Bitcoin Forum
September 08, 2025, 09:19:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 6089 6090 6091 6092 6093 6094 6095 6096 6097 6098 6099 6100 6101 6102 6103 6104 6105 6106 6107 6108 6109 6110 6111 6112 6113 6114 6115 6116 6117 6118 6119 6120 6121 6122 6123 6124 6125 6126 6127 6128 6129 6130 6131 6132 6133 6134 6135 6136 6137 6138 [6139] 6140 6141 6142 6143 6144 6145 6146 6147 6148 6149 6150 6151 6152 6153 6154 6155 6156 6157 6158 6159 6160 6161 6162 6163 6164 6165 6166 6167 6168 6169 6170 6171 6172 6173 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 ... 34896 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26836978 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
phatsphere
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 11:46:28 AM

MORE WALLS, less bets pls!
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:00:57 PM


Explanation
akujin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:01:41 PM



30 days does not embody the full epicness of saying "never" when we are talking about the trigger being only $20 below the the price today. Also I don't want to change my 10:1 leverage to an arbitrary $500 especially as both agree than in P(98%) it will be hit in 90 days anyway. These are the changes. It seems clear that once again if you are bullish on bitcoin, the best odds you get by buying it. If you are bearish, then you have a few weeks/months in the sun, and then you are replaced with a new generation. And I have seen many.





the epicness is already embodied in saying "never".

so, the only question here is are we going to see another rpietila's failed prediction.


Personally, I have NO problem with predictions being wrong.   Who cares?

I have a problem with someone saying that s/he will put money on his/her prediction, and then failing to commit to that course of action.  People are wrong all the time, and NO BIG deal, but if you say that you are going to put some money on your prediction, then make it happen.. to solidify the amount of money and the timeline and the triggering mechanisms for the payout(s).. or at least make a  good faith attempt at 1 BTC or something.. at least you put some money on it.. like you said you were willing to do....

If you do NOT follow through with your statement and your proposal to make a bet, then you are merely trolling this thread to make the other people in the thread to do all the work in formulating the hypothetical that you apparently had NO intention to follow through with.


btctalk trolls do care about their reputation and predictions.

there is some serious math behind them and a 0 % possibility that they are wrong.
 

 Grin Grin Grin
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:13:48 PM



I expect it to die or at least become dormant, yes.  What I was trying to say is that it may go out almost invisibly.  The volume numbers are misleading.  They can effect subjective impressions, but not supply and demand.   I think price is low enough now so that demand is largely insensitive to price.  Even stronger:  Most of the non-churn demand is very inelastic.  But the fiat turnover will have to decline as the coins are drained by the arbitrageurs, and the impact of arbitrage on the free market will be limited to that quantity of supply.  I would expect it to decline very suddenly, and perhaps resume intermittently as the last few elastic coins get shaken out in spurts, then the supply impact would end completely.  Because this will be invisible to us, it will just be a slight supply cliff, mostly lost in the noise, visible primarily in price decoupling.  The sentiment reaction may be early or late.  If it takes a long time for price decoupling to become obvious, and the exchange remains operational, sentiment may be very late indeed, and the reaction almost invisibly slow.  


Very well put aminorex, I have been thinking this over for the last few days and I think what your saying is spot on. The fact is that if the external volume is fake(or increased by being 0 fee) it obfuscates the demand and the amount of coins in China even more. I agree that the decoupling has begun to a degree and people waiting for that to happen will likely be too late. All this hinges on the belief though that the majority of coins are not in China which I think will be the case due to the 4 months of one way arbing as the Chinese have sold out.
chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:14:41 PM

Some people like to mistake propositions for guarantees. It means they have someone to blame when they lose, but still they have an excuse to chase a free lunch.

why should speculators on a speculation forum have to begin and end every sentence with 'probably imo'?
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:17:49 PM

Nice poll question Adam most interesting in a while, the results so far are surprising.
Meman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:20:39 PM

If the price breaks below 400 (that's not for sure, but quite possible) it may stay there for some time. But chances are good, that it'll be pumped up again (big media attention, max keiser going crazy about bitcoins etc.). Nobody knows when the bottom is in and it may be a good idea, to cost average into bitcoins, when prices are low (now they are not low imho). And be warned, it's a big gamble, so don't bet your house Cheesy
nanobrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


Dumb broad


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:51:14 PM

Some people like to mistake propositions for guarantees. It means they have someone to blame when they lose, but still they have an excuse to chase a free lunch.

why should speculators on a speculation forum have to begin and end every sentence with 'probably imo'?

Because most posters don't change their PoV every fifteen minutes or claim to constantly be 'right'.

