djm34
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
March 09, 2014, 06:16:09 PM |
|
Have you tried to look into the task manager just to see what process was causing that ? (can't be cudaminer if it is closed... could be windows explorer though... had something really strange yesterday while plugging my phone into my computer...)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
rahrahrah
|
|
March 09, 2014, 06:22:11 PM |
|
Have you tried to look into the task manager just to see what process was causing that ? (can't be cudaminer if it is closed... could be windows explorer though... had something really strange yesterday while plugging my phone into my computer...)
Yeah, there isn't anything visible at all (this is *with* all processes shown for all users). However I might be making some headway: Previous settings: GPU Clock Offset: 0 Memory Clock Offset: +500 I did this because I read somewhere that the GPU clock offset didn't seem to have much of an impact on hashing speed. Anyway I just reset the memory clock offset from +500 to 0, and increased the GPU clock offset from 0 to 20. It was stable (but hashing slower). I cancelled Cudminer and it was responsive in closing. The system CPU usage wasn't through the roof after closing either. I repeated this with a GPU Clock Offset of 40. Same result. System fine. CPU usage looking healthy / normal. I'm going to try to confirm this next, but this appears to suggest increasing the Memory Clock Offset puts a lot more pressure on the system both before and after(?!) mining. |
VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2014, 06:34:58 PM |
|
Any progress or updates on the riser issue?
my 10 risers have arrived. That's progress I guess. |
|
|
|
|
eLeMe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 06:52:25 PM |
|
Interesting you achieved this with risers. Have you ever tried to see what kind of hashrate you get without risers on those cards?
I'd be curious to see how that's possible on a board with only one 16x slot..  |
|
|
|
|
cvax
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 09, 2014, 07:20:59 PM |
|
Interesting you achieved this with risers. Have you ever tried to see what kind of hashrate you get without risers on those cards?
I'd be curious to see how that's possible on a board with only one 16x slot.. Ya I meant with just one card to see how much he is losing on the risers. Because his hashrates are better than mine even if I use a single card, no risers so I am curious how high his numbers can actually get. |
BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta | YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
|
|
|
empirebuilder1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 07:25:24 PM |
|
Wow! Have to hand it to you, I'm not a hardcore miner and I was only getting into it for the fun, but man, this has tripled my hashrate! I was only mining on my CPU (i7 3630QM) and it was getting me about ~30Khash/s.... My GPU (Geforce GT 650M), once started on this program, is spitting out 60Khash/s just on it's own!
Many thanks for kicking the AMD master-race believers in the ass! (Nvidia FTW!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
rahrahrah
|
|
March 09, 2014, 07:25:56 PM |
|
Have you tried to look into the task manager just to see what process was causing that ? (can't be cudaminer if it is closed... could be windows explorer though... had something really strange yesterday while plugging my phone into my computer...)
Yeah, there isn't anything visible at all (this is *with* all processes shown for all users). However I might be making some headway: Previous settings: GPU Clock Offset: 0 Memory Clock Offset: +500 I did this because I read somewhere that the GPU clock offset didn't seem to have much of an impact on hashing speed. Anyway I just reset the memory clock offset from +500 to 0, and increased the GPU clock offset from 0 to 20. It was stable (but hashing slower). I cancelled Cudminer and it was responsive in closing. The system CPU usage wasn't through the roof after closing either. I repeated this with a GPU Clock Offset of 40. Same result. System fine. CPU usage looking healthy / normal. I'm going to try to confirm this next, but this appears to suggest increasing the Memory Clock Offset puts a lot more pressure on the system both before and after(?!) mining. Ok. I increased the GPU clock offset by 10, upto 50 and left it there. I then set the memory clock offset at +100, and increased it by +50 at a time, upto +500. Everytime closing Cudaminer was quick and the system was responsive immediately afterwards. I tried using Cudamanager at this point and again it stopped mining almost immediately (previously it took 20 seconds or more). Could it be that having a high memory clock offset, without an increase in GPU clock offset could cause a problem? I don't understand overclocking enough to know whether these are related. So, happy to report that things seem stable now at +50/+500 (pretty sure this wasn't earlier). Interestingly when I tried +50/+520 it went back to being sluggish (unusable) again and had to reboot. |
VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2014, 09:49:56 PM |
|
I've been looking into the newly released HeavyCoin, which uses 4 well known hash functions
(SHA-256, Keccak-512, Grøestl-512, BLAKE-512) plus a new one called HEFTY1
They claim it's CPU only, which I might actually put to the test.
