Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Flickspeed]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP

[1714631228]

1714631228

[CoRpO]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

I'm pretty sure that the 280x are in the 180-210w range ... that's certainly the case with 1100 core clock

[Trimegistus]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

I would say it's impossible!

[Squall10]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

I'm pretty sure that the 280x are in the 180-210w range ... that's certainly the case with 1100 core clock

 Yeah, I agree on that.

I think the minimum TDP of a R9 280x is 170W so maybe the information was mis-inputted in the table (180W not 130W)

[aistto]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

I would say it's impossible!

agree
GPU-z info I guess

[Zosinburg]

Dwarf pool started.

I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.

[Trimegistus]

Dwarf pool started.

I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.

Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results

[grn]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP

Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall

[Simon_Grape]

I feel like a crack addict.. waiting for my next Claymore fix. DT's are starting to set in.  Shakiness, cold sweats, cant eat, always thirsty - .

Just kidding Claymore, Take your time man!

Claymore = ultimate drug pusher. He get's ya hooked quick!

[Mugatu]

Dwarf pool started.

I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.

Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results

Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with.

[choppy123]

Hey all,

Wanting to build another mining rig using this older cpu, motherboard and RAM (below). I have this stuff kicking around, will Zcash mining work with 4GB of DDR2? This motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB DDR2 so I can't add any more sticks

I was planning on buying an RX470 4GB for this rig. I have a decent 600 Watt power supply which will be plenty and planning to use Windows 7. thanks


AMD ATHLON 64+ 3200 2.0 GHZ SOCKET AM2 CPU
 
2 X 2GB DDR RAM (4GB TOTAL)
XMS2 CORSAIR 800 MHZ

ASUS M2N68-AM SE2
SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD

If you're only going to have 1 or 2 cards - that should be fine.

thanks for your help !

[svetliopi44]

PowerColor 7850 1GB
Win 10
mod Bios
Claymore v.8.0
106 Sol

super
ty Claymore

[Flickspeed]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP

Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall

Yes and when optimized should be doing probably at least 260 h/s @ 140w at wall

[d57heinz]

going to let dwarfpool settle in but so far the vardiff port works great.  Maybe other pools can try it for themselves and learn from it.  Will see how it holds up over the next week.  I had good luck with dwarf on eth and even better solo. Thats why i ask if claymore would provide a solo option.  If i can point this miner to sammy proxy or something close im familiar with setting that up.  Anyone know if that will work?  Then i wouldnt need to bother claymore with feature to solo straight to wallet.   

BR

[Famnant]

So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?

That's weird.

Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP

Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall

Yes and when optimized should be doing probably at least 260 h/s @ 140w at wall

How do you know?

[ofpcarnage]

Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
[imghttp://][/img]

[Flickspeed]

Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here

Well as it seems not all of your cards are set the same and 62.1 Watts per card, is that what GPU-z shows you? Because When GPU-z shows 62.1W that is actually like 110-115W at the wall

[ofpcarnage]

I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha

[AriesIV10]

going to let dwarfpool settle in but so far the vardiff port works great.  Maybe other pools can try it for themselves and learn from it.  Will see how it holds up over the next week.  I had good luck with dwarf on eth and even better solo. Thats why i ask if claymore would provide a solo option.  If i can point this miner to sammy proxy or something close im familiar with setting that up.  Anyone know if that will work?  Then i wouldnt need to bother claymore with feature to solo straight to wallet.   

BR

I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works.  Mine On

[Marvell1]

I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha

add around 30-40 watts to the GPUZ reading to get more realistic results, GPUZ only shows the power drawn by the PCI-E slot its self.