Bitcoin Forum
November 23, 2017, 04:59:07 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ⚡⛏️[ANN] Giga Watt: Best Home for your Mining. Starts today!  (Read 145268 times)
rafzalan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
October 22, 2017, 02:52:31 PM
 #1841

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
1511456347
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511456347

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511456347
Reply with quote  #2

1511456347
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511456347
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511456347

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511456347
Reply with quote  #2

1511456347
Report to moderator
1511456347
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511456347

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511456347
Reply with quote  #2

1511456347
Report to moderator
1511456347
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511456347

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511456347
Reply with quote  #2

1511456347
Report to moderator
chip1982
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
October 22, 2017, 04:04:41 PM
 #1842

Currently do not buy WTT on EtherDelta!

You can't transfer your WTT tokens to GW because the transfer function does not work. Multiple users complaining in the chat.

I have WTT tokens stuck in the EtherDelta wallet and enough ETH to cover the fees. It won't work.

It work's again. I was simply too stupid.
iGotHope
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 12:02:25 AM
 #1843

Currently do not buy WTT on EtherDelta!

You can't transfer your WTT tokens to GW because the transfer function does not work. Multiple users complaining in the chat.

I have WTT tokens stuck in the EtherDelta wallet and enough ETH to cover the fees. It won't work.

It work's again. I was simply too stupid.
So you can get WTT tokens from etherdelta & get it transferred to GW? If so how much per WTT tokens over there? Thanks
monica69
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:18:19 AM
 #1844

That process has been underway since we were informed of this requirement, and I expect to have substitute power supplies in hand before we need them for the next pod. UL has also indicated that fans used on the mining units themselves may not be UL compatible.This means Giga Watt has to find a replacement for all non UL power supplies, which include the power supplies our customers purchased with their mining units.  Giga Watt is assisting with document discovery related to those components as well.
chip1982
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:56:03 AM
 #1845

Currently do not buy WTT on EtherDelta!

You can't transfer your WTT tokens to GW because the transfer function does not work. Multiple users complaining in the chat.

I have WTT tokens stuck in the EtherDelta wallet and enough ETH to cover the fees. It won't work.

It work's again. I was simply too stupid.
So you can get WTT tokens from etherdelta & get it transferred to GW? If so how much per WTT tokens over there? Thanks

1. yes
2. fluctuating around 1,60 USD
3. keep in mind: you don't get pushed forward in the miner deployment queue although you have first batch tokens then
Bitcoin2theEnd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 10:13:43 AM
 #1846

Hopefully all the pods are up and running before xmas. Would like to start using my S9 miners.

Does anyone know what exchange/s Giga Watt will list the tokens on once all tokens have been issued
mextrusion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 01:59:48 PM
 #1847

Well I bought my tokens $1.10, told batch 3 Sept. 15. My 5k tokens are now batch 4. How many batch 3 people are being pushed back to batch 4?

I got pushed back from batch 3 to batch 4. No idea why but it is what it is.

I purchased three tiers and 4 miners, the first was at $1.05. They all were pushed back to batch 4.  If one of my companies treated their financing people the way GW tokens holders are with no respect, they would take back their support. That's the problems with tokens, once they get the company gets the money, there is nothing they can take back except their reputation. I have no idea whats going on except the little circles without dates or wrong dates.

Don't get me wrong.  The little circles were a huge boost in moral.
mextrusion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:55:05 PM
 #1848

Hopefully all the pods are up and running before xmas. Would like to start using my S9 miners.

Does anyone know what exchange/s Giga Watt will list the tokens on once all tokens have been issued

They are traded on Ether Delta currently.
CrRo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:30:05 PM
 #1849

Well I bought my tokens $1.10, told batch 3 Sept. 15. My 5k tokens are now batch 4. How many batch 3 people are being pushed back to batch 4?

I got pushed back from batch 3 to batch 4. No idea why but it is what it is.

I purchased three tiers and 4 miners, the first was at $1.05. They all were pushed back to batch 4.  If one of my companies treated their financing people the way GW tokens holders are with no respect, they would take back their support. That's the problems with tokens, once they get the company gets the money, there is nothing they can take back except their reputation. I have no idea whats going on except the little circles without dates or wrong dates.

Don't get me wrong.  The little circles were a huge boost in moral.

This is why I kind of hope there is competition and someone else gets all the business. Hope someone buys their pods out cheap as their business model doesn’t work anymore, it would be ironically just given everyone having to sell their miners at a loss and 2 weeks since pods 1-2 complete, 0 miners online. These guys are undeserving of the support. Right now reputation is ripping off customers and investors.
xcajun21
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


Proof-of-Asset Protocol


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 06:27:14 PM
 #1850

I don't care if they are gonna become the most awesome mining company in the US and they could offer us to buy 100 miners and have them hosted on the same day. I'll just remember how they made me feel when btc rose 2 times while we bought miners going to the rust while they are doing their business on our support.

|
 
 
50
|
 




                       ▄
           ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████
▄▄▄▄█████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████

█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
█████████  █████████████
▀▀▀▀█████  █████████████
           ▀▀▀▀▀▀███████
                       ▀
|
 
 
$1,5 M
|



        ▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄
      ▄█████▀▀███▀▀█████▄
    ▄███▀     ███     ▀███▄
   ████       ███       ████
  ███▀                   ▀███
 ███▀                     ▀███
▄██▀       █████████       ▀██▄
███                         ███
███        █████████        ███
███                         ███
▀██▄       █████████       ▄██▀
 ███▄                     ▄███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ████       ███       ████
    ▀███▄     ███     ▄███▀
      ▀█████▄▄███▄▄█████▀
        ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀
|
 
|
 
<>
<>
<>
<>
 
GITHUB
TWITTER
YOUTUBE
FACEBOOK
Lucas Johannesburg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 09:42:18 PM
 #1851




Biggest ICO fail of 2017?

