Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 08:42:51 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?  (Read 234694 times)
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
April 07, 2016, 05:40:21 PM
 #1241

Do not forget the firing of the White House travel department so she could give the work to her friends. Also, how she treats the secret service people assigned to protect her.


If you have a link about this it would be cool.




http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/05/us/memo-places-hillary-clinton-at-core-of-travel-office-case.html



She is bad news.


Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
April 07, 2016, 07:06:22 PM
 #1242

i do no think she is trustworthy.
many times in poll she appears as untrustworthy.

This is true however it is easily fixed.  Just redefine "Trustworthy" to mean "untrustworthy."

Rizla2345
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 02:10:16 AM
 #1243

Hillary lies about everything - how she got her name, how long she supported marriage equality, that Bosnian snipers shot at her, everything. The list is way too long.
Rizla2345
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 02:16:10 AM
 #1244

One thing I don´t get; she´s supposed to be so experienced but she only passed like one law as a US Senator and has no accomplishments to speak of as Secretary of State, only horrible screwups. It seems to be some myth created by the media to cover her utter untrustworthiness,
bitcoinisfurture
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 08, 2016, 09:49:32 AM
 #1245

People votes will decide if she is trustworthy or not. But hope she turns out to be better then people's understanding.
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 01:01:05 PM
 #1246

People votes will decide if she is trustworthy or not. But hope she turns out to be better then people's understanding.



Better than...? What?



Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 02:02:57 PM
 #1247

People votes will decide if she is trustworthy or not. But hope she turns out to be better then people's understanding.



Clinton Campaign Uses Noise Machine To Block Reporters From Hearing Fundraiser Speech




Hillary Clinton’s campaign team reportedly used a static noise machine on Thursday to block reporters outside of a fundraiser in Denver from hearing her remarks.

That’s according to Stan Bush, a reporter for Denver’s CBS-4, who was stationed outside of the event, which was held outdoors at the home of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a superdelegate who has endorsed Clinton.

Bush said that the noise interference machine was turned on after a band — later identified as Big Head Todd and the Monsters — finished playing music and before Clinton spoke. The device was placed inside of a fence on the property and aimed in the direction of the press, Bush wrote.

He posted video showing what it sounded like outside of the event before and after the machine was turned on. The device produced a low-intensity throbbing noise, much like a helicopter off in the distance.

After the sound machine was quieted, music can be heard coming from inside the event.

Clinton’s visit to Denver was solely for fundraising purposes. She lost to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders by 20 points in last month’s caucuses. According to The Denver Post, the top donor level for the fundraiser was $27,000. Funds will be dispersed between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and state party committees.

The Clinton campaign frequently uses noise in another way to prevent reporters from overhearing the candidate’s remarks. Often, while Clinton is shaking hands with voters at campaign events, staff will crank up music to prevent reporters from recording their conversations.

The Clinton team has also been criticized for using a rope line to prevent reporters from getting too close to the former first lady.

The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/07/clinton-campaign-uses-noise-machine-to-block-reporters-from-hearing-fundraiser-speech/


Betwrong
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3318
Merit: 2176


I stand with Ukraine.


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 03:27:08 PM
 #1248

People votes will decide if she is trustworthy or not. But hope she turns out to be better then people's understanding.


Yep, I hope her command will be made of the best professionals in their fields and that's why I think she'll be good as the President. It's not about her it's about who is with her. Trump seems too authoritative to me and I'm afraid even he has a good command he will not listen to them.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 03:33:02 PM
 #1249

People votes will decide if she is trustworthy or not. But hope she turns out to be better then people's understanding.


Yep, I hope her command will be made of the best professionals in their fields and that's why I think she'll be good as the President. It's not about her it's about who is with her. Trump seems too authoritative to me and I'm afraid even he has a good command he will not listen to them.


Maybe he seems to be, but we know harpy is awful with her staff and is abusive with the people paid to protect her.


iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2016, 01:03:18 AM
 #1250

BREAKING HARD:

Clinton Foundation Donor Ensnared in Kickbacks Probe

http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-foundation-donor-kickback-probe/

Quote
A major Clinton Foundation donor company that has been granted millions in U.S. federal loans has been linked to a corruption probe in Pakistan, according to reports.

