brainless
Member
Offline
Activity: 318
Merit: 34
|
|
March 22, 2024, 01:22:15 PM |
|
What if I can open all of them at once? Would that not overwhelm the miners? They can't be watching all of them.
What if I just sweep all of them at the same time? What if I know how to generate all of them, the same way he did? Where I have all of them, all at once? What then? It's like being frozen and unable to walk from the casino to the parking lot just to get back to your car after everyone around you heard you won... How do you get back to your car safely?
I need help and I don't know where to find it...
It's been 3 days now and I still can't come up with a safe way to get back to the mother fucking car...
~K¹
(Does anyone live in Southeast Missouri? I will meet you, pay you, to get this over with. We all know how much is here, you can have 40%.)
I think you don't understand what the "problem" is here. What happens here is what the bitcoin protocol is expected to do. What is not expected is that someone can obtain a private key that "does not" belong to them, and that can only happen with the certainty of a certain proximity as occurs in the case of low bit puzzles. 9 bit - 256 bit ... they're all the same as far as I'm concerned. Only difference here is that it looks like it's considered "acceptable" for one to take what's in the addresses that are provided for themselves, instead of it being considered theft if it were to come from any other address. The addresses that aren't included in this "puzzle" however, belong to individuals that aren't participating in any of this... So obviously that's not an ethical option, we get that. But here, here is different. The only thing keeping these addresses from being swept is the fact there remains the potential for the "reward" to be ripped out from under you... So, as I said, it's now been 4 days... And I still can't come up with a safe way to get back to the mother fucking car... in short, you have puzzle 66 key, and afraid to create tx ?
|
13sXkWqtivcMtNGQpskD78iqsgVy9hcHLF
|
|
|
nomachine
Member
Offline
Activity: 415
Merit: 23
|
|
March 22, 2024, 02:02:26 PM |
|
in short, you have puzzle 66 key, and afraid to create tx ?
Who knows how many of them here are with a key
|
bc1qdwnxr7s08xwelpjy3cc52rrxg63xsmagv50fa8
|
|
|
brainless
Member
Offline
Activity: 318
Merit: 34
|
|
March 22, 2024, 02:55:02 PM |
|
in short, you have puzzle 66 key, and afraid to create tx ?
Who knows how many of them here are with a key And watching each n every post day n night like the Dog, for how to create safe n secure tx
|
13sXkWqtivcMtNGQpskD78iqsgVy9hcHLF
|
|
|
zahid888
Member
Offline
Activity: 272
Merit: 20
the right steps towerds the goal
|
|
March 22, 2024, 03:30:19 PM |
|
What if I can open all of them at once? Would that not overwhelm the miners? They can't be watching all of them.
What if I just sweep all of them at the same time? What if I know how to generate all of them, the same way he did? Where I have all of them, all at once? What then? It's like being frozen and unable to walk from the casino to the parking lot just to get back to your car after everyone around you heard you won... How do you get back to your car safely?
I need help and I don't know where to find it...
It's been 3 days now and I still can't come up with a safe way to get back to the mother fucking car...
~K¹
(Does anyone live in Southeast Missouri? I will meet you, pay you, to get this over with. We all know how much is here, you can have 40%.)
Hi..Digaran..Meet you after a long time..How are you..Lol
|
1BGvwggxfCaHGykKrVXX7fk8GYaLQpeixA
|
|
|
albert0bsd
|
|
March 22, 2024, 03:36:00 PM |
|
Hi..Digaran..Meet you after a long time..How are you..Lol
I also have this suspicion about that user and other users, a lot of newbie accounts recently came up to this topic, all of them writing non-senses
|
|
|
|
Baskentliia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 1
34Sf4DnMt3z6XKKoWmZRw2nGyfGkDgNJZZ
|
|
March 22, 2024, 03:40:09 PM |
|
Is JLP's Kangaroo program used for puzzle 130, which is original and published on github? Yes or no ?
Some said you can use it because the range width is 125 bits. Some have said that the original version of JLP has 130 puzzles and you cannot use it for more comprehensive puzzles.
Which one is right ?
What I'm talking about is the 130 bit range width, that is, if there is more than a 125 bit gap between the start and end, does the program work?
|
34Sf4DnMt3z6XKKoWmZRw2nGyfGkDgNJZZ
|
|
|
albert0bsd
|
|
March 22, 2024, 03:46:25 PM |
|
What I'm talking about is the 130 bit range width, that is, if there is more than a 125 bit gap between the start and end, does the program work?
Somobody already reply you
|
|
|
|
|
unclevito
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 4
|
|
March 22, 2024, 07:52:16 PM |
|
They are false positives. If you are using Windows just block their ability to send and receive to and from the internet they should still work, most of the anti-viruses will give some kind of warning on mining software even though these are not considered mining software. I have been using each on and off for years with no issues
|
|
|
|
kTimesG
Member
Offline
Activity: 142
Merit: 25
|
|
March 22, 2024, 07:55:54 PM |
|
hi... new here. apologies for entering the gates with suspicions but merely curious what these means, if anything important.
