62,489 members, I'd guess < 2% take you up on the offer. There's just tons of free magazine offers out there, lots of dead accounts, lots of users that won't see the offer, lots of users that don't want to give their address, etc.
So a 50k run of one issue for distribution to bitcointalk.com members seems like a bad idea.
Flawed logic is flawed. For one thing you can not assume that everyone has seen this thread. |
|
|
|
So, how do the competition rate for KYC? Are the other exchanges doing it properly?
What is not proper? |
|
|
|
|
I am all for any solution that works.
|
|
|
|
Running into the hell of compiling Armory on OSX.... What if you required brew for OSX? I know that is not 'ideal' but it is loads better than what we have today. Then users could install your custom formula and just brew install armory https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/wiki/Formula-Cookbook |
|
|
|
I support both first-class by default (this is less confusing to the average user than the arcane "Receive coins" screen), and the inclusion of Armory-style signature blocks.
Agreed.. I think for any serious future use that we need some sort of signature block format. |
|
|
|
Good to know. At almost 20% growth since IPO I'd like to say that is an A-game if I ever saw one. Thanks!
Who has two thumbs and is jelly they missed the IPO? <------ This guy |
|
|
|
|
NO I WOULDNT GIVE YOU MY ADDRESS!!!
If i did, the next thing I know I would have a truckload of giggling Korean girls at my door.
On second though... at least I wouldn't have to pay for electricity anymore.....
|
|
|
|
|
What about using blockchain.info's API to get the balance of the key?
|
|
|
|
What are the dimensions of the 1BTC coin, does it fit in any "standard" coin capsules?
It is slightly bigger than a US Quarter... I believe the actual dimensions are on the site. |
|
|
|
etotheipi, I think you're trying to put the cart before the horse. Yes, there are plenty potential use-cases for it, but very few of those use-cases are wanted/needed/used by anyone right now. I don't hear any merchants clamoring to have customers sign their physical address information with their payment address - for the merchants, it is plenty good enough to just have the user fill out their address information into a normal HTML form at the time of purchase (and really, why wouldn't that be good enough?).
I disagree with this... It is a chicken and egg problem. If it were there then people would use it, organically. You can see much the same problem with the iPad: there were no crys of "GIVE US TABLETS" but Apple came along and sparked a whole ecosystem. Try to take away someones tablet now (even if it is an android) and chances are they will raise a huge storm. |
|
|
|
I attempted to follow the OSX build instructions on the site; however I keep getting an odd error: Generating wrappers...
BlockUtils.h:326: Warning 472: Overloaded method AddressBookEntry::AddressBookEntry(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:378: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcAddress::BtcAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:378: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcAddress::BtcAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:378: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcAddress::BtcAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:378: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcAddress::BtcAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:378: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcAddress::BtcAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:414: Warning 509: Overloaded method BtcAddress::addTxIO(TxIOPair &) effectively ignored,
BlockUtils.h:413: Warning 509: as it is shadowed by BtcAddress::addTxIO(TxIOPair *).
BlockUtils.h:413: Warning 509: Overloaded method BtcAddress::addTxIO(TxIOPair *,bool) effectively ignored,
BlockUtils.h:414: Warning 509: as it is shadowed by BtcAddress::addTxIO(TxIOPair &,bool).
