Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 06:56:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 6120 6121 6122 6123 6124 6125 6126 6127 6128 6129 6130 6131 6132 6133 6134 6135 6136 6137 6138 6139 6140 6141 6142 6143 6144 6145 6146 6147 6148 6149 6150 6151 6152 6153 6154 6155 6156 6157 6158 6159 6160 6161 6162 6163 6164 6165 6166 6167 6168 6169 [6170] 6171 6172 6173 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 6190 6191 6192 6193 6194 6195 6196 6197 6198 6199 6200 6201 6202 6203 6204 6205 6206 6207 6208 6209 6210 6211 6212 6213 6214 6215 6216 6217 6218 6219 6220 ... 33314 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26370726 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
nrd525
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1867
Merit: 1023


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:43:05 PM

Based on my research, I don't believe we will see 435 ever again (Bitstamp). If someone is willing to bet (I naturally expect much better than 1:1 for me), PM please.

Chart1 & Chart2.

This is just the 2013-7-18 again. No looking back (when you least expect it).

I had estimated that probability for 435 holding should be 10% in general public's eyes, but I thought it was 20%. So I would have taken 7:1 odds for me, and lost almost straight away.


This whole controversy boils down to
-people assuming that all bets are done at 1:1 odds (most person to person bets are done this way, but not all)
-the large gap between "better than 1:1" and "7:1"

Making fun and/or insulting someone into taking a bet doesn't work.  Trying to have the bet setup in a way that grossly favors your side and then insulting the other party for refusing to take the bet is the classic, but ineffective tactic.

In general it is unlikely that you will be able to organize a bet online with someone you haven't met nor trust (the bet against Bitcoin Savings and Trust was a big exception - but it had value for both the better who was going to win, and Trendon who was hoping to prop-up his ponzi).

1714632978
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714632978

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714632978
Reply with quote  #2

1714632978
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
podyx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:44:36 PM

good opportunity to sell right here and rebuy at 450

Good to enter here
Might flash 420, might not

I guess we kinda did flash 420
elg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 104



View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 06:46:16 PM

450 wall at stamp is being eaten
edit: eaten
sleger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:50:03 PM

450 wall at stamp is being eaten
edit: eaten

Yes but there is a (large?) hidden order on bfx at same price keeping the price down
Ivanhoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 841
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:50:36 PM

Keep a eye on the 3D MACD Wink
podyx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:54:02 PM

Keep a eye on the 3D MACD Wink

lookin good!
seldon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:55:53 PM

So now we go up slowly until chinese decide to ban some more stuff tomorrow?
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:56:45 PM

Why not? It seems to be the customary behaviour these days. Shame to mess with tradition.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1759


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:00:54 PM


Explanation
p0peji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:02:29 PM

Look at all the buys on Huobi, I feel a ban hammer incoming, followed by a big red candle.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10196


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:05:01 PM

Based on my research, I don't believe we will see 435 ever again (Bitstamp). If someone is willing to bet (I naturally expect much better than 1:1 for me), PM please.

Chart1 & Chart2.

This is just the 2013-7-18 again. No looking back (when you least expect it).

I had estimated that probability for 435 holding should be 10% in general public's eyes, but I thought it was 20%. So I would have taken 7:1 odds for me, and lost almost straight away.


This whole controversy boils down to
-people assuming that all bets are done at 1:1 odds (most person to person bets are done this way, but not all)
-the large gap between "better than 1:1" and "7:1"

Making fun and/or insulting someone into taking a bet doesn't work.  Trying to have the bet setup in a way that grossly favors your side and then insulting the other party for refusing to take the bet is the classic, but ineffective tactic.

In general it is unlikely that you will be able to organize a bet online with someone you haven't met nor trust (the bet against Bitcoin Savings and Trust was a big exception - but it had value for both the better who was going to win, and Trendon who was hoping to prop-up his ponzi).

It seems that a lot of people are missing the point, and that is Rpietila proposed to bet.

Rpietila weasled out of making any bet by making the matter more complicated than it needed to be.  If he truly wanted odds, then he should have clearly and unambiguously reiterated that point and made his proposed odds clear, but he did NOT. 

His talk about odds was ambiguous at best b/c he spoke out of two sides of his mouth by saying out of one side of his mouth that the price would never reach $435.. and then saying out of the other side of his mouth that he wants odds in his favor.  These two statements are ambiguous and seem to be contradictory and it was up to him to clarify them.. and he failed/refused to clarify until afterwards.. and even afterwards it remains unclear what bet and what odds he would have taken in such hypothetical circumstances.
y3804
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:07:15 PM

So now we go up slowly until chinese decide to ban some more stuff tomorrow?

Just look at Huobi orders on bitcoinwisdom... Volume is so fake. 1 real order every 5 minute, literally
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:10:02 PM

Its the same guy with his 299 constantly moving bids thats pushing us up in the same way the March run to $700 was pushed up.
Erdogan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:21:19 PM

Someone is trying to buy under the radar, Huobi.

You see it on the smooth upper edge of the minute chart, wisdom.

RUEHL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:21:53 PM

Its the same guy with his 299 constantly moving bids thats pushing us up in the same way the March run to $700 was pushed up.
yea, this appears to be manipulation at its finest.  suspect when chinese wake up in 2 hrs, something's going to give...
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:24:33 PM

Stamp also with much less volume than Huobi over the last few hours.
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:25:46 PM

round numbers are not psychological barriers
xulescu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:41:53 PM

Someone is trying to buy under the radar, Huobi.

You see it on the smooth upper edge of the minute chart, wisdom.



If that's what "under the radar" means... maybe they assume everybody has a 19th century radar...
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:42:31 PM

round numbers are not psychological barriers
Robots and formulas have no respect for round numbers.
macsga
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002


Strange, yet attractive.


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:44:04 PM

Nonsense, there was a quadruple bottom and I saw it:
WARNING!
LEGIT TA FOLLOWS:



In other words:

CCMF!!!!!1
Pages: « 1 ... 6120 6121 6122 6123 6124 6125 6126 6127 6128 6129 6130 6131 6132 6133 6134 6135 6136 6137 6138 6139 6140 6141 6142 6143 6144 6145 6146 6147 6148 6149 6150 6151 6152 6153 6154 6155 6156 6157 6158 6159 6160 6161 6162 6163 6164 6165 6166 6167 6168 6169 [6170] 6171 6172 6173 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 6190 6191 6192 6193 6194 6195 6196 6197 6198 6199 6200 6201 6202 6203 6204 6205 6206 6207 6208 6209 6210 6211 6212 6213 6214 6215 6216 6217 6218 6219 6220 ... 33314 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!