p33k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 02:48:10 AM |
|
Do you know why i get this error ? INFO : [20:35:44] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! INFO : [20:35:44] : Share difficulty reset -- 512 (0.00781) INFO : [20:35:44] : New block #45455 received, new difficulty is 87.365 INFO : [20:35:45] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1351 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1352 : out of memory. Install latest nvidia drivers. I have it but still same problem... Set your virtual memory to 10-20Gb How .. ? http://bfy.tw/FugB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
nsummy
|
|
January 07, 2018, 03:42:14 AM |
|
Gentlemen/Ladies
Currently running ccminer-alexis 1.0
Is this still one of if not the best option for x17 and CUDA? Has worked well for me but as you all know efficiency is king.
Im still going for x17 as for what I know it's still the most profitable. Maybe there is something new out there but kept secret as long as possible I have to say that I love the algos where Nvidia is king as all the AMD rigs can't switch to that algo What are you mining with x17? verge? Not OP, but in my opinion, the best x17 coin right now is Shield, not Verge. Shield is at 27 cents and Verge is at 18. Not to mention Verge has about 30x the circulating supply.
|
|
|
|
nsummy
|
|
January 07, 2018, 03:48:53 AM |
|
Gentlemen/Ladies
Currently running ccminer-alexis 1.0
Is this still one of if not the best option for x17 and CUDA? Has worked well for me but as you all know efficiency is king.
Im still going for x17 as for what I know it's still the most profitable. Maybe there is something new out there but kept secret as long as possible I have to say that I love the algos where Nvidia is king as all the AMD rigs can't switch to that algo I will add to that algos that Nicehash doesn't support.
|
|
|
|
keremthecelikk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 09:35:43 AM |
|
Gentlemen/Ladies
Currently running ccminer-alexis 1.0
Is this still one of if not the best option for x17 and CUDA? Has worked well for me but as you all know efficiency is king.
Im still going for x17 as for what I know it's still the most profitable. Maybe there is something new out there but kept secret as long as possible I have to say that I love the algos where Nvidia is king as all the AMD rigs can't switch to that algo What are you mining with x17? verge? Not OP, but in my opinion, the best x17 coin right now is Shield, not Verge. Shield is at 27 cents and Verge is at 18. Not to mention Verge has about 30x the circulating supply. I think it is because of intensity set it starting from -i 19 try one by one until it works. Mine worked at -i 25
|
|
|
|
Makak4R
|
|
January 07, 2018, 09:52:57 AM |
|
Do you know why i get this error ? INFO : [20:35:44] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! INFO : [20:35:44] : Share difficulty reset -- 512 (0.00781) INFO : [20:35:44] : New block #45455 received, new difficulty is 87.365 INFO : [20:35:45] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1351 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1352 : out of memory.
this error often pops out when your intensity is set too high or you should lower overclocking of your gpu's memory. but it is still a good advice to set windows virtual memory to 50-60GB so you may change intensity with -i key in your bat file
|
|
|
|
|
pfft
|
|
January 07, 2018, 12:06:43 PM |
|
Do you know why i get this error ? INFO : [20:35:44] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! INFO : [20:35:44] : Share difficulty reset -- 512 (0.00781) INFO : [20:35:44] : New block #45455 received, new difficulty is 87.365 INFO : [20:35:45] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1351 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1352 : out of memory.
this error often pops out when your intensity is set too high or you should lower overclocking of your gpu's memory. but it is still a good advice to set windows virtual memory to 50-60GB so you may change intensity with -i key in your bat file all done but i get disconnect all the time ? INFO : [14:05:22] : Share Accepted Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1500 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1513 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure.
|
|
|
|
EfEks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 12:15:52 PM |
|
Gentlemen/Ladies
Currently running ccminer-alexis 1.0
Is this still one of if not the best option for x17 and CUDA? Has worked well for me but as you all know efficiency is king.
