282
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Just-Dice.com : Play or Invest : 1% House Edge : Banter++
|
on: August 19, 2013, 02:22:36 AM
|
a) investors consider keeping 90% of profits to be pretty much the same as keeping 95% of the profits, and consider both to be a really good deal, or b) investors didn't notice that the rate changed, so the real reaction to the news is still to come
Either way, it doesn't seem I can manage investment levels by playing with the commission rate, unless I play a lot harder than I have so far.
Nice graph, I'd forgotten that you kept it all in one address so I hadn't thought to check that. How about these? c) The largest investors forgot their passwords / are dead d) Just-dice is the best deal around even at 50% commission, and investors take what they can get e) Serious investors put in more to keep their expected gains the same f) That's actually all your money, trying to hype up the site
|
|
|
283
|
Economy / Lending / Re: Stunna's 0% interest mini loans
|
on: August 17, 2013, 03:26:37 AM
|
Amount requested: .5 BTC Purpose: Additional capital for arbitrage trading. Arbitrage between exchanges is almost 100% safe investment. It only requires patience and capital and wait for the discrepancy to occur to earn a profit. Term: 1 week Trusted: I've conducted trades with various users, have been a long time member.
If by "long time" you mean registered in September 2012, then made almost every one of your posts on May 15th, 2013, and by "conducted trades" you mean entirely unverifiable trades with no record on the forums, then ok.
|
|
|
284
|
Economy / Lending / Re: .11 btc loan
|
on: August 17, 2013, 02:39:18 AM
|
huh? I'm a noob with the blockchain so idk what you guys are really talking about, but I definitely did use the .11 btc loan for a purchase.
EDIT: maybe this will help make sense.. the wallet I posted was my silk road wallet because I needed the BTC immediately (it saved me time from sending it to my blockchain wallet, then to silk road)
Thanks for clearing that up.
|
|
|
285
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Steam Games
|
on: August 16, 2013, 06:16:09 PM
|
lmao please leave, "violating terms of service" for a company that makes millions of $$$ for charity off pixels purposely DRM-free high-quality games that are pay-what-you-want
FTFY US copyright cartel shill please leave I can't even make sense of your position from a die-hard AnCap standpoint. If I'm not mistaken, even Anarcho-Capitalists believe in contracts, right?
|
|
|
286
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Steam Games
|
on: August 16, 2013, 05:30:59 PM
|
lmao please leave, "violating terms of service" for a company that makes millions of $$$ for charity off pixels purposely DRM-free high-quality games that are pay-what-you-want
FTFY
|
|
|
287
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Steam Games
|
on: August 16, 2013, 01:16:08 AM
|
Come on, man. Reselling Humble Bundle codes? That's not only against their terms, it's also what you call a "dick move."
well if you think this then i guess you have about 30 other posts to make as there is about that many of people selling said codes on this site. 1. You don't think this? That means a) it's not against their terms or b) reducing charity revenue by violating terms of service is not a dick move. Which one? 2. No, I won't spam 30 threads. I'm just calling it as I see it. Furthermore, you can buy the Humble Bundle with Bitcoin for less than the OP is asking. Not even a completely selfish, heartless, entirely rational market agent would buy the OP's stolen goods.
|
|
|
289
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Steam Games
|
on: August 16, 2013, 12:16:03 AM
|
Come on, man. Reselling Humble Bundle codes? That's not only against their terms, it's also what you call a "dick move."
I don't want the Steam codes to go to waste. (I used Origin.) Its not like I am trying to get rich off it. You are violating their terms of service and reducing demand for their product. Demand which directly benefits charity.
|
|
|
290
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Steam Games
|
on: August 16, 2013, 12:02:03 AM
|
Come on, man. Reselling Humble Bundle codes? That's not only against their terms, it's also what you call a "dick move."
|
|
|
299
|
Economy / Lending / Re: I need 0.50 btc for Marijuana on Silk Road
|
on: August 13, 2013, 01:59:39 AM
|
what happened to old bitcoin forum? remember when nice rich men on here gave away bitcoins to a person who only said "i want this, pay back by this day" i miss those nice rich men, they die?
are you all in debt? What are you talking about? It's the same as it's ever been. In fact, OgNasty just got a 200BTC loan nearly immediately after he requested it. Why are you requesting a loan? Are you in debt? I think he's right, it has changed quite a bit. A detailed account of why
|
|
|
300
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Git commit ostensibly from Satoshi in recent transaction
|
on: August 12, 2013, 11:58:59 PM
|
https://blockchain.info/tx/77822fd6663c665104119cb7635352756dfc50da76a92d417ec1a12c518fad69From a3a61fef43309b9fb23225df7910b03afc5465b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Satoshi Nakamoto < satoshin@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:28:02 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove (SINGLE|DOUBLE)BYTE I removed this from Bitcoin in f1e1fb4bdef878c8fc1564fa418d44e7541a7e83 in Sept 7 2010, almost three years ago. Be warned that I have not actually tested this patch. --- backends/bitcoind/deserialize.py | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/backends/bitcoind/deserialize.py b/backends/bitcoind/deserialize.py index 6620583..89b9b1b 100644 --- a/backends/bitcoind/deserialize.py +++ b/backends/bitcoind/deserialize.py @@ -280,10 +280,8 @@ opcodes = Enumeration("Opcodes", [ "OP_WITHIN", "OP_RIPEMD160", "OP_SHA1", "OP_SHA256", "OP_HASH160", "OP_HASH256", "OP_CODESEPARATOR", "OP_CHECKSIG", "OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY", "OP_CHECKMULTISIG", "OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY", - ("OP_SINGLEBYTE_END", 0xF0), - ("OP_DOUBLEBYTE_BEGIN", 0xF000), "OP_PUBKEY", "OP_PUBKEYHASH", - ("OP_INVALIDOPCODE", 0xFFFF), + ("OP_INVALIDOPCODE", 0xFF), ]) @@ -293,10 +291,6 @@ def script_GetOp(bytes): vch = None opcode = ord(bytes ) i += 1 - if opcode >= opcodes.OP_SINGLEBYTE_END and i < len(bytes): - opcode <<= 8 - opcode |= ord(bytes) - i += 1
if opcode <= opcodes.OP_PUSHDATA4: nSize = opcode -- 1.7.9.4
|
|
|
|