Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2017, 12:38:30 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BTB] The BitBar Information Thread  (Read 128522 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
doger69
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 04:45:03 AM
 #741

The community should go with the fork that both BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.
That is the way I'm leaning - keep the exchanges and the pools happy, plus the fork the explorer is on isn't moving at all.
btw I transfered 20 btb to Bter but it never showed - so they might not be on the same fork as cryptopia and ispace.


I have had success mining and receiving payouts at hash-to-coins.com. But haven't sent any to an exchange since Cryptsy.

I might try the solo mining thing above. i like bfgminer but never could get it to solo mine with my asics. i see cgminer is used above.

I don't understand why bitbar keeps forking. Whats different in the code from other coins that don't act in the manner bitbar has?

Yea I am a bfgminer fan too but it always refused to solo mine for me so I had to move to an alternative.Theres a couple out there but this one works best IMO.Good luck.

We need to figure this fork thing out fast though,I dont know if I should buy or sell.I've been buying at Cryptopia but need to know if we are staying on that fork before spending more BTC.
1493339910
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493339910

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493339910
Reply with quote  #2

1493339910
Report to moderator
1493339910
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493339910

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493339910
Reply with quote  #2

1493339910
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493339910
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493339910

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493339910
Reply with quote  #2

1493339910
Report to moderator
1493339910
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493339910

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493339910
Reply with quote  #2

1493339910
Report to moderator
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 05:04:54 AM
 #742

The community should go with the fork that both BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.
That is the way I'm leaning - keep the exchanges and the pools happy, plus the fork the explorer is on isn't moving at all.
btw I transfered 20 btb to Bter but it never showed - so they might not be on the same fork as cryptopia and ispace.


I have had success mining and receiving payouts at hash-to-coins.com. But haven't sent any to an exchange since Cryptsy.

I might try the solo mining thing above. i like bfgminer but never could get it to solo mine with my asics. i see cgminer is used above.

I don't understand why bitbar keeps forking. Whats different in the code from other coins that don't act in the manner bitbar has?
Code wise, it's the same as just about every other crypto out there. You can basically cut and paste from one to the other.
I think the biggest problem is the spread (or lack of) of hashing power. We could use some more pools.

And votes at https://safecex.com/coin/add?q=BTB  Smiley
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 05:07:07 AM
 #743

I use  cpuminer-gc3355 for my gridseeds with Ubuntu (linux) - don't know if they have a build for windows...
userpike
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:09:58 AM
 #744

It seems H2C is on the same chain as ispace. I also just received some BTB from H2C as I am typing this. I did a manual payout to see if it would go through.
userpike
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:11:05 AM
 #745

could CCE just be slow to update the site for whatever reason?
lukemarshall
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:24:05 AM
 #746

So my wallets are in sync with ispace and cryptopia, but not cce.
Anybody else ??

note: cce is almost 190 minutes from last block.

It appears there may be another fork that a majority amount of miners have switched to.

The coin daemon and explorer at CCE are in sync with each other but there are only a half dozen or so peers connected to the daemon.

So again, the community needs to decide which fork to use. The issue I have is which chain should I try to resync the coin daemon on CCE, if I should resync at all.


I recall Bitbar using checking, rather checkpointing in the past. Is there any way to get a check point server going to stop the forking

I think a re-sync is in order and some ideas on checkpoint servers,

So there is talk of alternate Bitcoin Clients that could work together, but certain features would be present in One version, butabsent in another. Perhaps applied to Bitbar as an alternate checkpointing client... working with user clients.


Its all about what the people want...
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:30:34 AM
 #747

I though 5mil had a checkpoint server running, I'll have to check with him.
So we have cce re-sync correct?
lukemarshall
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:38:20 AM
 #748

The community should go with the fork that BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.

I don't think BTER even has their Bitbar clients running. I attempted a test withdrawal nearly a month ago, submitted a support ticket and got a simple "thanks"

The two big hashing pools and Cryptopia seem to be running the show right now



Its all about what the people want...
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:43:05 AM
 #749

The community should go with the fork that BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.

I don't think BTER even has their Bitbar clients running. I attempted a test withdrawal nearly a month ago, submitted a support ticket and got a simple "thanks"

The two big hashing pools and Cryptopia seem to be running the show right now



I sent 20 btb over a week ago, and it never showed up. I submitted a couple of tickets, and sent an email.
for now, I think bter bites.
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:45:08 AM
 #750

Sound s like everybody agrees that CCE should re-sync to the chain that Cryptopia is on.
I'll send him a PM and let him know.
lukemarshall
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:48:28 AM
 #751

The community should go with the fork that BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.

I don't think BTER even has their Bitbar clients running. I attempted a test withdrawal nearly a month ago, submitted a support ticket and got a simple "thanks"

The two big hashing pools and Cryptopia seem to be running the show right now



I sent 20 btb over a week ago, and it never showed up. I submitted a couple of tickets, and sent an email.
for now, I think bter bites.

If you recall BTER was hacked for quite a large amount a year or ago. It is very well possible they are operating in the same manner as Cryptsy had.