If you dont trust it, just dont use it. NEVER use any exe you didnt compile Better yet: - review the source code line by line, if anything seems suspicious or don't understand it, it's likely a threat on so many levels; - review the compiler, check all SHA signatures for all downloaded and installed packages (use https to get sigs from authors, verify certificates, compare against results on another computer which you never touched) - dump Windows. You may have viruses already which you never knew about, or ever will. - clear CMOS / flash UEFI or BIOS and make sure secure boot is on and that you never signed insecure kernel modules to load at boot time Lastly: - make sure you protect against RF attacks (keystrokes and such can travel a long way in the EM field). Use a mechanical keyboard and a CRT monitor (not a digital display, pixels can be trapped with a correctly tuned analog-to-digital converter and some decoding software) - for maximal anti-virus protection you need to also disconnect from the internet, run all software on VMs. Compile everything from scratch.
|
|
|
|
ccinet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2024, 05:16:49 AM |
|
If you dont trust it, just dont use it. NEVER use any exe you didnt compile
Better yet: - review the source code line by line, if anything seems suspicious or don't understand it, it's likely a threat on so many levels; - review the compiler, check all SHA signatures for all downloaded and installed packages (use https to get sigs from authors, verify certificates, compare against results on another computer which you never touched) - dump Windows. You may have viruses already which you never knew about, or ever will. - clear CMOS / flash UEFI or BIOS and make sure secure boot is on and that you never signed insecure kernel modules to load at boot time
Lastly: - make sure you protect against RF attacks (keystrokes and such can travel a long way in the EM field). Use a mechanical keyboard and a CRT monitor (not a digital display, pixels can be trapped with a correctly tuned analog-to-digital converter and some decoding software) - for maximal anti-virus protection you need to also disconnect from the internet, run all software on VMs.
Compile everything from scratch.
Oh! This boy will never do it without a condom!
|
|
|
|
nomachine
Member
Offline
Activity: 415
Merit: 23
|
|
March 23, 2024, 05:09:50 PM Last edit: March 23, 2024, 05:26:50 PM by nomachine |
|
- clear CMOS / flash UEFI or BIOS
Someone in Russian intelligence is about to have an abrupt meeting with an open window. Another step is missing here. Clean bios with me_cleaner https://github.com/corna/me_cleanerHere is a demo of how to hack even the power-off computer via IME https://youtu.be/9fhNokIgBMU
|
bc1qdwnxr7s08xwelpjy3cc52rrxg63xsmagv50fa8
|
|
|
AndrewWeb
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
|
|
March 24, 2024, 08:11:44 PM |
|
Is JLP's Kangaroo program used for puzzle 130, which is original and published on github? Yes or no ?
Some said you can use it because the range width is 125 bits. Some have said that the original version of JLP has 130 puzzles and you cannot use it for more comprehensive puzzles.
Which one is right ?
What I'm talking about is the 130 bit range width, that is, if there is more than a 125 bit gap between the start and end, does the program work?
I tried JLP's Kangaroo on puzzle 65. It found the privat key in 28 seconds !
|
|
|
|
pbies
|
|
March 24, 2024, 10:09:20 PM |
|
I tried JLP's Kangaroo on puzzle 65. It found the privat key in 28 seconds !
Can you share the exact command?
|
BTC: bc1qmrexlspd24kevspp42uvjg7sjwm8xcf9w86h5k
|
|
|
kalos15btc
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 1
|
|
March 25, 2024, 01:13:46 AM |
|
Hi..Digaran..Meet you after a long time..How are you..Lol
I also have this suspicion about that user and other users, a lot of newbie accounts recently came up to this topic, all of them writing non-senses the probleme is not there, the probleme is we didint see digran reply from a long time, so you know the conclusion now xd we need mod here to check their ip and ban those users,
|
|
|
|
AndrewWeb
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
|
|
March 25, 2024, 08:45:02 AM |
|
I tried JLP's Kangaroo on puzzle 65. It found the privat key in 28 seconds !
Can you share the exact command? Today it found it in 46 seconds. It's probably possible to do this in 1 second or much faster than 46 seconds. If somebody knows exactly how please let me know.
|
|
|
|
brainless
Member
Offline
Activity: 318
Merit: 34
|
|
March 25, 2024, 09:09:13 AM |
|
I tried JLP's Kangaroo on puzzle 65. It found the privat key in 28 seconds !
Can you share the exact command? Today it found it in 46 seconds. It's probably possible to do this in 1 second or much faster than 46 seconds. If somebody knows exactly how please let me know. Better to focus unsolved keys Try 66 with Bitcrack2
|
13sXkWqtivcMtNGQpskD78iqsgVy9hcHLF
|
|
|
cryptoperson678
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2024, 05:52:39 PM |
|
Can anyone please be so kind and explain to me what it means that some public keys from this puzzle (like task 130 but not task 66 for example) have been found which makes kangaroo and keyhunt with bsgs mode possible?
I thought we know public addresses as they hold the reward and the task is to find the suitable public key from a reduced key range. So what does it mean that the public key for task 130 is known and is 03633cbe3ec02b9401c5effa144c5b4d22f87940259634858fc7e59b1c09937852? I literally don't understand this.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
AlanJohnson
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 11
|
|
March 26, 2024, 06:25:35 PM |
|
Can anyone please be so kind and explain to me what it means that some public keys from this puzzle (like task 130 but not task 66 for example) have been found which makes kangaroo and keyhunt with bsgs mode possible?
I thought we know public addresses as they hold the reward and the task is to find the suitable public key from a reduced key range. So what does it mean that the public key for task 130 is known and is 03633cbe3ec02b9401c5effa144c5b4d22f87940259634858fc7e59b1c09937852? I literally don't understand this.
Thank you
There are private keys , public keys and addresses. These are three different things. You can use BSGS or Kangaroo modes only on public keys but not on addresses. The known public keys in this whole challenge were intentionally released by it's creator. If you see an outgoing transactions in given address history you can easily check it's public key and try the BSGS or Kangaroo modes. When you have just address without any outgoing transactions your only method is to blindly guessing private keys in hope you will find one which corresponds to address. Currently finding 66bit privkey without knows public key can be considered as hard as finding 130bit privkey with public key known.
|
|
|
|
shelby0930
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 4
|
|
March 27, 2024, 11:59:40 PM |
|
So who has reached the closest to 130 puzzle?
|
|
|
|
|