 BTC and still does not reveal it, then there are two options. Either there is no exploit, or he stands to gain a lot by the price falling.
BCX is a very sneaky character, so should not take what he says at face value.
It could also mean he is not sure if there is an exploit. BCX has a record of both successfully attacking coins and also of profiting from the FUD generated from failed attacks on coins.
|
|
|
Now that we are approaching the First Day of Fall 2014 (The Autumnal Equinox) in the Northern Hemisphere (September 23 at 02:59 UTC) http://www.almanac.com/content/first-day-fall-autumnal-equinox here is a suggestion to help the Monero project while helping to stay warm this fall and winter. After starting bitmonerod (bitmonerod.exe for Windows users) enter: start_mining 46BeWrHpwXmHDpDEUmZBWZfoQpdc6HaERCNmx1pEYL2rAcuwufPN9rXHHtyUA4QVy66qeFQkn6sfK8aHYjA3jk3o1Bv16em 3 So what does this do. In addition to providing some warmth during the fall and winter, it adds some extra mining hashpower to help secure the Monero network, every little amount helps, while sending any found XMR to the development fund as a donation. Let us spread some warmth during this fall and winter. Technical note: The number 3 refers to the number of mining threads. I set mine to one less than the number of virtual processors in my CPU (4 for an Intel i5). To learn more about mining Monero please visit https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=653467.
|
|
|
Was there also something about Litecoin attacks? Then there is also using the attack to acquire a position if the coin survives, or even faking an attack in order to manipulate the price.
Edit: I am convinced that market manipulation plays a strong part here. Not in every case but in some cases.
|
|
|
HONEST TRUTH: People hate it because it is actually a legitimate, fairly launched, POW, fully anonymous crypto with a solid dev team. They are afraid of it taking over their precious alts.
This is all very true but I would add forked from a project embroiled in a major controversy over a massive premine / ninjamine, faked dates on white papers etc. In short a very legitimate project that in the process of its creation and development ruffled large quantities of very scammy feathers.
|
|
|
The danger with a very early boom bust cycle is that is can do a lot of damage to a coin before there is a strong enough community to deal with the aftermath. There are very few who can show a positive return and a large quantity of "bag holders". The perception then is that the coin is in terminal decline. An interesting case is DOGE that was launched very close to the XBT/USD peak. This has led to what is seen by many as a coin that has been in a bear market since its inception. My take in the case of DOGE is that this has less to do with the intrinsic merit or lack thereof of DOGE and more with the unfortunate timing of its release. Nevertheless the DOGE community has to overcome this perception. If the boom bust cycle happens when the coin is more mature then the recovery becomes much easier.
|
|
|
Hahem am I the only one that think BCX's findings are worrisome?
Claiming to have something and providing evidence thereof are two different things. If you have an exploit for a (genuine, not-scammy) FOSS project, not releasing it *at least* to the developers is unconscionable - you aren't hurting a corporation or a bunch of fat cats, you're hurting a small group of developers who work - unpaid - on a software development project for the presumed betterment of everyone. You're hurting altruists who are giving of themselves for little or no reward, but I guess there are people who are so ethically imbalanced that they don't even consider this. At a minimum some technical details about it would be nice. The ethical question I see here is that there is fierce competition among the CN coins so who does he release it to without picking favourites. If he releases the technical information to all the CN coin developers he could be providing the exploit to the attacker (black hat) as well as the defender (white hat). It is not as simple as a case where the white hats are easily identifiable.
|
|
|
The opposite is more nearly true. The future begins when the mining depletes.
before there is a sharp speculative spike in the XMR/XBT rate.
The market should be able to price the emission schedule in, when determining the price. At this point in the cryptoworld, having shart speculative spikes in a new coin's valuation is far from certain anyway. What IS reality, however, is that some people such as me, automatically reject coins that are too much mined, unless the coin has exceptional merits. This leads to such coins not receiving any investment from the likes of me. If Monero had been 70% mined when I heard about it, and otherwise same coin, same community and all, I would hardly have been interested. Yes, but there is a critical difference. By the time Monero reaches a 70% mined rate it will a fundamentally different investment than it is today, for better or for worse. This means a vastly different risk vs return consideration for any investor. We are talking 8 or more years since the start of crypto currencies in 2009.
|
|
|
I am far from convinced that the fast emission curve of Monero relative to Bitcoin is a negative. In fact the market may be saying the exact opposite. If the XMR/XBT rate remains relatively constant or rises slightly this would indicate that the emission curve is about right particularly during the early stages of Monero when it is the most critical. Ideally during the early stages one wants to see a small steady rise in price rather than a speculative boom bust cycle, and an emission curve that matches demand is close to ideal. In this respect a slightly bearish XBT/USD market over the next few months may actually also prove positive for Monero in the long run, as this would delay a speculative bubble in the XMR/XBT rate driven by a speculative bubble in the XBT/USD rate.
I would like to see critical fundamental work such as the database and also a reference GUI completed before there is a sharp speculative spike in the XMR/XBT rate.
|
|
|
Yep. Reverse trolling is the strategy now.
|
|
|
usually accs created with coinnames are "new accs" of actualy coin owners.
I have no idea what your source of data there is for that but in this case I can assure you there are all kind of trolls and FUDsters creating accounts with all sorts of names that have nothing to do with Monero. We've seen the pro-Monero troll strategy before (in July I think) where people create new accounts and post in support of Monero instead of against it. They apparently are trying to do so in such an obnoxious and spamy ay that it causes a backlash against Monero. At least that is my guess, because I don't really know. (As I said, the other highly plausible explanation is mental illness.) The sad fact is this forum site is so infested with trolls and FUDsters that you really can't believe anything people say unless you know them personally. The rest are best ignored. +1 I suspect the reverse troll theory is the most plausible especially when BCX was targeted.
|
|
|
BCX needs to post and either acknowledge or deny the messages. The alternative is to loose all credibility.
|
|
|
Moneroman88 is a fake shill actively trying to harm XMR by taunting whoever he can with the worst behavior imaginable. Don't get duped.
This actually makes sense. The PM messages are obviously fake. Why would BCX send a message to this account to communicate these messages anyway?
|
|
|
EDIT: It's a psychology thing. They either wanted to gain more BTC (rpietila admitted this and I did so too) and/or hedge on possible BTC failure. Are you kidding me? This is expressing so little faith in Monero, if an alt has any chance to succeed it needs fanatics who aim at No1.
Please link where I have said my aim is to gain more BTC? If I read my mind correctly, it has not been my aim since summer-13. Hedge is something I have talked about. USDXMR in my understanding would immediately gain a lot if something serious happened to Bitcoin, making it a perfect hedge. I also believe Monero has the chance of taking over Bitcoin. I'm not being purposely difficult, and I believe that you mean what you say, but XMR will not take over from bitcoin. Or rather, if XMR takes over from bitcoin, it will be in a drastically different crypto market, in which the potential for cryptocurrency to becme mainstream had been reduced to near zero. People, Joe and Jill Public, don't want cryptonote. They might go for another alt, but it will be easy to use and they will want to be able to track their money and to prove it to the authorities. XMR over taking XBT may or may not happen. What is not the case is that XMR overtaking XBT means that end of crypto-currency, crypto-currency not becoming mainstream, or that those holding XBT will be left "holding the bag". The history of credit cards indicate the exact opposite is the case. American Express had a significant first mover advantage over VISA and MasterCard. This has not meant the end of credit cards, or credit cards not becoming mainstream. Furthermore those who invested in American Express in the early 1970s and held did very well. https://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=AXP+Interactive#symbol=axp;range=my;compare=;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=;
|
|
|
|