▂▃▅▆▇⫷[🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰]⫸⫷[!Paying 10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸▇▆▅▃▂

[phm87]

Hi,


You added DAS coin to your pool but the only exchange (Nova) doesn't work (wallet in maintenance). Miners have wallets issues and the developer isn't available. I analyzed and I think that pools used a correct DAS source. Many miners are not able to sell the coins (and I think that your pool with auto-exchange is not able to sell this coin nor send it to Nova).

I'd like to check among pools what source code they used for DAS as I think (and hope) that they used the same correct version. I read that some commits may have been deleted/reverted on some github. So please also keep all the source files used for your compilation (backup these).

Can you tell me which code of DAS you used on your pool ? The github used with the time of the git clone to know exactly the source used.

Details:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1988059.msg25110981#msg25110981

PS: I want to create a DAS masternode, I bought 1000 DAS on Nova at 35$ worth of BTC. It is now at 7$ worth but I still want to know how to do a masternode.

Thank you,


phm87

[JaredKaragen]

Thanks for help.

Can you explain why do i need to write ,X11 after the c=BTC

Its good practice to tell stratum the algos you are mining;  because if you are mining multiple algos you'd add them all to that list, and give them a normalization value as well.

Its just good practice in the end, as the pools code expects to see something there, and you are better off not relying on a default or unsubmitted value that it will then assume.

there is no work for nvidia miners today?

My nvidia machines are online and mining.....  not sure what you are trying to imply.

[CaHek83]

there is no work for nvidia miners today?

My nvidia machines are online and mining.....  not sure what you are trying to imply.
[/quote]
When i mined skein algo my half of rig does not working and i make a half of my usual hashrate, maybe i should play with d= now its 0.898 (8x1070)
same thing with kessak algo, ususal 5.4 GH now about half and uses half of cards, maybe i should use intensity?
neoscrypt and x17 works well

[CaHek83]

What i have to say to stratum that i want and can mine much more and faster? it wait 5 min before usual speed!


[2017-11-24 10:23:29] Starting on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3737
[2017-11-24 10:23:29] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 10:23:29] 8 miner threads started, using 'x17' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 10:23:45] Stratum difficulty set to 0.152
[2017-11-24 10:23:45] x17 block 1671501, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:23:47] GPU#5: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:47] GPU#1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:47] GPU#2: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:48] GPU#7: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:48] GPU#6: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:48] GPU#0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:49] GPU#4: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:23:50] x17 block 1671502, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:23:51] [S/A/T]: 0/1/1, diff: 1.331, 6973.87kH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:24:00] x17 block 1671503, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:24:07] x17 block 1671504, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:24:13] x17 block 1671505, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:24:21] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.53MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:24:22] [S/A/T]: 0/2/2, diff: 0.301, 14.12MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:24:40] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.43MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:24:40] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 0.361, 15.89MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:25:03] [S/A/T]: 0/4/4, diff: 1.192, 16.77MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:25:08] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.56MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:25:13] x17 block 1671506, diff 605.973
[2017-11-24 10:25:50] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.42MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:25:50] [S/A/T]: 0/5/5, diff: 0.295, 18.19MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:25:52] x17 block 1671507, diff 713.914
[2017-11-24 10:26:07] x17 block 1671508, diff 742.428
[2017-11-24 10:26:32] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.53MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:26:32] [S/A/T]: 0/6/6, diff: 0.374, 18.72MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:26:34] x17 block 1671509, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:26:44] x17 block 1671510, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:27:02] x17 block 1671511, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:27:08] [S/A/T]: 0/7/7, diff: 0.192, 19.08MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:27:17] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.43MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:27:18] [S/A/T]: 0/8/8, diff: 0.296, 19.44MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:28:01] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.54MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:28:01] [S/A/T]: 0/9/9, diff: 0.224, 19.69MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:28:15] [S/A/T]: 0/10/10, diff: 0.189, 20.13MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:28:31] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.48MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:28:31] [S/A/T]: 0/11/11, diff: 1.222, 20.33MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:28:33] [S/A/T]: 0/12/12, diff: 0.390, 20.47MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:29:06] x17 block 1671512, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/13/13, diff: 0.282, 20.63MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:29:23] x17 block 1671513, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:29:25] [S/A/T]: 0/14/14, diff: 0.161, 20.75MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:29:56] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.29MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:29:56] [S/A/T]: 0/15/15, diff: 0.193, 20.83MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:02] x17 block 1671514, diff 801.315
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.67MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] [S/A/T]: 0/16/16, diff: 0.259, 20.96MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#3: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#2: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.18MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#4: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.62MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.24MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.07MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:03] GPU#7: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 10.41MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:04] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.62MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:30:14] [S/A/T]: 0/17/17, diff: 0.201, 88.19MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:16] [S/A/T]: 0/18/18, diff: 2.222, 88.15MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:17] [S/A/T]: 0/19/19, diff: 0.233, 88.75MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:24] [S/A/T]: 0/20/20, diff: 0.522, 88.97MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:37] [S/A/T]: 0/21/21, diff: 0.545, 89.07MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:30:38] [S/A/T]: 0/22/22, diff: 0.488, 89.12MH/s yes!

