Lambie Slayer
|
|
March 08, 2020, 08:27:24 AM |
|
Is Venezuela rich now bc they have toilet paper money?
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
March 08, 2020, 08:40:34 AM |
|
But but, you can't wipe your ass with that, it has C O R O N A.
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1478
Self made HODLER ✓
|
|
March 08, 2020, 08:46:12 AM |
|
No, really, I am serious now... Why do people think toilet paper will be their biggest concern in case of a shortage of supplies?
What about water and food?
How the fuck does this work? Like "I am fully prepped for the apocalypse because now I have a room completely filled with toilet paper." ?
Maybe it's the cheapest way to completely fill a supermarket cart so that they fool themselves that they are doing good?
Don't they know that when you don't eat you barely shit either?
Nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Lambie Slayer
|
|
March 08, 2020, 08:52:43 AM |
|
No, really, I am serious now... Why do people think toilet paper will be their biggest concern in case of a shortage of supplies?
Maybe it's the cheapest way to completely fill a supermarket cart so that they fool themselves that they are doing good?
Nonsense.
Think you nailed it.
|
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1478
Self made HODLER ✓
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:10:18 AM |
|
No, really, I am serious now... Why do people think toilet paper will be their biggest concern in case of a shortage of supplies?
Maybe it's the cheapest way to completely fill a supermarket cart so that they fool themselves that they are doing good?
Nonsense.
Think you nailed it. If so, then maybe we really needed a pandemic to rebalance humanity. And in some way I am also serious about that. I mean... If this thing really goes BAD it will be a great "stress test" of current dependence on specific chains of supply. Not that I really want that to happen (unlike some) but just trying to see the good side of an inevitable bad situation.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:10:33 AM |
|
P.S.: Thinking about this is making me recognise how wonderful is to have free public health service and how we usually don't see the value in those things we have always taken for granted. It's not free. In this case it appears you don't see the cost. Of course it is being paid in advance in order to be "free" when you need it but, there is something very wrong with the alternative system: Look at the prices of medical procedures in the US. One would suppose that capitalism would manage to reduce prices due to competition as it does in most other sectors. But in this particular case it is not happening at all. How do you reconcile US not having universal health care and still having the biggest per person spend? It just doesn't make any sense. I don't believe in socialism, but in this particular case I have to acknowledge universal health care works way better overall. Of course I find completely ridiculous that universal health care also covers foreigners (and even ilegal migrants) here whose respective nations don't reciprocate when we go there. That's completely stupid and plain wrong from an economical point of view (I will leave ethical concerns out of this) and it is well known there are many people exploiting this. I don't know nearly enough about the US health system to answer this, but I will say that part of the problem is that the US is not a capitalist country. It is as socialist as everywhere else in the west, it just has a slightly different form. Another potential issue is the sue culture. It's so out of hand that we make fun of it in the rest of the world. What's a medic to do when he risks getting sued every time he treats a patient? Well he obviously has to charge enough that he can afford that risk. I have stayed at a number of hotels in thailand with pools over the past months, and they all have the same sign with the same clause: There is no lifeguard, and you use the pool at your own risk. Remove the welfare state - all of it, rip it out by the roots - and change the legal system so people are forced to accept a higher degree of personal responsibility for their own actions, and prices might eventually come down. But it's a decades long process, even if done right, which it won't be. Basically the whole country is fucked.
|
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:13:49 AM |
|
Look at the prices of medical procedures in the US. One would suppose that capitalism would manage to reduce prices due to competition as it does in most other sectors. But in this particular case it is not happening at all. How do you reconcile US not having universal health care and still having the biggest per person spend? It just doesn't make any sense.
Simple. Medicine in the US is a semi-socialized, government-market-distorted clusterfuck that has nothing whatsoever to do with capitalism. So the alternative being fully socialising it would probably work better IN COMPARISON... Unless they manage to keep corrupting the system somehow... which probably they would. Is there any country where a pure capitalist health system exist? If there is, I would like to know and compare costs. Possibly in eastern europe somewhere, but I can't say for sure. In some of the former soviet countries communism and socialism is (at least officially) illegal. I'll be looking into this in the next half year or so.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
No, really, I am serious now... Why do people think toilet paper will be their biggest concern in case of a shortage of supplies?
What about water and food?
How the fuck does this work? Like "I am fully prepped for the apocalypse because now I have a room completely filled with toilet paper." ?
Maybe it's the cheapest way to completely fill a supermarket cart so that they fool themselves that they are doing good?
Don't they know that when you don't eat you barely shit either?
Nonsense.