Most posters slowly earn people's respect and some latitude, newbs who fish bomb the forum with their vicarious opinions are quickly seen for what they are - loud-mouthed attention seekers.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:00:54 PM


Explanation
ShroomsKit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:04:11 PM

Can you idiots stop filling up whole pages with your pathetic attention seeking betting shit?
chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:31:41 PM

Some people like to mistake propositions for guarantees. It means they have someone to blame when they lose, but still they have an excuse to chase a free lunch.

why should speculators on a speculation forum have to begin and end every sentence with 'probably imo'?

Because most posters don't change their PoV every fifteen minutes or claim to constantly be 'right'.


Most posters slowly earn people's respect and some latitude, newbs who fish bomb the forum with their vicarious opinions are quickly seen for what they are - loud-mouthed attention seekers.

If you are accusing me of doing this, this really underlines your entire misunderstanding of what I am doing. I am 80% a holder, and 20% a day trader. Maybe this is why you are so confused. short term and long term are very different things. I dont hold a crystal ball, but I do not have to declare this every time I express an idea or an opinion. Im not going to put up with your strawman arguments, maybe that's why you percieve my need to be 'right'.
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:36:35 PM

I guess this would just end up like Pacquiao vs Mayweather   Grin Grin
The image that comes to my mind is a sumo wrestling match to be played with the speed of a chess-by-mail match.
(No offense intended.)
Cheesy
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:47:56 PM


Some basics if you want to use the exponential trendline, or contend against its use. Two things must be observed:

- The base value of the trendline
- The deviation of the current price from the trend, expressed in log10 units (1 unit = price is 90% lower or 900% higher).

The range where the deviation typically wanders, which is seen as booms and crashes in the price chart, is -0.4...0.5 log units.

In 2014-7-15, for example:

-0.4 => $0.75
-0.3 => $0.95
-0.2 => $1.20
-0.1 => $1.53
0.0 => $1.94
+0.1 => $2.47
+0.2 => $3.10
+0.3 => $3.95
+0.4 => $4.90
+0.5 => $6.30.

This is a very wide range (basically a whole order of magnitude), so the trendline price in any future point cannot very accurately predict what the actual price in that point is. In the short term, the obscene range makes it useless, in the longer term, there are other uncertainties.

What it can do, however, is to gauge the buy and sell zones, which are points where the current price deviates from the trendline price significantly. At present we are in buy zone, because the current price is about -0.35 log units below the trendline price. Similarly in November we were in sell zone when the current price was over 0.4 units above.

The next sell signal comes when the price goes to 0.4 the next time, and it is unlikely to happen before July, so it is likewise unlikely for the top to be any lower than $5k.

In 2013-11-23 it gave a sell signal at $872. The buy signal came in 2014-3-30 at $460.

For the funds that were thus risked, the return was +90% in 4 months.
chromosoma
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:51:42 PM

Still waiting for bitcoin  death:) Just a bit more, few months maybe
I know i am just a bit impatient:)
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:56:44 PM

Meanwhile, it looks like Huobi may end the day with the lowest daily volume since Dec/03, lower even than "DDOS Sunday"'s (Mar/23).

Has anyone seen any public response by them to the latest PBoC news? (The red-lamp announcement on their homepage has not changed since Apr/17.)
podyx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 01:58:05 PM

Risto, the log10 units are based on the trendline

How can you be so sure that your trendline is correct? It might work for now but it's gonna make a pretty big difference in the future
I will be using this method for the next bubble however Grin
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 02:00:56 PM


Explanation
Guinpen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 02:03:37 PM

Nice poll question Adam most interesting in a while, the results so far are surprising.

Yes, but it's missing a valid viewpoint: "I couldn't care less about precious metals", which is not the same as thinking about it.
boumalo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019


View Profile WWW
April 27, 2014, 02:10:18 PM

Still waiting for bitcoin  death:) Just a bit more, few months maybe
I know i am just a bit impatient:)

It would make more sense to invest some time in something you believed in instead of being Bitcoin Mister Doom
xulescu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 02:16:26 PM

In the meanwhile, masterluc suggests red candles in the 'analysis never ends' thread ...
Pages: « 1 ... 6089 6090 6091 6092 6093 6094 6095 6096 6097 6098 6099 6100 6101 6102 6103 6104 6105 6106 6107 6108 6109 6110 6111 6112 6113 6114 6115 6116 6117 6118 6119 6120 6121 6122 6123 6124 6125 6126 6127 6128 6129 6130 6131 6132 6133 6134 6135 6136 6137 6138 [6139] 6140 6141 6142 6143 6144 6145 6146 6147 6148 6149 6150 6151 6152 6153 6154 6155 6156 6157 6158 6159 6160 6161 6162 6163 6164 6165 6166 6167 6168 6169 6170 6171 6172 6173 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 ... 34896 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!