The Abraaj Group, a Middle Eastern investment fund that contributed between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, has not been charged in the case, but its name has surfaced in Pakistani media reports. Authorities in Sindh province have accused a prominent government official of providing illegal favors to K-Electric, a power company owned and managed by the Abraaj Group since 2009.

Former Pakistani oil minister Dr. Asim Hussain was arrested last year amid allegations that he helped harbor terrorists in a string of hospitals he owned and doled out illegal contracts to companies, including K-Electric. Both Hussain and K-Electric have denied the allegations.

The investigation has not impacted the U.S. government’s ongoing partnership with the Abraaj Group, which dates back to at least 2012. That year, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation—a federal agency that dispenses corporate loans under the guidance of the U.S. State Department—selected the Abraaj Group to manage its $150 million Middle East investment fund.

Two weeks later, the Abraaj Group co-sponsored the Clinton Global Initiative’s annual meeting.

Drudge siren (or three) in 10, 9, 8....


██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
CarrollFilms
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100

Can I eat a Bitcoin?


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 06:40:55 AM
 #1251

If the FBI can't trust her because of her emails, what makes people think she is trustworthy enough to run this country?

Back in my day Bitcoin used to cost $69
Rizla2345
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 10:35:54 AM
 #1252

If the FBI can't trust her because of her emails, what makes people think she is trustworthy enough to run this country?

There´s this myth that she´s so "experienced" which probably is supposed to balance out or even cancel out her dishonesty, serial lying and untrustworthiness.
Rizla2345
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 10:40:00 AM
 #1253

This myth has been created by the media which of course is owned by interests that love a screwball like Hillary, that is Wall Street and the warmongers/war business and other parasites on the American taxpayer.
Racey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000


Soon, I have to go away.


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 12:18:32 PM
 #1254

This myth has been created by the media which of course is owned by interests that love a screwball like Hillary, that is Wall Street and the warmongers/war business and other parasites on the American taxpayer.

That is type of person they want, so easy to pull her strings.
I bet she stinks of fish, I dislike her more each day.
She is so cheap, anyone that will have her pays nothing at all. Cheesy

And its gone.
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 11:20:00 PM
 #1255

This myth has been created by the media which of course is owned by interests that love a screwball like Hillary, that is Wall Street and the warmongers/war business and other parasites on the American taxpayer.

That is type of person they want, so easy to pull her strings.
I bet she stinks of fish, I dislike her more each day.
She is so cheap, anyone that will have her pays nothing at all. Cheesy

LOL She wouldn't even make a good whore. I like the way you think.

PakistanHockeyfan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 11:28:43 PM
 #1256

Well there are no untrustworthy emails sent on her government email address Smiley.  Then again no emails were sent there.

On the other side thinking of computer security.  Each person having their own email server does make it hard to compromise everyone at once.  So she did add some security by doing it.
Just because she's trying to be president, doesn't mean she should give up her privacy. That's just how I see it. I don't know why people made it a huge deal, but then again I never actually knew the full logistics on the email scandal so if somebody could explain, it'd be appreciated.
galdur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 10, 2016, 09:45:57 AM
 #1257

Well, she was the Secretary of State. It´s not so much about her personal privacy. There´s diplomatic communications, sensitive and secret stuff. There are strict regulations regarding security of that obviously. It´s nothing new.

galdur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 10, 2016, 11:46:36 PM
 #1258

Obama: Clinton Was “Careless” With Emails But Didn’t Jeopardize National Security

By Daniel Politi

APRIL 10 2016 3:30 PM

President Obama sat down for the his first interview with Fox News since February 2014 and said that while Hillary Clinton may not have been as careful as she should have been with her emails, she did not harm national security while serving as secretary of State. He also “guaranteed” that politics have not and will not influence the ongoing investigation into Clinton and her use of a private email system.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama said on Fox News Sunday. "What I've also said is that—and she has acknowledged—that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she ... recognizes," he added, noting that the issue had to be seen in perspective and Clinton did an "outstanding job" as secretary of State. Obama also assured Fox News’ Chris Wallace that there would be no political influence in the investigation.

