Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 09:53:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 280 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] No Staking, 1% Standard Interest per Day, 750% APR For HOdlers  (Read 472773 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
coinstash
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


G'day!


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 04:49:26 AM
 #1061

A question that comes up frequently is what can I expect from mining, how many coins can I mine.

This depends on two factors: Network hashrate and your computer's hashrate.

You can see the current network hashrate here: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HODL/

It tends to hover around 40,000 to 45,000 hashes/second.

So, assuming that doesn't change dramatically, a simple rule of thumb for calculating how many coins you will mine is: 100 hashes/sec = 1 acorn per day = 50 HOdl per day.

If your computer gets 100 hashes/sec (and a good modern desktop will get this easily) then you can expect 50 HOdl daily. It's that simple. Of course, if the computer is only mining for part of the day then the output is reduced accordingly.

Processors made before 2006 are not worth using for mining HOdl, they don't have the AES-NI instructions.

HOdlcoin tip jar: HHodLxkjawXxt86EnDB1i8hCxkC4exGvab
1715507593
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715507593

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715507593
Reply with quote  #2

1715507593
Report to moderator
1715507593
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715507593

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715507593
Reply with quote  #2

1715507593
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715507593
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715507593

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715507593
Reply with quote  #2

1715507593
Report to moderator
1715507593
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715507593

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715507593
Reply with quote  #2

1715507593
Report to moderator
Vaccomondus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 08:39:38 AM
 #1062

can you mine and deposit at the same time?
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030



View Profile
March 07, 2016, 08:45:26 AM
 #1063

can you mine and deposit at the same time?

There is no support for it in the client. I'm not sure if mining straight to deposit would work in the protocol . . . it might do, but hasn't been tested as of yet.

Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network.
10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
DreamSpace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 07, 2016, 10:38:18 AM
 #1064

what are the best mining settings for a  Intel Xeon E5-2600 with 8 cores available?
is it useful to use more memory per core or does it make only a marginal difference?
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 10:45:27 AM
 #1065

what are the best mining settings for a  Intel Xeon E5-2600 with 8 cores available?
is it useful to use more memory per core or does it make only a marginal difference?


you need at least one core per gb, but you can use more cores per gb (but it doesn't help, afaik).
genproclimit sets the number of cores PER gb (as in minermemory).
so if you want to use 8gb and 8 cores you should use -minermemory=8 and -genproclimit=1
personally I think it's better to use just 1 gb and all the cores on it (default settings) because it takes a lot to compute a single nonce and doubling the ram almost doubles that time.

Vaccomondus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 11:50:48 AM
 #1066

can you mine and deposit at the same time?

There is no support for it in the client. I'm not sure if mining straight to deposit would work in the protocol . . . it might do, but hasn't been tested as of yet.

but can i find block with mining if deposit is enabled for another amount?
coinstash
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


G'day!


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 01:13:05 PM
 #1067


but can i find block with mining if deposit is enabled for another amount?

Yes. What happens depends on your operating system and how mining is set up on the computer.

Each time a new block is mined it is given a new address. In Windows these blocks will show up as completely separate to your deposited amounts. If you want to deposit them to get bonus interest just send them all to another address in the same wallet using the Deposit button.

If you are mining from Linux, the mining command contains an address to sent the mined coins. I send them all to one address on my laptop, then daily - sometimes more often - save them to a separate deposit address.


HOdlcoin tip jar: HHodLxkjawXxt86EnDB1i8hCxkC4exGvab
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030



View Profile
March 07, 2016, 01:22:50 PM
 #1068

can you mine and deposit at the same time?

There is no support for it in the client. I'm not sure if mining straight to deposit would work in the protocol . . . it might do, but hasn't been tested as of yet.

but can i find block with mining if deposit is enabled for another amount?

Yes, generally there is no problem re-using addresses and having multiple deposits of different lengths and non deposits at the same address. Re-using addresses does have some theoretical security weaknesses, but for practical purposes, it's not a problem.

Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network.
10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
Klaasje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1080
Merit: 1000

BTC - 14ZVqS5UGqhY77d5u9aUSW24ipRJ2g9wmm


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 01:47:01 PM
 #1069

what are the best mining settings for a  Intel Xeon E5-2600 with 8 cores available?
is it useful to use more memory per core or does it make only a marginal difference?


you need at least one core per gb, but you can use more cores per gb (but it doesn't help, afaik).
genproclimit sets the number of cores PER gb (as in minermemory).
so if you want to use 8gb and 8 cores you should use -minermemory=8 and -genproclimit=1
personally I think it's better to use just 1 gb and all the cores on it (default settings) because it takes a lot to compute a single nonce and doubling the ram almost doubles that time.


