█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[tbearhere]

Anyone know the algo for blake coin in  ccminer ... is it -a blake    or  -a blake256     thx

in ccminer it was "blakecoin"

Thank you JaredKaragen...trying it out.
Is that 37.400 x the hashrate  or .000374 x the hashrate?

Blake is measured in GH/s so 45500Mh will be 45.5

I think for the intensity I am running on my GTX980;  I am seeing ~38-44

Ok  so  45.5 x .0384000  = 13.2....... or   45.5  x .0000384  =  .0017  I think  last one is correct.

I'm getting a lot of rejects at the pool.
And pool is showing 3 mh/s I'm mining at 3 gh/s.

[JaredKaragen]

I updated my response above after analyzing the comment I was responding to.   Cant really comment on rejects other than let diff be default at first.    Basically explain to me what exactly you are trying to calculate?   your profitability scaling for the miner password or how much your hashrate should net you?

[tbearhere]

I updated my response above after analyzing the comment I was responding to.   Cant really comment on rejects other than let diff be default at first.  

Yes

Ok  so  45.5 x .0384000  = 13.2....... or   45.5  x .0000384  =  .0017  I think  last one is correct.

I'm getting a lot of rejects at the pool.
And pool is showing 3 mh/s I'm mining at 3 gh/s.

how much my hashrate should net me.

[JaredKaragen]

please double check my reply  just above, I was editing it also when you replied....

[tbearhere]

me too check above.

[JaredKaragen]

Yeah.  hashrate X profitability;  then convert from mBTC to BTC =)  (divide by 1000)

[JaredKaragen]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC
45.5Mh x 38.4000 Profitability = 0.0017472 BTC

[tbearhere]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC

45 Gh will get 1.74 BTC a day?

And pool is showing 3 mh and I'm mining at 3 Gh...?

[JaredKaragen]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC

45 Gh will get 1.74 BTC a day?

And pool is showing 3 mh and I'm mining at 3 Gh...?

Thats the issue;  I dont know why its reporting one way or the other....  I believe there is a simple error in the scripting of the pool that is causing it to report that way.  1.74mBTC sounds more correct for blake profitability.   I think its just being reported wrong on the site for some reason (chose Mh instead of Gh, etc)

Hopefully crackfoo will have a comment.

[tbearhere]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC

45 Gh will get 1.74 BTC a day?

And pool is showing 3 mh and I'm mining at 3 Gh...?

Thats the issue;  I dont know why its reporting one way or the other....  I believe there is a simple error in the scripting of the pool that is causing it to report that way.  1.74mBTC sounds more correct for blake profitability.   I think its just being reported wrong on the site for some reason (chose Mh instead of Gh, etc)

Hopefully crackfoo will have a comment.   I was certain my GTX980 was like 45Gh at home......  which would be seriously off the wall earnings at that payrate....

Yes I'm doing a test run  3x 750ti  but I have 2x 980ti  and 1 970 gtx .
So my 980ti should do 25% more than the 980 gtx... I hope the price is correct ... I'll put it in my conf files.

Throwing in 3 Gh  pool shows 2 mh.

Crackfoo plz fix.

[JaredKaragen]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC

45 Gh will get 1.74 BTC a day?

And pool is showing 3 mh and I'm mining at 3 Gh...?

Thats the issue;  I dont know why its reporting one way or the other....  I believe there is a simple error in the scripting of the pool that is causing it to report that way.  1.74mBTC sounds more correct for blake profitability.   I think its just being reported wrong on the site for some reason (chose Mh instead of Gh, etc)

Hopefully crackfoo will have a comment.   I was certain my GTX980 was like 45Gh at home......  which would be seriously off the wall earnings at that payrate....

Yes I'm doing a test run  3x 750ti  but I have 2x 980ti  and 1 970 gtx and 12 750ti total.
So my 980ti should do 25% more than the 980 gtx... I hope the price is correct ... I'll put it in my conf files.

the price changes constantly;  it shouldn't be a part of the normalization calculation on your end FYI.

if it gets locked on blakecoin;  divide the normalization value by 1000 and try again.... worth an attempt.

[tbearhere]

45.5Gh x 38.4000 Profitability = 1.7472 BTC

45 Gh will get 1.74 BTC a day?

And pool is showing 3 mh and I'm mining at 3 Gh...?

Thats the issue;  I dont know why its reporting one way or the other....  I believe there is a simple error in the scripting of the pool that is causing it to report that way.  1.74mBTC sounds more correct for blake profitability.   I think its just being reported wrong on the site for some reason (chose Mh instead of Gh, etc)

Hopefully crackfoo will have a comment.   I was certain my GTX980 was like 45Gh at home......  which would be seriously off the wall earnings at that payrate....

Yes I'm doing a test run  3x 750ti  but I have 2x 980ti  and 1 970 gtx  .
So my 980ti should do 25% more than the 980 gtx... I hope the price is correct ... I'll put it in my conf files.

the price changes constantly;  it shouldn't be a part of the normalization calculation on your end FYI.

if it gets locked on blakecoin;  divide the normalization value by 1000 and try again.... worth an attempt.

No I'm just doing a test run without profit switching.

[AngryDwarf]

Enable qubit/myr-gr AUR please!!

[Erumara]

Was watching all day waiting for that sweet sha256 AUR to kick in, go baby go!

[crackfoo]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

[tbearhere]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

I was thinking of  -f 256  but didn't try it....Thx    crackfoo.

Yes and it is reporting mh/s it should be Gh/s.
And I can't put it in my bat or conf file because of this... it will stick to that algo as being the highest forever.

[crackfoo]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

I was thinking of  -f 256  but didn't try it....Thx    crackfoo.

Yes and it is reporting mh/s it should be Gh/s.

Ok, I'm going to apply a different fix. Stratum will restart in a bit

[tbearhere]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

I was thinking of  -f 256  but didn't try it....Thx    crackfoo.

Yes and it is reporting mh/s it should be Gh/s.

Ok, I'm going to apply a different fix. Stratum will restart in a bit

Ok but   I can't put it in my bat or conf file because of this... it will stick to that algo as being the highest forever.

[crackfoo]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

I was thinking of  -f 256  but didn't try it....Thx    crackfoo.

Yes and it is reporting mh/s it should be Gh/s.

Ok, I'm going to apply a different fix. Stratum will restart in a bit

Ok but   I can't put it in my bat or conf file because of this... it will stick to that algo as being the highest forever.

Ok, shouldn't need that now then. Hashrates look normal now.

[tbearhere]

For miners using blakecoin there is an extra switch you should use, which will make the pool report the proper hash rate.

GPU miners please add -f 256 to your command line. There is no standard with blakecoin which is why there is a discrepancy but your shares are still accepted and valued properly.

Cheers

I was thinking of  -f 256  but didn't try it....Thx    crackfoo.

Yes and it is reporting mh/s it should be Gh/s.

Ok, I'm going to apply a different fix. Stratum will restart in a bit

Ok but   I can't put it in my bat or conf file because of this... it will stick to that algo as being the highest forever.

Ok, shouldn't need that now then. Hashrates look normal now.

Ok looking good doing a test run  1 miner 2.7 gh  2 miner 10.6 gh.