“I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case,” Obama said. “Nobody is above the law. How many times do I have to say it?” The president did note however that there was often a problem of over-classification and there are some things classified as top secret that “is basically stuff that you could get in open-source.”

Obama also emphasized he had no intention of pulling Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination. "Absolutely not," Obama said when asked whether he might consider dropping Garland’s nomination before he leaves office.

Asked about his “worst mistake” while in office, Obama said he thought it was “probably failing to plan for the day after” the intervention in Libya.

The president said that his “number one job is to protect the American people” and defended his efforts to fight terrorism. He then went on to give a long explanation on how combating terrorists involves more than just guns:

In the wake of terrorist attacks, it has been my view consistently that the job of the terrorists, in their minds, is to induce panic, induce fear, get societies to change who they are. And what I’ve tried to communicate is, “You can’t change us. You can kill some of us, but we will hunt you down, and we will get you.”
And in the meantime, just as we did in Boston, after the marathon bombing, we’re going to go to a ballgame. And do all the other things that make our life worthwhile.  … That’s the message of resilience. That we don’t panic, that we don’t fear, we will hunt you down and we will get you.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/04/10/obama_clinton_was_careless_with_emails_but_didn_t_jeopardize_national_security.html

Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
April 11, 2016, 12:24:39 AM
 #1259

Obama: Clinton Was “Careless” With Emails But Didn’t Jeopardize National Security

By Daniel Politi

APRIL 10 2016 3:30 PM

President Obama sat down for the his first interview with Fox News since February 2014 and said that while Hillary Clinton may not have been as careful as she should have been with her emails, she did not harm national security while serving as secretary of State. He also “guaranteed” that politics have not and will not influence the ongoing investigation into Clinton and her use of a private email system.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama said on Fox News Sunday. "What I've also said is that—and she has acknowledged—that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she ... recognizes," he added, noting that the issue had to be seen in perspective and Clinton did an "outstanding job" as secretary of State. Obama also assured Fox News’ Chris Wallace that there would be no political influence in the investigation.

“I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case,” Obama said. “Nobody is above the law. How many times do I have to say it?” The president did note however that there was often a problem of over-classification and there are some things classified as top secret that “is basically stuff that you could get in open-source.”

Obama also emphasized he had no intention of pulling Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination. "Absolutely not," Obama said when asked whether he might consider dropping Garland’s nomination before he leaves office.

Asked about his “worst mistake” while in office, Obama said he thought it was “probably failing to plan for the day after” the intervention in Libya.

The president said that his “number one job is to protect the American people” and defended his efforts to fight terrorism. He then went on to give a long explanation on how combating terrorists involves more than just guns:

In the wake of terrorist attacks, it has been my view consistently that the job of the terrorists, in their minds, is to induce panic, induce fear, get societies to change who they are. And what I’ve tried to communicate is, “You can’t change us. You can kill some of us, but we will hunt you down, and we will get you.”
And in the meantime, just as we did in Boston, after the marathon bombing, we’re going to go to a ballgame. And do all the other things that make our life worthwhile.  … That’s the message of resilience. That we don’t panic, that we don’t fear, we will hunt you down and we will get you.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/04/10/obama_clinton_was_careless_with_emails_but_didn_t_jeopardize_national_security.html



Obama: Clinton Was “Careless” With Emails But Didn’t Jeopardize National Security

How does he know? I thought the FBI,the DOJ and the White House were separated entity... You know, to avoid the impression of a crooked regime...


If he sees himself as an tyrant then there is nothing wrong with his statement. President, judge and jury.


galdur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 11, 2016, 12:29:18 AM
 #1260

"there’s classified, and there’s classified. There’s stuff that’s really top secret, top secret, and then there’s just stuff being presented to the President or Secretary of State." --Obama

If only I had known. https://t.co/yrPg8uxiQO

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) April 10, 2016

Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!