Bitcoin Forum
August 21, 2018, 08:09:33 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 347 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XEL] Elastic Project - The Decentralized Supercomputer  (Read 448530 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
YNWA2806
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 09:04:08 PM
 #381

Any relation for TAU project? thought of co-operation?
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
1534882173
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534882173

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534882173
Reply with quote  #2

1534882173
Report to moderator
cryptodv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 501


btcstakes.com


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2016, 10:45:18 PM
 #382

How about ELP  Grin

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses .100% original codebase.
  Superfast with .30 seconds instant finality.
  Tested .5000 tx per block. on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
-Greed-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Decentralized Jihad


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 04:37:35 AM
 #383

SCAM ALERT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1426466.0

TLDR: Lannister is a bought account from an asian kid, self-mod topic to remove any 'unwanted' posts, no demo/working prototype and less 2 months until the release, no funds/team to build the project, empty repo / copycat fork with 4 commits (mirror).

This message constantly gets removed. So please quote repost it.

I will keep posting the message on a daily basis because I consider it as my duty.

MadCow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 05:12:32 AM
 #384

SCAM ALERT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1426466.0

TLDR: Lannister is a bought account from an asian kid, self-mod topic to remove any 'unwanted' posts, no demo/working prototype and less 2 months until the release, no funds/team to build the project, empty repo / copycat fork with 4 commits (mirror).

This message constantly gets removed. So please quote repost it.

I will keep posting the message on a daily basis because I consider it as my duty.

E-K dealt with you previously, his account is not bought from anyone, and he's in charge, and he's the core dev.
xibeijan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 07:04:29 AM
 #385

I like esc, but it will get lost in search because of all the escrow topics, so xel is better.

as in the ESC key?

I vote for ELC.  Much better than all suggestions.

Notable projects: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Semux, Wagerr, Elastic, TenX, Ardor, Quantum, Dero, Sia Storage
BigBoom3599
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 07:07:17 AM
 #386

I like esc, but it will get lost in search because of all the escrow topics, so xel is better.

as in the ESC key?

I vote for ELC.  Much better than all suggestions.
ELC is already taken by another coin.
xcurry
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 07:14:19 AM
 #387

I like esc, but it will get lost in search because of all the escrow topics, so xel is better.

as in the ESC key?

I vote for ELC.  Much better than all suggestions.

ESC is not bad, "apple" most people connect with iphone, not with fruit. When Elastic will become huge same will happen with "ESC"
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1149



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 07:47:01 AM
 #388

E-K dealt with you previously, his account is not bought from anyone, and he's in charge, and he's the core dev.

Thanks for your support.
I have no idea what it is, but Greed has some serious mental issues. I honestly believe that.

For example he keeps claiming that Elastic has an empty repo, even though people told him something different multiple times in one of his idiotic threads.
Quote

As you can see, there are many commits and a daily progress. Everyone can verify that.
I have no idea how this troll can still claim that there is an empty repo and not feel like a complete idiot lol.
Maybe the reason could be, that people with no competence simply lack the ability to see that.

The rest of what he writes is just as stupid, if not more.
Nobody has ever written that the launch is in 2 months (never, nowhere),
he claims that nobody works on the project while you can clearly see that I am,
and he claims that the project had no funds.

I have no idea what to do anymore, he comes back every few hours and spams this thread with his stupidity.

BTW: If you are as annoyed of him as I am, please consider giving him a negative feedback as I did.
In my opinion, full time trolls should be tagged red for the rest of their live.
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 10:56:15 AM
 #389

it's a interesting project.
ttookk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 507


The Future Of Work


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 11:13:39 AM
 #390

I like esc, but it will get lost in search because of all the escrow topics, so xel is better.

as in the ESC key?

I vote for ELC.  Much better than all suggestions.

ESC is not bad, "apple" most people connect with iphone, not with fruit. When Elastic will become huge same will happen with "ESC"

ESC is the abbreviation for "European Song Contest", if that plays a role at all Wink



███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████████████████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████████████████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████████████████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██████████████████
███████░░░░░░░░░░░▄█████▀░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░░▄█████▀░░░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░▄█████▀░░░░░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░▄█████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░▄█████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████
███████░▄█████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████
████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████

BLACKBOX OS
The Future of Work. Decentralized.
███████████████████
███████████████████
████████████▀▀█████
███████▀▀▀    █████
███▀    ▄▄▀  ▐█████
█████▄▄█     ██████
██████▌ ▄█▄  ██████
███████████████████
███████████████████




█ ANN THREAD █
YNWA2806
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 06:34:49 PM
 #391

How many users invested so far? By accounts
xxxgoodgirls
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 06:43:03 PM
 #392

How many users invested so far? By accounts

245 donations. Unique users might be less.

