|
Take the red pill
|
 |
March 05, 2017, 07:39:08 PM |
|
To ESPERS communityIf we wish to really help CryptoCoderz and Espers than we have to get ESP to https://www.zpool.caHow?We have to move ESP to one of this exchanges: Bittrex, Poloniex, BLEUTRADE, Yobit, Cryptopia or CCEX We can forget about Yobit as it still on old ESP chain and will not move to new until they see profit, so the best chance is to win voting at C-CEX. Whit 307 votes there is a good chance to be listed in next weeks, but you all have to vote: https://c-cex.com/?id=vote&coin=esp Here is the condition from zpool to add ESP: https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/837660603279884288 (Maybe DEV could also help herewith some bounty) Why?If we win voting at C-CEX and start trading at C-CEX zpool will add ESPERS and HMQ1725 algo to their multi-pool. This means that you all could mine in any algo listed (at the moment 30 supported algho) and be paid in ESP or BTC. If you choose to be paid in ESP zpool will buy ESP at C-CEX and send to you wallet! This way the price will for sure increase and maybe we will help also DEV to finish next steps in development! What do you think about this idea!? Will you help? I'm against being on zpool. It will only bring casual miners which use their BTC address and that will mean constant dump and price down. Even if you use an esp address, zpool will not buy any coin on the exchange, it will only wait for the coins to be mined. OK... any better idea at the moment?! What if we still try to get to C-CEX first and than will see what will happen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
March 05, 2017, 08:22:04 PM |
|
To ESPERS communityIf we wish to really help CryptoCoderz and Espers than we have to get ESP to https://www.zpool.caHow?We have to move ESP to one of this exchanges: Bittrex, Poloniex, BLEUTRADE, Yobit, Cryptopia or CCEX We can forget about Yobit as it still on old ESP chain and will not move to new until they see profit, so the best chance is to win voting at C-CEX. Whit 307 votes there is a good chance to be listed in next weeks, but you all have to vote: https://c-cex.com/?id=vote&coin=esp Here is the condition from zpool to add ESP: https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/837660603279884288 (Maybe DEV could also help herewith some bounty) Why?If we win voting at C-CEX and start trading at C-CEX zpool will add ESPERS and HMQ1725 algo to their multi-pool. This means that you all could mine in any algo listed (at the moment 30 supported algho) and be paid in ESP or BTC. If you choose to be paid in ESP zpool will buy ESP at C-CEX and send to you wallet! This way the price will for sure increase and maybe we will help also DEV to finish next steps in development! What do you think about this idea!? Will you help? First should dev to help himself. You're talking about success and dev weeks is not able to make stable wallet and wallet which work?! Do not be naive. The first stable wallet and then the rest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluedude
|
|
March 05, 2017, 09:34:49 PM |
|
I think there are still 2 chains going on. I synced from scratch and my new blockhash is not the same as the one here at http://espv2.miningalts.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
EpyxZ
|
|
March 05, 2017, 10:51:02 PM |
|
I think there are still 2 chains going on. I synced from scratch and my new blockhash is not the same as the one here at http://espv2.miningalts.com/So that chain is the correct one right? Just making sure before I re-sync and dload the chain again. |
|
|
|
|
|
TomVelvetPaws
|
|
March 05, 2017, 11:53:20 PM
Last edit: March 06, 2017, 12:30:51 AM by TomVelvetPaws |
|
I think there are still 2 chains going on. I synced from scratch and my new blockhash is not the same as the one here at http://espv2.miningalts.com/So that chain is the correct one right? Just making sure before I re-sync and dload the chain again. Here's what I suggest.It looks like there is 2 chains maybe more god forbid..Everyone that has a synced up wallet Post your block count and Time that way we can figure out if 2 chains or not then get everyone on the same chain and discard ignore one.W could probably do that by looking at nodes and just deleting them from the conf file.If we do this diligently for a bit we can figure it out being a few blocks off and minutes will show were on the same chain but big discrepancies in block count and time will show a bad chain.What you want is the highest block count with the lesser time.Any other thoughts on this? Also look at your configuration file as well we need to make sure everyone has the same client when thats done we can work on getting everyone on the same chain as I mentioned.First things first.Create the Conf file or get peer info.It could help by posting that info here on this thread as well.Just one person running the wrong client can really screw up the system.Im not running mine at all until I figure everything out.My suggestion to coderz is to disable pow and staking until this is figured out.You all are just going to have to bear with it until its fixed. I guarantee you it will be worth the work.Normally I would have thrown in the hat as they say because of the problems.Those problems do not lay in the algorithm it's self but that being said this is a ground breaking history making ALT so its worth the work and wait.I am somewhat of a visionary and you youngsters will remember this and you will remember that I and we helped you.It is my greatest wish |
◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ ☠ CRAVE ☠ Embrace the privacy movement ☠ ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ Your Market. Your Blockchain Business. Your Profit. ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ |
|
|
|
marcelocoin
|
|
March 06, 2017, 05:17:08 AM |
|
Hello there is no active pool?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TomVelvetPaws
|
|
March 06, 2017, 07:04:35 AM |
|
Hello there is no active pool?
