Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:40:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381856 times)
BitterTea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2011, 09:29:23 PM
 #1961

Well, deepbit is stating >500Ghash/s, whereas slush's pool is at around 180Ghash/s. They should be finding 3x as many blocks as we are. Combine that with an unlucky round, and you've got a five hour round.

Can a well timed DDOS kill a pool? Sad
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
May 10, 2011, 09:32:16 PM
 #1962

So, all are not fighting for a particular block?
I mean every one chooses any block they want to solve?
BitterTea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2011, 09:33:47 PM
 #1963

No, everybody is trying to find a block that can be validly connected to the previous one. When someone else finds that block before you, you try to find one that can be connected to theirs instead.
sniper_sniperson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 10, 2011, 10:51:59 PM
 #1964

Shit, not again!

Quote
Score - 1944720.9310

 Undecided
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
May 11, 2011, 12:11:05 AM
 #1965

Pool is going fine, today was just bad luck, nothing more. warweed, you don't need to apologize, it's your rig.

warweed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 12:40:00 AM
 #1966

slush to be honest i will give deepbit a 48 hour try and compare averages

one thing i think that makes deepbit attractive to *me* is some of it's feature i think your pool would benifit greatly in a facelift

some things i think would be awesome if even possible is the following
most of it is copys from deep bit

the ability to add more then one worker account at once or at the very least when submiting a new worker have it refresh back to the my account clicking back is annoying as fuck when adding 20 some accounts

some of the features i like on deepbit are the share and share % in the account view

the ability to see your average hashrate (and what would be cool is to see worker hash rate) i also like that the account name changes color if active or not makes it easyer to sort thru

i like tha bility to have a signature pic to brag bout hash rate Tongue

long polling and instant payout are AWESOME features i hate having to wait if it's a buy or sell kind of market

and the reward estimation feature is nice not super accurate but still good

and some things i like about your pool are the graphing

if we could bundle this all up into one

duh
winning Tongue

plus like i said the front end could certainly use a facelift
dafishman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 12:41:56 AM
 #1967

IDK but if everyone goes to Deepbit and slush's pool dissolves we are then left with a monopoly. Sure anyone can create a pool. But who is going to join a 30 or 40 megahash pool? You think 3% is bad...What if he suddenly wants 5%? What happens next month if Deepbit has troubles? Where to then?

Slush is the only real competition right now. Everyone up and left while there was trouble. I understand this. However, the problem is fixed and the future has been addressed by slush. Lesson learned.

It is time for everyone who left to come back.

I know it's not my place to say this, but we need people like slush to keep things somewhat fair and balanced. I know that we will miss having a 2nd option if he leaves.

This was one event:

WAS IT BAD? YES.
WAS IT ADDRESSED? YES.
WERE YOU HAPPY BEFORE YOU LEFT? THAT IS THE QUESTION...

Because as of now the pool is operational again and working the same as when you left. I ask not for slush or myself, but for the good of the entire community.

I truly believe this.

Thank you,

Dafishman

sniper_sniperson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 12:51:48 AM
 #1968

What a drama!  Grin

If you have decent gh/s rig just go solo ...
Dayofswords
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 11


Exchange BTC in Telegram https://bit.ly/2MEfiw8


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2011, 03:59:44 AM
 #1969

I have no reason to leave slush's pool.

BTC Banker - Exchange BTC in Telegram bot https://bit.ly/2MEfiw8
d3athrow
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 04:12:01 AM
 #1970

Slush i've decided to give your pool a try and with my workers they're not reporting correct stats on the score, my 5830 is somehow beating my 5870 and 6870 in score for each round. Any idea what the issue may be?
Jaime Frontero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 04:23:26 AM
 #1971

i was putting one miner into slush's pool before the crash.  173 Mhash/sec.

now i've got two, better miners in his pool - 525 and 325 Mhash.  blocks are cracking, payment is going out, and all's well with the world.

those virgin blocks are getting tough.  still got my big miner going solo though.
VPoro
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 100


Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 09:07:55 AM
 #1972

With the hashrate slush's pool had before the big crash, the pool was mining ~50 blocks per day, of which slush got 1 BTC each. That's 50 BTC * 3 USD/BTC (at that time) = 150 USD per day, or 4500 USD per month. That's starting to be a serious amount of money, and would definately warrant for hiring someone to watch the servers while slush is on a holiday / other leave.

I was lucky to notice the crash, and was able to move my miners as soon as things went really bad, but I do feel the pain of the previous posters, losing 30-40 BTC is no fun :/

All in all, at least I won't be moving my miners back before adequate measures are taken to ensure that long (4h+) service outages don't happen; with the current USD/BTC rate, the pool can afford it - that's what the fees are for...