BlockUtils.h:459: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcWallet::addAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 1 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:459: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcWallet::addAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 1 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:459: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcWallet::addAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 1 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:459: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcWallet::addAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 1 of type 'BinaryData'
BlockUtils.h:459: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcWallet::addAddress(BinaryData) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 1 of type 'BinaryData'
BtcUtils.h:956: Warning 472: Overloaded method BtcUtils::verifyProofOfWork(BinaryDataRef,BinaryDataRef) with no explicit typecheck typemap for arg 0 of type 'BinaryData'
g++ -I"/usr/include/python`python -c 'import sys; print str(sys.version_info[0]) + "." + str(sys.version_info[1])'`" -c -O2 -pipe -fPIC -Icryptopp -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -lpthread CppBlockUtils_wrap.cxx
In file included from /usr/include/python2.7/Python.h:126,
from CppBlockUtils_wrap.cxx:150:
/usr/include/python2.7/modsupport.h:27: warning: ‘PyArg_ParseTuple’ is an unrecognized format function type
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-g++-4.2: -lpthread: linker input file unused because linking not done
g++ -shared -lpthread UniversalTimer.o BinaryData.o FileDataPtr.o BtcUtils.o BlockObj.o BlockUtils.o EncryptionUtils.o libcryptopp.a "/usr/lib/libpython`python -c 'import sys; print str(sys.version_info[0]) + "." + str(sys.version_info[1])'`.a" CppBlockUtils_wrap.o -o ../_CppBlockUtils.so
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-g++-4.2: /usr/lib/libpython2.7.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [swig] Error 1
╭─aburns@aab ~/src/bitcoin/BitcoinArmory/cppForSwig ‹› ‹master›
╰─[12:29:34]$ ls -lh /usr/lib/libpython2.7* 1 ↵
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 65B Aug 25 12:27 /usr/lib/libpython2.7.a -> usr/local/Cellar/python/2.7.3/lib/python2.7/config/libpython2.7.a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 53B Aug 24 20:59 /usr/lib/libpython2.7.dylib -> /usr/local/Cellar/python/2.7.3/lib/libpython2.7.dylib
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68B Aug 22 2011 /usr/lib/libpython2.7.dylib.orig -> ../../System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/Python
╭─aburns@aab ~/src/bitcoin/BitcoinArmory/cppForSwig ‹› ‹master›
╰─[12:29:35]$
As you can see libpython2.7.a does indeed exist (although I had to manually symlink it). My gut feeling is that it has something to do with the PyArg_ParseTuple erro, but I do not have the skills to troubleshoot this. Thanks. |
|
|
|
How does a company prove it's identity? Does this rule out Panamanian companies?
My guess would be that a principal would sign indicating such. Give them a call; it wouldnt be the first time Mt Gox has this situation. |
|
|
|
Yes, some people are lazy, and others are greedy.
I am both lazy AND greedy. |
|
|
|
I recently changed the password to my wallet.
Now when trying to pair my iphone with my existing wallet by scanning the QR code, I receive the following error:
...
When I enter the password that I am %100 sure is the correct password (I can login to the wallet in Safari using this password.) I still receive the same error.
I have already run the "integrity check" on the wallet as well.
I get this error too Roger... I think it has to do with 2-factor auth. What I ended up soing was setting up a mobile wallet that does not have 2FA and that paird successfully. |
|
|
|
Here is a drawing I just made, reflecting my initial idea and the colors proposed by grondilu:  it is a svg file, feel free to improve it: http://ecdsa.org/electrum_logo.svgMy personal favorite so far. |
|
|
|
|
But if it were a display piece would you want your private key on it?
|
|
|
|
Neat little trick. My only worries is that DropBox will revoke the space  Honestly I had the same thought given that the emails are obviously bogus and come in one right after another. You will get a full refund if your space is revoked (I need to check it myself though) I've been selling it for more than a year. None revoked, till today. How about giving us a 500MB referral to test and sit on for a while? Unessecary... I have had mine for awhile and it has yet to be revoked. Good to hear about the refund. |
|
|
|
Neat little trick. My only worries is that DropBox will revoke the space Honestly I had the same thought given that the emails are obviously bogus and come in one right after another. |
|
|
|
Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?
It's a bug in the satoshi client. In an attempt to avoid sending change less than 0.01 BTC, it sends change even when it isn't necessary. I submitted a fix for the bug a long time ago, but it never got included in the master branch. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/898Here's a good example. MtGox is trying to consolidate 10 50k outputs into a single 500k output, but an 11th 50k gets pulled in and spat out as change due to the same bug: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/2048819/1Is it a bug or (privacy) 'feature'? |
|
|
|
Thought I would leave this here.
I love you. <hugs> Also it was The Oatmeal who created it, I just thought it awesome and relavent. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