[CaHek83]

Same with skein algo 5 min for usual speed


[2017-11-24 10:33:19] Starting on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4933
[2017-11-24 10:33:19] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 10:33:19] 8 miner threads started, using 'skein' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 10:33:22] Stratum difficulty set to 0.898
[2017-11-24 10:33:22] skein block 5608006, diff 23515.283
[2017-11-24 10:33:24] GPU#3: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:33:24] GPU#7: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:33:24] GPU#6: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:33:33] skein block 5608007, diff 29901.707
[2017-11-24 10:33:48] GPU#4: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:33:49] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 542.27MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:33:49] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 549.88MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:33:51] [S/A/T]: 0/1/1, diff: 4.818, 1095.48MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:33:54] [S/A/T]: 0/2/2, diff: 1.683, 1095.86MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:33:56] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 0.991, 1095.28MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:33:58] [S/A/T]: 0/4/4, diff: 1.153, 1094.98MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:33:58] [S/A/T]: 0/5/5, diff: 1.723, 1094.88MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:03] [S/A/T]: 0/6/6, diff: 1.045, 1093.80MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:19] [S/A/T]: 0/7/7, diff: 2.188, 1092.52MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:20] [S/A/T]: 0/8/8, diff: 3.306, 1092.42MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:21] [S/A/T]: 0/9/9, diff: 3.306, 1092.42MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:23] [S/A/T]: 0/10/10, diff: 12.605, 1092.15MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:25] skein block 5608008, diff 28751.710
[2017-11-24 10:34:26] [S/A/T]: 0/11/11, diff: 1.530, 1092.54MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:28] [S/A/T]: 0/12/12, diff: 36.442, 1092.13MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:30] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 547.02MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:34:30] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 537.19MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:34:30] GPU#5: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:34:32] [S/A/T]: 0/13/13, diff: 259.401, 1090.91MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:32] [S/A/T]: 0/14/14, diff: 3.908, 1090.84MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:34] skein block 5608009, diff 27645.904
[2017-11-24 10:34:35] [S/A/T]: 0/15/15, diff: 3.141, 1090.39MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:35] [S/A/T]: 0/16/16, diff: 6.826, 1090.26MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:38] [S/A/T]: 0/17/17, diff: 1.746, 1090.20MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:40] skein block 5608010, diff 26582.462
[2017-11-24 10:34:48] [S/A/T]: 0/18/18, diff: 20.461, 1088.98MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:48] skein block 5608011, diff 25560.175
[2017-11-24 10:34:49] [S/A/T]: 0/19/19, diff: 3.935, 1088.95MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:51] [S/A/T]: 0/20/20, diff: 1.071, 1088.81MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:34:58] [S/A/T]: 0/21/21, diff: 0.928, 1088.36MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:01] [S/A/T]: 0/22/22, diff: 8.447, 1088.19MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:03] [S/A/T]: 0/23/23, diff: 2.896, 1088.17MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:06] skein block 5608012, diff 24576.984
[2017-11-24 10:35:07] skein block 5608013, diff 23631.731
[2017-11-24 10:35:12] [S/A/T]: 0/24/24, diff: 4.192, 1087.92MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:15] [S/A/T]: 0/25/25, diff: 4.957, 1088.67MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:20] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 545.77MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:35:20] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 545.25MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:35:21] GPU#2: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:35:23] [S/A/T]: 0/26/26, diff: 0.938, 1088.84MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:24] GPU#0: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:35:24] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 528.45MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:35:27] skein block 5608014, diff 22722.905
[2017-11-24 10:35:30] [S/A/T]: 0/27/27, diff: 1.545, 1643.82MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:30] skein block 5608015, diff 28894.268
[2017-11-24 10:35:33] [S/A/T]: 0/28/28, diff: 0.980, 1644.78MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:33] [S/A/T]: 0/29/29, diff: 0.980, 1644.78MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:33] [S/A/T]: 0/30/30, diff: 0.980, 1644.78MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:34] skein block 5608016, diff 27782.892
[2017-11-24 10:35:37] [S/A/T]: 0/31/31, diff: 1.018, 1645.00MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:38] [S/A/T]: 0/32/32, diff: 0.939, 1645.02MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:39] [S/A/T]: 0/33/33, diff: 3.524, 1644.86MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:40] [S/A/T]: 0/34/34, diff: 3.524, 1644.84MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:41] skein block 5608017, diff 26714.240
[2017-11-24 10:35:44] [S/A/T]: 0/35/35, diff: 2.651, 1644.06MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:46] skein block 5608018, diff 25686.904
[2017-11-24 10:35:47] [S/A/T]: 0/36/36, diff: 0.900, 1643.19MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:47] skein block 5608019, diff 24698.816