Hello there is no active pool?
Did you even read anything? Lol  |
◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ ☠ CRAVE ☠ Embrace the privacy movement ☠ ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ Your Market. Your Blockchain Business. Your Profit. ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ |
|
|
perez70
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 327
Merit: 251
SmartHoldem.IO
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:06:13 AM |
|
Maybe something went wrong with the op.  |
|
|
|
|
connexus
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:31:11 AM |
|
Maybe something went wrong with the op. Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem. |
|
|
|
|
perez70
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 327
Merit: 251
SmartHoldem.IO
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:47:12 AM |
|
Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem.
I use it! |
|
|
|
|
dox-ua
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:48:24 AM |
|
my node got two pos blocks , espv2.miningalts.com shows it was three. last one (third) is trying to be confirmed for about 8-10 times with no success, but it already shows as mined. dev's got to fix this imo. wallet synced yesterday added nodes from posts at 500-501 page |
|
|
|
|
|
gawlea
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:50:26 AM |
|
Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem.
I use it! Same here on 0.8.5.4 version of wallet. PoS is working but is showing 0 net weight. Wallet need some adjustments but the good thing is that is working. |
|
|
|
|
|
BelgianBoy
|
|
March 06, 2017, 09:39:38 AM |
|
Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem.
I use it! Same here on 0.8.5.4 version of wallet. PoS is working but is showing 0 net weight. Wallet need some adjustments but the good thing is that is working. Same here... No stakes. Used the Espers_v0.8.5.4_Patch-6_cleanbuild-qt, and sync all the blocks trough network. |
Yes it's me, the former ESP Billionaire. Sold some to build 5rigs with 30 GTX1070  . Still big believer and very big bag holder. Want the same? Buy and hold! |
|
|
|
cryptomass
|
|
March 06, 2017, 10:00:08 AM |
|
I think there are still 2 chains going on. I synced from scratch and my new blockhash is not the same as the one here at http://espv2.miningalts.com/So that chain is the correct one right? Just making sure before I re-sync and dload the chain again. Here's what I suggest.It looks like there is 2 chains maybe more god forbid.. Everyone that has a synced up wallet Post your block count and Time that way we can figure out if 2 chains or not then get everyone on the same chain and discard ignore one. W could probably do that by looking at nodes and just deleting them from the conf file. If we do this diligently for a bit we can figure it out being a few blocks off and minutes will show were on the same chain but big discrepancies in block count and time will show a bad chain. What you want is the highest block count with the lesser time.Any other thoughts on this? Also look at your configuration file as well we need to make sure everyone has the same client when thats done we can work on getting everyone on the same chain as I mentioned.First things first. Create the Conf file or get peer info. It could help by posting that info here on this thread as well.Just one person running the wrong client can really screw up the system. Im not running mine at all until I figure everything out. My suggestion to coderz is to disable pow and staking until this is figured out.You all are just going to have to bear with it until its fixed. I guarantee you it will be worth the work. Normally I would have thrown in the hat as they say because of the problems. Those problems do not lay in the algorithm it's self but that being said this is a ground breaking history making ALT so its worth the work and wait. I am somewhat of a visionary and you youngsters will remember this and you will remember that I and we helped you.It is my greatest wish Hi. I'm at block 651210, March 06, 2017, 09:59:42 AM Bitcointalk time. Client v0.8.5.4-Patch 6 compiled on Ubuntu. Peerinfo: { "addr" : "85.145.32.75:22448", "addrlocal" : "151.57.135.142:27107", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1488794314, "lastrecv" : 1488794316, "bytessent" : 1667, "bytesrecv" : 5227, "conntime" : 1488794062, "pingtime" : 2.31932400, "version" : 60020, "subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 651209, "banscore" : 0, "syncnode" : true } |
|
|
|
|
CryptoHobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 06, 2017, 10:40:41 AM
Last edit: March 06, 2017, 11:20:27 AM by CryptoHobo |
|
Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem.
I use it! Same here on 0.8.5.4 version of wallet. PoS is working but is showing 0 net weight. Wallet need some adjustments but the good thing is that is working. Same here... No stakes. Used the Espers_v0.8.5.4_Patch-6_cleanbuild-qt, and sync all the blocks trough network. same everywhere i guess but if you do getstakinginfo in debug you'll see the netweight, funny a recent release called neuron has the exact same issue [edit] win 10 X64 v0.8.5.4-Patch 6
11:17:30

getpeerinfo
11:17:31

[
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:34a4:e5e4:14d3:a13:b128:96ad]:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799018,
"bytessent" : 61367,
"bytesrecv" : 108332,
"conntime" : 1488798940,
"pingtime" : 0.12232600,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 649999,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "198.245.50.213:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488798974,
"lastrecv" : 1488799017,
"bytessent" : 1694,
"bytesrecv" : 6084,
"conntime" : 1488798973,
"pingtime" : 0.25969000,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "85.145.32.75:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799017,
"bytessent" : 902,
"bytesrecv" : 13548,
"conntime" : 1488798974,
"pingtime" : 0.10427700,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "137.74.33.98:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488798980,
"lastrecv" : 1488799016,
"bytessent" : 292,
"bytesrecv" : 959,
"conntime" : 1488798980,
"pingtime" : 0.19150900,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "85.255.7.224:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799023,
"bytessent" : 353,
"bytesrecv" : 5248,
"conntime" : 1488798980,
"pingtime" : 5.72421600,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:d58:bbbf:30fb:d293:e020:7631]:51405",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799040,
"lastrecv" : 1488799040,
"bytessent" : 2728,
"bytesrecv" : 237,
"conntime" : 1488799040,
"pingtime" : 0.24565300,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 651233,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
}
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
BelgianBoy
|
|
March 06, 2017, 11:33:36 AM |
|
Try using the latest update v0.8.5.4, it may solve your wallet problem.
