erundook
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:14:34 PM |
|
Funny coin indeed, I'm seeing nearly the same profitability on this one compared to what CNC had. Feathercoin was better so far but maybe WDC gets into better speed soon. Buying: Total Sums 148825.72820343 WDC 39.27840002 BTCSelling: Total Sums 55178.31971023 WDC 206.58190963 BTC look at wdc numbers. there is 3x more buy orders that sell orders. people are holding their coins ehm, look at the numbers in bold, the rest is useless that just isnt right. i can place an order to sell 100 wdc for 100000 btc and btc numbers will change accordingly. you should compare only wdc amounts. and by dividing wdc by btc you can get average selling/buying prices
|
|
|
|
antimattercrusader
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:15:59 PM |
|
psshhhhh worldcoin. SOL Coin FTW!!!!
|
BTC: 13WYhobWLHRMvBwXGq5ckEuUyuDPgMmHuK
|
|
|
Tobius
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:18:30 PM |
|
psshhhhh worldcoin. SOL Coin FTW!!!!
What coin? I've lost track
|
|
|
|
paul21
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:18:54 PM |
|
Was there a fork just now?
|
RIP my old pools... sometimes BTC isn't life ;(
|
|
|
Tobius
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:20:36 PM |
|
Was there a fork just now?
Yup, but only wdc.dontmine.me is on the losing fork
|
|
|
|
paul21
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:25:46 PM |
|
Was there a fork just now?
Yup, but only wdc.dontmine.me is on the losing fork Well maybe, but it wasn't the only node contributing blocks to the chain. It looks like the "erundook" nodes combined represent the 1200 MH/s that was on one fork, and my pool had ~60% on the second.
|
RIP my old pools... sometimes BTC isn't life ;(
|
|
|
237
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:27:31 PM |
|
Well maybe, but it wasn't the only node contributing blocks to the chain. It looks like the "erundook" nodes combined represent the 1200 MH/s that was on one fork, and my pool had ~60% on the second.
Exactly that. I think wdc.dontmine.me was on it's own fork for about 80 blocks.
|
Donatioins always welcome LTC: LL2UDTbQNx9UiP37ZzJ4CLQDWm6JPgZG8t
|
|
|
gudmunsn
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:31:53 PM |
|
Well maybe, but it wasn't the only node contributing blocks to the chain. It looks like the "erundook" nodes combined represent the 1200 MH/s that was on one fork, and my pool had ~60% on the second.
Exactly that. I think wdc.dontmine.me was on it's own fork for about 80 blocks. his page says that it was about 300 blocks. Damn, there goes some cash money!
|
|
|
|
paul21
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:33:07 PM |
|
Well maybe, but it wasn't the only node contributing blocks to the chain. It looks like the "erundook" nodes combined represent the 1200 MH/s that was on one fork, and my pool had ~60% on the second.
Exactly that. I think wdc.dontmine.me was on it's own fork for about 80 blocks. Block 41306 to 41670 got orphaned on the chain, but it wasn't just my own fork. My pool got 205 blocks out of 364 which means someone else is out there on a forked chain. We absolutely must move some hashing away from the eurndook pools, and not to my pool. 650+480=1130 MH/s sitting on the same subnet in a datacenter, so this is going to happen again.
|
RIP my old pools... sometimes BTC isn't life ;(
|
|
|
gpudude
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
GPUDude
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:41:12 PM |
|
Agree. My pool is sitting at 45MH/s from 140MH/s peak (had some vps hosting downtime, now 100% fine).... feel free to have some sent my way to distribute the network hash. Anyone interested? Link is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=207463.0
|
|
|
|
cimpex
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:54:28 PM |
|
my wallet won't sync for over 2 hours?!
|
|
|
|
cimpex
|
|
May 20, 2013, 04:26:01 PM |
|
now my wallet is working too, thanks!
|
|
|
|
dman99
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:07:34 PM |
|
Block 41306 to 41670 got orphaned on the chain, but it wasn't just my own fork. My pool got 205 blocks out of 364 which means someone else is out there on a forked chain.
We absolutely must move some hashing away from the eurndook pools, and not to my pool. 650+480=1130 MH/s sitting on the same subnet in a datacenter, so this is going to happen again.
I recommend people check out BigVern's pool at worldcoinpool.com. It's just as solid as your two pools and hopefully will help distribute the hashrate.
|
|
|
|
|
vm1990
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:22:09 PM |
|
sweet my post got added to the OP im useful XD and so is mr_random
|
|
|
|
|
niteryder
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:35:36 PM |
|
Well maybe, but it wasn't the only node contributing blocks to the chain. It looks like the "erundook" nodes combined represent the 1200 MH/s that was on one fork, and my pool had ~60% on the second.
Exactly that. I think wdc.dontmine.me was on it's own fork for about 80 blocks. Block 41306 to 41670 got orphaned on the chain, but it wasn't just my own fork. My pool got 205 blocks out of 364 which means someone else is out there on a forked chain. We absolutely must move some hashing away from the eurndook pools, and not to my pool. 650+480=1130 MH/s sitting on the same subnet in a datacenter, so this is going to happen again. I'm not sure, but why would eurndook even open a second pool? I can understand server load, but you should be scaling back some when you get close to 40% right?
|
|
|
|
DMIS
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:37:14 PM |
|
WDC on Bter
|
|
|
|
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 20, 2013, 06:23:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 20, 2013, 06:28:21 PM |
|
Don't own any eh? You're pathetic
|
|
|
|
|