In summary, the Intel Management Engine and its applications are a backdoor with total access to and control over the rest of the PC. The ME is a threat to freedom, security, and privacy, and the libreboot project strongly recommends avoiding it entirely. Since recent versions of it can’t be removed, this means avoiding all recent generations of Intel hardware. details https://libreboot.org/faq.html#intelme --- https://tehnoetic.com/laptops --- https://store.vikings.net/x200-ryf-certfied
Sam123
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 882
Merit: 502


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 09:45:39 PM
 #393

We have not heard comments from Dazza for a while, I hope his fine  Smiley

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses .100% original codebase.
  Superfast with .30 seconds instant finality.
  Tested .5000 tx per block. on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
notsofast
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1445
Merit: 1030


@notsofastcrypto


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2016, 09:57:38 PM
 #394

How many users invested so far? By accounts

245 donations. Unique users might be less.

I'm pretty sure I was the first one. Just catching up on the thread. Wish I knew more(/anything) about coding so I could evaluate the progress in github commits. Evil Knievel, how's it going?

twitter.com/notsofast
TheDR
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 10, 2016, 03:47:12 AM
 #395

If nothing more I think there should be a minimal viable product with modular adaptability released this summer. Something possible to elaborate later and be delivered relatively soon.
bitbite111
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 10, 2016, 06:11:18 AM
 #396

I'm new to ICOs and want to invest.

How exactly do I receive my tokens after the ICO? Can I send my bitcoin deposit via my blockchain.info wallet? Will my tokens be sent to blockchain.info?

░░░░░
RISE      |      ICO: May 10th until June 10th      |      BONUS: 1st, 2nd & 3rd Weeks      |      ✔ USER FRIENDLY DAPPS ✔      |
░░░░░
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1149



View Profile
April 10, 2016, 02:58:46 PM
 #397

http://icocountdown.com has listed the project as having potential risk due to code not being adequate in the github repository or demo software.

Please what? How can you say something like that?
This is absolutely untrue.

And by the way, your "reference" is a thread from an annoying well-known troll. Unbelievable.
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1149



View Profile
April 10, 2016, 03:11:49 PM
 #398

Again I'm happy to take the warning off if there is software demonstrated, I have read through the whitepaper. I cannot see the correlation with the whitepaper and the core code currently. If you want to correct me I will happily eat my words as I don't want to put any project on potential risk. I liked the project but there has been people asking me why I haven't looked at particular assets. This is a conditional thing and will be removed if it's false, I have to help the userbase.

This is simply not true. I have just given you a red negative feedback as you seem to repeat the same false spam accusations from the well-known troll named "-Greed-".
For example you, just as him, claim that the github repository contains something entirely different than the actual coin.

You wrote yourself:

Quote
http://icocountdown.com has listed the project as having potential risk due to code not being adequate in the github repository or demo software.

This is not true and everyone here can verify that the Github repository contains the actual coin implementation (in its current stage of course) and that commits are frequently made to the code.
Here, you can see all commits: https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/commits/master.

In fact, we have spent hours of discussions about the architecture of this coin. We have agreed on a mini-blockchain based approach (easy pruning) which secures the blockchain using proof-of-stake (for now we have settled with an adaptation of NXT's model using an exponentially increasing target value). The "proof-of-work" itself (meaning people being paid to contribute computational resources to user provided tasks/programs/etc.) is independent from the blockchain security because of the famous "Faster Algorithm Attack" (you probably know that one if you, as you claim, have read the whitepaper). Of course, we are at an early stage of development, but if you claim that you do not see any connection between the github repository and the whitepaper, than you have simply failed doing your job.

I am willing to remove my feedback if you explain to us, why you exactly claim that the "code (is) not being adequate in the github repository".

Note: I would never give anyone a red feedback who just expresses his doubts or criticizes parts of the project.
I only do so, if he bases his criticism on provably false, made-up facts from either himself or some other well-known troll.
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 10, 2016, 04:15:56 PM
 #399

Again I'm happy to take the warning off if there is software demonstrated, I have read through the whitepaper. I cannot see the correlation with the whitepaper and the core code currently. If you want to correct me I will happily eat my words as I don't want to put any project on potential risk. I liked the project but there has been people asking me why I haven't looked at particular assets. This is a conditional thing and will be removed if it's false, I have to help the userbase.