Im still going for x17 as for what I know it's still the most profitable. Maybe there is something new out there but kept secret as long as possible I have to say that I love the algos where Nvidia is king as all the AMD rigs can't switch to that algo What are you mining with x17? verge? Not OP, but in my opinion, the best x17 coin right now is Shield, not Verge. Shield is at 27 cents and Verge is at 18. Not to mention Verge has about 30x the circulating supply. With Shield aren’t you better off using lyra2?
|
|
|
|
mak013
|
|
January 07, 2018, 12:43:16 PM |
|
Do you know why i get this error ? INFO : [20:35:44] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! INFO : [20:35:44] : Share difficulty reset -- 512 (0.00781) INFO : [20:35:44] : New block #45455 received, new difficulty is 87.365 INFO : [20:35:45] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1351 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1352 : out of memory.
this error often pops out when your intensity is set too high or you should lower overclocking of your gpu's memory. but it is still a good advice to set windows virtual memory to 50-60GB so you may change intensity with -i key in your bat file all done but i get disconnect all the time ? INFO : [14:05:22] : Share Accepted Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1500 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1513 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. he answered you. use in your start file(.bat or .cmd) key -i for example -i 19 and try again. if error repeats - decrease it. and set windows memory fixed 16GB at least.
|
|
|
|
pfft
|
|
January 07, 2018, 12:57:38 PM |
|
Do you know why i get this error ? INFO : [20:35:44] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining! INFO : [20:35:44] : Share difficulty reset -- 512 (0.00781) INFO : [20:35:44] : New block #45455 received, new difficulty is 87.365 INFO : [20:35:45] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1351 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1352 : out of memory.
this error often pops out when your intensity is set too high or you should lower overclocking of your gpu's memory. but it is still a good advice to set windows virtual memory to 50-60GB so you may change intensity with -i key in your bat file all done but i get disconnect all the time ? INFO : [14:05:22] : Share Accepted Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1500 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1513 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure. he answered you. use in your start file(.bat or .cmd) key -i for example -i 19 and try again. if error repeats - decrease it. and set windows memory fixed 16GB at least. i set 60gb virtual memory and i left without -i and is automatic i will try with -i 15 and see what is happen.
|
|
|
|
mpirun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 09:41:44 PM |
|
Not OP, but in my opinion, the best x17 coin right now is Shield, not Verge. Shield is at 27 cents and Verge is at 18. Not to mention Verge has about 30x the circulating supply.
is there any pool for that?. I like the chart.
|
|
|
|
AllthewayUUppp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
|
January 08, 2018, 08:01:02 AM |
|
Sure I will. Thank you so much for the share will start to watch this now.
|
|
|
|
Riptide_NVN
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 16
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:32:29 AM |
|
Almost everyone on yiimp x17 uses ccminer 2.2.4. On zpool it's ccminer Alexis. You can see this by looking at the bench tab. Seems odd the two use different clients.
I am trying 2.2.4 tonight. It runs the GPU cooler than ccminer Alexis and pulls less power. Hash rate reported by the client is lower.
I'll let it run 24 hr and if it really does run slower I'll go back to ccminer Alexis.
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
January 09, 2018, 05:21:44 PM |
|
Almost everyone on yiimp x17 uses ccminer 2.2.4. On zpool it's ccminer Alexis. You can see this by looking at the bench tab. Seems odd the two use different clients.
I am trying 2.2.4 tonight. It runs the GPU cooler than ccminer Alexis and pulls less power. Hash rate reported by the client is lower.
I'll let it run 24 hr and if it really does run slower I'll go back to ccminer Alexis.
Running Alexis78 x17 -i 20 I'm seeing an average of 17.8 mh/s in the console for days now. So Alexis is the best X17 miner ?
|
|
|
|
melancoly
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
January 09, 2018, 05:39:26 PM Last edit: February 22, 2018, 05:34:14 PM by melancoly |
|
1080ti Would not it be better to opt for AT instead of I think ATi graphics cards are more successful
|
|
|
|
cryptologicc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 09, 2018, 05:42:54 PM |
|
Whats the sol rate you get for 1080ti mining equihash and what OC have you guys done?
