YACoin Windows 7 x64 [SSSE3 and AVX support] / x86 miner

[ballot]

doesnt it support stratum pools 

doesn't it?

when i type to -o stratum+tcp:// it days check help and stops but when i write http:// its ok
i talk about windows version

[Thirtybird]

doesnt it support stratum pools 

doesn't it?

when i type to -o stratum+tcp:// it days check help and stops but when i write http:// its ok
i talk about windows version

If you are using the one from the original post, then no, it doesn't support stratum.  You want my version, ONLY at Github with the source code
https://github.com/Thirtybird/cpuminer

[z1103246]

I know this is a old post.. But my fx 8350 is only doing 0.55 khs,
Which according to this list http://[Suspicious link removed]/index.php/Mining_Hardware_Comparison is completely normal but is way off the 290 khs listed in this post. Can anyone tell me how to improve my speed? Thanks!

[Thirtybird]

I know this is a old post.. But my fx 8350 is only doing 0.55 khs,
Which according to this list http://[Suspicious link removed]/index.php/Mining_Hardware_Comparison is completely normal but is way off the 290 khs listed in this post. Can anyone tell me how to improve my speed? Thanks!

Get a faster processor. Make sure you're using the cpu miner with stratum support I keep mentioning.

Not the answer you wanted I'm sure, but when you understand how an incrementing N factor coin works, and the fact that YACoin is at N=14 now when it was probably at N=6 or somewhere in that neighborhood when looking at that old post.  The numbers do not compare at all.

[ivanlabrie]

+1, overclock, or get gpus...or just mine like that.
It isn't too shabby, but with current btc prices I'm not sure you can pay for power costs mining yac on cpu.

[z1103246]

I have a gtx780 going 5.5 khs with t9x21, is that good enough? Also, the 0.55 khs is normal on the fx 8350?

[ivanlabrie]

I have a gtx780 going 5.5 khs with t9x21, is that good enough? Also, the 0.55 khs is normal on the fx 8350?

I can get over 7kh/s with mine...
-s 10 --algo=scrypt-jane:YAC -i 0 -C 2 -b 8192 -L 6 -l t12x32 -m 1

See that btc address below my signature? Feel free to use it if it worked.
As for the cpu, hash is perfectly fine.

[Thirtybird]

See that btc address below my signature? Feel free to use it if it worked.
As for the cpu, hash is perfectly fine.

I keep trying to withdraw from it, but it doesn't work

[z1103246]

Just another question... Can someone explain those crazy 290 khs i5 shown in the main page?

[Thirtybird]

Just another question... Can someone explain those crazy 290 khs i5 shown in the main page?

I already did

Not the answer you wanted I'm sure, but when you understand how an incrementing N factor coin works, and the fact that YACoin is at N=14 now when it was probably at N=6 or somewhere in that neighborhood when looking at that old post.  The numbers do not compare at all.

Looking at the main post, it appears those numbers are from when N = 4.  N is the number of iterations needed to perform a calculation, so everytime N goes up by 1, the number of iterations doubles.  So, 1 << (14-4)  = 1024 time longer to perform one calculation than it did in the post you're quoting from nearly a year ago.  Multiply your .55 by 1024, and that will let you roughly compare to what it was back then, but those numbers do not matter.  All that matters is what it takes now, and everyone is playing the same ballgame - your CPU performance will always be the same relative to someone elses CPU performance at any given time (based on the CPU)

[Volblack]

By settings from the beginning of the post, the list has several processors with their income in kh / s, the list has a core 2 quad Q6600 with perspective 170-190 kh / s. It's been almost a month since I'm mining for that currency Yacoin with a Q9550 quad core processor 2 which is faster than Q6600, however the rendering it not in this kh / s but in hash / s. So I ask colleagues who have more experience, is that my setup is wrong or was that impede increased in recent days too, if the answer is the second option I definitely leaving this virtual currency. It is absurd performance of over 200kh / s drops below 1kh / s.

[Thirtybird]

By settings from the beginning of the post, the list has several processors with their income in kh / s, the list has a core 2 quad Q6600 with perspective 170-190 kh / s. It's been almost a month since I'm mining for that currency Yacoin with a Q9550 quad core processor 2 which is faster than Q6600, however the rendering it not in this kh / s but in hash / s. So I ask colleagues who have more experience, is that my setup is wrong or was that impede increased in recent days too, if the answer is the second option I definitely leaving this virtual currency. It is absurd performance of over 200kh / s drops below 1kh / s.

Okay, well bye then.  There is no reason not to understand the increasing nfactor after one year and what it does to everyones hashrate.  That leaves an unwillingness to read as the only remaining option. 

