Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[jackcantrell]

Here's a pretty complete guide on mining Zcash Headless on Ubuntu 16.04 using AMD R9 boards. They are kind of power hungry, so I would recommend something like the AMD RX480. Claymore's linux miner is definitely the way to go right now.

https://blockoperations.com/build-6-gpu-zcash-headless-mining-rig-ubuntu-16-04-using-claymore/

[Claymore]

I spent a lot of time for Polaris, so update for Tonga will be available in a day, not too much improvements for now, hashrate of my 380 increased from 165H/s to 175H/s. It takes a lot of time to optimize kernels for every card so don't expect max speed for all cards at once.
I will also build asm kernels for 16.x drivers so you can use 16.11.3 (some other versions as well) instead of 15.12.
Linux version will be released as soon as I finish current round of optimizations.

[Hurtman]

I spent a lot of time for Polaris

for Polaris there will be special settings, or automatic will be defined?

[786sam]

I spent a lot of time for Polaris, so update for Tonga will be available in a day, not too much improvements for now, hashrate of my 380 increased from 165H/s to 175H/s. It takes a lot of time to optimize kernels for every card so don't expect max speed for all cards at once.
I will also build asm kernels for 16.x drivers so you can use 16.11.3 (some other versions as well) instead of 15.12.
Linux version will be released as soon as I finish current round of optimizations.

16.11.3 for fiji cards too?

[doktor83]

Cant you read? Tonga update is coming, not polaris.
Polaris already got attention

[jelin1984]

Fiji please updated

[qqqq]

I spent a lot of time for Polaris, so update for Tonga will be available in a day, not too much improvements for now, hashrate of my 380 increased from 165H/s to 175H/s. It takes a lot of time to optimize kernels for every card so don't expect max speed for all cards at once.
I will also build asm kernels for 16.x drivers so you can use 16.11.3 (some other versions as well) instead of 15.12.
Linux version will be released as soon as I finish current round of optimizations.

16.11.3 for fiji cards too?

Want to know also. Got 3 fiji (R9 Nano) in mixed rigs. -asm 0 for them right know in v11

[786sam]

I spent a lot of time for Polaris, so update for Tonga will be available in a day, not too much improvements for now, hashrate of my 380 increased from 165H/s to 175H/s. It takes a lot of time to optimize kernels for every card so don't expect max speed for all cards at once.
I will also build asm kernels for 16.x drivers so you can use 16.11.3 (some other versions as well) instead of 15.12.
Linux version will be released as soon as I finish current round of optimizations.

16.11.3 for fiji cards too?

Want to know also. Got 3 fiji (R9 Nano) in mixed rigs. -asm 0 for them right know in v11

I find v10 better than v11?

[th00ber]

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

As mentioned above, use 16.3.2 with fijis.

You get interessting result with this driver on R9 Fury family ?
I got 9 x R9 Fury something like 330-370 H/s (-45% power limit)
With -asm 0 -a 2 parameters.
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

[omshree]

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

As mentioned above, use 16.3.2 with fijis.

You get interessting result with this driver on R9 Fury family ?
I got 9 x R9 Fury something like 330-370 H/s (-45% power limit)
With -asm 0 -a 2 parameters.
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

400@-96mv with 16.3.2 lots of nanos, pro duos...

[omshree]

asm -1 of course

[jelin1984]

- asm i can put is 0 1 2 3 or not?/

[th00ber]

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

As mentioned above, use 16.3.2 with fijis.

You get interessting result with this driver on R9 Fury family ?
I got 9 x R9 Fury something like 330-370 H/s (-45% power limit)
With -asm 0 -a 2 parameters.
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

400@-96mv with 16.3.2 lots of nanos, pro duos...

I can't find a link on this version
Always redirected to latest version on AMD support ... Do you have the link ?

[jt821123]

hi. how much sol with a rx 470?
我想問一下大家 3xx is better than 4xx??

[_ZET_]

Sapphire R9 Fury Nano 15.12, Win8.1, Stock, -8

V10.0 - 320 h/s

http://i65.tinypic.com/vg54ec.jpg

V11.0 - 360 h/s

http://i65.tinypic.com/1dyf6g.jpg

Ty Claymore!

I think you can try 400H/s from single graphic card.

No doubts it's possible. Question is how do you like more energy consumption? If you can caary on, let's give a sign you made it.

[FFI2013]

algo ASM works great on 290x, 335sol/s with modded BIOS.

v.11
290x with modded bios 372 sol\s
1150\1500

but stock 290x only 315 sol\s

what core/mem freq do you use?

all card at 1150\1500
but card with bios mod 372 sol\s
original bios card 315 sol\s
mod bios not fitted to saphire 8 gb card tri-x

Thanks for prompt reply!
Hm, i have sapphire 4 gb tri-x 290x and I have flashed to modded bios from Modded R9 390X BIOS for R9 290/290X  thread on oveclock.net named 290X_HYNIX_MOD_V1.8.rom and it gives 355 sols.
I can set only 1090/1450 otherwise the card hangs on 1100/1500. Did you use the same 1.8 version of modded bios?

hynix ram card work stable at 1130\1500 on 1150\1500 have trouble with drivers reload
elpida at 1150\1500

but realy same hashrate 370-375 both card

ps bios mod same as you use

I was looking at the same mod for my 290 if I mod it to 390 would I get better power consumption

[fmz89]

hi. how much sol with a rx 470?
我想問一下大家 3xx is better than 4xx??

if you have free electric, then chose tahiti card its very cheap and easy ocing, without bios modification,
if you dont, get nano instead, or rx 470
nano bios mod = the only way you get best sol/watt, using tool ocing like msi afterburner wont get best efficiency even -96mv is the limit,
bios mod can get you around 0.88v which is arround 85watt power consumption

[Densitymax]

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

As mentioned above, use 16.3.2 with fijis.

You get interessting result with this driver on R9 Fury family ?
I got 9 x R9 Fury something like 330-370 H/s (-45% power limit)
With -asm 0 -a 2 parameters.
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

400@-96mv with 16.3.2 lots of nanos, pro duos...

I can't find a link on this version
Always redirected to latest version on AMD support ... Do you have the link ?

You can't download it from AMD support. There's only latest version. Use google search for this and download from another site.

[pbuva]

Tried diffrent drivers on my R9 Nano. No "asm" so no speed update... Funny that 290 and 7950 work just great

As mentioned above, use 16.3.2 with fijis.

You get interessting result with this driver on R9 Fury family ?
I got 9 x R9 Fury something like 330-370 H/s (-45% power limit)
With -asm 0 -a 2 parameters.
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd

400@-96mv with 16.3.2 lots of nanos, pro duos...

I can't find a link on this version
Always redirected to latest version on AMD support ... Do you have the link ?

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous?os=Windows%2010%20-%2064

[vapourminer]

You can't download it [16.3.2) from AMD support. There's only latest version. Use google search for this and download from another site.

yes you can, amd has a complete list of older drivers for dl

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous/detail?os=Windows%207%20-%2064&rev=16.3.2