ensurance982
|
|
August 05, 2014, 10:57:55 PM |
|
Impressive depth on Huobi On both sides, though. We will have to wait and see which side wins. In my opinion it's quite balanced as of now. The buying or selling pressure will have to decide about the eventual outcome.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 05, 2014, 10:59:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Marbit
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:01:19 PM |
|
On both sides, though. We will have to wait and see which side wins. In my opinion it's quite balanced as of now. The buying or selling pressure will have to decide about the eventual outcome.
Notable, though -- 3600 level was dumped twice and bid support refilled lightning quick both times -- right at spread, not below. The ask walls were placed 80-100 CNY above spread -- where no one could buy them. And every time someone places a 500+ ask wall at spread it is instantly eaten. I suspect the walls near 3700 are fake -- certainly there is much higher chance of that than the 3600 walls being fake. I wouldn't be surprised if the 3700 walls were placed by the accumulator, to try to force sellers into his bids.
|
|
|
|
Davyd05
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:02:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:04:15 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
|
|
|
|
Marbit
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:08:08 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread. Right?
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:12:31 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread. Right? I dont think I understand what you're saying.
|
|
|
|
findftp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:23:22 PM |
|
All my trades since February 2013 are based on the same model. So yes, I believe the same outcome, not necessarily this post at reddit.
|
|
|
|
Marbit
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:25:10 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread. Right? I dont think I understand what you're saying. 1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled) 2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again. 3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled) One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled.
|
|
|
|
MoreFun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:30:24 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread. Right? I dont think I understand what you're saying. 1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled) 2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again. 3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled) One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled. These could be dumps in their own walls to prove strength of the 3600 level. Then they set 3700 asks to limit short term growth and after some time upward hammer can follow when asks are either pulled or again bought by the owner.
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:31:28 PM |
|
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70
Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread. Right? I dont think I understand what you're saying. 1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled) 2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again. 3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled) One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled. Ah, I thought you were saying the bids were just people trying to sell the coins for a 2% profit
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:38:30 PM |
|
So where are we going next guys? God Bless ye' patient souls.
|
|
|
|
MoreFun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:48:08 PM |
|
So where are we going next guys? God Bless ye' patient souls. Watching the charts we will almost surely continue going to the right.
|
|
|
|
Marbit
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:49:47 PM |
|
So where are we going next guys? God Bless ye' patient souls. LOL, right? Where the hell did the last month of my life go? Once upon a time, bitcoin moved...
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:59:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:01:02 AM |
|
well i got my fill for today. UP
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 11064
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:02:36 AM |
|
I agree with you about the well written aspect..... and I will add that I believe that the ODDs of this story being true is likely less than one in a thousand.
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:10:28 AM |
|
well i got my fill for today. UP buyer?
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1136
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:29:42 AM |
|
I agree with you about the well written aspect..... and I will add that I believe that the ODDs of this story being true is likely less than one in a thousand. Yes, extremely unlikely to be true.
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:36:03 AM |
|
well i got my fill for today. UP buyer? lol hello!
|
|
|
|
|