[Volblack]

By settings from the beginning of the post, the list has several processors with their income in kh / s, the list has a core 2 quad Q6600 with perspective 170-190 kh / s. It's been almost a month since I'm mining for that currency Yacoin with a Q9550 quad core processor 2 which is faster than Q6600, however the rendering it not in this kh / s but in hash / s. So I ask colleagues who have more experience, is that my setup is wrong or was that impede increased in recent days too, if the answer is the second option I definitely leaving this virtual currency. It is absurd performance of over 200kh / s drops below 1kh / s.

Okay, well bye then.  There is no reason not to understand the increasing nfactor after one year and what it does to everyones hashrate.  That leaves an unwillingness to read as the only remaining option. 

If this makes it difficult to continue to increase so soon will soon be unfeasible for anyone to mine that currency because paresse so it does not fit well with gpu's, cpu's just finds it easier to mine.

[Thirtybird]

By settings from the beginning of the post, the list has several processors with their income in kh / s, the list has a core 2 quad Q6600 with perspective 170-190 kh / s. It's been almost a month since I'm mining for that currency Yacoin with a Q9550 quad core processor 2 which is faster than Q6600, however the rendering it not in this kh / s but in hash / s. So I ask colleagues who have more experience, is that my setup is wrong or was that impede increased in recent days too, if the answer is the second option I definitely leaving this virtual currency. It is absurd performance of over 200kh / s drops below 1kh / s.

Okay, well bye then.  There is no reason not to understand the increasing nfactor after one year and what it does to everyones hashrate.  That leaves an unwillingness to read as the only remaining option. 

If this makes it difficult to continue to increase so soon will soon be unfeasible for anyone to mine that currency because paresse so it does not fit well with gpu's, cpu's just finds it easier to mine.

I see no difficulty in mining this coin, or any other NFactor coin.  I'm sorry, the point you were trying to make did not translate to english well after "because".

[Volblack]

I ask you to help me please, my processor is a core 2 quad Q9550, I use it without overclock, default clock this cpu is 2.83 GHz, the maximum he can  is 1 kh/s, so this makes it difficult for certain current NFactor? . am using Windows 8 Prefessional 64-bit, my configuration is standard for bat cpu: minerd.exe -a scrypt-jane -o stratum+tcp://yac.m-s-t.org:3333 -u user.work -p password, the miner I'm using is: pooler-cpuminer-2.3.2-win64.

[Thirtybird]

I ask you to help me please, my processor is a core 2 quad Q9550, I use it without overclock, default clock this cpu is 2.83 GHz, the maximum he can  is 1 kh/s, so this makes it difficult for certain current NFactor? . am using Windows 8 Prefessional 64-bit, my configuration is standard for bat cpu: minerd.exe -a scrypt-jane -o stratum+tcp://yac.m-s-t.org:3333 -u user.work -p password, the miner I'm using is: pooler-cpuminer-2.3.2-win64.

There's a much newer version of the miner that's optimized for YAC and supports stratum.  It's in my signature.  1 KH/sec is unlikely with most all desktop CPU's.  Check the following hardware comparison page http://yacoinwiki.tk/index.php/Mining_Hardware_Comparison

[restless]

are there binaries for Windows?

[Thirtybird]

are there binaries for Windows?

https://github.com/thirtybird/cpuminer

under releases

[prints]

Hey guys,
 I don't want to clutter up the thread with useless stuff, but I've been reading over everything to figure out what I'm doing wrong here. I'm using a Core I5 3210M and I can't even get out of 'hash' speed territory (into khash). I didn't even notice it at first, but that's a huge difference. Right now it gets around 18 hash/s. I'm using the 2.4.0 cpu miner build from Thirtybird's releases page. Is this the 'old' build still? I tried downloading the one initially presented in this thread, but it won't connect to the stratum address.

Please forgive me if I'm being obtuse and missing something. I'm just starting with this whole cryptocurrency thing. I read up and down, and the only thing I didn't do was actually compile the binary that's here.

Thanks for the help

J

deadlightbulb.com

[Thirtybird]

You might want to google around on subjects like "N-Factor"  N goes up by 1, CPU mining hashrate is reduced by 50% (simplified example here) - and N is now 16, so hashrate would be 64 or 128 times slower than CPU scrypt mining.  Noones CPU is in KHash range any longer.  18 hash/sec sounds like a single thread speed - i5's usually have 4, so if you're around 72 hash/sec with that cpu, that might be around right... my i7 does 184 Hash/sec, which is real similar to my 2GB radeon GPUs (at 195 stable, 205 unstable)