I use it! Same here on 0.8.5.4 version of wallet. PoS is working but is showing 0 net weight. Wallet need some adjustments but the good thing is that is working. Same here... No stakes. Used the Espers_v0.8.5.4_Patch-6_cleanbuild-qt, and sync all the blocks trough network. same everywhere i guess but if you do getstakinginfo in debug you'll see the netweight, funny a recent release called neuron has the exact same issue [edit] win 10 X64 v0.8.5.4-Patch 6
11:17:30

getpeerinfo
11:17:31

[
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:34a4:e5e4:14d3:a13:b128:96ad]:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799018,
"bytessent" : 61367,
"bytesrecv" : 108332,
"conntime" : 1488798940,
"pingtime" : 0.12232600,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 649999,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "198.245.50.213:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488798974,
"lastrecv" : 1488799017,
"bytessent" : 1694,
"bytesrecv" : 6084,
"conntime" : 1488798973,
"pingtime" : 0.25969000,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "85.145.32.75:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799017,
"bytessent" : 902,
"bytesrecv" : 13548,
"conntime" : 1488798974,
"pingtime" : 0.10427700,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "137.74.33.98:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488798980,
"lastrecv" : 1488799016,
"bytessent" : 292,
"bytesrecv" : 959,
"conntime" : 1488798980,
"pingtime" : 0.19150900,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "85.255.7.224:22448",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799017,
"lastrecv" : 1488799023,
"bytessent" : 353,
"bytesrecv" : 5248,
"conntime" : 1488798980,
"pingtime" : 5.72421600,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 651232,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:d58:bbbf:30fb:d293:e020:7631]:51405",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1488799040,
"lastrecv" : 1488799040,
"bytessent" : 2728,
"bytesrecv" : 237,
"conntime" : 1488799040,
"pingtime" : 0.24565300,
"version" : 60020,
"subver" : "/Espers:0.8.5.4/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 651233,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
}
]
Dev worked whole night on the fix, it well be released soon. Its problem with difficulty. |
Yes it's me, the former ESP Billionaire. Sold some to build 5rigs with 30 GTX1070 . Still big believer and very big bag holder. Want the same? Buy and hold! |
|
|
mineru
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
https://forum.cryptoinfo.net/
|
|
March 06, 2017, 11:57:36 AM |
|
I'm against being on zpool. It will only bring casual miners which use their BTC address and that will mean constant dump and price down. Even if you use an esp address, zpool will not buy any coin on the exchange, it will only wait for the coins to be mined. [/quote] I agree with Pallas concerning zpool. |
|
|
|
FutureBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1138
|
|
March 06, 2017, 12:00:02 PM |
|
Meanwhile, the 24-volume of coin trading ESP/LTC on the novaexch is very small. And the rate has not changed for the better. Very sadly ...
|
|
|
|
|
mineru
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
https://forum.cryptoinfo.net/
|
|
March 06, 2017, 12:18:45 PM |
|
I think there are still 2 chains going on. I synced from scratch and my new blockhash is not the same as the one here at http://espv2.miningalts.com/So that chain is the correct one right? Just making sure before I re-sync and dload the chain again. Here's what I suggest.It looks like there is 2 chains maybe more god forbid..Everyone that has a synced up wallet Post your block count and Time that way we can figure out if 2 chains or not then get everyone on the same chain and discard ignore one.W could probably do that by looking at nodes and just deleting them from the conf file.If we do this diligently for a bit we can figure it out being a few blocks off and minutes will show were on the same chain but big discrepancies in block count and time will show a bad chain.What you want is the highest block count with the lesser time.Any other thoughts on this? Also look at your configuration file as well we need to make sure everyone has the same client when thats done we can work on getting everyone on the same chain as I mentioned.First things first.Create the Conf file or get peer info.It could help by posting that info here on this thread as well.Just one person running the wrong client can really screw up the system.Im not running mine at all until I figure everything out.My suggestion to coderz is to disable pow and staking until this is figured out.You all are just going to have to bear with it until its fixed. I guarantee you it will be worth the work.Normally I would have thrown in the hat as they say because of the problems.Those problems do not lay in the algorithm it's self but that being said this is a ground breaking history making ALT so its worth the work and wait.I am somewhat of a visionary and you youngsters will remember this and you will remember that I and we helped you.It is my greatest wish Sounds good. Let's wait for coderz's release and work all this from there. |
|
|
|
|
