Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[saatoshi_falling]

If someone found #66 and withdrew with an extremely high transaction fee say 10k USD and then within 1 minute the scammers find the private key with kangaroo and submit their withdrawal with lets say 100k USD fee! Would the scammers still get it? Cause this means all the lower bit range puzzles are useless to even attempt.

Correct, but I won't call it a "scammer", perhaps just a leech.  And it won't be found within 1 minute. It will be found within a few seconds. The leech will still get 6 bitcoins, so even 200k RBF won't be too far fetched, as he'll get double his money back.
I feel sorry for people who enthusiastically tried puzzle 66 for many months or even a year or two, without realizing even if they found the private key there's no way in hell they will be able to withdraw it because unless you have 20/30/40k sitting around to gamble on the RBF lottery, you're not getting those funds.

The reason this did not happen before is because puzzle 65 and lower had very little to no reward money in it, so it was not worth the bidding war, but this all changes when the puzzle creator decided to put 6+ BTC in each puzzle. Now there's more people sitting and waiting with bots than people trying to solve.

[pbies]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

[Baskentliia]

Can someone with definite knowledge about this subject write? Can anyone with definite knowledge write about it? Let's say we found puzzle 66 and wanted to withdraw it to our own wallet. and we completed the transaction. Because the public key was exposed, it took seconds to find the wallet's private key. Can someone spend the money in this wallet? Doesn't the money in this wallet come to my wallet? SOME friends say that even if we find the wallet, someone else will steal the bitcoins. Is there such a thing? Then there is no point in searching for low puzzles? HOW TO WITHDRAW MONEY IN THE MOST SAFE WAY, IF WE FIND THE LOW PUZZLES

[brainless]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

with RBF or without RBF, in both case transaction will attempt by many peoples, where running bots for find PK,
but safe and secure way i know , how to perform tx without fear of stolen, i have tested different solutions, and found correct way,
pbies writes 50% correct, but in his testing, others simple get pubk within sec's, and will cancel your tx, as its exist at fair away blocks, and will generate new tx, with rbf or without rbf, and new race will start
lot of viewer and poster's have some satoshi, can play test, simple create new tx without rbf, and use an other system with electrum, load PK, and simple cancel tx from other system, and create new one tx with new addr from 2nd system, you will see results, for proofe my words, when some of you test, and back to ask me alternate way to fearless tx creation

[Baskentliia]

Brother, if we find the 66th puzzle, please share how we can withdraw it to our own wallet without risk and which program we will use. Don't let people's labor go to waste, and don't let thieves steal people's labor.

[AliBah]

is it clear how many percent of puzzle 66 scanned from 0%?
If there is such a this information, then we dont scan the scanned range...

[citb0in]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

[Baskentliia]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

If we find puzzle 66, then someone else will steal it, right?

If someone found #66 and withdrew with an extremely high transaction fee say 10k USD and then within 1 minute the scammers find the private key with kangaroo and submit their withdrawal with lets say 100k USD fee! Would the scammers still get it? Cause this means all the lower bit range puzzles are useless to even attempt.

Correct, but I won't call it a "scammer", perhaps just a leech.  And it won't be found within 1 minute. It will be found within a few seconds. The leech will still get 6 bitcoins, so even 200k RBF won't be too far fetched, as he'll get double his money back.
I feel sorry for people who enthusiastically tried puzzle 66 for many months or even a year or two, without realizing even if they found the private key there's no way in hell they will be able to withdraw it because unless you have 20/30/40k sitting around to gamble on the RBF lottery, you're not getting those funds.

The reason this did not happen before is because puzzle 65 and lower had very little to no reward money in it, so it was not worth the bidding war, but this all changes when the puzzle creator decided to put 6+ BTC in each puzzle. Now there's more people sitting and waiting with bots than people trying to solve.

what is the solution ?

[citb0in]

If we find puzzle 66, then someone else will steal it, right?

obviously yes

what is the solution ?

either

a) you know someone who has a monstrous mining rig in the EH/s (exahash per second) range and you could ask him to include your transaction which you manually baked into a block

or

b) you just try extending your luck by risking to make the transaction with the vague hope that it will take place within a few seconds because a block containing your transaction will be mined within the next second.

Note: Please avoid consecutive posts.

[Baskentliia]

If we find puzzle 66, then someone else will steal it, right?

obviously yes

what is the solution ?

either

a) you know someone who has a monstrous mining rig in the EH/s (exahash per second) range and you could ask him to include your transaction which you manually baked into a block

or

b) you just try extending your luck by risking to make the transaction with the vague hope that it will take place within a few seconds because a block containing your transaction will be mined within the next second.

Note: Please avoid consecutive posts.

Brother, your information is very valuable, this is a very important issue, for this reason, I wrote messages frequently to ensure that this situation is not left behind.
Are you absolutely sure about this? So I'm in shock right now. I think there is definitely another way. Maybe we won't find the puzzle, but the person who finds it will be the victim. People with bitcoin technical background and any kind of knowledge on this subject should share what they know.

[pbies]

...

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

[nomachine]

Maybe we won't find the puzzle, but the person who finds it will be the victim. People with bitcoin technical background and any kind of knowledge on this subject should share what they know.

