What's your opinion of gun control?

[wolfracer]

I believe that every man head of a family that wanna to protect his patrimonic, family and home has the right to used a gun to defend it, of course with regulation and psicological profiles to prevent any crazy people blowing up his school companion in his school.

[BADecker]

I believe that every man head of a family that wanna to protect his patrimonic, family and home has the right to used a gun to defend it, of course with regulation and psicological profiles to prevent any crazy people blowing up his school companion in his school.

Yes. Let the wacko psychologists determine who has the right to use guns, so that the military can take down any Waco they want.

[Lieldoryn]

Tell during the attack you have you have a few minutes to wait for the police. Besides, who of the robbers will give you the opportunity to call the police? The weapons should be in the countryside and in the city. Trump said that since his arrival all the attacks on the second amendment will cease.

[killgald]

Tell during the attack you have you have a few minutes to wait for the police. Besides, who of the robbers will give you the opportunity to call the police? The weapons should be in the countryside and in the city. Trump said that since his arrival all the attacks on the second amendment will cease.

Every men must have the resources to defend his family and home, its natural behavior and having a gun is the only thing you need to do so. totally agreed with you.

[BADecker]

Beware the Militarized Cops

Today, Doug and I pick up that conversation. But this time, Doug shares his thoughts on the militarization of US police departments. We hope you enjoy this conversation as much as we did.

Justin: Doug, yesterday you called out anti-drug lawmakers, or what you called "drug warriors," for their immense hypocrisy and stupidity. But what about the growing number of "warrior cops" who seem to view the United States as their own personal battleground?

Doug: I started writing about the militarization of American police back in the 1990s, when it started happening in earnest. And it's very disturbing, because the way a solider deals with the enemy is necessarily quite different from the way the police are supposed to deal with citizens.

The US has these numerous continuing wars around the world, so they wind up with lots of spare military equipment. And what to do with it? They bring it home and give it to the police because they think it might be helpful. And then, driving APCs and wearing body armor, the police get the wrong idea.

Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05/no_author/beware-militarized-cops/.

[coinits]

It's simple.

Those who own the guns have control.

[BADecker]

Shove the business end of a microwave oven magnetron into a short piece of 3" stove pipe, add your transformer, a battery pack, and a trigger switch. Then head off down the street...

 

[muffinbiller]

I am against gun control 100%. I think those for gun control are missing the real reason behind crimes with a weapon. And that reason is criminals don’t care about laws. You can make all the laws you want and there will still be crime. Proof of this is countries that ban civilians from possessing a firearm and yet people are still being killed by firearms. Japan for example has very restrictive firearm laws yet criminals there still kill people and rob people with firearms.

The only way to reduce crime is to scare the bejesus out of criminals. Not be all sweet on them. They steal a car they get beat with the caning punishment used in other countries. This is a very painful punishment and imprints their mind that stealing results in extreme pain. Public executions such as hanging should be used and televised.
We need to enforce the laws we have. Its illegal to kill, rob, assault others, etc do those laws prevent that? No. So how is banning weapons going to stop that?
Banning firearms or restricting firearms only disarms the law biding and make them easy prey for criminals.
Example; why do some drunk drivers have over a dozen convictions? Did the law against driving drunk stop them? No! But I would bet you $100 that if you beat the hell out of them with a wooden cane after the 2nd conviction you wouldn’t see as many repeat drunk drivers! And if you executed a drunk driver for killing some one I know they wont be a repeat offender.

So lets get tough on the criminals and help not hinder the public to defend themselves.

[craked5]

It's simple.

Those who own the guns have control.

Not true.
Those who have the number have control.
No matter how well armed they are, if you're 100 times more numerous you can win.
It's not like army and police had ever managed to stop a revolution...

[7daystodie]

Tell during the attack you have you have a few minutes to wait for the police. Besides, who of the robbers will give you the opportunity to call the police? The weapons should be in the countryside and in the city. Trump said that since his arrival all the attacks on the second amendment will cease.

Every men must have the resources to defend his family and home, its natural behavior and having a gun is the only thing you need to do so. totally agreed with you.

Yes, people need to have protective equipment for their family, but they need to undergo a check for mental illness. There are many cases where unhealthy people killed members of their family in a fit of aggression.

[BADecker]

Tell during the attack you have you have a few minutes to wait for the police. Besides, who of the robbers will give you the opportunity to call the police? The weapons should be in the countryside and in the city. Trump said that since his arrival all the attacks on the second amendment will cease.