China is (was) the worlds biggest exporter of toilet paper. There’s bound to be a genuine supply side shortage somewhere. People are all thinking this is a demand side panic. That’s not necessarily the case. Why the fuck can’t I get lawn beetle killer? Is that a blind demand panic as well? Why can’t LFC get supplies? It all leads back to the worlds manufacturing hub being a bit fucked at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:34:21 AM |
|
The meat eaters shall take over the world~! There were a few links recently that pointed in the same direction, that meat eaters are more resistant to the virus than plant eaters. As it happens I mostly eat meat and always have. So many concerned people growing up, you will die before 30, and here we are.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 8544
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
I'm out of TP No prob, saved by the front desk They give it away
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
The government should not be responsible for anything of substance. A government is a costly, slow, and bureaucratic way to organize anything. It has it's place only in regulating, auditing and prosecuting.
Everything else should be handled by the free market. A free market is not what we have, and we can't have a free-market as long as the economy runs on monopoly money.
A truly competitive free market would work itself out as long as the government sets clear boundaries and is there to prosecute cartels, monopolies, collusion, price setting, and other anti-competitive practices.
Of course this can't happen either as long a bribery is legal in the form of lobbyists. Any candidate taking anything, even a free meal, should be prosecuted. The US government already has conflict of interest rules that conveniently don't extend to politicians.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:44:42 AM |
|
The government should not be responsible for anything of substance. A truly competitive free market would work itself out as long as the government sets clear boundaries and is there to prosecute cartels, monopolies, collusion, price setting, and other anti-competitive practices. Uh
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1478
Self made HODLER ✓
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:44:43 AM |
|
P.S.: Thinking about this is making me recognise how wonderful is to have free public health service and how we usually don't see the value in those things we have always taken for granted. It's not free. In this case it appears you don't see the cost. Of course it is being paid in advance in order to be "free" when you need it but, there is something very wrong with the alternative system: Look at the prices of medical procedures in the US. One would suppose that capitalism would manage to reduce prices due to competition as it does in most other sectors. But in this particular case it is not happening at all. How do you reconcile US not having universal health care and still having the biggest per person spend? It just doesn't make any sense. I don't believe in socialism, but in this particular case I have to acknowledge universal health care works way better overall. Of course I find completely ridiculous that universal health care also covers foreigners (and even ilegal migrants) here whose respective nations don't reciprocate when we go there. That's completely stupid and plain wrong from an economical point of view (I will leave ethical concerns out of this) and it is well known there are many people exploiting this. I don't know nearly enough about the US health system to answer this, but I will say that part of the problem is that the US is not a capitalist country. It is as socialist as everywhere else in the west, it just has a slightly different form. Another potential issue is the sue culture. It's so out of hand that we make fun of it in the rest of the world. What's a medic to do when he risks getting sued every time he treats a patient? Well he obviously has to charge enough that he can afford that risk. I have stayed at a number of hotels in thailand with pools over the past months, and they all have the same sign with the same clause: There is no lifeguard, and you use the pool at your own risk. Remove the welfare state - all of it, rip it out by the roots - and change the legal system so people are forced to accept a higher degree of personal responsibility for their own actions, and prices might eventually come down. But it's a decades long process, even if done right, which it won't be. Basically the whole country is fucked. Yes, I can understand the "sue culture" has a big impact on prices. You really need to set crazy prices to be able to cushion fines that can even reach the hundreds of millions here and there. Removing the welfare state? I donno... Maybe that's too much. Do you know what kind of things can do people that doesn't have enough to feed themselves? I don't think the welfare state was created just because of making sure everyone is well fed for... charity... it is also for safety of the rest. Also, the health system is very complex... If it were fully private and only for a few that can pay for it there would be no economy of scale and probably the cost would skyrocket. As much as I do believe in capitalism, until I see a detailed and well thought plan of how it could be implemented and what it costs would be I wouldn't vouch for it. Maybe Amazon has a plan for that... if so I would like to study it. In the meantime, I prefer euro universal health care even if there a lot a changes I would do... The first one being charging service costs to anyone whose country doesn't reciprocate the same.
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
|
March 08, 2020, 09:50:13 AM |
|
The government should not be responsible for anything of substance. A truly competitive free market would work itself out as long as the government sets clear boundaries and is there to prosecute cartels, monopolies, collusion, price setting, and other anti-competitive practices. Uh Substance meaning actual productivity. Like treating patients, managing companies, making economic/business decisions.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
March 08, 2020, 10:05:22 AM |
|
-That woman has pretty large earrings. -Thought she was a brunette. -Wonder what the hand gestures mean. -Think I have that same scarf. -Cool retro poster. etc
|
|
|
|
goldkingcoiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1971
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
|
|
March 08, 2020, 10:09:43 AM |
|
I will never understand the toilet paper shortage. The first thing people do in the face of doom is buy massive unreasonable amounts of TP....
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
March 08, 2020, 10:13:18 AM |
|
prosecute cartels, monopolies, collusion, price setting, and other anti-competitive practices. making economic/business decisions.
Uh
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
|
March 08, 2020, 10:16:27 AM |
|
prosecute cartels, monopolies, collusion, price setting, and other anti-competitive practices. making economic/business decisions.
Uh You're an idiot
|
|
|
|
|