Don't get too upset. I think there are at least 1000 bots already set up and waiting. There will be chaos the moment puzzle 66 public key appears. If there is any money left in that bidding.

[WanderingPhilospher]

...

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Really? That’s your reply?
No it can’t be done to any address. #66 will be solved within seconds of public key being broadcast, because its range is known. That’s why this is different versus just any old address.

[Baskentliia]

...

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Really? That’s your reply?
No it can’t be done to any address. #66 will be solved within seconds of public key being broadcast, because its range is known. That’s why this is different versus just any old address.

What do you think, brother? Is such a thing possible? Do you agree with what is said?
If so, there will be no point in searching for low-end puzzles.

[nomachine]

This is like throwing one fish into a pond of sharks. Either it will be torn apart and there will be nothing left for anyone,  or one will be the fastest.

[ccinet]

...

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Really? That’s your reply?
No it can’t be done to any address. #66 will be solved within seconds of public key being broadcast, because its range is known. That’s why this is different versus just any old address.

What do you think, brother? Is such a thing possible? Do you agree with what is said?
If so, there will be no point in searching for low-end puzzles.

The problem comes in the way the bitcoin protocol solves the double spending problem.
If two transactions from the same private address simultaneously without confirmations bid, the one with the most confirmations wins... then there is a possibility that the thief will keep your coins, and this is due to the bitcoin protocol itself.

[WanderingPhilospher]

...

Stop spreading bs.

better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Really? That’s your reply?
No it can’t be done to any address. #66 will be solved within seconds of public key being broadcast, because its range is known. That’s why this is different versus just any old address.

What do you think, brother? Is such a thing possible? Do you agree with what is said?
If so, there will be no point in searching for low-end puzzles.

Everything I’ve read, says it’s possible.
It will be interesting to see how many sharks are in the water.

With the low end challenges/puzzle, their time is almost up. Can search for 130, 135, 140 with same or lower ops as 67, 68, 69. For me, I stopped putting a lot of hash on #66 and more on 130; but that’s just me.

[albert0bsd]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

This is not bullshit, as some others users already mentioning, Doesn't matter if you mark it with or without RBF, the transaction always can be repleaced and that only depends of Node configuracions to accept it or reject it.

The only safest way to move the founds is ask to a miner if they mined your transaction without broadcast it (previously to the block begin mined), also it is even better if you are a miner and you include the transaction without broadcast it before it is mined.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Not for any address,  that is only for low puzzles like 66, 67...  maybe up to 80 bit can be solved in some seconds or minutes depending of the program used.

This is only for the next specific addreses:

Code:

66		13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
67		1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
68		1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ
69		19vkiEajfhuZ8bs8Zu2jgmC6oqZbWqhxhG
71		1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU
72		1JTK7s9YVYywfm5XUH7RNhHJH1LshCaRFR
73		12VVRNPi4SJqUTsp6FmqDqY5sGosDtysn4
74		1FWGcVDK3JGzCC3WtkYetULPszMaK2Jksv
76		1DJh2eHFYQfACPmrvpyWc8MSTYKh7w9eRF
77		1Bxk4CQdqL9p22JEtDfdXMsng1XacifUtE
78		15qF6X51huDjqTmF9BJgxXdt1xcj46Jmhb
79		1ARk8HWJMn8js8tQmGUJeQHjSE7KRkn2t8

Other Regular wallets are safe

[ccinet]

It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!

Stop spreading bs.

This is not bullshit, as some others users already mentioning, Doesn't matter if you mark it with or without RBF, the transaction always can be repleaced and that only depends of Node configuracions to accept it or reject it.

The only safest way to move the founds is ask to a miner if they mined your transaction without broadcast it (previously to the block begin mined), also it is even better if you are a miner and you include the transaction without broadcast it before it is mined.

Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.

Not for any address,  that is only for low puzzles like 66, 67...  maybe up to 80 bit can be solved in some seconds or minutes depending of the program used.

This is only for the next specific addreses:

Code:

66		13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
67		1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
68		1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ
69		19vkiEajfhuZ8bs8Zu2jgmC6oqZbWqhxhG
71		1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU
72		1JTK7s9YVYywfm5XUH7RNhHJH1LshCaRFR
73		12VVRNPi4SJqUTsp6FmqDqY5sGosDtysn4
74		1FWGcVDK3JGzCC3WtkYetULPszMaK2Jksv
76		1DJh2eHFYQfACPmrvpyWc8MSTYKh7w9eRF
77		1Bxk4CQdqL9p22JEtDfdXMsng1XacifUtE
78		15qF6X51huDjqTmF9BJgxXdt1xcj46Jmhb
79		1ARk8HWJMn8js8tQmGUJeQHjSE7KRkn2t8

Other Regular wallets are safe

Then we should stop trying to solve the low puzzles and program a bot to catch the low transactions.
We will go from being hunters to leeches!!!

[mcdouglasx]

This is not bullshit, as some others users already mentioning, Doesn't matter if you mark it with or without RBF, the transaction always can be repleaced and that only depends of Node configuracions to accept it or reject it.

The only safest way to move the founds is ask to a miner if they mined your transaction without broadcast it (previously to the block begin mined), also it is even better if you are a miner and you include the transaction without broadcast it before it is mined.

And if the miner includes the transaction and his block is mined by others? Would the transaction be free for the sharks?