How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070

[ltc_bilic]

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results

[1714727663]

1714727663

[1714727663]

1714727663

[1714727663]

1714727663

[1714727663]

1714727663

[1714727663]

1714727663

[fredeq]

I would prefer a card with 30+ Mhash as well

You need to buy the 1070 or the R9 490. I am pretty sure the 490 will be faster than the 390 and consumes less.

I kind of hoped for 480 to deliver around 30 at stock
390 is twice as expensive as 380, but producing only 1,5x more hashrate. Expecting the same from future 490.
Will be buying 480 for sure, as 1070 is too expensive for my taste.

[jimlite]

So what do you have to do in Win 7 64 to get a 1080 to mine? It either doesn't work or is .75Mh/s. Obviously the nvidia drivers or mining software isn't working with 1080. I've owned every graphics card made in the last 20 years and this is by FAR the fastest. There is no way it won't be an ETH mining monster once this shit is fixed.

[restless]

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results

There are results for stock 480 - 24MH/s and with overclock 26-28 http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/
Just as expected

[ltc_bilic]

first impressions from cryptomining blog on 1070: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8016-testing-the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-for-crypto-mining/

now waiting for polaris results

There are results for stock 480 - 24MH/s and with overclock 26-28 http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/
Just as expected

we'll I don't trust those screenshots, and furthermore not everyone is mining eth,...so waiting for a review for every other algo,...

[restless]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

[mandica]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

[onemd]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

[Zitdadast]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

[sanas]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

[Mometaskers]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

[mandica]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

Maybe more than half are 280x or 280. In every DAG change, we can see a big dip in the difficulty level.

[apriyoni]

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

Maybe more than half are 280x or 280. In every DAG change, we can see a big dip in the difficulty level.

These 280x will be used for long term. I think they will be mined to death. That is a very good card.

[giagge]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

[onemd]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

[Bokelka]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

[asdalani]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

[giagge]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

Yes i think so .

[RastoMan]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

If the difficulty doubles every two months as it did in the last 6 months, even for 480, there will be no ROI.

[Tacalt]

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

If the difficulty doubles every two months as it did in the last 6 months, even for 480, there will be no ROI.

Most miners are very experienced. I think they believe the price of Ethereum will rise after the crisis.