[2017-11-24 10:35:49] [S/A/T]: 0/37/37, diff: 1.174, 1643.07MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:51] [S/A/T]: 0/38/38, diff: 136.655, 1643.24MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:35:59] [S/A/T]: 0/39/39, diff: 2.479, 1640.63MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:05] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 550.96MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:36:06] [S/A/T]: 0/40/40, diff: 2.315, 1639.99MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:06] [S/A/T]: 0/40/41, diff: 4.407, 1639.83MH/s booooo
[2017-11-24 10:36:06] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-11-24 10:36:07] [S/A/T]: 0/41/42, diff: 19.696, 1640.22MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:13] [S/A/T]: 0/42/43, diff: 5.711, 1639.89MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:13] [S/A/T]: 0/43/44, diff: 2.837, 1639.84MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:21] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 532.00MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:36:21] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 532.65MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:36:22] [S/A/T]: 0/44/45, diff: 4.066, 1637.52MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:22] [S/A/T]: 0/45/46, diff: 1.500, 1636.74MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:26] [S/A/T]: 0/46/47, diff: 18.160, 1626.64MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:26] [S/A/T]: 0/47/48, diff: 18.160, 1625.93MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:30] [S/A/T]: 0/48/49, diff: 1.107, 1619.75MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:32] [S/A/T]: 0/49/50, diff: 1.306, 1615.26MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:34] [S/A/T]: 0/50/51, diff: 1.959, 1609.02MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:34] [S/A/T]: 0/51/52, diff: 1.564, 1607.49MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:36] [S/A/T]: 0/52/53, diff: 0.987, 1605.66MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:36] [S/A/T]: 0/53/54, diff: 6.329, 1605.68MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:36] [S/A/T]: 0/54/55, diff: 1.257, 1605.72MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:37] [S/A/T]: 0/55/56, diff: 1.981, 1605.72MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:38] [S/A/T]: 0/56/57, diff: 1.714, 1605.83MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:38] Pool asked your stats
[2017-11-24 10:36:46] [S/A/T]: 0/57/58, diff: 207.156, 1609.72MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:49] [S/A/T]: 0/58/59, diff: 1.584, 1617.14MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:55] GPU#5: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 549.06MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:36:57] [S/A/T]: 0/59/60, diff: 4.859, 1636.01MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:36:58] [S/A/T]: 0/60/61, diff: 1.547, 1637.06MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:02] [S/A/T]: 0/61/62, diff: 1.441, 1637.36MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:02] [S/A/T]: 0/62/63, diff: 1.441, 1637.36MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:02] [S/A/T]: 0/63/64, diff: 1.571, 1637.09MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:09] [S/A/T]: 0/64/65, diff: 29.594, 1637.85MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:11] [S/A/T]: 0/65/66, diff: 2.348, 1637.69MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:12] [S/A/T]: 0/66/67, diff: 0.962, 1637.58MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:14] [S/A/T]: 0/67/68, diff: 0.957, 1637.31MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:16] [S/A/T]: 0/68/69, diff: 1.495, 1637.26MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:17] [S/A/T]: 0/69/70, diff: 2.126, 1637.13MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:19] [S/A/T]: 0/70/71, diff: 2.730, 1636.91MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:22] [S/A/T]: 0/71/72, diff: 5.280, 1636.76MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:27] [S/A/T]: 0/72/73, diff: 1.540, 1636.89MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:30] [S/A/T]: 0/73/74, diff: 1.467, 1637.26MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:30] [S/A/T]: 0/74/75, diff: 9.602, 1637.32MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:31] GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 544.99MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:31] GPU#6: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 539.52MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:31] [S/A/T]: 0/75/76, diff: 1.192, 1636.79MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:31] GPU#1: Intensity set to 27, 134217728 cuda threads
[2017-11-24 10:37:32] GPU#2: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 541.75MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:32] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 542.05MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:32] GPU#7: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 533.18MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:32] GPU#4: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 550.72MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:32] GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 535.61MH/s
[2017-11-24 10:37:36] [S/A/T]: 0/76/77, diff: 1.050, 4397.94MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:37] [S/A/T]: 0/77/78, diff: 1.050, 4397.85MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:37] [S/A/T]: 0/78/79, diff: 1.652, 4397.70MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:38] [S/A/T]: 0/79/80, diff: 2.269, 4399.07MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:39] [S/A/T]: 0/80/81, diff: 1.353, 4398.85MH/s yes!
[2017-11-24 10:37:39] [S/A/T]: 0/81/82, diff: 2.185, 4398.51MH/s yes!

