|
SatoNatomato
|
 |
May 15, 2017, 08:55:10 PM |
|
You lost the last time you challenged me to a bet, and I didnt want your dirty scam money then and I dont want them now.
How could I lose the last time if you refused to accept the bet by using a childish excuse?  ...I think we might start from your claim that Byteball DB can be compressed very well, we will also test if Byteball indeed suits IoT. I had several GBs somewhere, let's use them for testing and let the witnesses earn easy buck. Here is the scenario I propose: 1. I will generate a lot of transactions containing high-entropy data. 2. You will measure TPS. 3. You will compress the DB in the end. 4. You will report the average TPS and the DB size after the compression. What do you think of this? A childish excuse? That I have my own money and dont need yours? I suggested you donate to the community fund, yet you didnt. My original statement, which as a liar as you are misrepresenting, regarding compression, is, **today** it compresses well as a tested matter of fact. The DB size is not even optimized at all, a same unit hash is stored in 10-20 different table columns, as tonych said correctness is important and not speed or data-size. In the future, the cost to store any data will be too high just as storing files in bitcoin is today. But whatever, Ill take your bet, its a deal, I am waiting for your "high-entropy" data and many transactions.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
May 15, 2017, 08:58:55 PM |
|
But whatever, Ill take your bet, its a deal, I am waiting for your "high-entropy" data and many transactions.
Could you point me to Byteball API? https://github.com/byteball is not very helpful. |
|
|
|
|
|
SatoNatomato
|
|
May 15, 2017, 09:06:33 PM |
|
But whatever, Ill take your bet, its a deal, I am waiting for your "high-entropy" data and many transactions.
Could you point me to Byteball API? https://github.com/byteball is not very helpful.  You are so embarrassing, I actually feel slightly embarrassed for you. |
|
|
|
|
yutyuf8687696
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2017, 09:09:13 PM |
|
Ah, I thought something new has appeared. Well, when every penny matters bitsquare is worth a mention, I think...
Just seen nvo.io(Decentralized Exchange) today,might interest you |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
May 15, 2017, 09:11:26 PM |
|
You are so embarrassing, I actually feel slightly embarrassed for you.
Well, I took into account this: Here we are instead, my department developing a IoT products with Byteball.
...and thought you might give me the direct link. I'll better ask the others. Guys, could anyone help a newbie to find API docs? The opening post of this thread doesn't even contain word "API". |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
May 15, 2017, 09:12:50 PM |
|
Just seen nvo.io(Decentralized Exchange) today,might interest you
Thx, I'll check it later. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
May 15, 2017, 09:43:40 PM |
|
Polo, Shapeshift, Exodus and Jaxx next  |
.
| .
| .
▬◇
▬◇▬◆
▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| .
◇▬
◆▬◇▬
◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
|
TronQuix
|
|
May 15, 2017, 10:29:45 PM |
|
Polo, Shapeshift, Exodus and Jaxx next i literally cant handle POLO, drives me bananas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HomoHenning
|
|
May 15, 2017, 10:39:01 PM |
|
volume on bittrex & co is nowadays enough. I think we can skip even polo.  |
|
|
|
|
|
TronQuix
|
|
May 15, 2017, 10:41:14 PM |
|
volume on bittrex & co is nowadays enough. I think we can skip even polo. thank goodness. I just moved some stuff out of POLO last night actually. Is omniwallet that much better than storing on an exchange? |
|
|
|
|
|
HomoHenning
|
|
May 15, 2017, 10:43:17 PM |
|
volume on bittrex & co is nowadays enough. I think we can skip even polo. thank goodness. I just moved some stuff out of POLO last night actually. Is omniwallet that much better than storing on an exchange? best way is to store it in a wallet on your PC / USB device / paper wallet online wallets like omni are more secure than an exchange |
|
|
|
|
sambudy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2017, 11:13:48 PM |
|
Hello,
I don't have any BTC but I have Bytes and received the 0.1 in my wallet.
Will I not receive any BlackBytes because I haven't linked my wallet to any (empty) BTC address?
The BlackBytes are coming,just be patient I must have done something wrong. How can I make sure that I receive the BlackBytes next time? Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
dbc23
|
|
May 16, 2017, 04:21:34 AM |
|
Hello,
I don't have any BTC but I have Bytes and received the 0.1 in my wallet.
Will I not receive any BlackBytes because I haven't linked my wallet to any (empty) BTC address?
The BlackBytes are coming,just be patient I must have done something wrong. How can I make sure that I receive the BlackBytes next time? Thank you. You may just need to doubletap your balance in the BB wallet to resync. Sometimes they don't appear automatically. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shiver
|
|
May 16, 2017, 05:05:16 AM |
|
Still catching up on thread so apologies if this has already been pointed out: The snapshot time is the exact time of the full moon expressed in UTC, and nothing to do with the timezone of the person who takes the snapshot. Block 465811 is going to be the snapshot block. We are are waiting a few hours to make sure there are no reorgs, then I'll start distributing bytes tomorrow morning.
Pretty annoying to read "tomorrow morning" on a planet with 24 time zones. No, it's not. Just look at snapshot time — May 10, 2017 at 21:42 UTC. So "tomorrow morning" — 7-10 UTC, May 11. |
|
|
|
|
Karartma1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
|
|
May 16, 2017, 06:48:10 AM |
|
volume on bittrex & co is nowadays enough. I think we can skip even polo. I agree that is more than enough now. And don't forget we can exchange via wallet's bot |
|
|
|
|
drawingthesun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
May 16, 2017, 07:00:01 AM |
|
We really need Byteball on Ledger Nano S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
May 16, 2017, 07:10:27 AM |
|
I don't have any BTC but I have Bytes and received the 0.1 in my wallet.
Will I not receive any BlackBytes because I haven't linked my wallet to any (empty) BTC address?
The BlackBytes are coming,just be patient I must have done something wrong. How can I make sure that I receive the BlackBytes next time? Yes, you won't receive blackbytes because you didn't link your Byteball address to any BTC address (even empty). Blackbytes are distributed to linked Byteball addresses only, so for next time just perform a link by chatting with the transition bot. |
|
|
|
|
Freefactomizer
|
|
May 16, 2017, 07:47:23 AM
Last edit: May 16, 2017, 10:13:16 AM by Freefactomizer |
|
We really need Byteball on Ledger Nano S.
Sure it would be great but you can right now reach very good level of security by using a multisignature wallet. An attacker would need to hack both your computer and your smartphone to steal your money. It's really easy to do with Byteball by pairing devices, I love this feature cause even my mother could be safe using it ! |
|
|
|
|
