Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 04:35:22 PM |
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here... wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components on large scale the 1070 win without doubts
|
|
|
|
lpedretti
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 04:43:23 PM |
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here... wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components on large scale the 1070 win without doubts Nice point, motherboard, memory, disk and risers also have costs, structure, physical space, heat dissipation So if you have cheap electricity and physical space, it may be better to go with 470's cause the heat dissipation is much less of a problem so 1 motherboard with 6 1070 is no match vs 2 motherboards with 12 470's, but if you have both those problems then 1070's are better.
|
AC: ANuRoFPkCjZSxsw2S41djrrA1D4xMMmwhs
|
|
|
chumurk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 04:44:21 PM |
|
Hello It is possible to asus TROOPER H110 D3 connect 3 graphics cards? for mining. when I connect only work 2. 3 graphics card does not show. Maybe in the BIOS you need to change something? Thanks to all
|
|
|
|
Puffy23
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:04:44 PM Last edit: December 24, 2016, 05:19:30 PM by Puffy23 |
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here... wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components on large scale the 1070 win without doubts Fiji still beats the pants off 1070... Efficient Setup Fury $260 300H/s 100W 1070 $400 330H/s 95W You're paying $840 more for 180H/s and 30W efficiency on a 6 card rig. Full Bore (small scale with no electric cost) Fury $260 350H/s Edit: 1070 $400 430H/s Edit: You're paying $840 more for 480H/s on a 6 card rig.
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:16:38 PM |
|
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
|
|
|
|
Puffy23
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:19:59 PM Last edit: December 24, 2016, 05:43:15 PM by Puffy23 |
|
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
See edits. Still isn't worth it... Further Edit: Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis. Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$1070 $400 330 95 0.825Fury $260 285 95 1.096Full Bore Setup Card Price Hash/s H/$1070 $400 430 1.075Fury $260 350 1.346The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:29:41 PM |
|
In case you want to save on fees (legally): 0% fee during Xmas on http://zec.suprnova.cc
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Le_Bleu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:30:51 PM |
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here... wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's Could you share yours settings and BIOS ? I have the same card but only 240 sol/s. I don't have the bios file at hand, but the only thing i did was use the 1750 straps for 2000 mhz. For zec, with wattool i took the gpu to 1420 and left the memory at 2000, i had to give them like around 50mv overvolt, but even with the straps mod i could downvolt the mem to 0.95 so it's not much of a difference with the default tdp. For Eth, i left the gpu at 1360 and instead took the mem to 2190, i had to do some serious overvolt there, 1.12, not all of them reached 2190, some did 2180, but they ended throwing 30.3mh/s on eth, stable, several days now. No dual mining. Hope it helps! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you, I will try this settings.
|
|
|
|
StanchoBS
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:43:52 PM Last edit: December 24, 2016, 06:11:05 PM by StanchoBS |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fprikachi.com%2Fimages%2F157%2F9001157R.png&t=665&c=1LxtIm3GcQQMiw) I pref suprnova for mining, but today lucky pool its nanopool. Every pool have +/- 10% profit per day , and dont think this luck +20% on nanopool can be every day
|
|
|
|
Steve Wozniak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 05:47:31 PM |
|
I love suprnova ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
isamamin
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 263
Merit: 250
semux
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 06:17:03 PM |
|
For Linux - Ubuntu - use this : export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0 export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 make new file : run.sh #!/bin/bash export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0 export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
sleep 20 ./zecminer64
Note: change the run.sh Permission use any setting ( read the ReadMe!! file ) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) i think this will help!!
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 06:18:36 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fprikachi.com%2Fimages%2F157%2F9001157R.png&t=665&c=1LxtIm3GcQQMiw) I pref suprnova for mining, but today lucky pool its nanopool. Every pool have +/- 10% profit per day , and dont think this luck +20% on nanopool can be every day where did u check it?
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
Knepala
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 06:23:52 PM |
|
For Linux - Ubuntu - use this : export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0 export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 make new file : run.sh #!/bin/bash export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0 export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
sleep 20 ./zecminer64
Note: change the run.sh Permission use any setting ( read the ReadMe!! file ) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) i think this will help!! Thank you, but for what reason do you use the sleep command?
|
|
|
|
StanchoBS
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 06:24:02 PM |
|
where did u check it?
Checked from every web site for last 1H. You can chek too if open one per one and see hashs and blocks for now.
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 07:51:50 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2j2xag9.png&t=665&c=f_EtC5vLRUUwzg) look at second worker 0 share i am mining from last 55minutes is this normal?
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
BitJunkie556
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 07:55:49 PM |
|
Hey guys, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I know most people feel that MSI Afterburner doesn't give the whole story in regards to power consumption, etc. For you guys with a Kill-A-Watt type device, about how many watts have you found your RX 480's to be using? RX 470 numbers would be great as well. Thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
BitJunkie556
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 07:57:24 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2j2xag9.png&t=665&c=f_EtC5vLRUUwzg) look at second worker 0 share i am mining from last 55minutes is this normal? Pretty sure that's not normal. Hit "S" to see if miner threads hung, or not. Most of the time, I have to manually go and restart the mining software for it to come back, even with watchdog setting enabled, etc.
|
|
|
|
smaxz
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 430
Merit: 253
VeganAcademy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 08:00:01 PM |
|
I love suprnova ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) what a generous offer, and plenty of newbie accounts endorsing the promotion. unfortunately mining at zero fees or not at suprnova has always netted me a marked decrease in coins mined vs other pools. never failed to fail.
|
- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 08:01:56 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2j2xag9.png&t=665&c=f_EtC5vLRUUwzg) look at second worker 0 share i am mining from last 55minutes is this normal? Pretty sure that's not normal. Hit "S" to see if miner threads hung, or not. Most of the time, I have to manually go and restart the mining software for it to come back, even with watchdog setting enabled, etc. miner is runnig fine. i am using eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 for all 3 workers. should i change EU1 to US1
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
BitJunkie556
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2016, 08:11:38 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2j2xag9.png&t=665&c=f_EtC5vLRUUwzg) look at second worker 0 share i am mining from last 55minutes is this normal? Pretty sure that's not normal. Hit "S" to see if miner threads hung, or not. Most of the time, I have to manually go and restart the mining software for it to come back, even with watchdog setting enabled, etc. miner is runnig fine. i am using eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 for all 3 workers. should i change EU1 to US1 Well, I suppose it's worth a shot. Did you check your config for any kind of typo on the server? Just a thought. But yeah, try a different server just to see if things are working. Better to have a little slower mining than no mining...
|
|
|
|
|