Slingshot
|
|
December 08, 2013, 05:56:05 AM |
|
Bitcoin has dynamic fees. You can opt to pay a fee for faster confirmation time but you can transact without paying a fee.
In Peercoins, there is a fixed fee of $0.01/kb. It is destroyed rather than giving it to miners like bitcoin. Because of this, PPC would be impractical for microtransactions in the future when its value rises. The coin would be mostly for speculation.
I'm looking for a PoS coin which allows for having zero transaction fees when there is less transactions to confirm but is dynamic enough to increase when there is load on the network. This allows for optimum growth because the market can balance liquidity and confirmation time.
You don't ask for much, lol. Just maybe the one at this link is a close enough match for your desires. It kinda fell off half off the map for a while but suddenly many are again mining it. But it still has tiny transaction fees now. And isn't an exact match. But comes close. I recall it used to have no transaction fees when I mined a bit of it. But that appears to have slightly been altered from what I just read. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=245951.0 Then again I am not certain any crypto would be sustainable long term without the mining incentive of transaction fees supporting it's networks blockchain maintenance/upkeep (transactions function), if I understand this correctly? Hence maybe why the one above like all the others(?) shifted to a modest transaction fee itself, upon further analysis. Search for yourself at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search Best tool here is this. Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
CaptainAK
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:50:41 PM |
|
Best I can tell you right now, it that Bitbar has dynamic fees and it appears to be based on both amount of transaction and the age of the coin. Looking back through my logs, I found that transfers that were happening before the boom were taking only .001 or no fees at all. As the average age of the coins in my pool wallet got younger, TXFees starting increasing. I am seeing now fees anywhere from .001 for small transfers up to .008 for very large transfers.
I have not seen any recent transfers that are fee-free though.
I hope that helps a little.
|
|
|
|
IamNotSure
|
|
December 10, 2013, 10:54:36 AM |
|
Bitbar guys, you should really clean up your forum, this looks really lame...
|
|
|
|
|
A L I E N
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2013, 03:55:53 PM |
|
500,000+inflation Nice website
|
|
|
|
colinistheman
|
|
December 18, 2013, 10:06:35 AM |
|
500,000+inflation Nice website I agree. I like the site. I have been looking for a total coin supply list for all cryptocurrencies for a few days now. One contradiction I noticed: Your site says " 500,000+ BTB" and the second post on this thread (by the OP) says "Total Supply: 2,800 BTB" That's a big difference. Which is correct?
|
|
|
|
A L I E N
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 18, 2013, 03:55:58 PM Last edit: December 18, 2013, 07:41:29 PM by A L I E N |
|
500,000+inflation Nice website I agree. I like the site. I have been looking for a total coin supply list for all cryptocurrencies for a few days now. One contradiction I noticed: Your site says " 500,000+ BTB" and the second post on this thread (by the OP) says "Total Supply: 2,800 BTB" That's a big difference. Which is correct? 2,800 was the outstanding BTB when that post was written. The 500,000 is in the source code for MAX_MONEY which is the same as for Peercoin. (PPC's MAX_MONEY=2000000000) https://github.com/aLQ/bitbar/blob/master/src/main.h
|
|
|
|
colinistheman
|
|
December 18, 2013, 07:38:01 PM |
|
Ah, I gotcha. thanks!
|
|
|
|
NextLevelBitBar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:09:13 PM |
|
Didn't know this thread existed. Thanks OP
|
|
|
|
CaptainAK
|
|
January 06, 2014, 02:25:10 PM |
|
Did the chain fork? My pool at pnwminer.com is at block 41511, but the block explorer is only at 41508. I just need to get some info before we mine too much more on a possible fork.
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 06, 2014, 05:31:43 PM |
|
Did the chain fork? My pool at pnwminer.com is at block 41511, but the block explorer is only at 41508. I just need to get some info before we mine too much more on a possible fork.
It is not uncommon for the block explorers (Both ABE based and the CCE3 test explorers) to be a couple of blocks behind, especially with fast chains. Sometimes processing the blocks after a new block trigger takes longer then the time a new block comes on the network. Orphan blocks also effect both types of explorer. If the daemon gives the explorer an orphan block, that block will be displayed until the daemon corrects itself and the explorer catches it. In short, I would wait for at least a 1/2 hour if what you are comparing to the explorers is different before becoming concerned.
|
|
|
|
udjin123
|
|
January 09, 2014, 02:41:40 PM |
|
New pool! http://btb.forkpool.comstratum proportional payout 2% fee good powerful server in cloud Email confirmation not needed! Tested and first block found. All work fine. Welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
Theraty
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
January 10, 2014, 04:13:35 AM |
|
Any predictions on the total amount of bitbar in circulation by the end of 2014 and 2015?
|
|
|
|
Spratan
|
|
January 10, 2014, 12:32:06 PM |
|
My wallet is synced but the balance is 0 BTB this morning The explorer shows the correct balance with my adsress Something is wrong now with the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
udjin123
|
|
January 10, 2014, 01:06:44 PM |
|
Try to run wallet with param -salvagewallet
|
|
|
|
coinminerz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2014, 12:59:48 PM |
|
anyone have a clue when btb.pnwminer.com is on again ? or why it is off perhaps
|
|
|
|
Lexomatico
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2014, 01:54:26 PM |
|
anyone have a clue when btb.pnwminer.com is on again ? or why it is off perhaps Allready up and running again
|
|
|
|
Hellionator
|
|
January 12, 2014, 02:06:10 AM Last edit: January 13, 2014, 01:50:59 AM by Hellionator |
|
New BitBar Pool opened - Low 1.5% Fee btb.scrypthp.com. Blocks found and running smoothly. It would be nice to distribute the hashing power as most of it is currently in one pool. Mine and hold my friends, BitBar has room to grow quite a bit! Proof of Stake is also a nice bonus!
|
→→MPOS POOLS ON SUPERFAST SECURE SERVERS!←←
|
|
|
coinminerz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 12, 2014, 12:13:04 PM |
|
and maybe a newbie question.. but when does my first unconfirmed show op ?
|
|
|
|
|