Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2025, 04:59:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Is the top in?
Yes - 18 (20.2%)
No - 60 (67.4%)
I have no idea - 11 (12.4%)
Total Voters: 89

Pages: « 1 ... 14708 14709 14710 14711 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717 14718 14719 14720 14721 14722 14723 14724 14725 14726 14727 14728 14729 14730 14731 14732 14733 14734 14735 14736 14737 14738 14739 14740 14741 14742 14743 14744 14745 14746 14747 14748 14749 14750 14751 14752 14753 14754 14755 14756 14757 [14758] 14759 14760 14761 14762 14763 14764 14765 14766 14767 14768 14769 14770 14771 14772 14773 14774 14775 14776 14777 14778 14779 14780 14781 14782 14783 14784 14785 14786 14787 14788 14789 14790 14791 14792 14793 14794 14795 14796 14797 14798 14799 14800 14801 14802 14803 14804 14805 14806 14807 14808 ... 34510 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26772737 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:01:11 PM

bargainbin/notlampchop/whatever: you are a nsa/banker rat, the sooner you admit defeat and ragequit, the better the chances your DC puppetmasters will be kind to you and maybe let you into their R3cev consortium, distributing stickers and vaporware brochures.. Grin
Thanks for buying my BTCits, chump prudent investor Smiley
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 2176


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:01:17 PM

Coin



Explanation
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:16:47 PM

Has there ever been a documented case on this thread or elsewhere of two opposing points of view actually learning and eventually taking the other on board? Everyone's so seemingly entrenched that I no longer need to read the post, I just spot the usernames and know what's going to be written.

To be fair, most of us are idiots.
mainpmf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:19:40 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:27:50 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/

Fire up a classic node. Let your voice be heard.

https://bitcoinclassic.com/
mainpmf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:33:53 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/

Fire up a classic node. Let your voice be heard.

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

Well I'm not so sure forcing the community to go to classic is the best solution though ^^
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:36:52 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/

Fire up a classic node. Let your voice be heard.

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

Well I'm not so sure forcing the community to go to classic is the best solution though ^^

You can't do that. That's for the devs and the miners. Nodes show support, but they don't decide.
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:45:54 PM

^^Non-mining nodes are *wallets*.
Suggesting that they mean anything above that is adding a layer of superstition on top of scripture -- like Catholics breaking canon by praying to Mary.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2016, 02:50:37 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/

Fire up a classic node. Let your voice be heard.

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

Well I'm not so sure forcing the community to go to classic is the best solution though ^^

You can't do that. That's for the devs and the miners. Nodes show support, but they don't decide.

you guys heard of the BIP to let miners vote using flags on the 32 bit version number with each block they mine? they should do the same thing with the nodes, i bet a lot of poeple running classic are only running it to let there "I WANT 2MB BLOCKS NOW!!!" voice be heard.
  
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2016, 02:53:01 PM

Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 02:53:59 PM


Full again...

Say whatever you want I don't like the idea of limited tx every day :/

Fire up a classic node. Let your voice be heard.

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

Well I'm not so sure forcing the community to go to classic is the best solution though ^^

You can't do that. That's for the devs and the miners. Nodes show support, but they don't decide.

you guys heard of the BIP to let miners vote using flags on the 32 bit version number with each block they mine? they should do the same thing with the nodes, i bet a lot of poeple running classic are only running it to let there "I WANT 2MB BLOCKS NOW!!!" voice be heard.
  

Give me Core with BIP101 and Segwit HF and I'm game.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2016, 02:57:13 PM

are classic devs even qualified to touch bitcoin, besides change the #define 1MB?

its gr8 there's a competing impl., hope it doesn't fade into obscurity.

but core will be the reference impl. for some time.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 2176


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:01:03 PM

Coin



Explanation
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:07:43 PM

are classic devs even qualified to touch bitcoin, besides change the #define 1MB?

its gr8 there's a competing impl., hope it doesn't fade into obscurity.

but core will be the reference impl. for some time.

Are Core devs qualified to touch Bitcoin? Is it lack of qualifications that's responsible for their stalling?
"It's all very scientific and complicated, we must conduct Rethier-Binks perambularization model analysis for at least 3 years before it's safe"?

But as far as having cred outside of Bitcoin? Classic devs certainly have more. Smiley
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2380
Merit: 1141


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:12:26 PM

Shame on you Adam Sad
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:17:27 PM

Shame on you Adam Sad

You are confused. This is not the Monero thread.
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:19:03 PM

Shame on you Adam Sad

Heh, albeit he made some progress not spitting on Core devs anymore and puffing on that hardfork pipe dream.

Still it is baffling that for someone who spent so much time on this forum not to acknowledge the vital security matters underlying the technology he is lucky to be part of and the dramatic consequences such contentious fork event would do to his bitcoin stack.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2016, 03:55:16 PM

Shame on you Adam Sad

Heh, albeit he made some progress not spitting on Core devs anymore and puffing on that hardfork pipe dream.

Still it is baffling that for someone who spent so much time on this forum not to acknowledge the vital security matters underlying the technology he is lucky to be part of and the dramatic consequences such contentious fork event would do to his bitcoin stack.
"vital security matters underlying the technology"

oh you.

i use to say bitcoin will evolve through hard forks, and that's true, they just won't ever ( or very unlikely to be )  a "contentious fork event "

as for the hardfork pipe dream:
i think if there ever is a fork 1 of the chains will be valueless within minutes, hours or at most days.
the simple fact that there are 2 chains of value, and all of what that implies, bring the value of both down dramatically, so user won't have that everyone will value only 1 chain, the most popular chain, very fast, and speculators will ack fast and short the shit out of the losing chain....
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:55:33 PM


XMR is Monero

Yeah I know XBT. I was posting in the Monero section at the same time (my only other crypto holding).

Subtle. Cheesy
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 03:56:20 PM

are classic devs even qualified to touch bitcoin, besides change the #define 1MB?

its gr8 there's a competing impl., hope it doesn't fade into obscurity.

but core will be the reference impl. for some time.

You mean Jeff and Gavin? Probably yes?
Pages: « 1 ... 14708 14709 14710 14711 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717 14718 14719 14720 14721 14722 14723 14724 14725 14726 14727 14728 14729 14730 14731 14732 14733 14734 14735 14736 14737 14738 14739 14740 14741 14742 14743 14744 14745 14746 14747 14748 14749 14750 14751 14752 14753 14754 14755 14756 14757 [14758] 14759 14760 14761 14762 14763 14764 14765 14766 14767 14768 14769 14770 14771 14772 14773 14774 14775 14776 14777 14778 14779 14780 14781 14782 14783 14784 14785 14786 14787 14788 14789 14790 14791 14792 14793 14794 14795 14796 14797 14798 14799 14800 14801 14802 14803 14804 14805 14806 14807 14808 ... 34510 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!