Its all about what the people want...
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:59:57 AM
 #752

maybe we can get Bitbar listed on https://safecex.com/coin/add?q=BTB ??
We only have two votes, mine and a guy from DMD that I traded votes with.
BitcoinNational
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204


Cryptocurrency Calculator


View Profile WWW
January 23, 2016, 09:37:38 AM
 #753

The community should go with the fork that BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.

agree
and get a new thread going so you can up date OP

anyone sent from BTER to crytopia?  just to test if they are on the same chain;)

luke says above no go, but last i recall BTER wallet looked open to me

PRoTIGERopenUNOSMCunic.zeit.TALK.GLCBCCBCT.emdASIC.SMART Observer op420UNO/XMR2.0sleepersdLEx◣table◣charity:UNOtek:UN<>EX<<>>
::::::  diction ::  :: top20cons ::  :: UNO tech :: UN<>EX :::CCtalk::::TOP50 :: BCC dir :: the media :: <<>>
✪ Pledges on the Record ✪ ✪ The Social Code of Noble Men of New & Old ✪ May2020BTC#18M◣◥◣◥◣◣◥◣◥ TALK CRjt8BZu5a7YYNc4yCXD9SqztQcSjwn5eZ ◣
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 09:45:28 AM
 #754

The community should go with the fork that BTER and Cryptopia hopefully are both on. Default to the exchanges, and always addnode the exchanges in your wallet.

agree
and get a new thread going so you can up date OP

anyone sent from BTER to crytopia?  just to test if they are on the same chain;)

luke says above no go, but last i recall BTER wallet looked open to me
I would try to send from bter to cryptopia, but as I said above, my deposit from last week hasn't gone through.

The OP was updated last month and most everything is current with he exception of cryptsy, and I haven't given up hope on them yet.
I do need to get Cryptopia added though, thanks for the reminder.
dreamwatcher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


View Profile WWW
January 23, 2016, 07:37:51 PM
 #755

Good and bad news  Wink

Good news - I finished coding the markets module of CCE for the Cryptopia API.  The BTB explorer on CCE now has Cryptopia in the market header.

Bad news:

I believe we are looking at a hard fork due to a client update.

After a complete fresh chain download with addnodes that were given to me on the longer chain, the daemon on CCE ended up on the same block (150545).

CCE peer list:

Code:
    {
        "addr" : "172.127.121.113:59629",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573183,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "173.65.129.85:8777",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573189,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "109.228.4.100:8777",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573191,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "108.61.10.90:8777",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576813,
        "conntime" : 1453573191,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "89.27.70.48:8777",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453577099,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573192,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "94.23.54.195:49148",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573226,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "144.76.91.109:8777",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573243,
        "version" : 60005,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150545,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "198.0.43.101:58716",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453577101,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573245,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150545,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "148.251.19.213:62161",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573272,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "81.230.143.200:46978",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576813,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573291,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "91.121.120.218:54756",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453573291,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Bitbar:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150882,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "159.205.246.59:58248",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453577091,
        "conntime" : 1453573692,
        "version" : 60005,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150545,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "87.182.80.119:43986",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576783,
        "lastrecv" : 1453577099,
        "conntime" : 1453573970,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150239,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "68.191.93.33:49519",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1453576812,
        "lastrecv" : 1453576812,
        "conntime" : 1453575612,
        "version" : 60005,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.4/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 150545,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]



It appears the clients responding with the subversion "/Bitbar:0.7.4/" are on the chain that is about block 150882.

The clients (including CCE) that are on subversion  "/Satoshi:0.7.4/" are on the chain that is on block 150545.


So now the question is, which client version is going to become the official client?

Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:53:10 PM
 #756

Good and bad news  Wink

Good news - I finished coding the markets module of CCE for the Cryptopia API.  The BTB explorer on CCE now has Cryptopia in the market header.

Bad news:

I believe we are looking at a hard fork due to a client update.

After a complete fresh chain download with addnodes that were given to me on the longer chain, the daemon on CCE ended up on the same block (150545).


It appears the clients responding with the subversion "/Bitbar:0.7.4/" are on the chain that is about block 150882.

The clients (including CCE) that are on subversion  "/Satoshi:0.7.4/" are on the chain that is on block 150545.


So now the question is, which client version is going to become the official client?


The newer version is the Bitbar version.
It has been updated with btb.altcointech.net as the seednode, where as the older versions have bitbar.biz as the seed node.

last checkpoint is ( 141550, uint256("0x0000000014b26064d91f70baed8561e6642d71fcbac3b38bf24f6fe262212792"))



Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 08:19:22 PM
 #757

Note to self:
I think it's time to add a block explorer to the wallet.
Spidersbox
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 523


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:22:10 PM
 #758

Cool - I'm in sync with CCE   Grin
userpike
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 11:51:57 PM
 #759

Cool - I'm in sync with CCE   Grin


me also.
rushmybitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 07:04:18 PM
 #760

Could someone possibly help me with something. I've been a big buyer of altcoins since 2011 but am not tech savvy one bit. I sent two transactions of Bitbar to my wallet on 10/03/15 and 10/10/15 neither of which registered on the blockchain but did show up in my wallet until I resynced it and now they are missing. One was for 52.123839 and the other 67.715018 it shows 119.883857 as unconfirmed. My address is B8Z8UBnZofYjMuxpMh4mFMTANsFYFpGxGD I have pictures to show all of this. Thanks for any help you can offer.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!