ocminer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
 |
February 24, 2016, 06:54:02 AM |
|
What is up with https://dcr.suprnova.cc/ looks like it may be having some issues Its been that way for a few hours it seems, so you may want to have a look and decide what to do until the issue is resolved. Cron was Stuck, fixed  |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 24, 2016, 07:18:38 AM |
|
What is up with https://dcr.suprnova.cc/ looks like it may be having some issues Its been that way for a few hours it seems, so you may want to have a look and decide what to do until the issue is resolved. Cron was Stuck, fixed Awesome, thank you for the quick fix and response! |
|
|
|
|
|
decred (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2016, 07:51:03 AM |
|
Updated the OP text to reflect the latest RFP. RFP-3 deals with visualizing the Decred network. If you know data, it is to port and build a network status dashboard. The next RFP will be for documentation and user guides. Then there will be an RFP for the miner devs. These all run in parallel. |
|
|
|
|
|
_ingsoc
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:05:07 AM |
|
I don't think so, as far as I can tell this coin has the best/solid dev team in the business. Decred might be the true bitcoin alternative we've all been waiting for.
I hope you are correct. I just think this dev team should have tried to apply the KISS principle to some of this. The fact that they have failed to apply KISS gives me doubts for wide adoption. Some of this stuff is rather convoluted. This is not an unfair point. It's important to remember that new technology is often complex. You can look back at any technology in its infancy, and see the trouble with complexity. The irony of the pursuit of simplicity is that it's not simple to do. The active solution to making simple a complex technology is to make it a pursuit. This is reflected in the RFP process. It begins with native GUIs ( RFP-1), improving the light web GUI ( RFP-2), and providing a simple overview of the network and its concepts ( RFP-3). And then there's the stake pool, which makes the process simpler by circumventing the need to keep a wallet online 24/7, or even the requirement of a reliable Internet connection. Deconstructing these processes, it becomes apparent that simplicity is in fact a desire of the project's output - however, as said, it's not as simple as keeping it simple. |
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:29:04 AM |
|
I have still same too much rejects,tried with different diff.  Uh time-too-new is the old bug of the first cgminer versions. Make sure you use the latest version from the decred github releases Yeah new cgminer fixed it, but at this time what's this?it's look lile poolside error.  Did you try a higher diff port ? Looks like the pool isn't providing the work fast enough, yep. Try adding the following parameters to your launcher (or .bat) --no-submit-stale --scan-time 2 --queue 0 Already i had this parameter in my bat file. |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
|
kjadB
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:34:23 AM |
|
is there an idiots guide to running PoS? what is the stake rate?
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:44:51 AM |
|
 OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed? Still having issues. If I still have them I'll add -s 2 to my bat file if that would help....but was working great 2 days ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
nrvasquez
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:49:21 AM |
|
I would not be shocked if the first Blake256 ASICS to be developed and released due to DCR
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
February 24, 2016, 08:50:49 AM |
|
I would not be shocked if the first Blake256 ASICS to be developed and released due to DCR
Could be...low on memory demand. |
|
|
|
|
|
CosaNostra
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:12:44 AM |
|
is there an idiots guide to running PoS? what is the stake rate?
thanks
+1, I was thinking there will be a web staking wallet or pool already  |
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:20:24 AM |
|
Problem gone after i deleted "--no-submit-stale --scan-time 2 --queue 0" parameters, rejects ratio less then %0.5 ...
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:24:05 AM |
|
OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed? OC SUPRNOVA Still having issues. If I still have them I'll add -s 2 to my bat file if that would help....but was working great 2 days ago. Stilll looks ok, a few duplicates are totally normal, I have that too. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:57:44 AM |
|
OC SUPRNOVA I'm getting this.... 2 days ago it was 100% accepts. Using 1.7.3 ccminer with getwork. What changed? OC SUPRNOVA Still having issues. If I still have them I'll add -s 2 to my bat file if that would help....but was working great 2 days ago. Stilll looks ok, a few duplicates are totally normal, I have that too. Looking better now at 98.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
d3athgu1s3
|
|
February 24, 2016, 10:11:32 AM
Last edit: February 29, 2016, 01:51:57 PM by d3athgu1s3 |
|
is there an idiots guide to running PoS? what is the stake rate?
thanks
You can use this noob guide script I have created below. The rest you will need to learn yourself. I did not include the binaries in there, please download it at official Decred github, everything is in the guide. p/s: link deleted, if you do not appreciate what i do, might as well keep it to myself  |
|
|
|
414740633
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2016, 11:45:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
poolmn
|
|
February 24, 2016, 11:47:04 AM |
|
Please write PM With TX ID - wallet is failing sometimes sending |
|
|
|
414740633
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2016, 11:54:04 AM |
|
Please write PM With TX ID - wallet is failing sometimes sending My wallet is DsYTT4HnUEUp1jaq3zrStkyyiwfz92Nayis ID 195678 2016-02-24 08:01:03 Debit_AP thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
Sanitough
|
|
February 24, 2016, 12:21:27 PM |
|
I saw Wolf0 is developing a FPGA system, when will that come to market? How fast will that compare to the GPUs?
|
|
|
|
|
mikewillda
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 219
Merit: 100
CTO/Spokesman
|
|
February 24, 2016, 12:51:03 PM |
|
The development is funded by 10% of the total block reward. Will that have big pressure on the selling?
|
Never invest more than you can afford to loose.
|
|
|
|
badam
|
|
February 24, 2016, 01:04:02 PM |
|
As of 2016/2/12 there are left 2163 airdrop addresses unspent. ~27% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/20 there are left 2024 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/21 there are left 2017 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/22 there are left 2000 airdrop addresses unspent. ~33% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/23 there are left 1989 airdrop addresses unspent. ~33% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/24 there are left 1971 airdrop addresses unspent. ~34% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
|
|
|
|
|
|