[CaHek83]

what with Veltor algo today ?

[JaredKaragen]

What i have to say to stratum that i want and can mine much more and faster? it wait 5 min before usual speed!

This is your miner ramping up... not the pool.

it takes time to average.  Everyting you read from the miner output is from your machine;  the only thing the pool reports to you is your next workunit, and a response for a share submission.  hashrate on the pool is based on share size/frequency.  The reading from your miner is from your miner's physical performance, not the calculated performance.

If you spam a bunch of low shares, you get low hashrate.  if you get regularly spaced or spam high diff shares, you get a high hashrate....  pools dont trust any hashrates reported by miners.   easy to fake the statistics.

[CaHek83]

but in some times, my rig starts at speed 90 mh\s for algo x17, another time it takes 5 min to reach that speed.
I think that stratum server can be configured and i am asking maybe there is some command line parametrs to lower that time such as intensity or difficulty?

[Mapuo]

Where is actual profit?

[crackfoo]

but in some times, my rig starts at speed 90 mh\s for algo x17, another time it takes 5 min to reach that speed.
I think that stratum server can be configured and i am asking maybe there is some command line parametrs to lower that time such as intensity or difficulty?

manually set your difficulty might help a bit.

http://zpool.ca/site/diff

[CaHek83]

[/quote]

manually set your difficulty might help a bit.

http://zpool.ca/site/diff


[/quote]
Thx what abouts question about Veltor and now same shit with x17?

[BlitheJr]

Please, i would like to know if we had to generate a minimum hashrate to mining BSD with a GPU in zpool?

[guytechie]

I still see:
BitcoinZ (equihash)   137.477449 BTCZ   1.100%   0.00000000   

And also worried that those that are considered "Completed" are also worth 0 BTC.  Can't see them now since they are past the last 50 blocks found list.

I understand the exchange is down for this coin (as well as others), but if that's the case, how would those coins get exchanged and completed?