And, to dafishman - I agree that having options is good, however, that shouldn't come at the cost of the miners. Once a failproof mechanism is in place, I will consider moving my miners back. Implementing a software solution just won't cut it, I'm afraid, since as we can see, software can and will fail. Paying someone 100 USD/day to watch over the servers (= check that they work once in 3 hours) while slush is on a holiday would not make a big dent in his wallet with the current fee income Wink

iBid     ▐     Decentralized Auctions on Blockchain    (    About us    Telegram   )
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬             AN  AUCTION    ❱   All auctions start at     $0

[  ◥   Google Play      ◥   App Store  ]   ██ SIGN UP ██        with no minimum reserve
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 11, 2011, 09:42:55 AM
 #1973

slush to be honest i will give deepbit a 48 hour try and compare averages

That wont tell you anything stastically significant.

It's like switching lanes in heavy traffic.

PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
cablepair
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2011, 10:20:49 AM
 #1974

one thing I would like to remind everyone is the longer you stay connected to slush's pool the better the payout


I made a decision that I was going to stay with slush with my 375+m/hash (and growing) and im sticking to it
how much more do you really think deepbit is going to net you? and with what cost
the market is still unstable, it jumps up and down 1.00+ usd every day, we need to work together and mine mine mine....
since poor slush went on a vacation and his server crashed (which probably was an attack IMO) everyone has been running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Wheres your loyalty? Slush has a better payout system and a fairer fee, and he works very hard for this thing which we are all very fortunate to be a part of. IMO, we need to band together and make slush's pool better together ive mined with deepbit and over there you feel like just another number. It's much more personal here.

keep up the good work slush
and dont get discouraged
im here with ya bro.

-iMMUNE
1KvnUa3thZ27cBVUUUGw4wfsT65zATpdbo
onarchy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 05:32:20 PM
 #1975

As far as I can tell the speed is not back to where it was before the crash. Is there another problem arising?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
May 11, 2011, 05:44:54 PM
 #1976

As far as I can tell the speed is not back to where it was before the crash. Is there another problem arising?

A lot of miners moved to deepbit when the crashed happen.  That sudden surge made Deepbit even more reliable in terms of very steady payouts (higher % of total network hash = likely to make more blocks per day), so some people haven't gone back to slush's pool.

This kind of situation is part of why I've gone the route of starting another pool.  The odds of passing great pools like slush or Deepbit are stacked against me, but that's not my goal.  Splitting the network into smaller pools is a way to help the network respond to pool crashes. 

With the percentage of miners in Deepbit, if it went down transactions across the network would see a large increase in time to be processed until the miners either switched pools or Deepbit came back online.  Compared to the overall network speed right now, I think Slush's pool is at a good size.  It's impact on the network is reasonable, but not crippling in the event of another crash.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054



View Profile WWW
May 11, 2011, 07:05:24 PM
 #1977

one thing I would like to remind everyone is the longer you stay connected to slush's pool the better the payout
This is wrong. It's refreshing to hear this myth said in favor of slush's pool this time. But your expected payout is exactly proportional to the amount of time spent mining.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
olefourtyniner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2011, 07:26:43 PM
 #1978

one thing I would like to remind everyone is the longer you stay connected to slush's pool the better the payout
This is wrong. It's refreshing to hear this myth said in favor of slush's pool this time. But your expected payout is exactly proportional to the amount of time spent mining.

I think the point that was trying to be made was that in 48 hours you might get unlucky and get a poor payout. With slush running at 180GHs that possible unluckiness is going to be exacerbated compared to deepbit. The longer you stay on slush (or any pool), the closer to the average probable payout you will get. (It's also possible that in 48 hours you get lucky, and then the longer you stay in the pool the less the payout).

Deepbit running at 560GHs is going to get you to a more stable payout quicker than slush. But it's going to cost you 3% versus slush's 2%. So, you'll always earn more in the long run on slush than deepbit. 

All things being equal, slush has some great features that deepbit doesn't, which is why competition is great. I really like a lot of slush's stats and graphs, and I also like that slush has a self signed SSL cert that I can use when accessing my account.

Downtime always occurs. Amazon EC2 was out for 24 hours recently, and they have gobs of people and resources. It'll happen to deepbit eventually, so it's no reason to jump ship.
cablepair
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2011, 07:48:16 PM
 #1979

is that really a myth? I know I read that on some pools official faq, oh well....

Although I am a Network Administrator the way that bitcoind works and interacts with the miners is still somewhat new to me, but I have been reading about it and am understanding it quite well. I find issue with the statement that because a pool has a higher hash rate that it will be more profitable for the miners. It seems to me that once a pool reaches the level of being able to mine blocks the individual roles of the miners and their payouts should not be affected.

Can you explain how having a 500 g/hash compared to 200 g/hash will be more profitable to the miners? Because I am considering this and not seeing it.

thanks!
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
May 11, 2011, 08:00:04 PM
 #1980

Actually i see opposite.
When i mine in deepbit, i get less than i mine in slush.
I started mining slush only first then as the network grow, i became to get less (also calculated with difficulty.)
So, i started moving around pools testing, At least in 2-3 days i must have mined in all the pools available. But just mine 3-4 hours then go back to deepbit.
But when slush pool failed, deepbit increased size & i felt i am getting low.
So, after slush came online i am on him & i feel i get more than deepbit.
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!