Every men must have the resources to defend his family and home, its natural behavior and having a gun is the only thing you need to do so. totally agreed with you.

Yes, people need to have protective equipment for their family, but they need to undergo a check for mental illness. There are many cases where unhealthy people killed members of their family in a fit of aggression.

Because of the way society is right now, the mentally unstable might need to be checked.

If society had parents who taught their children properly,
and if everyone wore guns while in public,
and if people were used to this,
there wouldn't be a need to check for mentally disabled.

Why not? They would be dead, or at least in prison. Guess how they would die?

[CataloniaFM]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

It is necessary to control whom to issue weapons, because there are many unhealthy people who can kill and destroy for no reason.

[BADecker]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

It is necessary to control whom to issue weapons, because there are many unhealthy people who can kill and destroy for no reason.

The exact reason why the military and the cops shouldn't have guns.

[wolfracer]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

It is necessary to control whom to issue weapons, because there are many unhealthy people who can kill and destroy for no reason.

There will always exist a way to traffic guns inside one country... thats the reason police forces and security needs gun to protect the people..

[BADecker]

https://i.imgur.com/q6sJpTH.jpg

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

It is necessary to control whom to issue weapons, because there are many unhealthy people who can kill and destroy for no reason.

There will always exist a way to traffic guns inside one country... thats the reason police forces and security needs gun to protect the people..

Police and security are simply people. Give all people guns so that they can protect themselves, and so that we don't need police and security. Can't trust police and security, anyway.

[Lancusters]

https://i.imgur.com/q6sJpTH.jpg

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

It is necessary to control whom to issue weapons, because there are many unhealthy people who can kill and destroy for no reason.

There will always exist a way to traffic guns inside one country... thats the reason police forces and security needs gun to protect the people..

Police and security are simply people. Give all people guns so that they can protect themselves, and so that we don't need police and security. Can't trust police and security, anyway.

No one trusts the police, but all use their help. I agree that everyone should have the opportunity of self-defense with a gun, but it does not says that the police are not needed. What will you do if you attack a gang? Having a weapon you can hold out until the police arrive.

[skillink]

Weapons can not be used as a tool for peace, as strong as any weapon goal. Guns are still weapons

[BADecker]

Weapons can not be used as a tool for peace, as strong as any weapon goal. Guns are still weapons

While this is true, nobody can get rid of all guns, as things now stand.

Since there will always be some guns around, let's all have some so that we can balance things out against those who would use guns for wrongdoing.

[bryant.coleman]

Weapons can not be used as a tool for peace, as strong as any weapon goal. Guns are still weapons

Weapons are a deterrent for crime and violence. But if they end up in the wrong hands, then they will do more harm than good. For example, people with prior felony convictions and a history of mental illness must not be allowed to own or rent firearms. Another issue is the ownership of firearms by minors. It is quite difficult to prevent minors from accessing guns.

[freeyourmind]

Tell during the attack you have you have a few minutes to wait for the police. Besides, who of the robbers will give you the opportunity to call the police? The weapons should be in the countryside and in the city. Trump said that since his arrival all the attacks on the second amendment will cease.

Every men must have the resources to defend his family and home, its natural behavior and having a gun is the only thing you need to do so. totally agreed with you.

Yes, people need to have protective equipment for their family, but they need to undergo a check for mental illness. There are many cases where unhealthy people killed members of their family in a fit of aggression.

Because of the way society is right now, the mentally unstable might need to be checked.

If society had parents who taught their children properly,
and if everyone wore guns while in public,
and if people were used to this,
there wouldn't be a need to check for mentally disabled.

Why not? They would be dead, or at least in prison. Guess how they would die?

Agreed - Mental instability combined with not having a proper outlet for aggression.

The less training and confidence in themselves someone with a gun has, the more likely they are to use it.  I would say a good prerequisite to having a gun would be to have years of training and progression in martial arts without weapons and in particular, brazilian jiu jitsu.  A very technical martial art with no striking, and learning to deal with the aggression of others with minimal damage.  Once you've trained for around 10 years and have a black belt, you can have the option to own a gun.

But realistically, outside of the legal framework, prohibiting anything will create a black market, and at the end of the day, anyone that wants a gun and has some cash can get their hands on one regardless of gun policy.