This is what I am getting with core 200; Memory 180; Power 205
> GPU3 52C Sol/s: 717.1 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 727.3 I/s: 389.7 Sh: 0.39 1.00 54 > GPU2 53C Sol/s: 740.0 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 726.7 I/s: 389.7 Sh: 0.41 1.00 52 > GPU0 52C Sol/s: 722.7 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.8 Sh: 0.40 1.00 60 > GPU1 54C Sol/s: 727.4 Sol/W: 3.57 Avg: 730.3 I/s: 391.7 Sh: 0.40 1.00 53 GPU4 52C Sol/s: 724.6 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 730.7 I/s: 391.7 Sh: 0.40 1.00 50 GPU5 52C Sol/s: 725.7 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 724.3 I/s: 388.5 Sh: 0.40 1.00 51
========== Sol/s: 4357.7 Sol/W: 3.57 Avg: 4372.0 I/s: 2344.1 Sh: 2.40 1.00 53
|
|
|
|
naresh963
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 09, 2018, 05:52:23 PM |
|
Almost everyone on yiimp x17 uses ccminer 2.2.4. On zpool it's ccminer Alexis. You can see this by looking at the bench tab. Seems odd the two use different clients.
I am trying 2.2.4 tonight. It runs the GPU cooler than ccminer Alexis and pulls less power. Hash rate reported by the client is lower.
I'll let it run 24 hr and if it really does run slower I'll go back to ccminer Alexis.
Running Alexis78 x17 -i 20 I'm seeing an average of 17.8 mh/s in the console for days now. So Alexis is the best X17 miner ? Alexis with intensity of 21.5 ( value found in nemosminer 1.7.6 zip bat file) gives an average of 20.5 MH/s at 100% tdp, core +20, mem +200, fan 80%.
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
January 09, 2018, 06:34:42 PM |
|
Almost everyone on yiimp x17 uses ccminer 2.2.4. On zpool it's ccminer Alexis. You can see this by looking at the bench tab. Seems odd the two use different clients.
I am trying 2.2.4 tonight. It runs the GPU cooler than ccminer Alexis and pulls less power. Hash rate reported by the client is lower.
I'll let it run 24 hr and if it really does run slower I'll go back to ccminer Alexis.
Running Alexis78 x17 -i 20 I'm seeing an average of 17.8 mh/s in the console for days now. So Alexis is the best X17 miner ? Alexis with intensity of 21.5 ( value found in nemosminer 1.7.6 zip bat file) gives an average of 20.5 MH/s at 100% tdp, core +20, mem +200, fan 80%. So, It is usefull to OC the mem too on X17 algo ?
|
|
|
|
naresh963
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 09, 2018, 06:44:49 PM |
|
Almost everyone on yiimp x17 uses ccminer 2.2.4. On zpool it's ccminer Alexis. You can see this by looking at the bench tab. Seems odd the two use different clients.
I am trying 2.2.4 tonight. It runs the GPU cooler than ccminer Alexis and pulls less power. Hash rate reported by the client is lower.
I'll let it run 24 hr and if it really does run slower I'll go back to ccminer Alexis.
Running Alexis78 x17 -i 20 I'm seeing an average of 17.8 mh/s in the console for days now. So Alexis is the best X17 miner ? Alexis with intensity of 21.5 ( value found in nemosminer 1.7.6 zip bat file) gives an average of 20.5 MH/s at 100% tdp, core +20, mem +200, fan 80%. So, It is usefull to OC the mem too on X17 algo ? Core frequency was oscillating +-25mhz. so i oced the mem till it looked stable at constant 2025mhz.
|
|
|
|
ManuBBXX
|
|
January 09, 2018, 06:59:11 PM |
|
With my 4 Aorus 1080TI's, the core clock oscillating between 1300 and 1500 mhz ! oO
Power limit 65%, with stock, or mem +200 settings. Why ?
Usually, it is at 2050 mhz core, stable Using Alexis ccminer, 22.5 intensity default settings
|
|
|
|
|