Christin
|
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:13:02 PM |
|
I've been looking into the newly released HeavyCoin, which uses 4 well known hash functions
(SHA-256, Keccak-512, Grøestl-512, BLAKE-512) plus a new one called HEFTY1
They claim it's CPU only, which I might actually put to the test.
Christin
Yes please!!!  While the hype and timings are not comparable, the earnings could just remotely resemble the Max launch (oh, what a night)... Cheers, Myagui |
|
|
|
orrett3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:15:18 PM |
|
I've been looking into the newly released HeavyCoin, which uses 4 well known hash functions
(SHA-256, Keccak-512, Grøestl-512, BLAKE-512) plus a new one called HEFTY1
They claim it's CPU only, which I might actually put to the test.
Christin
Nice that your taking my suggestion Good luck, i wish i could help, but im still teaching myself. Any tips on C++/CUDA? |
|
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:23:21 PM |
|
Any tips on C++/CUDA?
...uh, learn by doing Christian |
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:23:43 PM |
|
I've been looking into the newly released HeavyCoin, which uses 4 well known hash functions
(SHA-256, Keccak-512, Grøestl-512, BLAKE-512) plus a new one called HEFTY1
They claim it's CPU only, which I might actually put to the test.
Christin
Yes please!!! While the hype and timings are not comparable, the earnings could just remotely resemble the Max launch (oh, what a night)... Cheers, Myagui yes could be interesting, I tried yesterday my luck on it yesterday with my cpu... I only got noise... (did they finally manage to get pools ?) |
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:24:20 PM |
|
yes could be interesting, I tried yesterday my luck on it yesterday with my cpu... I only got noise...
(did they finally manage to get pools ?)
The 1gh pool does stratum with a modified cpuminer Christian |
|
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 09, 2014, 10:48:24 PM |
|
I think if you can get HeavyCoin to work Christian, then it's going to be a max coin style event. Nvidia as only capable miners, would be another big profit venture if you can get it to work off their cpu code
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
JimmyD
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:02:36 PM |
|
I think if you can get HeavyCoin to work Christian, then it's going to be a max coin style event. Nvidia as only capable miners, would be another big profit venture if you can get it to work off their cpu code
Are there any exchanges yet for HeavyCoin? Mined 20 coins on my CPU's today but no idea what the value would be? |
|
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:05:16 PM |
|
No exchange yet I don't think
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
JimmyD
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:09:40 PM |
|
No exchange yet I don't think
That's the problem. I too believe that this coin could have huge potential if Christian is doing another masterpiece - but we don't know yet whether the market will accept it... |
|
|
|
|
cvax
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:28:39 PM |
|
Anybody trying GPUCoin with scrypt:N? I am getting all bad hashes for some reason. Hmm.
cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt:N -H 2 -i 1 -m 1 -l T10x24 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3367
|
BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta | YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:30:10 PM |
|
100% accepted on my 780 over at hashfever
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
|
DougB62
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:40:50 PM |
|
Anybody trying GPUCoin with scrypt:N? I am getting all bad hashes for some reason. Hmm.
cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt:N -H 2 -i 1 -m 1 -l T10x24 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3367
Going through fine, at hashfever as well. cudaminer32_2_28.exe --algo=scrypt: 2048 -o stratum+tcp://gpu.hashfever.com:3262 -u user -p pass -d 2 -l T10x24 -H 2 -i 0 -m 1 -s 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