This is simply not true. I have just given you a red negative feedback as you seem to repeat the same false spam accusations from the well-known troll named "-Greed-".
For example you, just as him, claim that the github repository contains something entirely different than the actual coin.

You wrote yourself:

Quote
http://icocountdown.com has listed the project as having potential risk due to code not being adequate in the github repository or demo software.

This is a lie and everyone here can verify that the Github repository contains the actual coin implementation (in its current stage of course) and that commits are frequently made to the code.
Here, you can see all commits: https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-[Suspicious link removed]mits/master.

I am willing to remove my feedback if you explain to us, why you exactly claim that the "code (is) not being adequate in the github repository".

Note: I would never give anyone a red feedback who just expresses his doubts or criticizes parts of the project.
I only do so, if he bases his criticism on provably false, made-up facts from either himself or some other well-known troll.


Firstly I am not a troll and I do not like when others condemn projects. I am not in collusion with these people, I got around 10 emails about this so I had to check it out.

Secondly I do not know why you are giving me negative feedback when the issue was just raised and I'm simply doing analysis and asking for information on behalf of my userbase.

Thirdly it could be FUD anyway and I want all projects to succeed.

Fourthly my main concern was the proof of stake integration in the whitepaper I can see here that you are trying to use an adaptive POS method:
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/Makefile.include
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-[Suspicious link removed]mit/3bc7ba837897f3a12f888ed8f1cf56409b235ce1
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/wallet.h

Ffithly my other concern was your use of CPU processing how to categorize it and contain it, it seems you are working on a solution here:
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-[Suspicious link removed]mit/44bb8f9b96bad0b02619459d1607cf4aa53830ae

Sixthly whoever the manager of this project is, if it is not yourself there is uncertainty in the community who controlled the funds.

I would ask you kindly to dispell "the controlling of the funds" since you are a capable developer and are clearly an asset to the community, and I have never said otherwise. I do not doubt your ability and have personally agrandized you.

Reference:https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4e0yg4/upcoming_crowdsales/d1x8tfs

However, I would say if you are giving others control of the funds for this project potentially use an escrow. Or you solely control the funds because of the respect and trust you have with the community.

Again, the risk warning is only until the issue is cleared up.

Congratulations on the coding, I also really like the whitepaper. I just had to check it to see what was going on and why people were asking these questions.

So tl:dr all the active tech is there, but not fully developed yet the only thing in dispute is who is prime controller of these funds yourself or another party.

Thanks again for your understanding and to reiterate there is no offense intended I'm just doing my due dilligence.
Not everyone is out to get you.

Evil-Knievel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1149



View Profile
April 10, 2016, 04:34:32 PM
 #400

Fourthly my main concern was the proof of stake integration in the whitepaper I can see here that you are trying to use an adaptive POS method:
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/Makefile.include
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-[Suspicious link removed]mit/3bc7ba837897f3a12f888ed8f1cf56409b235ce1
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/wallet.h

Neither the "Makefile.include" nor "wallet.h" have any sort of relevance for the proof-of-stake scheme.
You rather want to take a look into https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/main.cpp (lines 2079 and following) including all sub-functions as well as into https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-blockchain/blob/master/src/miner.cpp .

Quote
Ffithly my other concern was your use of CPU processing how to categorize it and contain it, it seems you are working on a solution here:
https://github.com/elastic-project/elastic-mini-[Suspicious link removed]mit/44bb8f9b96bad0b02619459d1607cf4aa53830ae

This is work done by the Cryptonite team and is something entirely different.
This is not the part, which constitutes the decentralized computational power market.

Quote
However, I would say if you are giving others control of the funds for this project potentially use an escrow. Or you solely control the funds because of the respect and trust you have with the community.

There will be no escrow: not now and not in the future. This has been stated by Lannister multiple times, transparently for everyone (read page 1 of this thread).
People can decide themselves if this is a problem for them or not, how much of red flag that is and how much risk they are willing to take.
If you do not feel good with that, then just stay away from this project. It is not that hard.

Quote
Again, the risk warning is only until the issue is cleared up.

What issue? You mean that Lannister controls the funds? Well, this is no general issue.
But if its an issue for you and you do not feel good with that, then just stay away from this project. Luckily everyone has the right to decide himself which project he feels comfortable with and which not.

Quote
Congratulations on the coding, I also really like the whitepaper.

Thank you very much. I appreciate that.

Quote
So tl:dr all the active tech is there, but not fully developed yet.

Of course not, as the devlopment is still ongoing.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 347 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!