[crackfoo]

I still see:
BitcoinZ (equihash)   137.477449 BTCZ   1.100%   0.00000000   

And also worried that those that are considered "Completed" are also worth 0 BTC.  Can't see them now since they are past the last 50 blocks found list.

I understand the exchange is down for this coin (as well as others), but if that's the case, how would those coins get exchanged and completed?

hrmm it shouldn't be mining these. grrr

There's not a way to pause the earnings for this until the exchange is sorted out. I'll manually take it off.

[crackfoo]

I still see:
BitcoinZ (equihash)   137.477449 BTCZ   1.100%   0.00000000   

And also worried that those that are considered "Completed" are also worth 0 BTC.  Can't see them now since they are past the last 50 blocks found list.

I understand the exchange is down for this coin (as well as others), but if that's the case, how would those coins get exchanged and completed?

hrmm it shouldn't be mining these. grrr

There's not a way to pause the earnings for this until the exchange is sorted out. I'll manually take it off.

I think that when there are still miners using c=BTCZ stratum wants to try and keep mining it... 

[CaHek83]

Crackfoo anyone want to mine this shit?
MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.025193 MBL   0.123%   0.00000000   28m ago   Immature (72/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.026448 MBL   0.130%   0.00000000   30m ago   Immature (75/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.028066 MBL   0.138%   0.00000000   31m ago   Immature (76/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.028066 MBL   0.138%   0.00000000   32m ago   Immature (78/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.031434 MBL   0.154%   0.00000000   32m ago   

[CaHek83]

Where is actual profit?

Ctackfoo fixed yesturday)))

[JaredKaragen]

Crackfoo anyone want to mine this shit?
MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.025193 MBL   0.123%   0.00000000   28m ago   Immature (72/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.026448 MBL   0.130%   0.00000000   30m ago   Immature (75/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.028066 MBL   0.138%   0.00000000   31m ago   Immature (76/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.028066 MBL   0.138%   0.00000000   32m ago   Immature (78/120)
   MobileCash (lyra2v2)(auxPoW)   0.031434 MBL   0.154%   0.00000000   32m ago   

Please do yourself and us the favor and look up what AuxPOW is for coins, and how pools use it in switching code...  Not earning these coins is "wasting hash" compared to earning them with a hash result that would not work on a big coin.

Also read this whole thread;  there are excellent descriptions and analogies tht explain why its good to get these credits that you think are worthless.

but in some times, my rig starts at speed 90 mh\s for algo x17, another time it takes 5 min to reach that speed.
I think that stratum server can be configured and i am asking maybe there is some command line parametrs to lower that time such as intensity or difficulty?

The server can't be configured differently because of the way it calculates share % based on submitted shares.   It must delta up the hashrate (poolside) to be sure people arent whipping in with erroneous miner behavior to try and trick the calculations into giving you hashrate that wasn't submitted.

[guytechie]

Please do yourself and us the favor and look up what AuxPOW is for coins, and how pools use it in switching code...  Not earning these coins is "wasting hash" compared to not earning them.

I think you mean Not earning these coins is "wasting hash" compared to earning them.

I still see:
BitcoinZ (equihash)   137.477449 BTCZ   1.100%   0.00000000   

And also worried that those that are considered "Completed" are also worth 0 BTC.  Can't see them now since they are past the last 50 blocks found list.

I understand the exchange is down for this coin (as well as others), but if that's the case, how would those coins get exchanged and completed?

hrmm it shouldn't be mining these. grrr

There's not a way to pause the earnings for this until the exchange is sorted out. I'll manually take it off.

Cool.  So what happens to those who already mined them?

[JaredKaragen]

Please do yourself and us the favor and look up what AuxPOW is for coins, and how pools use it in switching code...  Not earning these coins is "wasting hash" compared to not earning them.

I think you mean Not earning these coins is "wasting hash" compared to earning them.
gack.  yes.  too many negatives in one sentence?  I corrected my typo in the original post.

hrmm it shouldn't be mining these. grrr

There's not a way to pause the earnings for this until the exchange is sorted out. I'll manually take it off.

Cool.  So what happens to those who already mined them?

Im not sure about that whole conversation myself....   Im not sure exactly what happened there.   I thought initially you were replying about mining MBL....  my mistake