I also have 8 core XEON with 28gb ram so what can i do best? not used for anything else at the moment

Bitcoin - 14ZVqS5UGqhY77d5u9aUSW24ipRJ2g9wmm
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030



View Profile
March 07, 2016, 01:50:58 PM
 #1070

what are the best mining settings for a  Intel Xeon E5-2600 with 8 cores available?
is it useful to use more memory per core or does it make only a marginal difference?


you need at least one core per gb, but you can use more cores per gb (but it doesn't help, afaik).
genproclimit sets the number of cores PER gb (as in minermemory).
so if you want to use 8gb and 8 cores you should use -minermemory=8 and -genproclimit=1
personally I think it's better to use just 1 gb and all the cores on it (default settings) because it takes a lot to compute a single nonce and doubling the ram almost doubles that time.


I also have 8 core XEON with 28gb ram so what can i do best? not used for anything else at the moment

Using 1 GB is best for most machines. Using 2 GB may give some performance improvements, but offset by more risk of orphans. You might eek out some higher performance with more gigs on very unusual setups, but 1 or 2 GB is best for nearly all casual miners.

Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network.
10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 04:01:39 PM
 #1071

Am I correct in saying that Skylake i7 is hashing at about the same speed as an Amd FX, but using half the power?

Vaccomondus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 04:04:56 PM
 #1072

Am I correct in saying that Skylake i7 is hashing at about the same speed as an Amd FX, but using half the power?

what is the speed? 200h/s?
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 04:07:39 PM
 #1073

Am I correct in saying that Skylake i7 is hashing at about the same speed as an Amd FX, but using half the power?

what is the speed? 200h/s?

100-120

Fishmaster42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 803
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 08:02:06 PM
 #1074

Windows 10 is a absolute resource pig. Im wondering how much better I would do in Linux anyone run Linux on a AMD 8 core what kind of hash are you getting?
SockPuppetAccount
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 500


MiG Messenger - earn while chatting


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 08:28:32 PM
 #1075

I saw a tweet from a couple days ago that said the latest win64 release is an 8% boost in mining speed vs the old win32 version.   Did the Linux version get any improvement in mining speed?  Just trying to figure out if I should bother to update my google cloud and amazon aws instances or not.

Also, in the qt where we are shown all the information on our current deposits, would it be possible to stick in the ability to sort the columns in the next release?  As coins come in, I've been locking up about half of them for a full year, and the rest spread out all over the place.  So I have a ton of small deposits and it would be nice to be able to sort them by maturation block or term or whatever.

Thanks.
samsmith16
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 08:41:33 PM
 #1076

I saw a tweet from a couple days ago that said the latest win64 release is an 8% boost in mining speed vs the old win32 version.   Did the Linux version get any improvement in mining speed?  Just trying to figure out if I should bother to update my google cloud and amazon aws instances or not.

Also, in the qt where we are shown all the information on our current deposits, would it be possible to stick in the ability to sort the columns in the next release?  As coins come in, I've been locking up about half of them for a full year, and the rest spread out all over the place.  So I have a ton of small deposits and it would be nice to be able to sort them by maturation block or term or whatever.

Thanks.

Windows is finally able to use more then 2gb of memory.. As for Linux some are reporting a slight boost..

As for the table being sortable.. We plan on it here is the issue for it..

https://github.com/HOdlcoin/HOdlcoin/issues/18


Royalties
pays interest on Term Deposits up to 15%!! Yes even Cold Storage!!
SockPuppetAccount
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 500


MiG Messenger - earn while chatting


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 08:44:11 PM
 #1077

I saw a tweet from a couple days ago that said the latest win64 release is an 8% boost in mining speed vs the old win32 version.   Did the Linux version get any improvement in mining speed?  Just trying to figure out if I should bother to update my google cloud and amazon aws instances or not.

Also, in the qt where we are shown all the information on our current deposits, would it be possible to stick in the ability to sort the columns in the next release?  As coins come in, I've been locking up about half of them for a full year, and the rest spread out all over the place.  So I have a ton of small deposits and it would be nice to be able to sort them by maturation block or term or whatever.

Thanks.

Windows is finally able to use more then 2gb of memory.. As for Linux some are reporting a slight boost..

As for the table being sortable.. We plan on it here is the issue for it..

https://github.com/HOdlcoin/HOdlcoin/issues/18

Nice.  Keep up the good work and thanks for the quick and concise reply.
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 08:48:43 PM
 #1078

Windows 10 is a absolute resource pig. Im wondering how much better I would do in Linux anyone run Linux on a AMD 8 core what kind of hash are you getting?

Fx 8320 100 h/s
120 with my mod.

Vin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1166
Merit: 1015


View Profile
March 07, 2016, 08:58:51 PM
 #1079

Can someone sort the tabs under "Hodlings"?

For example ascending and descending Estimated Date, Deposit Block, Maturation Block?

samsmith16
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2016, 09:01:15 PM
 #1080

Can someone sort the tabs under "Hodlings"?

For example ascending and descending Estimated Date, Deposit Block, Maturation Block?



Look up 2 or 3 post depending on where you start counting..


Royalties
pays interest on Term Deposits up to 15%!! Yes even Cold Storage!!
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 280 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!