Flickspeed
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:32:24 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP
|
|
|
|
CoRpO
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:33:03 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
I'm pretty sure that the 280x are in the 180-210w range ... that's certainly the case with 1100 core clock
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:33:48 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
I would say it's impossible!
|
|
|
|
Squall10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:36:40 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
I'm pretty sure that the 280x are in the 180-210w range ... that's certainly the case with 1100 core clock Yeah, I agree on that. I think the minimum TDP of a R9 280x is 170W so maybe the information was mis-inputted in the table (180W not 130W)
|
|
|
|
aistto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1001
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:38:05 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
I would say it's impossible! agree GPU-z info I guess
|
|
|
|
Zosinburg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:46:47 PM |
|
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:48:48 PM |
|
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better. Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results
|
|
|
|
grn
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:59:18 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall
|
How is that Lexical analysis working out bickneleski?
|
|
|
Simon_Grape
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:59:30 PM |
|
I feel like a crack addict.. waiting for my next Claymore fix. DT's are starting to set in. Shakiness, cold sweats, cant eat, always thirsty - . Just kidding Claymore, Take your time man! Claymore = ultimate drug pusher. He get's ya hooked quick!
|
|
|
|
Mugatu
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:00:04 PM |
|
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better. Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with.
|
|
|
|
choppy123
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:09:03 PM |
|
Hey all, Wanting to build another mining rig using this older cpu, motherboard and RAM (below). I have this stuff kicking around, will Zcash mining work with 4GB of DDR2? This motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB DDR2 so I can't add any more sticks I was planning on buying an RX470 4GB for this rig. I have a decent 600 Watt power supply which will be plenty and planning to use Windows 7. thanks AMD ATHLON 64+ 3200 2.0 GHZ SOCKET AM2 CPU 2 X 2GB DDR RAM (4GB TOTAL) XMS2 CORSAIR 800 MHZ ASUS M2N68-AM SE2 SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD If you're only going to have 1 or 2 cards - that should be fine. thanks for your help !
|
|
|
|
svetliopi44
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:26:49 PM |
|
PowerColor 7850 1GB Win 10 mod Bios Claymore v.8.0 106 Sol
super ty Claymore
|
|
|
|
Flickspeed
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:30:29 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall Yes and when optimized should be doing probably at least 260 h/s @ 140w at wall
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:34:57 PM |
|
going to let dwarfpool settle in but so far the vardiff port works great. Maybe other pools can try it for themselves and learn from it. Will see how it holds up over the next week. I had good luck with dwarf on eth and even better solo. Thats why i ask if claymore would provide a solo option. If i can point this miner to sammy proxy or something close im familiar with setting that up. Anyone know if that will work? Then i wouldnt need to bother claymore with feature to solo straight to wallet.
BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
Famnant
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:39:56 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall Yes and when optimized should be doing probably at least 260 h/s @ 140w at wall How do you know?
|
|
|
|
ofpcarnage
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 05:46:01 PM Last edit: November 29, 2016, 05:58:28 PM by ofpcarnage |
|
Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s @ 62.1 Watts per card . No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same. I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here [img http://][/img]
|
|
|
|
Flickspeed
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 06:01:34 PM |
|
Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s @ 62.1 Watts per card . No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same. I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
Well as it seems not all of your cards are set the same and 62.1 Watts per card, is that what GPU-z shows you? Because When GPU-z shows 62.1W that is actually like 110-115W at the wall
|
|
|
|
ofpcarnage
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 06:04:40 PM |
|
I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
|
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
November 29, 2016, 06:09:15 PM |
|
going to let dwarfpool settle in but so far the vardiff port works great. Maybe other pools can try it for themselves and learn from it. Will see how it holds up over the next week. I had good luck with dwarf on eth and even better solo. Thats why i ask if claymore would provide a solo option. If i can point this miner to sammy proxy or something close im familiar with setting that up. Anyone know if that will work? Then i wouldnt need to bother claymore with feature to solo straight to wallet.
BR
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
|
|
|
|
Marvell1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1105
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
November 29, 2016, 06:12:51 PM |
|
I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
add around 30-40 watts to the GPUZ reading to get more realistic results, GPUZ only shows the power drawn by the PCI-E slot its self.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
|