Who agrees?
bitcoinguy140
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 09:44:02 PM
 #1852

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.
mextrusion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 03:18:10 AM
 #1853

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Perhaps that's why we don't get any real updates from them. I hope we didn't pay to get them rich as they are mining with others equipment. 

Maybe they are testing them.
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 334

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 04:30:46 AM
 #1854

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Believe it or not Giga-Watt was hosting miners before the ICO. The ICO was so that they could expand.

Giga-Watt is not mining for themselves, per se, but rather all the miners point to the Giga-Watt address and probably use a worker name to identify the owner, rather than use the owners address. Giga-Watt does things this way so that they can get paid their fees up front, rather than trusting miners to pay their bills.

Please leave your FUD in the bin outside.

rafzalan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
October 24, 2017, 06:16:26 AM
 #1855

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Believe it or not Giga-Watt was hosting miners before the ICO. The ICO was so that they could expand.

Giga-Watt is not mining for themselves, per se, but rather all the miners point to the Giga-Watt address and probably use a worker name to identify the owner, rather than use the owners address. Giga-Watt does things this way so that they can get paid their fees up front, rather than trusting miners to pay their bills.

Please leave your FUD in the bin outside.
Is it FUD that a customer ask about delivery date of his asset?

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Mr Frog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


Bitcoin is the King


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 09:24:17 AM
 #1856

They finally got a Webcam install inside Giga Watt center.  Grin


I did not post this message, The Russians did it !
fckltx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 11:39:45 AM
 #1857




Biggest ICO fail of 2017?

Who agrees?


totally agree Cheesy

"Best Home for your Mining"  really ?  Roll Eyes More like "Best Storage Space for Miners"



bitcoinguy140
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 11:14:31 PM
 #1858

Let's take your comments and compare them to all of the people who are upset about 5-8 month delays.  Im pretty sure 95% of the people are not buying the excuses they are selling.

And yes, they were mining in the past.  You can see here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoT-y5FPoqw




We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Believe it or not Giga-Watt was hosting miners before the ICO. The ICO was so that they could expand.

Giga-Watt is not mining for themselves, per se, but rather all the miners point to the Giga-Watt address and probably use a worker name to identify the owner, rather than use the owners address. Giga-Watt does things this way so that they can get paid their fees up front, rather than trusting miners to pay their bills.

Please leave your FUD in the bin outside.
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 334

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!


View Profile
October 25, 2017, 05:36:38 AM
 #1859

We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Believe it or not Giga-Watt was hosting miners before the ICO. The ICO was so that they could expand.

Giga-Watt is not mining for themselves, per se, but rather all the miners point to the Giga-Watt address and probably use a worker name to identify the owner, rather than use the owners address. Giga-Watt does things this way so that they can get paid their fees up front, rather than trusting miners to pay their bills.

Please leave your FUD in the bin outside.
Is it FUD that a customer ask about delivery date of his asset?

Nope. The FUD is the fscking conspiracy theory crapola peddled by lazy noobs who can't be bothered to contact Giga-Watt via the published methods they monitor, or too lazy to even use search to see if their question has already been answered.

If you really wanted an answer rather than just whining about how think you're "being jerked around" you'd contact Giga-Watt directly.

I've been in contact with them several times via email, and not once have they blown me off or ignored me.


ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 334

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!


View Profile
October 25, 2017, 05:47:20 AM
 #1860

Well, if they/you are not buying the excuses, then get out of the market.

This is a new venture, doing something in a totally new way, in an area that isn't used this kind of business. They are trying to be above board, but this is the internet, and everyone knows that everyone lies. However, they following the guidelines/rules, and running into bureaucratic red tape, and interpretations of the rules that can differ between inspectors. If an inspector or department, or certification agency wants to play hardball and deny you their approval, they can do it. All they need to do is find one minor nit, and bam, you fail. Sorry, better luck next time.

If you were so sure that this was a scam why did you buy in?


Let's take your comments and compare them to all of the people who are upset about 5-8 month delays.  Im pretty sure 95% of the people are not buying the excuses they are selling.

And yes, they were mining in the past.  You can see here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoT-y5FPoqw




We really need someone from Giga support to give investors info about this situation.

I dont work for Gigawatt, but I can tell you that they have no issues mining themselves!

https://www.litecoinpool.org/stats

Currently number 2 in the Litecoin mining pool.

And they say ICOs are not scams.  Haha.  Seems they sure have room for themselves to mine.

Believe it or not Giga-Watt was hosting miners before the ICO. The ICO was so that they could expand.

Giga-Watt is not mining for themselves, per se, but rather all the miners point to the Giga-Watt address and probably use a worker name to identify the owner, rather than use the owners address. Giga-Watt does things this way so that they can get paid their fees up front, rather than trusting miners to pay their bills.

Please leave your FUD in the bin outside.

Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!