HAHA!!!  Damn iPhone keyboard!  of course we should not be making payb.tc's life difficuilt.

I would suggest saying that you will not include them manually and thy will be returned to sender sans 0.005 TX fee, or considered a donation if below that amount.   Or just a donation period.

Honestly you are doing us a favor, we should be making your life difficult.

After sleeping on this something else has occured to me on the topic.

Certain hosted walelts that "do it right" (namely strongcoin and blockchain.info) may actually be *more* secure for many of the reasons stated in this thread aginst them.

The biggest one, that I have yet to see mentioned, is the isolation imparted by the browser. 

I think it has been hashed to death and we all agree that unless you are implementing your own bitcoin clcient 100% from scratch or you review each and every line of library code each time it changes that you are imparting some level of trust on someone.

In this regard the browser/javascript based wallets are acutally more secure IMHO because they are isolated and can only access the funds I give them the private keys for.  As opposed to a desktop client that feasbly could capture every bit-cent that flowwed through that system.

I just think the whole FUD against the managed wallets (again those who "get it right") is unbiased.  If you want to take a walk down the road of "what could happen if a solution provider woke up evil this mornign" then consider...

Most people install the desktop clients in binary form, and even those who compile their own don't check the source code.  Lets say that the Armory/Electrum/Satoshi (seems how we are picking clients with absolutly no proof or knowledge) developers decided tthey were evil and deployed slightly modified client that say for the enxt six months gathered every private key that ever passed through it, even paper wallets.

Then on a "bitcoin black friday" the evil dooers decided to empty all of those addresses.  Most people wouldn't even know until it was WAY too late, and the few people that were actually taking the propper precautions to prevent this would be inconsiquential compared to the funds they would actually capture.  Furthermore because they are desktop clients there are about 1000 and 1 ways that they could capture the wallet.dat files of other applications and exfiltrate them.

My point is: Unless you are one of a very few people in the community who write this from scratch, you are trusting someone.  That doesn't really matter if you are trusting them to write a library, a desktop client, or a website.

Also web clients have certain features I find very attractive such as:
 - There is no wallet.dat on any of my systems to steal.
 - I have two factor authentication to my wallet, so even if my password if compromised I still have a window of protection from my two factor which would be impossible to do correctly in a non-hosted solution.
 - I have access to my wallet on all of my devices, including my un-jailbroken iDevices.
 - It looks better than any of the other desktop clients I have tried.
 - I don't have to wait 2+ hours for the blockchain to download
 - Payment notifications

These are just a few of the things I can count off the top of my head.  If you decide that you would rather use a desktop client then that is great.  That is the great thing about choice, and we have alot of great (and for the record I believe trustworthy) sources to choose from.  But to spread FUD that is opinionated and uneducated is just irresponsible.

With multiple wallets/addresses you need to capture multiple private keys tO spend the coins. As Ben said: mistakes happen in the worse way. If you only have one address run onmistake and EVERYTHING is gone.

Can't wait until I have my BTC for my first deposit. 

Now if we could just working instructions for OSX Lion.

Sorry... I copy and pasted my decryption password, which is quite complex, to ensure that I was not mistyping it on the iOS keyboard.  I also attemtped to enter it on a bluetooth keyboard.

Or to piss them off enough to come after you.  Anyone in the US that really wants to play at strike sapphire can, they just have to put a little work into it and it isn't the sites fault the user purposefully circumvented their checks.

Just jailbroke my iPod 4G and it keeps rejecting my password, I even copy-pasted so I *KNOW* it was correct.

I have suspicions that it is because the camera on the iPod sucks and is mis-reading the QR code, but that is just a guess.

What can I do?

How long have they been outstanding?

I see the max bet is still pretty low which says to me that there have been some major TXs lately.

You are correct, I mis-typed.  Thank you for clarifying TangibleCryptography.

The tradeoff ribuck is that there is supposed to be guaranteed funds to payout any win, granted there have been problems with unconfirmed funds being used to payout wins, but they come through eventually.

If there was no dynamic limit and two big payoffs hit in close proximity then SatoshiDICE may be put in the position of having to say "Umm... we will have your money tomorrow" which would kill it's rep.

I am on US soil, hence my worry.


My worry is that there is a judicial ruling stating that the UIGEA only applies to sports betting; however the US Justice department (the one responsible for the actual prosecution) has publicly stated they disagree and will go after ALL gambling sites.

I also notice that Strike Saphire is blocked in the US... so obviously you have some concern as well.  May I ask where you operate out of?

Yes

You sill control your DNS gweedo so it would only be temporary censorship.

Very interesting...   AnonOps used CloudFlare for a bit too.

The blockchain.info wallet is very similar to last pass in the sense that their servers only store a blob of data, all the encryption/decryption happens in your browser.  Also they support two factor authentication which makes it slightly stronger than most desktop clients IMHO.

I have never used strong coin so I can not speak to that.

Addict

See the first paragraph in the link I posted:


In other words: they will still arrest your ass.  I don't want to be arrested.  I see you are operating out of LA AnonymousBat, what is your legal strategy, if I can ask.

Sweet, I think I was #1

Now 9 other people need to go find it so I can make some BTC!